Law School

The Law School of America
  • 0.0 (0)
  • Courses
  • Updated daily

The Law School of America podcast is designed for listeners who what to expand and enhance their understanding of the American legal system. It provides you with legal principles in small digestible bites to make learning easy. If you're willing to put in the time, The Law School of America podcasts can take you from novice to knowledgeable in a reasonable amount of time.

  1. Torts Before 1L: Defamation, Privacy, Economic Torts, Damages, and the Complete Torts Exam Strategy

    16 hr ago

    Torts Before 1L: Defamation, Privacy, Economic Torts, Damages, and the Complete Torts Exam Strategy

    📘View Study GuideMastering Tort Law: Intangible Injuries, Privacy, and Modern Challenges This episode dives deep into the complex world of tort law, focusing on the often invisible injuries like reputation, privacy, and economic harm that traditional legal tools struggle to address. If you're preparing for law school exams or the bar, understanding these nuanced doctrines is essential for crafting precise, effective answers. Most people assume injuries are always visible — broken bones, bruises, scars. But in tort law, some of the most devastating harm is entirely invisible: reputational damage, invasions of privacy, emotional distress, and economic sabotage. If you’re preparing for your finals or bar exam, understanding how the law quantifies and remedies these intangible injuries could be your game changer. This episode shatters the myth that injury must leave physical proof. You’ll discover how the legal system recognizes that false accusations, reputational sabotage, invasive surveillance, and malicious online defamation can devastate lives without a single broken bone. We break down the core frameworks for handling defamation, privacy torts, economic interference, and constitutional protections—everything from the essentials of truth and privilege to the nuanced debates over free speech on the internet. Key insights covered include: How defamation protects your social currency and what constitutes a false, verifiable statement of fact versus opinion. The four privacy torts, from intrusion upon seclusion to false light and the subtle distinctions that determine liability. The specialized rules for economic torts, including fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, and the limits imposed by the economic loss rule. The unique constitutional standards for public figures versus private citizens, and the high threshold of 'actual malice' that shields the press. How modern technology—deepfakes, AI-generated images, online aliases—complicates traditional law and demands new legal thinking. Why does this matter? Failing to grasp intangible injuries could leave you blind to vast realms of liability—costly for clients and career-ruining for practitioners. Recognizing the difference between a false light invasion and a defamatory statement, or understanding when a private fact is truly protected, unlocks the strategic advantage in every case. Finally, we synthesize these doctrines into a precise, nine-step exam strategy—classification, fact application, causation, defenses, responsibility, damages, and policy—to help you analyze even the most complicated hypotheticals with confidence. Whether you’re a student facing final exams or a lawyer navigating the digital frontier, mastering the architecture of intangible harms will elevate your mastery of tort law to new heights. Prepare to see beyond the visible and protect the invisible centers of personhood and commerce. Perfect for law students, future litigators, and anyone committed to the evolving landscape of civil justice. Hit play and arm yourself with clarity, strategic insight, and the rigorous discipline needed to excel. Key topics: The distinction between physical injuries and intangible, invisible harms Core principles of defamation: false statements, publication, fault, damages Privacy torts: appropriation, intrusion, private facts, false light The constitutional interplay with First Amendment protections and actual malice Economic torts: fraud, misrepresentation, tortious interference Remedies: compensatory, nominal, punitive damages, and injunctions The nine-step exam strategy: identify, classify, apply, analyze causation, defenses, responsibility, damages, policy Future challenges: AI-generated deepfakes and digital privacy implications

    1hr 32min
  2. Torts Before 1L: Strict Liability, Products Liability, Nuisance, and Land-Based Harms

    1 day ago

    Torts Before 1L: Strict Liability, Products Liability, Nuisance, and Land-Based Harms

    .spotify-style-link { display: inline-flex; align-items: center; background-color: #1e293b; /* Deep Slate for authority */ color: #ffffff !important; text-decoration: none; font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 800; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.5px; border-radius: 4px; border: 1px solid #334155; transition: background 0.2s; padding: 2px 16px; } .spotify-style-link:hover { background-color: #0f172a; border-color: #fbbf24; /* Amber highlight on hover */ } .icon { margin-right: 8px; color: #fbbf24; } 📘View Study GuideMastering Tort Law: Beyond Ordinary Negligence This episode offers a comprehensive guide to understanding the complex categories of tort liability that go beyond standard negligence. Whether you're preparing for law school exams or the bar, you'll gain clarity on strict liability, product defects, land-based harms, and defenses, equipping you with a structured approach to analyze intricate fact patterns. Most tort claims are built around negligently failing to act carefully. But what happens when society decides that even the most cautious conduct isn't enough to prevent harm? This episode reveals the behind-the-scenes shift in tort law from a focus on fault to a system that emphasizes policy, risk, and economic efficiency. Whether you're prepping for the bar exam or just want a clearer picture of how dangerous activities, wild animals, and defective products are regulated—this is your essential guide. We dive into the core principles of strict liability—the legal framework where acting carefully simply isn’t enough—and explore how courts determine when an activity is so risky that the law imposes responsibility regardless of fault. You’ll discover how landmark cases like Rylands v. Fletcher revolutionized land-based harms and delve into the critical six-factor test from the Restatement Second of Torts that judges use to categorize dangerous activities. Surprising examples—including toxic waste storage, fireworks on city streets, and the risk calculus behind modern industrial hazards—illustrate how courts balance societal benefit against individual harm. The episode charts the classic distinctions between wild and domestic animals, showing how species’ natural propensities trigger strict liability, while owners of domestics benefit from the “one bite” rule (or its statutory variations). We explain the evolution of products liability—from old privity and negligence to the watershed section 402A of the Restatement Third—and unpack how courts impute knowledge of dangerous conditions to manufacturers, even when risks were scientifically unknowable at the time. Why does this matter? Because understanding these frameworks lets you predict how courts will treat environmental harm, industrial accidents, or even innovative tech like autonomous vehicles. You’ll learn to analyze complex fact patterns by systematically applying a structured question framework—identifying interest invaded, defenses, damages, and underlying policy—to craft precise, high-scoring exam answers. This episode is perfect for law students aiming to master the doctrinal terrain of non-fault torts, environmental law, or product liability. With practical insights into land support, nuisance versus trespass, private and public claims, and defenses like public necessity, you'll walk away with a toolkit to approach any complex scenario with clarity and confidence. Key Topics: The paradox of strict liability through microscopic flaws in products, like lawnmower blades The evolution from negligence to strict liability, emphasizing economic theory and policy Landmark case Rylands v. Fletcher and the shift to activity-based liability Section 520 of Restatement Second on abnormally dangerous activities and practical application Animal liability distinctions: wild vs. domestic, and "scienter" or knowledge of dangerous propensities The seven elements of strict products liability under Section 402A and defect classifications Design defects: risk utility vs. consumer expectations tests Warning defects: the importance of non-obvious hazards and adequacy of instructions Defenses: misuse, assumption of risk, substantial alterations, and statutory modifications Land-based harms: trespass and nuisance, including microscopic chemical invasions Differentiating private and public nuisance, and balancing tests for reasonableness Land support: lateral and subjacent, and liability distinctions for natural vs. artificial supports

    1hr 1min
  3. Torts Before 1L: Negligence Part Three - Defenses, Multiple Defendants, Vicarious Liability, and Comparative Fault

    2 days ago

    Torts Before 1L: Negligence Part Three - Defenses, Multiple Defendants, Vicarious Liability, and Comparative Fault

    📘View Study GuideNavigating Tort Law: Defenses, Multiple Defendants, and Vicarious Liability This episode unpacks the complex mechanics of responsibility in tort law, showing how courts allocate blame among multiple parties and the crucial defenses that can shift or bar liability. Whether you're preparing for the bar or seeking clarity on core principles, this detailed breakdown clarifies how to approach these layered issues with precision. Most tort cases hinge on the crucial difference between liability and responsibility—and mastering this distinction can make or break your exam score. In this episode, we peel back the layers of complex tort doctrines — from contributory negligence and comparative fault to vicarious liability and indemnity — revealing the secret frameworks that turn chaos into clarity. Imagine a reckless speeding driver with a documented history of violations, hitting a pedestrian outside a crosswalk. How should the legal system allocate responsibility when multiple parties are involved? You'll discover the nuanced rules of joint and several liability, and how states split the blame between full and proportional liability, dramatically impacting a defendant’s pocketbook. We break down the ins-and-outs of contribution and indemnity, explaining how defendants recover from each other after paying the full damages. In high-stakes scenarios involving multiple defendants, the choice between pure and modified comparative fault, and within that, the exact threshold language—less than or not greater than—can mean the difference between full recovery and complete zero. We clarify how these thresholds work in practice, using crystal-clear numerical examples, and teach you how to spot the exact language needed to get the right outcome on exam day. But it’s not just about the math. You’ll learn how doctrines like assumption of risk, including express waivers and implied consent, modify liability—especially in the gig economy and essential services—and the importance of the control test for distinguishing employees from independent contractors. We reveal how vicarious liability works differently from direct negligence, and when employer immunity turns into liability for wrongful acts like malicious assaults or inherently dangerous activities. This episode is perfect for law students, future lawyers, or anyone serious about cracking the toughest exam questions. If you want your rulebook to be second nature and build exam-ready outlines that are both precise and persuasive, this deep dive is your blueprint for success. Master these doctrines, and you'll unlock the precise control needed to allocate responsibility with confidence — because in tort law, how responsibility is divided is just as important as proving fault itself. Key Topics The structure of defenses based on plaintiff’s fault: contributory negligence, comparative fault, assumption of risk, and mitigation How courts apportion fault among multiple defendants via joint and several liability versus several liability The distinction and application of contribution and indemnity among joint tortfeasors Deep dive into vicarious liability: scope of employment, detours vs. frolics, and exceptions for intentional torts The clear delineation between vicarious liability (respondeat superior) and direct liability for independent negligence Special considerations: non-delegable duties, inherently dangerous activities, and liability in the gig economy

    1hr 12min
  4. Torts Before 1L: Negligence Part Two - Actual Cause, Proximate Cause, Damages, Emotional Distress, and Wrongful Death

    3 days ago

    Torts Before 1L: Negligence Part Two - Actual Cause, Proximate Cause, Damages, Emotional Distress, and Wrongful Death

    📘View Study GuideUnderstanding Causation and Liability in Negligence Law This episode clarifies the complex layers of causation law, exploring how courts determine responsibility for harm amid the chaos of multiple forces, unforeseeable events, and fragile victims. It's essential listening for anyone looking to deepen their grasp of negligence, causation doctrines, and the philosophical underpinnings that shape liability. When does negligence truly turn into legal liability? Today’s deep dive unpacks the tangled, often counterintuitive world of causation—where physics meets policy, and fairness is often the first casualty. If you’ve ever wondered why a negligent bump can trigger a catastrophic train derailment in reality but not in court, this episode reveals the secrets behind how the law draws its lines: from "but-for" causation to the colorfully named "substantial factor" test, and why some collisions are so bizarre they defy all logic. In this section, we examine the fundamental principles that distinguish the physical reality of actual causation from the legal standards of liability. You'll discover how courts handle multiple independent forces, the infamous Summers v. Tice case that shifted the burden of proof, and why the law refuses to hold someone liable for unforeseeable meteor strikes. We also explore how the law recognizes that sometimes, even a "clean" chain leads to fairness dilemmas—like when tiny vulnerabilities amplify injuries under the eggshell skull rule, or why emotional distress claims are tightly rationed to prevent epidemic lawsuits. Why does the law go to such lengths—requiring real harm, foreseeable risks, and specific causation—even when moral outrage might suggest otherwise? Because the stakes are colossal: infinite liability, chaos, and undermining the very purpose of deterrence. This episode equips you with a sophisticated, approachable map through the landscape of negligence causation, showing how courts balance physics, policy, and fairness—often in ways that challenge your intuitions. Perfect for law students, legal practitioners, or anyone passionate about understanding how real-world chaos is tamed by legal principles. If you want clarity on when a careless act results in liability—and when it doesn’t—this masterclass will change how you see responsibility forever. Main insights include: The difference between physical causation (but-for test) and legal causation (proximate cause) The impact of multiple independent causes and the introduction of the substantial factor test How the law handles cases where causation evidence is destroyed (summers v. Tice) through alternative liability The conception of foreseeability in proximate cause and the boundaries of liability with intervening or superseding causes The “eggshell plaintiff” rule emphasizing defendants’ liability for all damages resulting from foreseeable injuries, even unexpected severity Special rules around emotional distress (NIED), including the zone of danger, bystander, and familial relationship requirements The distinction between wrongful death and survival actions, and their importance in compensation for victims and their families

    58 min
  5. Torts Before 1L: Negligence Part One - Duty, Breach, Reasonable Care, and Special Duty Rules

    4 days ago

    Torts Before 1L: Negligence Part One - Duty, Breach, Reasonable Care, and Special Duty Rules

    📘View Study GuideMastering Negligence: Duty, Breach, and Structural Analysis for the Bar Exam In this comprehensive deep dive, we explore the core principles of negligence law, emphasizing a structured, element-by-element approach. Whether you're prepping for finals or bar, understanding how duty, breach, causation, and damages fit into an ordered circuit is essential for scoring high on your exam. Most law students overlook the single biggest mistake that destroys their negligence essays—failing to establish duty and breach with surgical precision. In this power-packed episode, we unravel the complex architecture of negligence from the threshold duty to the nuanced standards of care that vary by client, activity, and circumstance. If you’re aiming for exam mastery, understanding how to methodically build your case step-by-step will dramatically boost your scores and sharpen your legal thinking. We dive deep into the core elements—duty, breach, causation, and damages—and explore the secret frameworks that help you frame your analysis confidently. Discover why the objective reasonable person standard is your baseline, how physical and mental disabilities adjust that standard, and why mental impairments are generally judged as if the defendant was fully capable. You’ll learn to distinguish between statutory shortcuts like negligence per se and evidentiary rules like res ipsa loquitur, turning abstract concepts into actionable steps for every exam scenario. Key insights include specific test strategies for differentiating between landowner categories, understanding the special duty rules to rescue, and applying the hand formula for risk utility balancing. We also cover powerful doctrines like the locality rule and the evolving modern trends that shift duty standards, giving you the edge to adapt your answer to any jurisdiction. And just when you think you’ve cracked the code, we warn about the butterfly effect of causation—how liability can stretch or shrink when chain reactions occur far downstream of the initial act. This episode is perfect for students and bar candidates who want to transcend rote memorization and develop a structured, analytical approach to negligence. Master duty and breach now, and you’ll unlock the rest of torts with clarity and confidence. Push your understanding past the superficial—this is how top exam-takers think, structure, and score. Whether you’re outlining a practice essay or prepping for the big day, tuned-in listeners will walk away equipped with the precise tools to issue spot like legal pros. Harness these frameworks to turn intricate rules into simple, logical steps—and watch your scores soar. Key Topics: Why negligence law is like an electrical circuit—current passes only if all switches are on The difference between criminal and tort liability How to determine duty: foreseeability and legal boundaries The objective reasonable person standard—why it’s harsh but necessary Adjustments to standard of care: physical disabilities, emergencies, mental impairments, and youth Legislative shortcuts: negligence per se and res ipsa loquitor Special duty rules, including affirmative rescue obligations and landowner liabilities The significance of landowner classifications: trespasser, licensee, invitee The modern trend towards a general reasonable care standard and exam tips

    1hr 3min
  6. Torts Before 1L: Intentional Torts - Battery, Assault, False Imprisonment, Trespass, Conversion, and Intentional Emotional Harm

    5 days ago

    Torts Before 1L: Intentional Torts - Battery, Assault, False Imprisonment, Trespass, Conversion, and Intentional Emotional Harm

    .spotify-style-link { display: inline-flex; align-items: center; background-color: #1e293b; /* Deep Slate for authority */ color: #ffffff !important; text-decoration: none; font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 800; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.5px; border-radius: 4px; border: 1px solid #334155; transition: background 0.2s; padding: 2px 16px; } .spotify-style-link:hover { background-color: #0f172a; border-color: #fbbf24; /* Amber highlight on hover */ } .icon { margin-right: 8px; color: #fbbf24; } 📘 View Study Guide Mastering Intent and Fundamental Torts in Civil Liability In this episode, we dissect the core principles of intentional torts, emphasizing how legal intent differs from everyday notions and the significance of precise analysis during exams. You'll learn to identify protected interests, navigate doctrinal traps, and understand defenses—skills essential for law school exams and the bar. Most tort law defenses are about controlling what is legal and what isn't — but one defense stands out as a masterclass in defending the unexpected. Consent isn't just about permission; it’s about understanding the deeply subjective boundary of what society considers acceptable contact, and when that boundary is crossed, liability follows. If you want to excel in legal exams and truly grasp how liability can be shifted or avoided, this episode reveals the precise frameworks, common traps, and subtle nuances you must master. Dive into the complex landscape of intentional torts, where the law’s focus isn't just on harm but on the underlying protected interests: bodily integrity, personal dignity, and emotional security. You’ll discover how intentionality works—clarifying the purpose prong versus the knowledge prong—and learn why transferred intent applies strictly to classic torts like battery and trespass, but seriously not to modern claims like IIED. We break down: The objective standard for offensive contact and the fascinating extended personality doctrine demonstrated in landmark cases like Fisher v. Carousel. How assault is about creating a reasonable apprehension of imminent contact—not fear—and how verbal threats can become actionable assault depending on context, proximity, and social dynamic. The precise parameters of false imprisonment, including the crucial role of awareness and reasonable escape routes, plus how the shopkeeper's privilege can shield stores from liability when detaining suspected shoplifters. The stark difference between trespass to land, trespass to chattels, and the extreme remedy of conversion, highlighting why a small scratch results in different liabilities than full theft. Critical property defenses like private necessity, where the law balances individual survival against property damage, and the famous case of Vincent v. Lake Erie, illustrating why pushing property rights past the point of human safety is simply illegal. And the key to mastery? A meticulous, element-by-element analytical approach that ignores emotional reactions or notions of fairness. Focus on what the law protects, the intent behind actions, and when privileges apply—ensuring you’re prepared for the trap-filled multiple-choice questions that decide your exam score. Whether you’re preparing for law school exams, the bar, or just want to think differently about how the law values human life over property (and how those principles are evolving in the digital and AI age), this episode arms you with the insights and frameworks to dominate the law with clarity and confidence. Perfect for law students, paralegals, or anyone interested in how legal principles shape our rights—and how they might adapt to the future of technology and virtual spaces. Hit play and elevate your understanding of the most fundamental yet nuanced areas of intentional tort law. Key insights: The distinction between legal intent and colloquial malicious intent; intent is satisfied by purpose or substantial certainty The concept of transferred intent, its scope, and critical limitations (not applicable to IIED) The mental state requirements across different torts, including objective tests for offensive contact and imminence for assault How physical boundaries—such as the extended personality in Fisher v. Carousel—expand protection beyond skin contact The importance of contextual factors in defining whether conduct is unlawful or outrageous The crucial role of defenses like consent, privileges (self-defense, necessit

    1hr 9min
  7. Torts Before 1L: What Is Tort Law? Civil Wrongs, Protected Interests, and the Structure of Liability

    6 days ago

    Torts Before 1L: What Is Tort Law? Civil Wrongs, Protected Interests, and the Structure of Liability

    Click Here for the Review Guide: What Is Tort Law Mastering Tort Law: The Essential Map for Success This episode decodes the complex world of tort law, guiding you through key doctrines, frameworks, and practical tips to excel in law school and on the bar exam. Whether you're a student, a future lawyer, or just curious about society’s hidden rules, gain clarity on how responsibility for injury is allocated and understood. Most people assume tort law is straightforward—damage equals liability. But dig deeper, and you'll find it's a complex web of deliberate distinctions that shape responsibility. How does the law decide whether an injury creates liability? Why are some harms punishable, while others just lead to compensation? If you want to understand society’s unspoken rules for responsibility—and master one of the most heavily tested areas in law school—this episode is your essential guide. We peel back the layers of tort law’s intricate architecture, starting with the core question: what is a tort? You’ll discover how tort law differs sharply from criminal law and contracts, and why society treats accidental injuries so differently from crimes or voluntary promises. We break down the three main categories—intentional torts, negligence, and strict liability—and show how each protects specific human interests like bodily safety, property, reputation, and emotional well-being. Key insights include masterful frameworks for analyzing complex fact patterns, from when intent transforms a harmless act into a tort to how causation and foreseeability determine liability. You’ll learn the six sequential questions every lawyer uses to dissect liability—questioning interest invaded, applicable tort family, elements, defenses, causation, and policy. This disciplined approach empowers you to read any scenario—be it a reckless driver or a defective product—and craft a clear, compelling liability analysis. Why does all this matter? Because ignoring these distinctions risks misjudging responsibility, missing opportunities for fair compensation, or worse—failing to hold the right parties accountable. Whether you’re a law student prepping for exams, a future lawyer honing your analytical rigor, or simply curious about society’s hidden rules of responsibility, this episode transforms complex doctrine into an accessible, strategic map. This isn’t just theory—it's society’s silent safety net, placed through every speed bump, warning sign, and product label. Tap into this knowledge and see how responsible behavior is quietly orchestrated by the shadow of tort law. Perfect for exam prep and real-world understanding alike—hit play and see the law behind the invisible boundaries we all navigate daily. In this episode: The fundamental nature of tort law as the law of civil injury The difference between tort law, criminal law, and contracts The three major families of liability: intentional torts, negligence, and strict liability How to map protected interests to relevant tortories The six sequential questions to analyze any injury situation How to apply the master nine-step blueprint for case analysis Key policies underpinning tort decisions, illustrated through real-world scenarios

    41 min
  8. Contracts Before 1L: Expectation, Reliance, Restitution, Specific Performance, and Contract Exam Strategy

    31 May

    Contracts Before 1L: Expectation, Reliance, Restitution, Specific Performance, and Contract Exam Strategy

    Click Here for the Review Guide: Remedies — Expectation, Reliance, Restitution, Specific Performance, and Contract Exam Strategy Deep Dive into Contract Remedies and Damages In this episode, we explore the dense yet crucial landscape of contract remedies, emphasizing how law constructs a precise architecture to ensure parties are compensated but not punished. The discussion reveals how expectations, limitations, and strategic frameworks shape legal analysis and exam success. Most legal systems treat broken promises in contract law quite differently from criminal or tort cases—they reward economic efficiency rather than punish misconduct. But what if breaking a contract deliberately, or even maliciously, actually benefits one side financially? This episode unpacks the surprising philosophy behind contract damages, revealing a dense but clear framework for analyzing, calculating, and argumentatively mastering damages on any exam. We dive into the core principle: expectation damages—the legal equivalent of "getting what you bargained for." You'll discover how courts value hypothetical future performance, adopt the famous Hawkins v. McGee case to understand expectation calculations with human bodies, and apply this logic to real-world scenarios, from breached software contracts to agricultural sales. Learn why punitive damages are rare in contracts, and how the law promotes efficient breaches—breaking promises in certain cases to benefit society overall. Beyond expectation, we break down practical limitations: foreseeability, certainty, and mitigation—three critical hurdles you need to expertly navigate during exams. We explore case studies like Luten Bridge, Shirley McLean, and Michael Jordan endorsements to see what happens when these limits are tested. Plus, discover fallback remedies like reliance, restitution, and the latest theories like the "restoration of contractual equivalence," which adjust damages based on proportional bargained value or delayed delivery. We then cross into equitable remedies—specific performance and injunctions—highlighting which circumstances justify forcing performance and which do not, with real examples like land sales and celebrity singing contracts. We also examine liquidated damages clauses: when they’re enforceable, and when they’re disguised penalties—a common exam trap. Finally, we stitch it all together with a nine-step exam architecture—think of it as building a legal house from foundation to roof. You'll learn how to structure your answer, from identifying the law governing your facts, through formation, breach, defenses, to the final remedy. We finish with a provocative question: does contract law, emphasizing efficiency over morality, erode the very idea of moral promises? This isn’t just theory; it’s the lens through which top exam-takers see the entire law of remedies. Perfect for students preparing for finals or the bar, this episode transforms complex doctrines into a logical, actionable framework. If you want to see contracts in a new light and master the art of legal analysis, this is your essential guide to remedy theory, strategy, and the architecture of penalty-free, efficiency-driven law. In this episode: The philosophical shift from moral blame to economic substitution in contract damages The concept of expectation damages: benefit of the bargain, expectation math, and historical cases like Hawkins vs. McGee Key limitations: foreseeability, certainty, and mitigation—illustrated through landmark cases like Hadley v. Baxendale and Parker vs. Fox Alternatives to expectation damages: reliance, restitution, and the modern doctrine of Restoration of Contractual Equivalence (RCE) The role of equitable remedies: specific performance, injunctions, and their strict boundaries Contract remediation tactics: liquidated damages clauses, defenses, and the importance of a strategic exam architecture The nine-step contract exam framework: from governing law to remedy analysis, built as a hou

    1hr 7min
See All (1.8k)

Trailers

About

The Law School of America podcast is designed for listeners who what to expand and enhance their understanding of the American legal system. It provides you with legal principles in small digestible bites to make learning easy. If you're willing to put in the time, The Law School of America podcasts can take you from novice to knowledgeable in a reasonable amount of time.

Information

  • Creator
    The Law School of America
  • Years Active
    2020 - 2026
  • Episodes
    1.8k
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © The Law School of America
  • Show Website
    Law School

You Might Also Like