Blockchain Innovation: Interviewing The Brightest Minds In Blockchain Frederick Munawa
-
- Technology
-
Frederick Munawa here.
Blockchain Innovation is where I interview the brightest minds in blockchain and cryptocurrency – every Tuesday – to discuss present and future applications of decentralized technologies.
-
Ethereum 2.0 – with Lane Rettig
Lane Retting works at the Ethereum Foundation. He is a hacker and polyglot with an affinity for East Asian languages.
In this episode, Lane and I discuss:
The journey to a brand new Ethereum – Ethereum 2.0 (code named “Serenity”). We discuss what Serenity’s roadmap looks like, and when it’s expected to ship We discuss Lane’s work on ewasm And of course, we discuss governance, proof-of-stake, sharding, “Plasma,” and much more! -
Your Biggest Challenge with Blockchain (part 4/4)
I sent a survey to about 1,500 people and asked them what their biggest challenges were, when it comes to learning about blockchain and cryptocurrency.
We created Blockchain Innovation Academy to address those challenges.
This is a short tour of the Academy.
Watch the video – https://blockchain.global/academy/
Join the Academy – https://memorypool.ca/home/ -
Your Biggest Challenge with Blockchain (part 3/4)
I sent a survey to about 1,500 people and asked them what their biggest challenges were, when it comes to learning about blockchain and cryptocurrency.
Here are the final 3 challenges my subscribers submitted. (From the top 10. See previous episodes for the other 7).
Watch the video - https://blockchain.global/academy/ -
Your Biggest Challenge with Blockchain (part 2/4)
I sent a survey to about 1,500 people and asked them what their biggest challenges were, when it comes to learning about blockchain and cryptocurrency.
Here are 4 of the top 10 challenges my subscribers submitted.
Watch the video - https://blockchain.global/academy/ -
Your Biggest Challenge with Blockchain (part 1/4)
I sent a survey to about 1,500 people and asked them what their biggest challenges were, when it comes to learning about blockchain and cryptocurrency.
Here are 3 of the top 10 challenges my subscribers submitted.
Watch the video - https://blockchain.global/academy/ -
: Decentralization-as-a-Service – with Blockdaemon’s Konstantin Richter
Konstantin Richter is the Co-Founder & CEO of Blockdaemon. He is a serial software entrepreneur and has also held senior-level positions at prominent firms such as Nokia and Deutsche Telekom.
In this episode, Konstantin and I discuss:
The difference between Blockdaemon and other infrastructure startups Key reasons why individuals and enterprises should outsource their blockchain infrastructure Blockdaemon’s business strategy – what Konstantin calls, “Decentralization-as-a-Service”
Customer Reviews
Excellent Work!
Hey Frederick
Thank you for bringing to us this great knowledge through the eclectic mix of guests you interview on this podcast. I really enjoy not only the subject that is blockchain, but the excellent questions you ask the guests. Bravo!
Ivan
Useful source of information when getting to know blockchain for the first time.
Let me qualify by first saying that I have only listened to episode one which involves an interview with Roger Ver on Bitcoin. The shows format is good because it is very useful when learning about this stuff to get it from the people who are closest to it. In this episode the expert was a trained programmer and economist, and a long time entrepreneur in the crypto industry. I learned many things that expanded what I know about crypto currencies but I was also frustrated at the overconfidence from Mr. Ver bordering on hubris. This was especially poignant when disparaging rivals and selling his own views as absolutes. Also quite frustrating is the zealousness of belief that many in this industry have about its potential to change society.
TLDR: useful but will keep looking around for more balanced content on blockchain.
No depth just ad
Never provides any depth to the one sentence answers other than he covers it in his courses. EX “People who support bitcoin mining say that the value is worth the energy cost” but no justification.