Candace

I don’t agree with a lot of Candace’s views but listening to people you disagree with is important. And while I don’t support all her opinions, I definitely respect her conviction, effort into fact finding and general story telling ability. She’s right, she’s an acquired taste.

I don’t always agree, but she is honest. If she makes a mistake, she owns it. She doesn’t try to gaslight, she is based, authentic and very intelligent. I like her and she is an asset to the crowded scene.

I liked Candace’s pods particularly her earlier episodes and the series on the Macrons. I had to UNSUB because of her constant BS and unproven theories after the Charlie Kirk assassination which were becoming annoying and absolutely disgusting. Candace would have to be the one person who had discredited herself by going after a widow (Erika Kirk) and the one person she alleged was her friend (Charlie). All I hear now since 9/10th is Candace’s personal gripe and bad blood with the late Charlie and her current action of dishonoring his legacy, the Kirk family and TPUSA with her theories and unverifiable innuendos. Sorry Candace fans but this pod is nothing short of hatred, lies and unproven, non-factual BS. Just because Candace says her statements are facts does not make it a fact without evidence or irrefutable citations or proof. As a result, I can only conclude that 98% of what she says is not worth my time or anyone else who has values and morals.

Candace, as far as I can conclude, has the better argument. She has legitimate questions that are not getting answered to my satisfaction. I have zero emotional attachment to the subject matter and if no one can prove her wrong, she’s not wrong.