RevDem Podcast

Review of Democracy

RevDem Podcast is brought to you by the Review of Democracy, the online journal of the CEU Democracy Institute. The Review of Democracy is dedicated to the reinvigoration, survival, and prosperity of democracies worldwide and to generating innovative cross-regional dialogues. RevDem Podcast offers in-depth conversations in four main areas: rule of law, political economy and inequalities, the history of ideas, and democracy and culture.

  1. Why Politicians Talk About Migration Instead of Markets

    vor 1 Std.

    Why Politicians Talk About Migration Instead of Markets

    Migration is usually discussed as a question of borders, identity, or national security. This angle might obscure other more fundamental aspects. The real question to poseis not simply who moves, but how decades of marketization transformed both labor and the politics of fear. These ideas were at the heart of Atilla Melegh’s presentation at the the Democracy Institute Annual Conference, held in Budapest on June 25- 26. With the title Imaginary Exhaustion?, this event asked to what extenttoday’s democracies are trapped by fear and exhaustion and how we might rebuild our collective imagination to shape more hopeful democratic futures. Meleghspoke in the panel The People We Fear: Demography, Migration, and Civilizational Anxiety. His central claim is that migration has become one of the defining contradictions of our age. Whilst mobility itself is not new, decades of marketization turned labor into a global commodity. In Eastern Europe particularly, the transitionto capitalism produced social dislocation, mass emigration, which in turn lead to what he calls ” an ontological insecurity”. These transformations, rather than migration alone, created fertile ground for anti-migrant nationalism. Our conversation develops these arguments further. Firstly, Melegh situates the post-socialist transition within a broader global history of neoliberalism.Both East and West gradually abandoned the idea of reforming social institutions in favor of market fundamentalism. Then, he explains how economicanxieties were displaced onto migrants, allowing political elites to personalize structural contradictions instead of confronting them. Our conversation also examines the transformation of demography into what he calls a ”science of population management”. As a solution, we need more criticaldemography that reconnects migration, labor markets, social reproduction, and human rights. Rather than treating migration as the problem, Melegh invites usto rethink the economic institutions that have made it the central political question of our time.

    52 Min.
  2. Postcolonial? – How Does the House of History Confront Europe’s Colonial Past and the “Colonial Matrix of Power”? Part II

    vor 4 Tagen

    Postcolonial? – How Does the House of History Confront Europe’s Colonial Past and the “Colonial Matrix of Power”? Part II

    This spring, the House of European History – a flagship museum of the European Parliament – has opened a temporary exhibition under the title Postcolonial?that features unique artworks, historical objects, and personal stories. Knowing the multifaceted and controversial legacies of European colonialism and being aware of just how closely intertwined the European integration project and thehistory of decolonization have been, this amounts to a significant and urgent intervention. The exhibition asks explicitly how Europeans preserved their power as their empires collapsed and aims to show how the “colonial matrix of power” continues to shape the world we live in. The exhibition ultimately ambitions no less than to help us rethink what it means to be European – and thus raises a host of essential and challenging questions.  Our podcast features two of the exhibition’s main curators – Kieran Burns and Ayoko Mensah – and two eminent experts in colonial history, postcolonial theory, and questions of European and postcolonial memory – Diana Natermann and Aline Sierp. Moderated by Ferenc Laczó, they jointly examine this crucial new exhibition in depth – and consider what it means to have such an exhibition at the heart of the EU today. The first part of the podcast explored some of the mostthought-provoking parts of the exhibition. This second part focuses on the links between the main themes of the exhibition and the history of European integration; asks whether there might be a risk here ofoffering a dichotomous and too moralizing reading of history; and considers what a thorough rethinking in the light of colonial history of how to be European today would imply – and what might be most in need of revision in theHouse of European History itself in accordance with that process of rethinking.

    42 Min.
  3. Postcolonial? – How Does the House of European History Confront Europe’s Colonial Past and the “Colonial Matrix of Power”? Part I

    2. Juli

    Postcolonial? – How Does the House of European History Confront Europe’s Colonial Past and the “Colonial Matrix of Power”? Part I

    This spring, the House of European History – a flagship museum of the European Parliament – has opened a temporary exhibition under the title Postcolonial?that features unique artworks, historical objects, and personal stories. Knowing the multifaceted and controversial legacies of European colonialism and being aware of just how closely intertwined the European integration project and thehistory of decolonization have been, this amounts to a significant and urgent intervention. The exhibition asks explicitly how Europeans preserved their power as their empires collapsed and aims to show how the “colonial matrix of power” continues to shape the world we live in. The exhibition ultimately ambitions no less than to help us rethink what it means to be European – and thus raises a host of essential and challenging questions.  Our podcast features two of the exhibition’s main curators – Kieran Burns and Ayoko Mensah – and two eminent experts in colonial history, postcolonial theory, and questions of European and postcolonial memory – Diana Natermann and Aline Sierp. Moderated by Ferenc Laczó, they jointly examine this crucial new exhibition in depth – and consider what it means to have such an exhibition at the heart of the EU today. This first part of the podcast explores some of the most thought-provoking parts of the exhibition: it discusses how the curators selected the artworks, objects, and stories to be featured in the exhibition and reflects on the ways theexhibition builds on current scholarship – and why its makers decided to place a clear emphasis on how Europeans largely preserved their power even as their empires collapsed. The second part will focus on the links between the main themes of the exhibition and the history of European integration. The episodes are based on a panel that was held at Maastricht University’s Brussels Hub on May 11, 2025, and was generously supported by the Arts, Media and Culture research group of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences.

    43 Min.
  4. Challenging Archives, Episode 2: The Apartment Universities in Czechoslovakia

    29. Juni

    Challenging Archives, Episode 2: The Apartment Universities in Czechoslovakia

    Challenging Archives is a new series of podcasts jointly organized between Review of Democracy and BlinkenOpen Society Archives, based in Budapest. We will invite scholars to discuss about their investigation in this archive. The Blinken Open Society Archives, or the OSA, is a complex archival institution. On one hand, it is a repository of vast collections that document how power operated across the twentieth century. OSA holds 10,000 linear meters ofarchival material, 17,000 hours of audiovisual recordings, and 15 TB of digital records, as well as 150,000 photographs, 6000+ documentary film titles and 22,000 library items. Their catalogue is available online. OSA is not only an archive. It is one of Europe’s leading research centers on the history of the Cold War, statesocialism, human rights, and surveillance. The OSA Archivum also provides fellowships for promising researchers that want to investigate the archival funds. Particularly the Visegrad Fellowship supports scholars, engaged artists, journalists, scholars at risk who want to work directly with these materials.Since its start in 2010, the Visegrad Scholarship has been awarded to more than 290 fellows from over 65 countries. In our series, we will invite the Visegrad Fellows that will share us their experience with working with this fascinating archive.   In our second episode, we explore the permeability of theIron Curtain. Politically, the divide was real. Yet unofficially, ideas, books and people kept finding small cracks to slip through. This paradox, in turn, led György Péteri to argue that, at least from a cultural perspective, the metaphor of the Iron Curtain should be replaced by that of a Nylon Curtain. In our conversation, we focus on a fascinating storythat started in 1978, when the Czech dissident Julius Tomin sent a letter to Oxford, Harvard, Freiburg and the Freie  Universität Berlin. Within this text, he described the hardships endured by Czech academics. The response came quickly.  Some philosophers responded and decided to travel to Czechoslovakia. They arrived with the intention to teach philosophy. Asthey could not lecture within the university premises, scholars moved instead in private apartments. Visiting academics, including Jacques Derrida, held apartment seminars that became not only space of intellectual academy but alsothe foundation of later dissident networks. As Bethan Winter argues in our podcast, these seminarsbecame much more than acts of symbolic solidarity. Over time, they contributed to the formation of broader dissident and intellectual networks that connected Eastern European opposition circles with Western academics and institutions. She also emphasizes throughout this case that détente was not only negotiated by diplomats and statesmen, but also enacted from below through personal relationships, educational exchanges, and fragile forms of intellectualcooperation. Throughout her Visegrad Fellowship at the OSA Archivumin Budapest, she reconstructed this remarkable story. In our podcast, she discusses her archival findings on the apartmentseminars, particularly a specific folder on Julius Tomin and Zdena Tominova, where she found documents about their police harassment, articles written in support of them, but also articles written by themselves and published in the West. Other broader topics completed her work: fileson Czechoslovak culture⁠, Czechoslovak dissidents, links between Czechoslovakia and the West, which opened broader questions about cultural and intellectual exchanges. Together, these sources illuminate not only the history of the apartment seminars, but also the wider networks through which ideas continued to circulate across Cold War Europe.

    30 Min.
  5. Challenging Archives, Episode 1: Hungarian-Language Theaters in Socialist Romania

    22. Juni

    Challenging Archives, Episode 1: Hungarian-Language Theaters in Socialist Romania

    Challenging Archives is a new series of podcasts jointly organized between Review of Democracy and Blinken Open Society Archives, based in Budapest. We will invite scholars to discuss about their investigation in this archive. The Blinken Open Society Archives (OSA), is a complex archival institution. On one hand, it is a repository of vast collections that document how power operated across the twentieth century. OSA holds 10,000 linear meters of archival material, 17,000 hours of audiovisual recordings, and 15 TB of digital records, as well as 150,000 photographs, 6000+ documentary film titles and 22,000 library items. Their catalogue is available online. OSA is not only an archive. It is one of Europe’s leading research centers on the history of the Cold War, state socialism, human rights, and surveillance. The OSA Archivum also provides fellowships for promising researchers that want to investigate the archival funds. Particularly the Visegrad Fellowship supports scholars, engaged artists, journalists, scholars at risk who want to work directly with these materials. Since its start in 2010, the Visegrad Scholarship has been awarded to more than 290 fellows from over 65 countries. In our series, we will invite the Visegrad Fellows to share us their experience with working with this fascinating archive. In our first episode, we discuss about Hungarian-language theater in socialist Romania with Eszter Szabó-Reznek. Her case offers a unique perspective into how ideology, culture, and bureaucracy intertwined. Eszter Szabó-Reznek is currently an Associate Lecturer at the University of Bucharest. She was a New Europe College Fellow in Bucharest. Her area of expertise is the social and economic history of cultural institutions, with a particular focus on Hungarian and Romanian theater.

    38 Min.
  6. The Ancient World Mobilized for Hate: A Conversation with Curtis Dozier

    18. Juni

    The Ancient World Mobilized for Hate: A Conversation with Curtis Dozier

    Ancient Greece and Rome are often celebrated as the foundations of Western civilization, democracy, and political thought. But what happens when these revered historical traditions are mobilized to legitimize exclusionary and authoritarian politics? In this episode of the Review of Democracy podcast, we speak with Curtis Dozier, author of The White Pedestal – How White Nationalists Use Ancient Greece and Rome to Justify Hate (Yale University Press, 2026), about the enduring political power of classical antiquity. Drawing on years of research into extremist appropriations of the ancient world, Dozier explains why white nationalists are so drawn to Greece and Rome, how concepts such as race, hierarchy, decline, and Western civilization are anchored in selective readings of the classical past, and why these interpretations resonate far beyond the political fringes. The conversation explores the surprising continuities between extremist and mainstream narratives about antiquity, the role of historical prestige in legitimizing political projects, and the ways in which the classical tradition has been used to justify slavery, imperialism, exclusion, and domination. At the same time, Dozier reflects on the responsibilities of historians and classicists today, arguing for a reorientation of the field that takes seriously the political afterlives of ancient texts and foregrounds the diverse experiences often excluded from traditional accounts. This is a timely discussion about the uses and abuses of history, the construction of collective identities, and the urgent need to think critically about how the past continues to shape our present. Curtis Dozier is an Associate Professor and Chair of Greek and Roman Studies at Vassar College. He is also the Director of Pharos: Doing Justice to the Classics.

    43 Min.
  7. Georgia’s Struggle Between Democracy and Autocracy – In Conversation with Ghia Nodia

    15. Juni

    Georgia’s Struggle Between Democracy and Autocracy – In Conversation with Ghia Nodia

    In our latest episode of the special series produced in partnership with the Journal of Democracy, we discuss the recent article by Ghia Nodia, entitled “Georgia: Between Democracy and Autocracy” (Journal of Democracy, Vol. 37, No.2, April 2026) Over the last couple of years, Georgia has frequently been in foreign news due to two related issues. Firstly, in 2024, the current Georgian government, after a failed initial attempt, has adopted the law “On Transparency of Foreign Influence,” thereby joining a global trend of countries adopting so-called “Foreign Agents Laws.” While facially claiming to protect a country against threats posed by foreign interference, such laws are often used by governments with authoritarian tendencies to suppress their country’s civil society. The second related issue is the long protests of Georgian civil society against the authoritarian tendencies of the incumbent party, Georgian Dream. Georgia is known for its vibrant and active civil society, which has often shown its willingness to take to the streets and confront its government. In a recent article in the Journal of Democracy, Ghia Nodia analyzes the hybridity of the Georgian state resulting from these opposing tendencies and asks in which direction the country is headed: Democracy or Autocracy. Ghia Nodia is a professor of political science at Ilia State University and director of the Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy, and Development in Tbilisi, Georgia. He is a member of the Editorial Board of the Journal of Democracy. In 2008, Prof. Nodia served as Georgia’s Minister of Education and Science.

    47 Min.

Info

RevDem Podcast is brought to you by the Review of Democracy, the online journal of the CEU Democracy Institute. The Review of Democracy is dedicated to the reinvigoration, survival, and prosperity of democracies worldwide and to generating innovative cross-regional dialogues. RevDem Podcast offers in-depth conversations in four main areas: rule of law, political economy and inequalities, the history of ideas, and democracy and culture.

Das gefällt dir vielleicht auch