Locked On Spurs - Daily Podcast On The San Antonio Spurs

Ok, so let's look at your pod on the 21st as an example of what's wrong. Your guest (and you) talk repeatedly about "front court weaknesses", when you both really mean back court weaknesses. This is embarassing. You and your guest keep saying bland things, and then your reply is always "interesting". There is nothing interesting in your pods, because it's all generalities. There needs to be one of the following things (preferably all of them): 1) Play breakdowns that show insight into the players and how they work (e.g. like Lowe or Nate Duncan) 2) Insider talk/insights (not a friendly interview with a Spurs commentator who knows nothing, with like real inside info, which I recognise is hard given the Spurs don't leak) 3) More sensible and insightful talk about the Spurs. You and your guests usually seem to have a very poor insight into the Spurs, and offer very knee jerk commentary (it's almost as bad as Spurstalks forums). Some LMA rumours come out, and instantly you take it seriously and hypothesis about something you know nothing about and which is absurdly unlikely to happen. You're "shocked" Forbes and Lapro made the roster, even though it was pretty obvious this was the way things were headed, and you constantly make poor assumptions about the team (e.g. talking about David Lee as a big rotation player, when he's kind of the 3rd string center for the Spurs, saying "well, the Spurs got Lapro, so they must not trust Murray" which makes no sense because Murray is on the active roster tonight and Forbes is not; hint, the reason they need more PG's is because Mills is probably leaving after this year if he's not traded before then to get something in return). I am happy to give you my Skype or something, just so I can help you with your ideas on the team, that seem to be just very uninformed (and that's annoying, because you live in the area and report from there).