86 episodes
JAMA Pediatrics Editors' Summary JAMA Network
-
- Health & Fitness
-
-
3.0 • 2 Ratings
-
Editor's Audio Summary for JAMA Pediatrics, from the JAMA Network. On research in medicine, science, and clinical practice related to children’s health and illness
-
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Care
New research finds that an artificial intelligence decision support tool has high accuracy for diagnosing otitis media. Bimal Desai, MD, MBI, Chief Health Informatics Officer at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, discusses applications of artificial intelligence in pediatric care with Editor in Chief Dimitri A. Christakis, MD, MPH, and Associate Editor Alison A. Galbraith, MD, MPH.
Related Content:
Development and Validation of an Automated Classifier to Diagnose Acute Otitis Media in Children -
Fruit Juice Consumption and Strategies to Address Pediatric Obesity
A new systematic review and meta-analysis supports recommendations to limit 100% fruit juice consumption for children and adults to prevent weight gain. JAMA Pediatrics Editor in Chief Dimitri Christakis, MD, and JAMA Pediatrics Associate Editor Alison Galbraith, MD, discuss strategies to address pediatric and adolescent obesity with Thomas Robinson, MD, MPH, of Stanford University.
Related Content:
Consumption of 100% Fruit Juice and Body Weight in Children and Adults -
HPV Vaccination and Strategies to Improve Uptake
New research shows that HPV vaccination rates have increased, and interventions targeted to parents and health care professionals can improve rates. JAMA Pediatrics Editor in Chief Dimitri Christakis, MD, and JAMA Pediatrics Associate Editor Alison Galbraith, MD, discuss strategies to increase HPV vaccination with Melissa Gilkey, PhD, of the University of North Carolina's Gillings School of Global Public Health.
Related Content:
Multilevel Implementation Strategies for Adolescent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Uptake Trends in HPV Vaccination Before Age 13 Years in the US National Immunization Survey–Teen -
Safety and Effectiveness of Maternal and Child COVID-19 Vaccination
Two recent studies find that COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is safe for infants and effective for children aged 1-4 years. JAMA Pediatrics Editor in Chief Dimitri Christakis, MD, and JAMA Pediatrics Associate Editor Alison Galbraith, MD, discuss clinical and policy implications with Grace Lee, MD, MPH, professor of Pediatrics at Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Related Content:
Newborn and Early Infant Outcomes Following Maternal COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy Effectiveness of Monovalent mRNA Vaccines Against Omicron XBB Infection in Singaporean Children Younger Than 5 Years -
Screen Time Exposure at Age 1 Year and Developmental Delay at Ages 2 and 4 Years
Screen use by children is common and can affect child development, with effects varying by age and developmental domain. JAMA Pediatrics Editor in Chief Dimitri Christakis, MD, and JAMA Pediatrics Associate Editor Alison A. Galbraith, MD, discuss evidence about screen use across childhood and strategies to reduce negative impacts with Sheri Madigan, PhD, RPsych, of the University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Related Content:
Screen Time at Age 1 Year and Communication and Problem-Solving Developmental Delay at 2 and 4 Years -
Gun Violence and Injury Prevention
Firearm suicide takes the lives of thousands of US youths annually, and the economic burden of youth violence is high, especially from male firearm homicides. JAMA Pediatrics Editor in Chief Dimitri Christakis, MD, and JAMA Pediatrics Associate Editor Alison A. Galbraith, MD, discuss the burden of gun violence and prevention of firearm-related injuries with JAMA Network Open Editor Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH, of the Seattle Children’s Hospital.
Related Content:
Years of Life Lost to Firearm Suicide Among Young People in the US Economic Burden of US Youth Violence Injuries
Customer Reviews
Bias and cognitive dissonance still rampant
Just listened to the August episode about fluoride in pregnant women and found it fascinating how they compared it to the “anti vaxxers” and Andrew Wakefield’s paper. Anyone who has researched the issue knows that what that paper stated has now been replicated many times over. Isn’t it the definition of hypocritical to say that you used to think it was junk science but now would advice pregnant women to drink bottled water after this paper... while still talking about those hesitant about vaccines as though they’re “crazy”? Have we learned nothing? We all know that there is science on both sides of the vaccine issue- as there is with fluoride. Do you really want to be on the wrong side of history there too? I encourage you to mind your affirmative comments and remember “tobacco” science. It’s the same with fluoride. The same company that killed thousands with vioxx is also making vaccines but cannot be sued. Be careful what you say this episode may come back to bite you one day.
Top Podcasts In Health & Fitness