American Law Cafe

Pre-Law Productions
  • 0.0 (0)
  • COURSES
  • WEEKLY SERIES

American Law Cafe: Exploring the Foundations of Law Welcome to the American Law Cafe, your go-to podcast for breaking down the basics of fundamental law courses. Whether you're a current law student preparing for exams or a legal enthusiast eager to dive into the world of law concepts from contracts to criminal procedure and torts, this podcast simplifies complex legal principles into clear, engaging discussions. Join us each week as we unpack landmark cases, key doctrines, and real-world applications, making the law accessible and interesting for everyone passionate about justice and the rule of law.Disclaimer: This podcast features originally owned content created by a human, generated with the assistance of AI tools, and carefully reviewed and edited by a human to ensure accuracy and quality. This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you need legal advice or assistance finding a lawyer, the Tennessee State Bar Association offers free lawyer referrals. You can find more information here: https://www.tba.org/?pg=find-an-attorney.  Love the show? Consider becoming a supporter! Click this link for more information: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2429305/support 

See All

  1. EPISODE 1

    Evidence 101: Silence Can Cost You the Case (Federal Rules of Evidence 101-103)

    🎙️ Welcome to Season 7 of American Law Café, where we’re breaking down the foundation of courtroom evidence! The Federal Rules of Evidence open with Rules 101–106 — the ground rules that shape when evidence rules apply, how judges decide questions, and what you must do to preserve errors for appeal. Miss these, and you may lose your case before the jury even decides. 🔑 Key Topics Covered: Scope & Purpose (Rules 101–102) Rule 101: The FRE govern evidence in federal courts, including electronic records.Rule 102: The “mission statement” — fairness, efficiency, truth, and justice.Preserving Error (Rule 103) To challenge evidence on appeal, objections must be timely and specific (State v. Torres).If evidence is excluded, make an offer of proof to preserve the record (Alley v. State; State v. Gaylor).Errors range from harmless → prejudicial → rare plain error.🎯 Bottom line: Appellate courts can only review what’s in the record.Preliminary Questions (Rule 104) Judges decide admissibility, privilege, and witness competency.They may consider evidence outside the rules (except privilege).State v. Brown: Judge properly ruled on party admissions and co-defendant statements.Limited Admissibility (Rule 105) Evidence usable for one purpose but not another requires a limiting instruction to the jury.Ensures evidence is considered only for its proper scope.Rule of Completeness (Rule 106) Prevents “cherry-picking” evidence.If part of a statement is introduced, the opposing party can require the rest.State v. Brown: The court admitted an entire co-defendant statement to give jurors the full picture.🎧 Whether you’re prepping for Evidence class or want to understand how trials really work, these six rules are the backbone of courtroom fairness — and the key to preserving your case on appeal.  Introductory Music for American Law Cafe. In Jazz Short by moodmode / Vlad Krotov.  Support the show 🎶 Intro Music: "In Jazz Short" by moodmode / Vlad Krotov 📚 Content Created by Heather Mora 🎙️ Hosted on Buzzsprout: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2429305

    19 min

  2. EPISODE 2

    Judicial Gatekeeping to Rule of Completeness (Understanding the Federal Rules of Evidence 104–106)

    🎙️ Welcome to Season 7 of American Law Café—today we’re mastering the four rules that win evidentiary fights and protect your appeal. This episode focuses on FRE 103–106: how to preserve error, how judges gatekeep evidence, how to limit what jurors may do with it, and how the rule of completeness stops cherry-picking. Miss these, and you can lose before the jury ever speaks. 🔑 Key Topics Covered Preserving Error (Rule 103) Objections must be timely and specific to preserve issues for appeal.If evidence is excluded, make an offer of proof to build the record (State v. Gaylor; see also Alley v. State).Appellate review hinges on the record: no record, no appeal (State v. Brown illustrates incomplete-record pitfalls).Error tiers: harmless → prejudicial → rare plain error.Preliminary Questions (Rule 104) Judges decide admissibility, privilege, and witness competency—the judge is the gatekeeper.104(b) conditional relevance: admit now if the foundation will be shown later.Courts can hear foundation outside the jury’s presence to avoid prejudice.State v. Brown: Proper 104 rulings on party admissions and co-defendant statements.Limited Admissibility (Rule 105) When evidence is admissible for one purpose/party but not another, the court must give a limiting instruction on request.Keeps jurors within the evidence’s proper scope (e.g., cautioning about accomplice testimony in Brown).Rule of Completeness (Rule 106) Prevents cherry-picking: if part of a writing/recording is introduced, the opponent can require related portions at the same time when fairness requires.State v. Brown: Court admitted the entire co-defendant statement so jurors had full context.🎧 Whether you’re prepping for Evidence or gearing up for trial, 103–106 are the backbone of courtroom fairness: preserve the issue (103), clear the gate (104), cabin the use (105), and demand the whole story (106).  Introductory Music for American Law Cafe. In Jazz Short by moodmode / Vlad Krotov.  Support the show 🎶 Intro Music: "In Jazz Short" by moodmode / Vlad Krotov 📚 Content Created by Heather Mora 🎙️ Hosted on Buzzsprout: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2429305

    27 min

  3. EPISODE 3

    Judicial Notice 101: What Judges Can Assume — And What They Can’t (Federal Rules of Evidence 201 and 202 Explained)

    🎙️ In this episode we’re mastering Judicial Notice under Rules 201 & 202 so you know what courts can accept without proof—and what they can’t. This episode covers how judges notice adjudicative facts (201) and law (202), the strict limits that protect fairness, and the TN cases that show what happens when courts overstep. 🔑 Key Topics Covered Judicial Notice Overview A time-saver, not a shortcut: courts may accept certain facts or law without formal proof—but only within narrow rules.Two lanes: Rule 201 = facts of the case; Rule 202 = law (statutes, regs, common law, some ordinances/foreign law).Rule 201 — Adjudicative Facts Eligibility: Fact must be not subject to reasonable dispute because it’s (1) generally known in the jurisdiction or (2) accurately and readily verifiable from unquestionable sources.Procedure: Court may act on its own or must on proper request with sources; can be taken at any stage; parties get an opportunity to be heard.Jury Instruction: Civil—jury must accept the noticed fact; Criminal—jury may accept it (protects defendants).Limits & Pitfalls:Berry v. Berry / Petty v. Petty: No “notice” of speculative social science or predicted harm—requires proof, not assumptions.Vaughn v. Shelby Williams: No judicial notice based on a judge’s personal observations; judges can’t become witnesses (see Rule 605).Rule 202 — Law Scope: Courts notice federal and state law; may notice municipal ordinances and foreign law with proper request and reliable materials.Practice Point: Provide the text/source (certified ordinance, official code, expert materials for foreign law).Limit: Judicial notice of law can’t cure a party’s failure of proof.State v. Chearis: No automatic notice of a city ordinance; without a proper request/source, the state’s case failed (and suppression followed).Practical Playbook Requesting notice? Cite the rule, supply authoritative sources, and propose the correct jury instruction (civil vs. criminal).Opposing notice? Demand your opportunity to be heard, contest disputability, and preserve the issue.Record, record, record: If notice is granted or denied, make sure the basis and materials are in the file for review.🎧 Whether you’re prepping for Evidence classes or litigating at motion call, Rules 201 & 202 keep trials efficient without sacrificing fairness: notice only the indisputable, prove the rest.  Introductory Music for American Law Cafe. In Jazz Short by moodmode / Vlad Krotov.  Support the show 🎶 Intro Music: "In Jazz Short" by moodmode / Vlad Krotov 📚 Content Created by Heather Mora 🎙️ Hosted on Buzzsprout: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2429305

    39 min

  4. EPISODE 4

    Presumptions in Evidence Law: FRE 301 and 302

    🎙️ Podcast Summary – Presumptions in Evidence In this episode of American Law Café, we unpack how the Federal Rules of Evidence deal with presumptions, focusing on the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) 301 and 302. FRE 301 – Presumptions in Civil Cases Presumptions shift the burden of producing evidence, but not the burden of persuasion. For example, if the law presumes a mailed letter was received, the other party must show it wasn’t—but the ultimate burden of persuasion stays with the original side. Think of it like a bursting bubble: once rebutted, the presumption disappears.FRE 302 – State Law Presumptions When a federal court applies state law to decide a civil case, it must also apply that state’s presumptions. This keeps outcomes consistent between state and federal courts, especially in diversity cases.Civil vs. Criminal Distinction Civil cases use many presumptions—like ownership, legitimacy of a child, or receipt of mail. Criminal cases, by contrast, are tightly limited because of due process. The presumption of innocence is the only true presumption. Other so-called presumptions are really just permissive inferences, giving jurors discretion rather than requiring conviction.Case Applications • Seavers v. Methodist Medical Center – Expanded res ipsa loquitur in medical malpractice, allowing expert testimony to help establish negligence. • State v. Sensing – Clarified that DUI breath test results create a permissive inference, not a mandatory presumption. • State v. Brown – Highlighted how Rules 103–106 work to preserve fairness, context, and appellate review in evidentiary disputes Introductory Music for American Law Cafe. In Jazz Short by moodmode / Vlad Krotov.  Support the show 🎶 Intro Music: "In Jazz Short" by moodmode / Vlad Krotov 📚 Content Created by Heather Mora 🎙️ Hosted on Buzzsprout: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2429305

    13 min
See All Season 7 (4)

About

American Law Cafe: Exploring the Foundations of Law Welcome to the American Law Cafe, your go-to podcast for breaking down the basics of fundamental law courses. Whether you're a current law student preparing for exams or a legal enthusiast eager to dive into the world of law concepts from contracts to criminal procedure and torts, this podcast simplifies complex legal principles into clear, engaging discussions. Join us each week as we unpack landmark cases, key doctrines, and real-world applications, making the law accessible and interesting for everyone passionate about justice and the rule of law.Disclaimer: This podcast features originally owned content created by a human, generated with the assistance of AI tools, and carefully reviewed and edited by a human to ensure accuracy and quality. This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you need legal advice or assistance finding a lawyer, the Tennessee State Bar Association offers free lawyer referrals. You can find more information here: https://www.tba.org/?pg=find-an-attorney.  Love the show? Consider becoming a supporter! Click this link for more information: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2429305/support 

Information

  • Creator
    Pre-Law Productions
  • Episodes
    51
  • Seasons
    7
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © 2025 American Law Cafe
  • Show Website
    American Law Cafe

You Might Also Like