You, me & the UPC

Bristows LLP

Bristows' patent litigation experts unpack key UPC decisions, explore their implications, and share practical strategies to help your business navigate the UPC with confidence.Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.

  1. Case by Case | Court of Appeal confirms Local Divisions’ discretion in value in dispute assessments

    vor 3 Tagen ·  Bonus

    Case by Case | Court of Appeal confirms Local Divisions’ discretion in value in dispute assessments

    Helin Kaya walks you through a Court of Appeal (CoA) decision today. In which it issued an order dismissing Speed Care’s request for discretionary review concerning the value in dispute set by the Hamburg Local Division (LD) in proceedings concerning EP 2 077 811.  Want to learn more about the UPC, visit our UPC case tracker today. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com. Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.

    3 Min.
  2. Case by Case | Mannheim Local Division grants injunction against Disney in respect of InterDigital’s video streaming patent

    vor 3 Tagen ·  Bonus

    Case by Case | Mannheim Local Division grants injunction against Disney in respect of InterDigital’s video streaming patent

    On 16 June 2026, the Mannheim Local Division (LD), granted relief, including an injunction, against the Defendants (Disney) in respect of InterDigital’s (IDC) EP 2 465 265, a patent relating to intra chroma encoding and decoding of video data. Listen to Nadine Bleach's summary of the decision decision today. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com. Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.

    4 Min.
  3. Case by case | Court of Appeal Confirms Security for Costs Obligations Apply to SMEs

    26. Juni ·  Bonus

    Case by case | Court of Appeal Confirms Security for Costs Obligations Apply to SMEs

    On 1 June 2026, the Court of Appeal confirmed that a claimant's status as a small or medium-sized enterprise does not exempt it from the obligation to provide security for costs under r. 158 RoP, dismissing an appeal by La Siddhi Consultancy Limited against a €75,000 security order made in revocation proceedings before the Milan Central Division. Listen to Lucy Sewter's overview of the decision today. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com. Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.

    3 Min.
  4. Case by Case | Court of Appeal clarifies decision by default against appellants who fail to provide security for costs

    26. Juni ·  Bonus

    Case by Case | Court of Appeal clarifies decision by default against appellants who fail to provide security for costs

    Lucy Sewter walks you through a Court of Appeal decision in this episode.  The decision was issued by default against Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy, dismissing its appeal against the Paris Central Division's revocation of EP 2 671 173 in its entirety. The decision serves as a reminder of the consequences of non-compliance with security for costs orders. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com. Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.

    3 Min.
  5. Case by Case | Lisbon Local Division provides guidance on revocation of expired patents and online infringement

    19. Juni ·  Bonus

    Case by Case | Lisbon Local Division provides guidance on revocation of expired patents and online infringement

    Jonathan Ross explores a Lisbon Local Division (LD) decision today.  They found that Ericsson had successfully established infringement of its Wi-Fi related patent EP 2 819 131 against AsusTek. The case concerned laptops and notebooks incorporating Intel Wi‑Fi 6 and Wi‑Fi 6E modules. Ericsson alleged that AsusTek infringed through its various European‑facing websites. AsusTek counterclaimed for revocation and denied infringement, arguing both that the patent was invalid and that it was not responsible for the relevant acts relied upon by Ericsson. Visit our UPC case tracker to stay up to date on all things UPC. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com. Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.

    4 Min.
  6. Case by Case | Hamburg Local Division penalises defendants for website and marketplace offerings despite disclaimers

    12. Juni

    Case by Case | Hamburg Local Division penalises defendants for website and marketplace offerings despite disclaimers

    Maria Ryan talks you through a Hamburg Local Division (LD) decision today. The Hamburg LD ordered penalty payments of EUR 58,800 against two defendants for non‑compliance with a final order. The order for payment follows a preliminary injunction granted in October 2025 in favour of Occlutech GmbH, in which the defendants, Lepu Medical, were prohibited from offering, placing on the market or using (or importing or storing for those purposes) certain braided occlusion devices in a number of countries (Germany, France, Italy, The Netherlands and Ireland). Stay up-to-date on all things UPC by exploring our UPC case tracker. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com. Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.

    4 Min.
  7. Case by Case | Düsseldorf Local Division grants Yangtze Confidentiality Order against itself to comply with US export controls

    12. Juni ·  Bonus

    Case by Case | Düsseldorf Local Division grants Yangtze Confidentiality Order against itself to comply with US export controls

    On 11 May 2026, the Düsseldorf LD issued an order in the ongoing proceedings between Yangtze Memory Technologies (Yangtze) and Micron Technology (Micron). Yangtze is suing Micron for infringement of EP 3 909 047, which relates to advanced semiconductor memory technology. Ewan MacAulay explores the case in detail. Listen now! Interested in learning more about UPC cases. Check out our UPC case tracker. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com. Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.

    3 Min.
  8. Case by Case | Brussels Local Division sets costs ceiling for PI proceedings and clarifies waiver and interpretation of cost rules

    5. Juni

    Case by Case | Brussels Local Division sets costs ceiling for PI proceedings and clarifies waiver and interpretation of cost rules

    On 7 May 2026, the Brussels LD issued a cost decision under r. 150 RoP arising from Preliminary Injunction (PI) proceedings (UPC_CFI_582/2024) and related appeal proceedings (UPC_CoA_317/2025 and UPC_CoA_376/2025) concerning EP 3 732 827. Barco’s PI requests had been dismissed at both instances for lack of urgency. Lucy Sewter dives into the details of this decision in today's episode.  Interested in other UPC cases? Check out our new UPC case tracker today! If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com. Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.

    3 Min.
Alle anzeigen (80)

Info

Bristows' patent litigation experts unpack key UPC decisions, explore their implications, and share practical strategies to help your business navigate the UPC with confidence.Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.

Informationen

  • Erstellt von
    Bristows LLP
  • Jahre aktiv
    2023 - 2026
  • Folgen
    80
  • Bewertung
    Unbedenklich
  • Copyright
    © 2026 Bristows LLP
  • Sendungswebsite
    You, me & the UPC

Das gefällt dir vielleicht auch