Based Camp | Simone & Malcolm Collins

Based Camp | Simone & Malcolm Collins

Based Camp is a podcast focused on how humans process the world around them and the future of our species. That means we go into everything from human sexuality, to weird sub-cultures, dating markets, philosophy, and politics. Malcolm and Simone are a husband wife team of a neuroscientist and marketer turned entrepreneurs and authors. With graduate degrees from Stanford and Cambridge under their belts as well as five bestselling books, one of which topped out the WSJs nonfiction list, they are widely known (if infamous) intellectuals / provocateurs. If you want to dig into their ideas further or check citations on points they bring up check out their book series. Note: They all sell for a dollar or so and the money made from them goes to charity. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08FMWMFTG basedcamppodcast.substack.com

  1. 14 hrs ago

    Aid Workers Keep Getting ** & It's Being Covered Up (The Data Is Scary)

    In this episode of Based Camp, Simone walks through a question most humanitarian orgs would rather leave off the annual report: how often are aid workers, Peace Corps volunteers, and refugee-support staff sexually assaulted — and why do official databases, NGOs, and political tribes treat some perpetrators as unspeakable?The episode starts with a 2024 r/rapecounseling post from a high-school volunteer who said she was assaulted by a man she had been helping at a refugee organization, then deleted the thread. From there Simone stacks official sources against what workers say to each other when they think no one is compiling a press release. Show Notes A July 2024 Reddit post in r/rapecounseling by a user identifying as a high-school-age female volunteer describes being raped for several hours and nearly killed by “one refugee guy” she had been helping weekly at a refugee support organization and temporary accommodations. * She wrote that she had been assisting families, talking with them and their children, and helping with integration; “uncomfortable things happened from some guys” but she continued because she felt she was doing good. * After the assault she lost her virginity to him, faced blame from some family/friends for volunteering in the first place, and questioned whether she had given “wrong signals” or dressed inappropriately relative to “their culture and religion.” * The post is unsubstantiated and received little engagement. OP ultimately deleted her post. Ultimately, when it comes to aid work: * Organizations seem to be systematically under-reporting cases of rape * Sometimes refusing to report it entirely * Most cases that get coverage have to do with organizational reporting, perhaps because it’s the one thing orgs think they can control * When it comes to attacks by outsiders, the only place you see people opening up candidly is among volunteers on places like reddit * And the craziest thing about women’s own accounts is both: * How universal and distressing the women find harassment to be * How ultimately dismissive they are of it, in a way that reminds me an awful lot of colonial-era texts I’ve read Let’s get into it. Scant Reporting The Aid Worker Security Database (AWSD) has tracked major violent incidents against aid workers since 1997, records rape/serious sexual assault as a category. * Here’s their 2025 report * The report does not provide a number of reported rapes in 2025. Its provisional mid-year figures report roughly 230 aid-worker deaths through 30 June 2025, but it does not publish a rape or sexual-assault total for that period. * The report does not say that rape was unreported, nor does it give a reason for omitting a 2025 rape total. * Rape and sexual assault are within AWSD’s tracked incident categories, but the report’s 2025 discussion and tables present only killings, serious injuries, kidnappings, and arrests/detentions—not a separate sexual-violence count. Therefore, no defensible 2025 rape total can be extracted from this report. * The report’s compilers explicitly flag underreporting as big problem in several contexts, especially in Sudan and with organizations refusing to report incidents because they might be nervous about losing funding * They also have criteria that make many genuine incidents not get counted * E.g. if someone was not kidnapped or detained for at least 24 hours, IT DOESN’T COUNT * If someone was assaulted and not “seriously injured” IT DOESN’T COUNT * Their full criteria * Killing * Kidnapping lasting more than 24 hours * Serious injury * Rape or sexual assault * Arrest or detention lasting more than 24 hours — a category AWSD began tracking distinctly in 2025. Known Cases SOMETIMES THEY ARE AMERICAN: In late 2014, Sarah Pierce (pseudonym), a U.S. aid worker with the Carter Center in a remote South Sudan field site, was raped in her tent by an American colleague. She reported it the next day. After speaking about the incident and criticizing the organization’s support, her contract was not renewed; she described feeling she was effectively punished for reporting. The organization stated it provided medical care and counseling and acted out of concern for her welfare. In February 2015, Canadian aid worker Megan Nobert was drugged (cocktail including morphine, codeine, oxycodone, and cocaine) and raped by a Syrian UNICEF contractor colleague on a UN base/Protection of Civilians site in Bentiu, South Sudan—an IDP/refugee-style camp setting. She woke up naked and ill with no memory of the assault. Toxicology confirmed the drugs. Her organization’s and UN response was described as dismissive; there was no meaningful investigation or accountability. Nobert later went public and founded Report the Abuse to collect other testimonies. The most prominent public incident occurred in July 2016 at the Terrain Hotel compound in Juba, South Sudan—a site used by foreigners and aid workers during the civil war. South Sudanese government soldiers killed a local journalist, looted the compound, and raped several foreign women. One Western woman reported being raped by 15 soldiers after being given the choice of sex or being gang-raped and shot. Associated Press interviews with eight survivors (three of whom described rape) and reporting by Human Rights Watch, NPR, and The Guardian documented the attack. UN peacekeepers stationed nearby did not respond to calls for help. Many survivors requested anonymity to protect themselves or their organizations’ ongoing operations. Underreporting, Reluctance, Cover-Ups Report the Abuse (founded by Megan Nobert, the woman who was raped by Syrian UNICEF contractor) collected over 1,000 self-reports from aid workers (mostly international). * Roughly 72% identified as survivors of sexual violence; around 13% of reports involved rape in some analyses. 87% knew a colleague who had experienced it. * Perpetrators were frequently colleagues (one analysis put this at ~64% of cases). A 2024 academic analysis of 62 public survivor testimonies found that in 45 of 60 cases the assailant’s behavior was described as condoned by supervisors or the organization. * 54 out of 60 indicated that no legal or even internal complaint process was pursued after the incident * Many victims were isolated or received no meaningful support. Shame, fear of career damage, not being believed, and “cowboy culture” in remote field settings are repeatedly cited barriers. * See: #AidToo, or when situation permits rape: sexual violence among humanitarian aid workers * They found that Incidents most often involve colleagues within the same organization; the next most common alleged perpetrators are staff from other agencies, peacekeepers, or armed groups. Assault by members of the local population is described as least common. Where They Talk About it Without Talking About it We do get a picture of reality when volunteers vent or trade advice online E.g. a post on /r/peacecorps titled “It’s Hard Being a Woman in PC” * “As I near the end of my two-year service I gotta say, I’m proud of myself. Because being a woman volunteer in certain host countries is freakin’ hard. I know male volunteers have their share of issues, but this post is for the women.” * “During my training, I feel my team did the best to educate me about the reality of being a woman during service. They highlighted the help lines offered, the numbers of safety & security, and assurances of therapy should we need it in the future. And they warned us on how the men acted differently than what we’re used to. They even acted out scenarios and how to approach them safely. But guys, I think it’s impossible for us to fully be prepared even with having the knowledge beforehand. The hissing, whistling, and catcalling is a type of harassment we’re not used to in the United States. Yes, we have our share of pervs, but it’s not as normalized.” * “While serving in Latin America, I’m always on edge. Waiting to be howled at, waiting to be approached by a sleazy male trying to hit on me. I can’t take a walk alone or do errands without men catcalling. It bleeds into professional situations as well where counterparts, teachers, and community members will proposition me during working hours (most married or with partners!). I need to adapt because the reality is that it’s a part of the culture. What I see as sexual harassment isn’t viewed the same way in my host country. Yet, I somehow need to set my boundaries while not alienating myself from my community. While I don’t feel unsafe, it’s simply an exhausting obstacle I need to overcome daily.” * “It can be challenging because you don’t want the actions of some to overshadow your whole experience as a volunteer. But it can be so damn hard. When I went home for vacation, the tension wasn’t there... It was...Quiet. I could walk with my friends in peace. Wear whatever I wanted, such as shorts. No men tried to get my attention or block my path to flirt with me. I could wait in line for a meal and not have a man ask for sex or a kiss on the lips in broken English. I felt like a human instead of some object to be pursued as an American trophy or a visa ticket. The United States is by no means perfect, but there’s privileges I never realized I had until doing service.” * COMMENTS * It is important to tell recruits to many, many countries (especially young, “conventionally attractive” women who are only known to host communities through “blue movies” and perceived to be loose): * You will get catcalled, proposed to, hit on, touched inappropriately on a DAILY basis by multiple men. Sometimes those men will be in your community and it’s difficult to navigate. Sometimes you’re in a good mood and can laugh it off and everyone thinks the joke is funny....And some days, it’s the 10th proposal of the day and you’re just done with the dehumanization of the

    Aid Workers Keep Getting ** & It's Being Covered Up (The Data Is Scary)
  2. 1d ago

    Muslim Heaven Is WAY More Psycho Than You Think

    What does a traditional Afghan or Pakistani Muslim actually believe happens in heaven? Not the sanitized Western or progressive version — the classic one drawn from the Hadith and mainstream interpretations. Malcolm and Simone dig into the details: every believing man gets at least two wives (with no upper limit tied to piety), no woman in paradise is ever without a sister-wife, houris (created beings often described in highly physical terms), infinite sexual stamina, controllable pregnancy and aging for children born in heaven, the absence of bodily waste, the majority-female population of hell according to reports of Muhammad’s night journey, and the young male servants who attend the righteous. They also cover the process of death, the period in the grave, the immediate entry of prepubescent children, and the extremely graphic punishments of Islamic hell.The conversation then compares these beliefs to Mormon spirit-world ideas, traditional Christian heaven, and the Collinses’ own techno-puritan framework — examining how different afterlife incentives shape behavior toward spouses, non-believers, long-term civilization, and personal morality. Want to dive deeper? Check out this episode’s companion page on the Techno-Puritan website. :) Episode Transcript Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are going to learn what Muslims believe happens in heaven, and here I do not mean Western Muslims or apologist Muslims. I wanted to get an understanding of what your standard - Afghani man, Pakistani man would believe is going to happen to them after they die, and it is way crazier than you think, and it reframes for me why Muslims in Islamic culture and far progressive culture get along so well. What? Uh. You’re like... So first, just a few to throw out some crazies here. Okay. If I were to convert to Islam- Okay ... when I die, you would believe and I would believe that I get at least one additional wife. No- And I’m s- I’m okay with that allegedly ... no Muslim man in heaven has fewer than two wives. So wait, wait, wait. If I, an Islamic woman, a believer, choose to marry a man I know that I’m gonna have a sister wife in heaven, at least Absolutely. There is no getting around it. And- Unless he goes to hell. Do I get a sixth one? No, no, no, no. Even if he goes to hell, you, when you get to heaven, get married to a believing Muslim man as an extra one of his wives, and he will have at least two wives. Wait, hold- oh. No woman in heaven is in a relationship with a man withou- out a sister wife. So you can’t be a female single in heaven? Not allowed. You’re not allowed to be single in heaven? Not allowed to be single. And if a woman’s like, “But what if I don’t want that? Like, what if I get jealous?” What Muslims believe is a satisfying answer is, well, God just brainwashes you into being okay with it. So- ... you don’t even know. Which is cool. Everyone’s kind of poly in heaven. It’s fine. He, He, He, he messes with your brain so that you no longer experience jealousy. And- Everyone belongs to everyone else. Yeah, no, it really does feel like one of those scary, like the faculty or something like that where I think too an American mindset, especially like a backwards American mindset, if somebody comes to you and they’re like, “There’ll be no pain.” “There’ll be no suffering. There’ll be no...” And it’s like, but it’s not me anymore. Right. It’s something else. Yeah. It’s a pod person. It is so much better. There’s no fear or pain. It’s beautiful. And you We’ll be beautiful. No problems or worries. We want you. No pain, Stan? We’re gonna come in here and I’ll show you some f*****g pain! So you’re gonna kill me is what you’re trying to say. Yes. Other crazy facts about heaven. Okay. Well, the number of additional wives I get. So the crazy thing is if, if you help me be an extra good Muslim man- Okay the better I am as a Muslim man, the better you make me as your, my wife, the more additional wives you need to deal with. Oh, man. And the, the 72 wives that martyrs get- Right ... you could get way over 72 wives. Oh. It’s said that some men live in tents where there’s so many women that you can’t- Wait. All you get in heaven is a tent? name them all. Are, is this a FEMA heaven? What, what is this? Yeah, I’d ... It’s a, we’ll get to it. It’s weird. Oh, another thing. You can have babies in heaven. And- Oh, no ... you can have a baby, and you can make the gestation whatever lengths you wish. So you could make the gestation a day if you wanted to. Okay. You could make the gestation a week if you wanted to, and then you could have them age at any speed you want So there are no diapers in heaven if you don’t want them. Okay. Oh, well, also all of your uncleanness. You don’t menstruate anymore. I think you don’t pee or poo anymore. Oh. No pooping in heaven. But what’s really interesting about these babies born in heaven- Okay ... that gets me is they have human souls. Like, they are actual human-souled babies, but they don’t have to go through the trials that God made all of the rest of humanity go through- Oh ... to get into this heaven, which seems- So it’s just- Why did we all have to go through it and these souls don’t have to go through it? It seems bizarre and unfair. Yeah. But- Hmm ... then again, these people... Oh, another fun one about women in heaven. Okay. So Muhammad said that when he went to hell, he saw many more women in hell than men. Hell was majority female. And when he came out- Hell is female. That’s... ... he saw far fewer females. So, you know, straight up- No, how is that po- ... misogyny There cannot be far fewer females because every man has all these wives. Well- This is mathematically impossible ... hold on, because a lot of these wives might be hurers, or hur- hu- hur- Hurers? It sounds like w****s, okay? But it’s spelled like H-U-R-O something. The point being- From now on, we need to spell w****s that way ... is they are constructed beings that are not fully human. And they are meant to look like y- young, beautiful maidens. I- So they’re sex bots. You have sex bots in heaven. They are sex bots, yeah, and the Hadith spends a lot of time talking about, like, how nice their breasts are and that, They’re, they’re real dolls. They are real dolls in heaven. You, no, you as a man get infinite stamina for sex. Explicitly it says, “Infinite stamina for sex.” Wait, I thought... This is one of the circles of hell. This is, this is lust. Why are we lust maxing in heaven? Well, actually, this is the point I’m gonna get to. It made me realize that Islam is, above all else, a max hedonism religion. Yeah, no kidding. Like, I mean- No other religion is like, “Yeah, you get all the sex bots you want in heaven.” Right? Like, you- Even like, “Well, don’t worry. In heaven, you’ll be stripped of this licentiousness and these, these basal drives. You can rise above.” And, and- Yeah, no ... with Islam, they’re like, “Don’t worry. The entire point of all of this is to be super freaking hedonistic.” It’s infinite heaven sex, and then- Oh my God ... then you have all the babies you want. This is... Well, what kind of... I mean, that’s the... Ugh. I, I’m speechless I’m actually this is where I think it, it works pretty interesting with techno puritanism No, no, no Because- The twain shall never meet. I’m seeing that we are incompatible N- well, hold on, hold on. You might think we’re more compatible than you would think Okay. Sure. Explain this to me So within the techno puritan afterlife we haven’t done our full afterlife tract series yet, but I do have the research notes for it, because I’ve been doing a lot of research on it recently. And people know we think that you’re going to be raised again into a new body, and that that body will likely, because it’s described in the Bible as being neither physical nor spiritual, likely some form of simulation in an artificial environment that’s given. And so the question w- is, is what are those environments like? And we know that some people are given work in heaven, and some people reign over others in heaven, and some people reign over cities in heaven. And so what does that mean? And so what it could mean is that heaven is sort of like a tiered system. It’s very clear that souls are tiered in traditional Christian heaven, and so in techno puritan heaven, yes. This is our weird belief system for people who do not know. But what, because it says that some people can be like angels, we would think, well, some people, if you’re, like, good enough in this series of simulations, you leave the simulation and you reenter future society, potentially as an AI on a spaceship or something like that, or either in, like, a humanoid body or whatever- Yeah form the world has taken at that point. But Muslims would be forever trapped, even the good ones, in their heaven, and never brought into the real world again, because what they cared for more than anything was an afterlife of pure hedonism. And so their souls are permanently trapped in hedonistic simulations. Which is what they wanted anyway, so it’s not like we’re doing anything bad to them. You know, they, they did all of this so they could get the hedonistic simulation. But hold on. I’ve, I’ve... Big deviant here. I haven’t mentioned the young boys yet. You also get, Oh, I should talk more about the houris. So the, these things in heaven now some Muslims believe that every truly believing Muslim male gets at least two real women in heaven, and then they get houris on top of that. Whereas others think... And the math on that just doesn’t make sense. There’s no way you could have every true believing Muslim man get two women, and men are more righteous than women. That, that, that just doesn’t make sense. There’s slightly more wo

    Muslim Heaven Is WAY More Psycho Than You Think
  3. 2d ago

    Guest Aydin Paladin: The First Right Wing Youtuber We Watched

    In this episode of Based Camp, Malcolm and Simone Collins sit down with longtime right-wing creator and social scientist Aydin Paladin (one of the earliest anti-woke voices online). They discuss her path from trying Norse paganism to Christianity after a near-death experience, starting her channel during the 2016 Trump campaign, the replication crisis in social science, and why the right needs its own researchers. Aydin shares details on the Beowulf Foundation’s projects—including Wolfings Publishing (reviving out-of-print and banned books), the Witan conferences, and upcoming parallel-economy tools like VPN and DNA services. The conversation covers the evolution of the online right: from libertarian edginess and Gamergate-era aesthetics to pro-natalism, tech optimism, monarchist thinking, and building real community instead of pure reaction. They also dig into what the left’s next major cause might be, the gender dynamics shift on the right, cancellations, the mentorship gap for young creators, and why democracy as currently structured is under strain. Check out Aydin channels (AydinPaladin + ScienceSibyl) and Wyflings Publishing for books by Ed Dutton, historical works, and more. Episode Transcript [00:00:01] Malcolm Collins: I am very excited to be with you all today. Today, we have on a guest, Aydian Paladin, who is a online right-wing content creator that I watched before we became right-wing. When we still voted Democrat, I watched her channel. So you can thank her channel in part for converting... [00:00:25] I don’t know what you did, Simone. But for converting both of us. And, and tha- this is one of the things that I often tell people about- Mm-hmm ... you know, you end up converting somebody between teams. , You often don’t think about it as just, like, a numbers game. But that person can then one day go on to be influential themselves, or, and I think the most important thing, is the positive impact it often has on individuals’ lives. [00:00:49] When they start being like, “Hey, you know what? Maybe I should do, like, a monogamous marriage.” Like, or, “That, that’d be neat.” And then you end up you know, having a bunch of kids and being like, “Oh, this is, is pretty fun.” But Welcome on the show. What I wanted to start with, because you’re very unique among the guests that we’ve had, in that you were part of wave one anti-woke, right? [00:01:14] Yeah. Like, Nux has been on the show, and he’s been making stuff for him forever, but he didn’t become a right-wing guy until fairly recently. Yeah, yeah. Right? But you were out there so long ago, and I actually find this to be very interesting the... Your contemporaneous voices were people like ShortFatOtaku when he was still somebody who people listened to in this space. [00:01:38] Simone Collins: Yeah. [00:01:39] Malcolm Collins: And I find the difference in both of your careers sort of since then, and both of your ideologies since then, to be sort of an interesting story in how this wider movement developed. So can you sort of talk about that? Like, what first got you into this? And, and a quick note for people, you used to be a... [00:02:00] actually, maybe a more interesting question. You used to be i- into Norse mythology. Like, that was your religion. Oh, [00:02:04] Aydin Paladin: yeah. What made you change? Well, I didn’t, I didn’t talk about it too much on the channel, but I, I, I was you know, I was trying to be spiritual, faithful, because I’d read the research on it, and it’s- it’s a positive thing. [00:02:15] Well, I never really believed in it, but I tried to convince myself of it. I had a near-death experience now six years ago. I was in hospital for months. And then I you know, saw that I thought that was my calling to Christ, and I’ve been a Christian ever since. So, you know, that was my path there. [00:02:29] Was it [00:02:29] Malcolm Collins: really just the near-death experience? Or were there- Yeah ... like, things you were reading around that time or other things you were doing? [00:02:35] Aydin Paladin: It may have been as well. I, I never f- felt anything for the, the Norse paganism stuff. It was, that was a response to research says that this is good for you, that this helps provide meaning in life and the sense of purpose. [00:02:47] But it didn’t... I, I guess I couldn’t really... I never really believed in it in the way that, you know, having a near-death experience, as many, as, as often reported will give people a, a different kind of perspective on things, right? [00:02:59] Malcolm Collins: Yeah. [00:02:59] Aydin Paladin: And going, “Oh, maybe I need to reconsider this a little bit more seriously as your weight of your soul is on it,” you know? [00:03:05] One way or another potentially. [00:03:07] Malcolm Collins: This is, it’s very interesting that you answer that way because it’s literally the same thing happened to us- Mm. Yeah ... where we first became religious because we were having kids- Mm-hmm ... and we were just like, “Well, all the research says they’re better off if they’re raised in a- Yeah [00:03:20] religious household, so we’ll pretend.” Yeah. And then we started reading the Bible and being like- Mm-hmm ... “Wait a second, this seems, like, weirdly true and sense-making- Yeah ... in a way I didn’t expect given the, you know, prejudices I had.” [00:03:34] Aydin Paladin: Yeah. It was- Same thing for me as well. Yeah, I, I’d grown up with, particularly growing up in the ‘90s, I think there was a lot of, at that period of time, and late ‘80s and 2000s as well, I guess, up until quite recently there have been these very negative connotations in public sort of mass media about Christianity being or, or any kind of faith as being ascientific. [00:03:54] Whereas actually I found that many things that are presented in the Bible and in you know, biblical [00:04:00] narratives going all the way back, ‘cause to, to the Christian story itself are actually- Yeah ... cogent with the scientific narrative as well. [00:04:06] Malcolm Collins: Yeah. But it- I, I often, you know, at, when I’m telling parents, like, how do you keep your kids in the religion and everything like that? [00:04:14] Arguing with the science is not a bad way to go, to be like, “In just reality, like, look at society right now. It doesn’t- Yeah ... seem to be working, right? Like, do you want to...” I, I wanted to get, when you created your channel originally, did you conceive it as, like, a science and psychology channel? [00:04:31] Aydin Paladin: No, I don’t. I, well, sort of. [00:04:32] At that time I was taking a sabbatical from doctoral school. I had been in doctoral school at the time. I, it, I ended up just leaving, but at the time it was just a sabbatical ‘cause I was really stressed out and I was, I was talking to my... I used to call my dad every day and I’d talk to him about... It, this was during 2016. [00:04:48] I, I, or it would’ve been 2017. It was right before the election. Mm-hmm. Trump’s first election. And it was during that el- that campaign cycle. I would just call him every day and I’d talk to him about politics, and he said, “Why don’t you go make a YouTube channel and talk to people in the ether instead of calling me up every day and talking to me about it?” [00:05:05] Malcolm Collins: What a thing for a parent to say. Oh my God. [00:05:07] Aydin Paladin: Well, I wasn’t, I wasn’t in grad or that would’ve been doc school. I wasn’t in doctoral school at the time ‘cause I was taking some time off, and I just ended up, I really liked doing it. I was very stressed out with doc school, so I just decided not to go back, and I got to do what I wanted, which was talk into the ether about politics you know, as as it interested me, but also be able to talk about my first passion and what my background is in, which is social science and statistics, and talk about how, you know, even though it’s social science I think this is a, a bit of a, something I lament with the right wing more broadly. [00:05:38] There’s sort of a distrust of science, and particularly- Mm ... a distrust of social science. That is warranted. Yeah. And it is the replication crisis is 49.3% of all studies in behavioral science can be replicated, so it, there’s a major, major problem in social science, and there’s a lot of political bias that goes into it. [00:05:55] But if you know how to read the studies and look sort of through the BS and just look at statistics, then you can actually find a lot of useful information, and largely it aligns with right wing perspectives on the world because- Of course it does. So, you know- [00:06:10] Malcolm Collins: Well, no, I, I, I think that this is a really important point I wanna flag here, which is yes, the field is heavily captured, but that doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t be doing as much research into it as possible. [00:06:23] Mm-hmm. Because with understanding how people think, how society moves, the differences between men and women- Mm-hmm ... we can act in a way and build systems that are better in the long term. Yes. And so- Yeah ... that requires that we have our own people out there doing stuff. Before we get too far into this, I want to now plug this new thing you’re working on- Yes [00:06:48] ‘cause it’s really cool. And it fits this idea of we need to have our own social scientists, but not just our own social scientists, but when, you know, people are getting canceled all the time, and people pulling sponsorships from them, and recently I’ve been like, “You know what I wanna do? I wanna get our company to a place where we can just give people sponsorships whenever they lose one.” [00:07:06] And we can just make a product for whatever product that’s been pulled from them. And you’re already working on a wider project like this. Can you talk about that? [00:07:14] Aydin Pa

    Guest Aydin Paladin: The First Right Wing Youtuber We Watched
  4. 5d ago

    Andrew Tate Truth Bomb Drops: Worse Than Anyone Thought Possible

    In this episode of Based Camp, Simone and Malcolm Collins break down Heidi Blake’s exhaustive New Yorker investigation “Andrew Tate’s Empire of Abuse.” They examine the documented pattern of rape, strangulation, underage exploitation, financial and psychological control, human trafficking, and the systematic teaching of “pimping” through the War Room. Key accounts include Lauren Southern’s experience in Romania, the early UK cam-house abuses, the recruitment and abuse of Romanian schoolgirls, the use of female enforcers, the coercion and reputation-destruction of women who tried to leave, and the real-world violence linked to Tate’s content. The discussion also covers Tate’s conversion to Islam, the Taliban’s public support, the double standard with Jeffrey Epstein, the failure of parts of the online right to apply consistent standards, and why “maximum masculinity” as an identity is a reliable red flag for dangerous actors. Sensitive content warning: detailed discussion of sexual violence, underage exploitation, trafficking, and child abuse. Show Notes For the full thing, read: Andrew Tate’s Empire of Abuse How the defining figure of the manosphere built a fortune—and became a political force—by systematically exploiting women By Heidi Blake, published June 8th In this article, Blake “pieced together an account of Tate’s activities from thousands of private messages, internal documents, sealed prosecutorial files, and court records—as well as scores of interviews with the Tates, their associates, and more than a dozen alleged victims” “I’ve done this with over 100 girls,” Tate said, about compelling women into sex work. “I almost sound evil. But I’m not.” The Lauren Southern case In case you’re not familiar with Lauren Southern: “She had become a darling of the manosphere at the age of nineteen with a video titled “Why I Am Not a Feminist,” in which she argued that men were the real victims of an unjust society. She followed up with a series of videos in which she trolled women who marched against sexual violence, ridiculing their views and holding up a sign saying “THERE IS NO RAPE CULTURE IN THE WEST.”” After getting introduced by Tommy Robinson, Andrew Tate got Lauren Southern to fly to Romania. “She told me that she flew to Bucharest without knowing much about Tate; Robinson had simply said that a kickboxer in Eastern Europe wanted to finance her work. When they arrived, Tate was waiting in one of his supercars, and he insisted on taking her out for lunch alone. Over steak, he told her “everything that you would want to hear as a conservative right-wing woman,” talking about the importance of family and praising her work. “You’re saving Western civilization,” she remembers him saying.” “After lunch, they headed to Tate’s compound. At a long table, Southern listened as the brothers laid out their proposal: they would fund a new right-wing media venture, with her and Robinson in charge, if she would use it to pump a cryptocurrency they were planning to launch. The idea, she recalls, was, “basically, we’re going to create a European-nationalist outlet to fleece all these idiots for money.”” Hmmmmmm….. That’s not what our community does “That evening, the Tates took Southern to a club, where they ordered bottle service. After a couple of shots of vodka, she recalls, she suddenly felt “like my consciousness was collapsing.” Tate carried her to his car, and when she came to they were on the bed at her hotel.” “Tate started kissing Southern and pulling off her clothes. She told me that she tried to push his hands away, but he wouldn’t stop. Then he hooked his arm around her neck and started to squeeze. She remembers thinking, “Oh, s**t, this guy actually is going to rape me.” Southern was anti-abortion, and was terrified of getting pregnant. She began pleading with him: “I know what you’re gonna do here. Please just wear a condom. Please.”” “Southern remembers fading in and out of consciousness as Tate raped her unprotected and choked her. Afterward, he sat on the edge of the bed and said, “Don’t tell the press I raped you.” She remembers saying, “My whole brand is literally talking about how stupid b*****s get themselves in situations like this. There’s nothing I can say without destroying my career. So congratulations.”” “In the car to the airport, Southern said, she discovered burst blood vessels around her eyes and marks on her neck. Back in Toronto, she was examined by a nurse who specialized in sexual assault. On an assessment form, the nurse recorded that Southern had been raped and strangled by a “well known male” at a hotel in Romania and had suffered an intimate injury. She noted that Southern seemed to be experiencing “personal struggles with her belief system” as a result.” “Southern told me that she tried to apply her political convictions to her experience, telling herself that she was at fault for drinking with a man she didn’t know. A month later, she texted Tate. “It was really shitty what you did that night in Bucharest,” she wrote. “I’m not going to tell anyone obviously because I was an absolute moron, but I hope you don’t do that to anyone else.” ““What did I do?” Tate replied. “I expected tons better from you. This msg is some liberal #metoo b******t.”” “You literally strangled me when I said I didn’t want to have sex,” Southern wrote. “You literally told me in the morning ‘don’t tell the press I raped you.’ ” “You’re absolutely embarrassing yourself,” he wrote. “Tate denied raping Southern, but he bragged to the War Room about spending the night with her, saying that he had invited her to Romania to discuss a business deal but “didn’t invest a f***ing penny.”” The Depravity He assaulted and raped women becuase he thought it would lead them to not require payment in exchange for camgirl work * This started with two young women, Walker and Navvaro, in the UK he recruited after learning from one of his girlfriends how much he could make * “But Tate was already coming to resent paying Navarro and Walker a cut of their earnings. Hruskova let him keep “100% of the f***ng money,” he later said. But, he complained, “once you get bigger, you start hiring girls who don’t love you.” He decided on a strategy: “I have a financial incentive to f*** as many as I can.” * NOTE ABOUT HRUSKOVA: “He reported in private chats that her live streams had made him around two million dollars, but all she got was pocket money for coffee and manicures.” * Even before this, when he did give them money, he immediately took them to malls and told them to go on shopping sprees, which meant they lacked funds to get away * What it was like to be in the house: * “One morning, Navarro [who was stranded at the house because the Tates would not drive her home and she lacked money or a car to get out] woke up to Tate and Walker having sex next to her. She shushed them, and Walker got up and went into the bathroom. When she was gone, Navarro said, Tate put her in a choke hold and raped her for a second time. Though she clawed at his arms, he wouldn’t release his grip. “I was scared that he was going to kill me,” she told me. Then Walker emerged from the shower, and he rolled off her. * Later, Navarro said, she was working on camera when she heard strange noises and went to investigate. Through the open bedroom door, she saw Tate strangling Walker on the bed. Walker’s face was red and puffy, and her body was limp. Navarro said that she felt a strange paralysis. “I was, like, There’s nothing I can do about it,” she told me. She went back to work.” * “The following morning, Navarro and Walker were putting on makeup in the bathroom when they noticed clusters of red spots around their eyes. Walker searched online and saw that petechiae—burst blood vessels—can be a sign of acute pressure in the head from strangulation. The women began to panic. Hearing a commotion, the Tates came to the door. When they saw the marks, they laughed. “You’re such dumb b*****s,” Navarro remembers them saying. “That’s from sleeping on the silk sheets.”” * “Navarro said that Tate started attacking her at random moments. Multiple times, when she slept late, he whipped her with a belt. Time became a blur, and the world outside the apartment seemed to recede. But, one day, Navarro had a moment alone, and something snapped: she walked out the door and never went back.” * This was BEFORE he stopped women from escaping Tate abused women on camera “In one video, Tate lay on a bed and ordered Hruskova to show the camera her tattoo. “Why does it say ‘Tate’?” he asked. “Because I’m his w***e,” she replied. “Why’s your ass got a bruise on it?” “Because my daddy hits me.” Tate picked up a belt and began whipping Hruskova as she lay in the fetal position, sobbing. “B***h, look at the camera,” he told her, yanking her head back by the hair. “This is what happens when you don’t f***ing listen.”” When footage of this video was released online, Andrew Tate “said that Hruskova was an ex-girlfriend, and shared a photo of her holding a belt inscribed with the words “But I love when Andrew spanks me.”” SHE WAS 15 YEARS OLD IN THAT PHOTO HE BEAT HER SO MUCH HE MADE A THEMED BELT FOR IT Tate Raped Underage Girls There was a LOT of underage stuff. Consider the testimony of Irina Pavel (name changed): * “When Pavel was fifteen, she told investigators, she had accompanied a school friend to a party hosted by the Tates, which was full of young girls. Her friend paired off with Tristan, leaving her with Andrew, who was so drunk that he spat as he talked. He pulled her into a bedroom and raped her, she said. Afterward, some of Tate’s “female friends” persuaded the g

    Andrew Tate Truth Bomb Drops: Worse Than Anyone Thought Possible
  5. 6d ago

    1 A**hole Can Make a Chud: Yukiwaru Tells All

    Yukiwaru joins Based Camp after going viral for saying the quiet parts out loud: men can’t get periods, and tomboys are good. In this conversation, Malcolm and Simone talk with the VTuber about why she refused to apologize or walk anything back, the toxic “friend”/artist who kept centering themselves and walking all over her boundaries (including on her birthday stream), and what it felt like to finally stop walking on eggshells. They also cover:• How she started streaming (just a unique voice playing League) and became a snow-leopard VTuber• Losing old friends and artists vs. the new community that actually let her be herself• Desexualizing her model and why that grew her channel• Building an authentic audience instead of a flirty persona• Reaction content, cop slop, pony play, and streamers as the next wave of cultural influencers• Tomboy identity, the pressure to invent special labels, and why “just a straight white female” suddenly felt lame Episode Transcript Malcolm Collins [0:00]:Hello. I’m excited to be here with you today! Today, we have Yuki Waru with us who recently went viral. There’s been a few red videos on her because she made the bold claim that men cannot get periods and that tomboys are good. And anyone who knows our channel, we we are so pro tomboy on this channel that I actually had a fan email me a detailed list of bible quotes trying to argue that the bible says you should only take tomboys. And I was like, that is that is another degree. But what makes her so interesting and why I was excited to talk with you is you were before saying this, you never really got into politics that much on your channel. Uh, you never really got into, like, the this kind of, like, political spicy opinion. And something really unique happened because the Internet decided to go after you for these takes. And normally, the reaction historically of, like, a nonpolitical VTuber would have been to either apologize or at the very least, if they’re not going to apologize, not lean into it, not watch the rev review of her, not come on Basecamp or something like that. And yet you go in this other direction, and it seems to have worked out really well for you. But I’m wondering why you went in this direction. Like, would do you think that this is just like the ethos now, or is this an intentional decision you made or what? Yukiwaru [1:29]:Well, for me, I mean, saying my thoughts and my point of view felt really freeing. And I feel like I’ve been walking on eggshells around people for so long worrying about everyone’s feelings, and, like, it’s been really, like, debilitating for me trying to just, you know, watch out for everyone’s feelings. And I was just like, you know what? I’m over it. And I said what I said. I I would I’m not gonna say something if I don’t mean it. And if I’m not gonna stand by it, that’s a waste of time and energy. I mean, why say something if you’re not gonna stick by it? I don’t see that point. Malcolm Collins [2:07]:Well, a lot of oh, continue. Continue. Yukiwaru [2:11]:Oh, I was just gonna say, I I don’t say something then back down. I’m gonna stick with it. I don’t care what people think, and I’m so sick of trying to, like, watch out for people. I mean, like, I respect people’s feelings, but, like, god, like, I have had to be so careful and, like, really think through what I say and, like, like, make sure I get, like, pronouns and stuff correctly because, you know, I I do respect how people feel and stuff, but it felt so good to let it out. Oh my god. No. It’s so so free. Malcolm Collins [2:45]:It it really this is a pathway that I feel like has happened to a lot of people. So we my wife and I used to be, like, very mainstream leftist, and then we ended up going viral a number of times for talking about birth rate collapse. Just like fertility rates are really low. This is gonna affect social security systems. And we got absolutely piled on. The the the Internet decided that that meant that we were white supremacists or whatever or, like I I don’t know. Right? Um, and so, uh, what ended up changing our mind is, at first, we weren’t like you. We hedged all of our points. We were like, well, with this and keep in mind this and keep in mind this. But as time went on, we begin to notice that there was, like, this community of people who just, like, cared about what was true. And they were, like, shockingly nice to us, um, even when we had a lot of differences of opinions with them. And this feeling that you’re talking about of, like, oh my god. I can just say whatever I think now It’s such such a weird place that we were in a society where it was normal to not feel that way. I mean, I I did did did you find yourself, like, self censoring a lot before? Was it was it the being called out that put you in a position where you could talk about things more? Like, was it was that what made it possible for you? Yukiwaru [4:16]:I did feel better really, you know, stating how I I’ve never really been one to censor. I’ve always been known for being, like, forward, bluntly honest, just saying how I feel. Because I I mean, personally, I don’t really understand other people’s feelings, like or empathy or compassion, you know. I just it doesn’t come natural to me. I think I felt empathy once in my entire life, and I didn’t understand what was happening. My dad, like, had to explain it to me like I was a kindergartner, learning how to feel and stuff. It was Oh. Simone Collins [4:52]:It was Yukiwaru [4:52]:a weird thing. But yeah. I mean, even now, I’m still kind of paranoid of my own pronouns. I I find myself referring to everyone as them, they just to be careful and cautious. It’s just in my head that I’m gonna say something and mess something up, and they’re gonna, like, come after me for it even if they are a friend or not. Malcolm Collins [5:16]:Well, your story was really interesting because it started with like, it seemed like this really started with a specific toxic individual in your life. And they go on your birthday stream, and somebody accidentally misgenders them, and they decide to make the birthday stream all about themselves. Mhmm. And I also wanna note here before I go all trans people do that. Like, I know some totally normal, cool, based trans people, and they don’t do this s**t. When somebody accidentally misgenders them, they’re just like, whatever. Like, it’s just not even important. It’s not even in the room of of of issues. Yeah. And then there’s this, like, other group that uses it to try to center themselves and, like, move past other people’s consensual boundaries and recenter and the your emotions because I thought it was very interesting the way that you talked about it. You’re like, this made me feel really bad when that happened. And it wasn’t the first time when this individual had made you feel really bad in this way. There was you were talking all the way back to when you first got partnered with Twitch. Yukiwaru [6:29]:Mhmm. Malcolm Collins [6:30]:And they hadn’t gotten the partnership, and they made you feel bad about celebrating, which is probably one of the biggest events in your life. Mhmm. Getting just interested to hear your thoughts on all this from the from, like, experiencing it and and moving primarily because of, like, one other individual pushing you into saying this stuff. Mhmm. Yukiwaru [6:57]:I became friends with them. They were they had more viewership than I did when we started becoming friends. And and at some time, I started surpassing them in viewership and growing more than they were. And, you know, at some point, they were viewer ing high where they could’ve gotten Twitch partner, but something happened where everything just dropped for them. And they they had been streaming longer than I have. So when I was, you know, growing more than them, I felt, like, guilty, like, because I felt, you know, they would always tell me how hard they’re trying and, like, mentally how they’re feeling. Like, they don’t understand. And, also, I understand that because even though I had Twitch partner, things dropped after my partner pushed. My views dropped, and I was like, alright. What am I doing wrong? What do I gotta change? But when I got the email for Twitch partner, was in a collab, and they were in my collab because, you know, I love including my friends. I love supporting my friends Yeah. Being there for them. And I got the email, and I started freaking out. And everyone in the collab was, like, so enthusiastic and so energetic and so celebratory. And then they came, and they’re like, what’s going on? And they’re like, oh my god. You just got Twitch burner. And they’re like, oh, good job. And I was like, Malcolm Collins [8:21]:Can can you explain for our audience who might not understand the significance of getting partnered with Twitch what this means for you as a creator? Yukiwaru [8:28]:I mean, besides having a really cool badge, not necessarily too much. It means that you were able to keep an average of a high viewership for a certain amount of time and complete the requirements. Malcolm Collins [8:44]:Doesn’t it change, like, the monetization or, like, the way the pathways you have to contact them? Yukiwaru [8:49]:From what I understand, when it comes to monetization, you do get more opportunities. But then it also you know, you have to do Twitch plus to get a bigger half of what you make on Twitch. If you don’t get Twitch plus, it really isn’t that much of a difference. And to get get Twitch plus, you have to hit goals of people subscribing and, like, gifting subs. Like, people need to spend money so you can get the different levels of Twitch plus to make more of the cut. So, Simone Collins [9:22]:like Oh god. Yukiwaru [9:23]:They changed it. Malcolm Collins [9:24]:I also just had a realization. You’ve been streaming for t

    1 A**hole Can Make a Chud: Yukiwaru Tells All
  6. Aug 19

    Islam vs Cell Phones: Down 25% In 10 Years

    In this episode of Based Camp, Malcolm and Simone Collins examine the rapid secularization underway in many Muslim-majority countries—often at a faster proportional rate than Christianity’s decline in the West. They walk through Arab Barometer and related data showing sharp rises in secular identification from 2012–2019 in Tunisia, Libya, Algeria, Morocco, and Egypt, followed by a partial rebound in the early 2020s. The conversation covers declining trust in Islamist parties (Muslim Brotherhood, Ennahda, Justice and Development Party), sub-replacement fertility across much of the region, and existential water scarcity in Egypt and Iran. They then dig into the drivers of deconversion: smartphone access to historical sources, the Islamic slave trade’s scale and character, Muhammad’s documented ownership of slaves (including Black slaves), Aisha’s age in the hadith literature, key Quranic verses on women, violence, sexual slavery, apostasy, and internal inconsistencies. Malcolm ranks the most common reasons people report leaving Islam, notes the heavy influence of modern egalitarian (“urban monoculture”) values, and offers a Techno-Puritan perspective on whether the tradition can be reconciled with reality-affirming religion. Simone adds her view on the ethical implications. The discussion is candid, data-driven, and frequently interrupted by family life. Based_Camp_-_Islam_Shiftsmp4 (1) [00:00:00] Malcolm Collins: Simone, I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are gonna be talking about a fascinating phenomenon, which is the collapse of Islam- Hmm ... in the Muslim world. And a lot of people are unaware that Islam has had as, as bad of a time as Christianity has had in the West. [00:00:21] Simone Collins: Yeah, [00:00:21] Malcolm Collins: it’s taken a beating. [00:00:21] At least proportionally, Islam is having a worse time in Muslim majority countries- Is it [00:00:29] Simone Collins: really? ... [00:00:30] Malcolm Collins: in terms of the speed of the collapse. So if you go from 2012 to 2014, all right? [00:00:38] Simone Collins: Okay. [00:00:39] Malcolm Collins: In Tunisia, you had 22% of people were secular. If you go to 2018 to 2019, so this is just less than a decade... Yeah, le- about... [00:00:52] What is it? Yeah, less than a decade later, it jumped up to 46%. [00:00:56] Speaker 3: Huh, huh. [00:00:57] Malcolm Collins: Okay. 22% to 46%. If you go to Libya, it’s 18% in the 2012 to 2014. Okay. 2018 to ‘19, it goes from 18% to 36%. Algeria, it goes from 13% to 24%. Morocco, it went from 4% to 22%. Stop. And in Egypt, it went from 3% to 18%. Now, I want people to understand that these are countries where you can be killed for deconverting from Islam. [00:01:32] Simone Collins: And- In... Wait, in which of these countries is that ki- like, in, in... ‘Cause I thought, like, caliphates only really existed in, at roughly, like... Okay, this is my uneducated, super unedu- it... I wanna say, I wanna say, like, Afghanistan and Iran Right? Like- Okay, [00:01:48] Malcolm Collins: countries that will kill you legally, not mob justice. In these other countries it can be mob justice. [00:01:53] But legally- But like ruled [00:01:54] Simone Collins: by Sharia law. [00:01:55] Malcolm Collins: Like- It’s the death penalty in Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Mauritania, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Somalia, the Maldives, Brunei, and some parts of Nigeria, and certain states in Malaysia. [00:02:08] Simone Collins: For what? For proselytizing Christianity or just being an unbeliever? [00:02:10] Malcolm Collins: No, [00:02:11] Simone Collins: for [00:02:11] Malcolm Collins: deconverting. [00:02:13] Simone Collins: How... How do they track that? And keep in mind, [00:02:16] Malcolm Collins: Iran appears to have a massive secular population now- [00:02:19] Simone Collins: Yeah. No, that- ... even [00:02:20] Malcolm Collins: though it’s the [00:02:20] Simone Collins: death [00:02:21] Malcolm Collins: penalty ... Oh, it’s, [00:02:22] Simone Collins: So wait, so like everyone like goes to the mosque regularly? Like how do they track... I mean, I’m just trying to figure out like how you make a case for having someone- [00:02:32] Malcolm Collins: The p- the point I’m making here is the numbers are almost certainly worse. [00:02:35] Now, what is interesting is many of these places many of these places have had a a boost post this happening. [00:02:44] Speaker 3: Oh gosh. Where did I, where did I post the, I’ll have to open it [00:02:47] Simone Collins: in Chrome again. Wait, did you get kicked again by a ghost? What, what, what was... [00:02:50] Malcolm Collins: No, something fell over. [00:02:52] Simone Collins: Wait. Shut up Was it a ghost? [00:02:55] Malcolm Collins: Was it [00:02:55] Simone Collins: a ghost? I’m so excited for ghosties. Ghosties. Spooky. Or... Oh, no, I should say jinn, because >. Jinn, jinn, jinn, jinn. So, if [00:03:11] Malcolm Collins: we look at wave three, we’ve seen a bit of a reduction. So 2021 to 2022. What is wave three? [00:03:16] Simone Collins: What... [00:03:17] Malcolm Collins: Oh. So if you go to Tunisia, it’s to 31% now. [00:03:21] If, if you go to Libya, it’s 24% now. You s- also saw a five-point drop in Algeria, a seven-point drop in Morocco, and a six-point drop in Egypt. So you- [00:03:34] Simone Collins: A drop in the number of atheists, in the percentage [00:03:36] Malcolm Collins: of atheists. A drop in the number of atheists. So you’ve had a [00:03:39] Simone Collins: slight drop- Wait, and over what year, over what year period, Malcolm? [00:03:42] Malcolm Collins: This is 2018 to ‘21, 2021 to 2020, so a fairly short time. Mm-hmm. So basically you had a big wave out, and a small wave back in, and we’ll see where the net is. But it’s worse than that, because you also have the problem of low [00:04:00] support of Islamic parties. So, If we look at the various things here, like the Egyptian Brotherhood, sorry, the, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. [00:04:10] Mm-hmm. In 2011, it had a trust rate of 44%. By 2018 to ‘19, it had a trust rate of only 17%. In the Tunisia, the Ennahda had a decline of 24 points since 2011, roughly down from a 40% range. And now with one detailed team survey showing it being at only 11 to 16% now. Wow. And in Morocco, the Justice and Development, the main Islamic party, went from 44% in 2013 to 25% in 2019. [00:04:42] A 20-point decline were reported for Muslim Brotherhood, Brotherhood groups in Jordan and Morocco as well. So You are basically seeing a lower degree of trust in the institutions that were meant to bring sort of Islam to everyone. And on top of all of this, we’re seeing fairly low fertility rates or extremely low fertility rates for the poverty in these regions across these regions as well. [00:05:11] Generally below the United States fertility rate. So Tunisia has a fertility rate of 1.53 to 1.58. Iran has a fertility rate of 1.6. Saudi Arabia has a fertility rate of 2.1 maybe, so they- they’re doing better than us. And UAE and other Gulf states have a fertility rate of 1.3 to 1.7, so very low. [00:05:34] Simone Collins: And- It’s lower than I’m sure anyone would expect, even in the case of the rare but still present above replacement country. [00:05:42] Because people think- Yeah ... Muslim country, and they’re like, “Oh, we’re talking families like six on average, right?” No. Like, no. [00:05:49] Malcolm Collins: No, no, nope. [00:05:51] Simone Collins: Yeah. [00:05:51] Malcolm Collins: We are seeing a collapse across the board. And it gets worse. We’re potentially better, and we should be grateful that this collapse is happening, or they should be grateful, is they’re also across the Arab world well, I should say Muslim world because it’s happening in Iran, too, about to run out of water. [00:06:12] Egypt right now, a- a- at current figures has a threshold of 490 to 500 meters squared per year in terms of the- the quality that puts it- it right below the scarcity threshold and less than half the UN water poverty line. Mm. And this has been a massive decline from historical levels. If you look at what does it mean to have, sorry, water levels at 490 to 500 meters, square meters, if we look at the 1960s, they had levels at 2,000 cubic meters. [00:06:47] Not good. If you look at the 1990s, it had fallen to 1,000 cubic meters, and now it’s at only 500 cubic meters And 98% of their fresh water comes from the Nile, which the country upstream of them can dam, and currently is damming. So it’s likely going to get worse. You have this at the same problem as Iran’s water problem that’s literally leading to giant sinkholes. [00:07:12] See our episode of, like, the hell on earth it is to live in Iran. R- this we did before the war talking about just how bad it’s gotten in Iran with their water situation. But we’re also seeing this across the region because, you know, oth- these regions are supplying other regions with water. The reason they’re doing the dam is ‘cause they’re also low on water. [00:07:31] Mm-hmm. And when a lot of these regions run out of water, there isn’t a lot they can do. They don’t have the economy or the economic capacity that a country like Israel does to run on desalination. Mm-hmm. So that sort of means that they don’t have a future. Like, when we did the Iran video, the answer to the future of Iran is Iran functionally has no future. [00:07:52] Mm-hmm. Y- there is no way that it can continue to operate at the population levels it’s operating at right now. Well, [00:07:57] Simone Collins: and, and with the water levels and [00:08:00] the, yeah, just the infrastructure issues at play. [00:08:03] Malcolm Collins: Yeah. So this has been a massive issue. So the question is, one, when we think about the future of the Muslim world, what’s gonna happen? [00:08:12] If we think about the future of Islam, what’s goin

    Islam vs Cell Phones: Down 25% In 10 Years
  7. Aug 18

    1/3 Cults Become A World Religion | Crazy Stats To Save Your People

    NOTE: This episode has a companion guide with graphs, links, and stats—don’t miss it! https://technopuritan.com/new-religions/ What if most new religions don’t fail — and the ones that follow a few simple rules have a 93% survival rate and over 50% chance of becoming major world religions? In this episode of Based Camp, Malcolm and Simone dig into original research on new religious movements founded since the 1700s. When you filter for groups with a unique metaphysical framework + a real written (or recorded) corpus, the numbers are already surprisingly high. Add an explicitly pro-natalist framing and something beyond ordinary materialist reality, and the success rate becomes almost absurd. They break down: * Why humanist/secular projects almost always die * Why “silliness” actually protects a religion * Why probable scams have some of the best survival rates * Succession systems that work (and the ones that kill movements) * Hard vs soft religion and fertility * What this means for anyone trying to build a durable culture or tradition today — including their own techno-puritan project If you’re interested in cultural survival, fertility, intentional community, or just love weird religious history, this one’s for you. Episode Transcript [00:00:00] Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone. I’m e- extra excited to be here with you today. This is probably gonna be one of my favorite episodes to do, one of the most interesting that I have researched, because I conducted a lot of original research for this episode and found something really, really fascinating. [00:00:14] So if we’re just going to jump to the punch, if you just go into the academic literature and say, of new religions, cults, whatever you wanna call them, what percent of them survive? They’ll say one in 1,000 or one in 100,000, right? [00:00:30] Octavian: Yeah. [00:00:30] Malcolm Collins: Yes. But if you actually look at those studies, what they’re generally looking at is, like, somebody got mad at their local pastor and started, like, a small schism or something like that. [00:00:39] Simone Collins: Mm. [00:00:40] Malcolm Collins: If instead you narrow it down to only books with a unique... Or not books, but, like, ways of seeing things with a unique metaphysical framing and a full written corpus this would be, techno-puritanism would be an example, like, Mormonism would be an example, Scientology would be an example. The Nation of Islam would be an example. [00:01:00] When you narrow it down to that, if you look at ones founded around the world from the 1700s till today, over a third of them end up surviving at least 100 years, and at some point having over 100,000 members. [00:01:18] Simone Collins: That’s... N- [00:01:19] uh. [00:01:19] Malcolm Collins: no. Now, if we narrow down the list further, so I’m gonna put two more coffee outs on here that are gonna make it even crazier. [00:01:26] Simone Collins: Okay. [00:01:27] Malcolm Collins: Take out all of the ones that are I’m gonna say, like, humanist. Like, techno-puritanism would not fall into this by any measure of the, But, but you know what I’m talking about. Those weird humanist religions that were founded in, like, the 1920s and then became a craze for a bit. [00:01:41] If you take those out and you take out any that do not have an explicitly pro-natalist framing, right? Like, it- Oh ... they, they grow through conversion rather than kids. [00:01:51] Simone Collins: Mm. [00:01:51] Malcolm Collins: You now get a 93% survival rate, and over a 53% rate of becoming a major world religion. And- [00:02:03] Simone Collins: Does this include, like, all the weird... [00:02:05] Like, would it include NXIVM? Would it include the one with the, the woman who died after taking tons of colloidal silver that HBO did a documentary about? [00:02:14] Malcolm Collins: Yeah, so it would not include her, and we’ll go over what it excludes explicitly. Okay. So first you have to have a unique metaphysical framework with a written corpus. [00:02:23] Oh. She didn’t have a wr- written corpus. She didn’t have, like- Mm. [00:02:26] Simone Collins: So cult of personality, basically, do not- [00:02:28] Malcolm Collins: Yeah, cults of personality, off the table. Okay. Anything that’s clearly just schizophrenic ramblings. This would be like Cubism or whatever- Yeah. A [00:02:37] Simone Collins: man- [00:02:38] Malcolm Collins: The world is a cube and there are two sides to a cube. [00:02:41] Cube-based logic. Yes. It, so it cuts out that, it cuts out cults of personality and it cuts out mild schisms. So like if you’re like a, you, you largely believe what the organization would believe, but you have some minor quibbles but you’ve written a lot on those minor quibbles, it cuts those out. [00:03:00] Simone Collins: Hmm ... [00:03:01] Malcolm Collins: but like that’s a very weird thing that the growth of new religious movements is dependent on their authorship and not on some of, of like, like the the, the core... What, what’s the word I’m looking for here? The core bottleneck happens before the point of authorship. Mm. And when I did this, I did a secondary thing that was very interesting. [00:03:25] So note here when I say I’m cutting out schizophrenic ramblings, I am not cutting out, in this list, one of the things we looked at was silliness. And you’ll actually find that silliness correlates with survivorship. [00:03:40] Simone Collins: Huh ... [00:03:40] Malcolm Collins: so what I mean [00:03:41] Simone Collins: by this is- So if the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster had managed to put together some coherent biblical, or not, like a religious text or something, a worldview, it could have actually done quite well. [00:03:53] Malcolm Collins: Unlikely because it falls into the one category where they always die. [00:03:57] Simone Collins: Oh, it’s not pronatalist. [00:03:58] Malcolm Collins: No. Anything that, that’s [00:04:00] explicitly atheistic, as I said, like any of those humanist projects- Oh, yes. Okay, okay ... or anything like that, every single one of them has died. Hmm. Now, note there have been a number of times where people have intentionally engineered religious systems. [00:04:15] Every single one of those became a major world religion. Hmm. So we’ll get into this. It’s crazy. I put together a companion doc. In the last companion doc that I gave you guys, I said, “Don’t go to it because that’s like way too AIE,” or like, you know, it’s... I fixed that. I fixed that in the last one. I fixed that in this one. [00:04:31] Now if you’re ever doing research using Fable or something like that, you know, to do like deep research, ‘cause it does deep research, but it’s terrible at writing- Yeah ... you can use the RFAB API, which will go back over it and check it for how AI it looks, and then rewrite it until it doesn’t look that way anymore. [00:04:47] And so now if you go to this companion doc, it reads like a human wrote it which is just a fantastic product to have. And also because it’s checking using an AI checking engine- Ah ... like if you were doing homework with this or something- [00:05:00] Oh, [00:05:01] God ... a detection system wouldn’t catch it. I’m just saying that’s... [00:05:05] I, I like to design tools. I like to design tools. What, what am I doing? I needed this for my research, all right? But I also went over during what periods, like if you look at different countries and cultures during what periods did you have more surviving religious systems? Founder motivations, how did those impact the religion? [00:05:25] E.g. did it appear to be started as a scam? Just to get it out there right now, religions that were like provably founded as scams, one they-- it doesn’t seem to affect their survivorship rate. If anything, they appear to have a slightly higher survivorship rate. And two we, because there have been so many of them we can go over what happens when it comes out that they were likely a scam, how followers react. [00:05:52] It’s very predictable. So that’s not really a big risk to a religion. We’ll go over, being a sex cult is a big risk to a religion, though. Religion- Oh, that [00:06:01] Simone Collins: is comforting. [00:06:02] Malcolm Collins: Yeah, that are, that are focused on, Well, often because they’re v- explicitly anti-natalist. That’s, that’s- Oh, yeah ... often part of being a sex cult. [00:06:10] Mm-hmm. Now somebody could say, “Malcolm, this is survivorship bias, right?” You know, you’re only seeing the ones that eventually survived. To which I would have a counter to you, which is to say we know of throughout history the beliefs of many intelligent, eccentric people. Those are the types of people most likely to form one of these. [00:06:32] We just don’t find in the historical record a lot of unique frameworks within these individuals that would, that would fit this category. In fact we can even we, in the, in the document if you go through it, it has a whole section where we check for this to see if this is just survivorship bias. [00:06:50] It does not appear to be survivorship bias. Mm-hmm. It appears that this is a genuine and very, very strange phenomenon. So we’re gonna get to it, and hopefully as we get to it and as we go through this, we can learn a lot more about what kinds of movements survive and what kinds of movements die. [00:07:07] And where this is relevant to listeners, whether you be from a traditional religious background or a non-traditional religious background right now every group on Earth right now is dying from fertility collapse except for Orthodox Jews. We’ll, we’ll, we’ll cut them out. And even they have issues right now, right? [00:07:23] Mm-hmm. A- and, and, and like the Amish, but the Amish don’t have technology, so it’s not super relevant in terms of, like, future geopolitical control. Now, a, it, it’s true whether y

    1/3 Cults Become A World Religion | Crazy Stats To Save Your People
  8. Aug 17

    Hotel Manager: How Different Ethnic Groups Use Hotels

    David Lorentzen is BACK—this time to share his behind-the-scenes experience as a Swedish hotel manager whose family has run hotels for over a decade. David gives a rare, unfiltered look at cultural differences he has observed as a hotelier: which groups of guests make staff smile and which ones create the biggest headaches. He walks through the three most difficult categories of guests his hotels have hosted — Russian oligarchs, Chinese tour groups, and certain Indian families — with specific, firsthand stories about room damage, cooking in rooms, overcrowding, and the economics of hospitality. The conversation then shifts to a much larger topic: the refugee housing industry in Sweden. David recounts the multimillion-dollar offers hotels received to house asylum seekers (especially young Afghan males), why his family turned them down, the insurance and property-value consequences, and the two competing integration strategies Sweden has tried (spreading people out vs. concentrating them). He also discusses literacy rates, cultural distance, and why some groups integrate far more easily than others. You can find David Lorentzon's various accounts and posts here: https://linktr.ee/davidlorentzon Episode Transcript And where I basically shared the story about about what what actually happens when the Swedish, I think it’s called emergency service in English, rescue service. They gave us a phone call, and they said that, would you like to house 30 Afghans? And you’ll get paid at the time at that time about $320 per night per child and do that year round. Now he received 30 of them. Okay. That’s like, what, 90,090 thousand dollars a day. Crazy. Yeah. It it turns it it basically your most profitable day becomes every day of the year. Malcolm Collins [0:42]: Yeah. David Lorentzen [0:43]: And most of it is profit. Simone Collins [0:45]: And it’s David Lorentzen [0:45]: hard to Simone Collins [0:46]: say no. Yeah. David Lorentzen [0:47]: You’re basically earning millions of dollars to accept mostly male between the age of 14 and 26 Afghan boys Afghan males. Simone Collins [0:58]: Wow. David Lorentzen [0:58]: Now this village has about 350 people. Speaker 4 [1:02]: Would you like to know more? Simone Collins [1:04]: Okay. Hello, everyone. I’m so excited for this. we’ll say more off the record, episode in which we interview David Lorenzen about his experience, with different cultural groups from the perspective of a hotel manager. I will say that when we have worked in the travel industry, we’ve been exposed to some really stark cultural differences, even just from, like, working in different parts of the world. And definitely from working with different groups as travelers, it’s kind of amazing. I think we’re mostly raised to believe that everyone’s kind of the same. Everyone does the same thing. We all, like, get up and we eat breakfast, and it’s all the same. Like, it’s broadly, like, cereal and croissants and fruit. And, like, we don’t realize that people actually live very different lives, have very different habits, and that becomes very clear when you get to see a sampling of people go through a specific pace. David Lorenzen is able to speak to this. He’s gonna explain to us why, and then we’re just gonna I I would love to dive into some things that you’ve observed about different behavioral patterns or or habits you’ve noticed from different groups that you’ve been exposed to through the nature of some of your work. David Lorentzen [2:08]: Yeah. So about thirteen years ago, my family decided to buy a hotel that was for sale, and we had never ever done anything like this. We my parents were from the tech industry, basically. Malcolm Collins [2:20]: Oh, wow. David Lorentzen [2:21]: We wanted to change in lifestyle, something healthier than sitting in an office all day. And we bought it when I was 18 years old. So for my entire adult life, I’ve had I’ve been deeply involved with running hotels in the tourism industry. Malcolm Collins [2:36]: Mhmm. David Lorentzen [2:36]: And I’m a hotel manager. And the reason I can talk about this is because it’s a family owned business, and they can’t fire me. So I got freedom of speech. Malcolm Collins [2:45]: That helps. So David Lorentzen [2:47]: and I do have to say that, you know, 90% of all our guests in Sweden here are, let’s say, Germanic people. Germans, Austrians, Dutch, Scandinavians, they are wonderful people. They do incredible they really do set the standard with like, I I get happy when whenever I see that they cleaned after themselves to make our jobs easier. Malcolm Collins [3:10]: Malcolm, what Simone does, and I get so mad at her. Simone Collins [3:12]: He gets super mad. I’m, like, stripping the sheets. I’m trying to clean up. I’m putting all the towels in a, like, folded pile. And he’s like, what are you doing? I’m just being correct, Malcolm. David Lorentzen [3:21]: Yes. You’re being correct. And I do the same thing because I I wanna be nice to the cleaners. Yes. But but as we were talking to each other, it says, okay. I’m having a really busy time now. We have to reschedule and so on. You started mentioning, I hope the guests are good to you. So, like, yep. Yeah. We’ve had some bad people too. And I started mentioning that the worst groups we’ve ever had, the bottom three, are Russian oligarchs, Chinese tourist groups, and Indian families, which is a very Simone Collins [3:56]: So wild. David Lorentzen [3:57]: Strange group to bundle together. And I’ll go through which one do you wanna start with? Simone Collins [4:03]: Let’s start. What surprised me the most, because Chinese tourists are kind of famous for being nightmares, especially, like, certain generations of Chinese tourists. But what I’ve not heard about is Russian oligarchs ever being a problem. You’d assume that they would just kind of, like, breeze through and barely stay in the room or something. What’s going on there? David Lorentzen [4:23]: Yeah. So we had Russian oligarchs a couple of times, and the moment this has happened multiple times. The moment they come in, they check-in, they check they see the room, they’re not happy with it, they come back, and they try to bribe us. So, like Okay. We’re willing to pay triple the price to get your best room. I’m sorry, sir. The hotel is fully booked. We’re not gonna kick out our guests. So and they insist upon it. No. No. No. We we want we’re paying triple now in cash. And it’s like, okay. No, sir. We’re not doing that. Then the neck the next problem is that over and over again, they party hard in the room. They shoot champagne bottles all over the place. They regularly smoke cigarettes and cigars in the room, which they’re not supposed to do. We tell people that it’s it’s illegal to smoke indoors. So whenever we go into the room after they’ve checked out, it’s like, oh my gosh. It’s a terrible smell. There’s mess everywhere. Malcolm Collins [5:25]: Oh, no. David Lorentzen [5:26]: And when you have that kind of cigarette smell in a hotel room, you can’t give it out to the next guest for the next three days because you have to open the windows. You have to make sure that the air quality goes up again, and you basically run into this really serious problem that, okay. We’re just now gonna get really bad reviews because we can’t get people this room. We’re gonna have to say, no. We can’t give you this room that you booked. Gonna have to refund and get bad reviews as a result. So even if they were to pay a whole lot of extra money for that service, the cost in the long run is repeatedly bad reviews on booking.com, on other websites that you’re basically yeah. Yeah. Exactly. It’s huge. And we are, you know, really high rating. We care a lot about it. So it just means that it’s bad business to deal with Russian oligarchs. And ever since the war in Ukraine began, we’ve not had them because Simone Collins [6:22]: Oh, good. David Lorentzen [6:24]: There there’s been a bunch of restrictions on these people that makes it very difficult for them to move around in the EU compared to before. Malcolm Collins [6:33]: So So they they they like to I mean, it must be a higher end hotel if you’re getting Russian oligarchs coming. Yeah. They they come to the your country to, what, to party? To do what? Like Yeah. Simone Collins [6:43]: Why are they there? Are you in the countryside? You’re in the city. You don’t have to name names or anything. David Lorentzen [6:46]: No. It’s a middle stop. So we are in a in a strategic location where we are convenient middle stop for a lot of travelers. So it doesn’t have to be high end luxury. It just has to be the most convenient middle stop, and that’s how we encounter these people. So we’ve had, you know, the Lotus Club, the Ferrari Club, the Amphibious Boat, Car Club, and a bunch other stuff. Simone Collins [7:10]: Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. People wait. Club. David Lorentzen [7:12]: Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Yeah. There was a bunch of Amphibious Boat, a car club that came to our hotel, from across the lake. Simone Collins [7:19]: Oh, so they, like David Lorentzen [7:21]: We have a beach. Simone Collins [7:21]: Across the lake. David Lorentzen [7:23]: Yeah. They they drove up on the beach. Simone Collins [7:25]: That must have been really fun to see. David Lorentzen [7:27]: Yeah. That was awesome. That was absolutely awesome. It’s like yeah. So we’ve had a bunch of these various really cool car clubs that has billionaires and millionaires in them. So but I do have to say that the rich people in the West, you know, they behave really nice. They behave really well. It’s just this particular group that seems to think that once you have a sufficient amount of money, ethics, being nice, no longer really relevant anymore. Like, you you can just pay to be an a*****e, and it’s fine. Simone Colli

    Hotel Manager: How Different Ethnic Groups Use Hotels
4.4
out of 5
7 Ratings

About

Based Camp is a podcast focused on how humans process the world around them and the future of our species. That means we go into everything from human sexuality, to weird sub-cultures, dating markets, philosophy, and politics. Malcolm and Simone are a husband wife team of a neuroscientist and marketer turned entrepreneurs and authors. With graduate degrees from Stanford and Cambridge under their belts as well as five bestselling books, one of which topped out the WSJs nonfiction list, they are widely known (if infamous) intellectuals / provocateurs. If you want to dig into their ideas further or check citations on points they bring up check out their book series. Note: They all sell for a dollar or so and the money made from them goes to charity. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08FMWMFTG basedcamppodcast.substack.com

You Might Also Like