irRational

Kurt Parks

Hosted by Kurt Parks, irRational is a podcast designed to bring people of opposing viewpoints together — not to argue, but to understand. Each episode explores complex topics that divide opinion, from politics and culture to religion, science, and identity. Our goal is simple: to create space for honest, intelligent, and respectful dialogue in a world that often rewards outrage over understanding. We ask the tough questions — Is faith irrational? Should Canada become a republic? Is AI a public right or private power? — and invite guests from different backgrounds to challenge ideas, not people. If you believe curiosity, civility, and critical thinking still matter, join the conversation.

Episodes

  1. Faith: Rational or irRational?

    2D AGO

    Faith: Rational or irRational?

    This conversation journeys to where believers and skeptics explore the nature of faith, reason, morality, and personal experiences. The episode dives into how different worldviews approach truth, evidence, and ethical living while fostering mutual respect. Timestamps:00:00 - Welcome and episode overview: bridging irrational views with rational dialogue 02:00 - Do faith and reason approach truth differently or seek the same? 04:30 - Tools of thought: Faith as rational? 11:00 - Can reason and evidence fully explain life’s meaning? 12:58 - Limits of human reason and the role of faith 23:34 - Evidence supporting Jesus as a historical figure 30:12 - Interpreting resurrection accounts from secular and theological viewpoints 39:11 - The validity of personal spiritual and mystical experiences 44:12 - How personal experiences shape beliefs and their evidentiary value 50:58 - Grounding morality in secular humanism versus divine command 63:21 - How beliefs influence moral decisions, suffering, and hope 76:28 - Navigating worldview differences in personal relationships and faith journeys 90:39 - Final thoughts on respectful dialogue and mutual understanding 94:00 - Coming attractions: Canada’s monarchy debate and coffee sponsorship Resources & Links:Humanism from the Heart by Steve Ghikadis Anthony Magna Bosco - Street EpistemologyDale McGowan - In Faith and In DoubtGary Habermas - Minimal Facts ApproachJosephus - Antiquities of the JewsNew Bean Nation CoffeeConnect with the Guests:Steve Ghikadis - FacebookMike Hiscock - Twitter | LinkedInSpecial Mentions:Upcoming episode in April 2026 on whether Canada should stay with the Royal Family or become a Republic.

    1h 30m
  2. AI: Regulated Utility or Private Power

    FEB 15

    AI: Regulated Utility or Private Power

    Guests: Bianca Wylie is an entrepreneur and a public interest technology advocate. She is the founder of T&S Advisory, a consulting firm that offers strategic innovation guidance and capacity-building for small and medium-sized businesses and non-profit organizations. She is also a partner at Digital Public, where she works on public interest technology governance. More info: innovatehow.com Scott Beck is CEO of the fast-growing Cyber Security & IT Services firm BeckTek. He’s a two-time international best-selling author and award-winning speaker, including appearances at NASDAQ and Harvard Club of Boston. Co-star of the Amazon documentary “Cyber Crime” and “Cyber Crime:Fallout”, Scott is a frequent TV celebrity guest expert with appearances on CTV, Global, NBC, ABC, CBS, Fox, and The CW. More info\: www.becktek.ca Summary This conversation delves into the complexities of artificial intelligence (AI), focusing on its governance, societal implications, and the urgent need for responsible use. Bianca Wiley and Scott Beck discuss the challenges of regulating AI, the role of government, and the importance of critical thinking in an AI-driven world. They emphasize the need for a mixed approach to regulation, the risks associated with AI misuse, and the cultural shifts that accompany technological advancements. The discussion also highlights privacy concerns and the necessity for ongoing dialogue about the ethical implications of AI in society. Takeaways AI governance requires a nuanced understanding of its applications.High-level discussions often overlook specific industry contexts.Existing laws and policies can be adapted for AI without starting from scratch.The government faces challenges in regulating AI due to economic incentives.Privacy laws are currently inadequate to protect users.AI's rapid development outpaces regulatory frameworks.Cultural implications of AI use must be considered in education.Critical thinking is essential in an AI-driven society.Standards bodies are working on AI guidelines, but enforcement is lacking.The future of AI regulation in Canada may align more with European models. Titles Navigating the AI Landscape: Governance and Ethics The Future of AI: Risks and Responsibilities Chapters 00:00 Introduction to AI and Its Challenges 02:10 Governance and Oversight of AI 08:11 Public vs. Private Control of AI 14:54 Understanding AI's Risks and Misconceptions 28:14 Defining Responsible AI Usage 34:35 Self-Governance in AI Utilization 36:49 The Complexity of Technology and Institutional Failures 38:03 The Double-Edged Sword of AI 40:14 Privacy Concerns in the Age of AI 43:27 The Illusion of Privacy and Data Security 48:35 Generative AI vs. Traditional AI: A Comparative Analysis 54:16 Regulatory Challenges and the Future of AI 58:19 The Impact of Regulation on Innovation 01:07:19 The Risks of Decision-Making AI Keywords artificial intelligence, AI governance, AI regulation, privacy concerns, cybersecurity, decision making, technology ethics, societal impact, responsible AI, Canadian AI policy

    1h 13m
  3. Hockey Fights: Forbidden or Forever

    JAN 15

    Hockey Fights: Forbidden or Forever

    The inaugural episode of the Irrational podcast delves into the contentious topic of fighting in hockey. The debate centres around whether fighting should be allowed to continue in the sport or if it should be forbidden. The guests, a sport enthusiast who studied in kinesiology and a former hockey player, provide insights and personal experiences to support their perspectives. The conversation dives into the role of fighting in hockey, its impact on player behaviour, and its place in the sport's culture. The discussion also explores the influence of fighting on team identity and the emotional regulation of players. The episode touches on the influence of fighting in the pros in the behaviours of young players in minor hockey and is fighting actually the culprit where player injury is concerned? Takeaways: Fighting in hockey has a unique place in the sport's historical and cultural significance The evolution of the game, the role of enforcers, and the impact of fighting on player safety are key considerations in the debate. Fighting in hockey raises questions about discipline, emotional control, and respect. The conversation also highlights the importance of wellness and community sports initiatives in promoting physical activity and positive engagement among adolescents. The impact of fighting in hockey extends beyond the game and affects the behaviour and mindset of players and fans. Chapters 00:00 The Significance of Fighting in Hockey 05:47 The Purpose and Impact of Fighting 11:21 The Evolution of the Game and the Role of Fighting 19:57 The Role of Fighting in Hockey 26:03 The Impact of Fighting on Team Identity 32:05 The Future of Fighting in Hockey Episode sponsor: New Bean Nation (www.NewBeanNation.ca)

    35 min

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
2 Ratings

About

Hosted by Kurt Parks, irRational is a podcast designed to bring people of opposing viewpoints together — not to argue, but to understand. Each episode explores complex topics that divide opinion, from politics and culture to religion, science, and identity. Our goal is simple: to create space for honest, intelligent, and respectful dialogue in a world that often rewards outrage over understanding. We ask the tough questions — Is faith irrational? Should Canada become a republic? Is AI a public right or private power? — and invite guests from different backgrounds to challenge ideas, not people. If you believe curiosity, civility, and critical thinking still matter, join the conversation.