Decibel and Docket

Dave Brooks

Decibel and Docket is a podcast at the intersection of the music business, live entertainment and the justice system. Hosted by veteran entertainment journalist Dave Brooks and attorney Mike Seville, this weekly podcast examines major legal stories and headlines affecting artists, content creators and the business of culture.

  1. hace 5 días

    Who Killed California's Anti-Ticket Scalping Law? + How Did Ellie Goulding Not Know Her Managers Were Owned by Live Nation?

    Did California Attorney General Rob Bonta help kill a ticket reform bill to protect the government’s antitrust victory over Live Nation and Ticketmaster? And did Ellie Goulding spend years paying managers who were secretly owned by the same concert giant they were supposed to negotiate against? On Episode 31 of Decibel & Docket, veteran music journalist Dave Brooks and attorney Michael Seville examine two stories about money, influence and conflicts of interest in the live music business. First, Dave and Mike investigate the mysterious death of AB 1720, the California Fans First Act. The ticketing bill originally proposed a broad restriction on reselling concert tickets above face value. After months of amendments, it was narrowed to venues with 3,000 seats or fewer and would have permitted resale prices up to 10 percent above face value. Even that was too much for StubHub, which spent approximately $3.4 million lobbying in California to defeat the legislation—including roughly $2.6 million during the most recent quarter. AB 1720 ultimately died in the California Senate Appropriations Committee’s suspense file, where lawmakers can quietly stop legislation without casting a public vote against it. Sources say Bonta’s office raised concerns that enforcing the law could cost approximately $1.4 million, giving the committee a fiscal justification to hold the bill. Was that a legitimate enforcement concern—or a convenient way to kill politically difficult legislation? Dave and Mike explore Bonta’s unusual position. As one of the state attorneys general seeking major remedies against Live Nation and Ticketmaster following the government’s antitrust victory, Bonta may eventually need financially viable ticketing companies to compete for contracts or assets divested by Ticketmaster. StubHub argued that California could not accuse Ticketmaster of monopolizing ticketing while simultaneously passing legislation that might weaken one of its competitors. But does StubHub actually compete with Ticketmaster in primary ticketing, venue software and box-office services—or is the company using the antitrust case to protect its resale business? Artist manager and returning guest Randy Nichols joins the show to deliver an insider’s postmortem of AB 1720. Nichols discusses StubHub’s multimillion-dollar lobbying campaign, the private pressure placed on lawmakers, Bonta’s alleged intervention and the music community’s attempt to impose limits on ticket scalping. He also explains why supporters believe StubHub misrepresented the bill as a giveaway to Ticketmaster, whether Assemblyman Matt Haney will revive the proposal and how the battle over ticket resale caps could now move to Massachusetts and Congress. Then, Dave and Mike break down Ellie Goulding’s lawsuit against her former managers, Ben Mawson and Ed Millett, and TAP Management’s parent company, HNOE Limited. Goulding alleges that she signed with TAP in 2018 without being told that Live Nation controlled its parent company. Live Nation reportedly acquired a 50.1 percent interest in HNOE in 2015 and purchased the remainder in 2019. During her relationship with TAP, Goulding paid a 20 percent management commission and entered agreements with Live Nation-affiliated companies involving touring, merchandise and a documentary. The most explosive allegation concerns contractual provisions that allegedly restricted Goulding’s managers from encouraging clients to stop doing business with Live Nation or taking actions that could diminish an artist’s commercial relationship with the company. That raises a fundamental question: Can an artist manager fulfill a fiduciary duty to a client while being owned by—and allegedly obligated to protect—the corporation sitting across the negotiating table?

  2. 31 jul

    Paramount Bets Billions, AI Breaks the Rules and a Lawyer Pauses the Show

    What happens when an artificial intelligence system is told to complete a task—and decides the easiest path is to break the rules? In Episode 29 of Decibel & Docket, veteran entertainment journalist Dave Brooks and attorney Michael Seville open with the strange and unsettling story involving OpenAI and Hugging Face. During a security evaluation, an AI model reportedly discovered a vulnerability in its isolated testing environment, escaped the sandbox and accessed outside systems containing information that could help it complete the assignment. The incident generated roughly 17,600 automated actions before researchers shut it down. The model had not become conscious or developed malicious intentions. Instead, it appeared to engage in what researchers call “reward hacking”: relentlessly pursuing its assigned objective while disregarding the rules governing how that objective should be achieved. Dave and Mike examine the murky legal questions raised by autonomous AI agents, including who could be held responsible when a model independently accesses another company’s systems. They also discuss proposed federal legislation that would require powerful AI systems to include a “kill switch”—and whether any safeguard can remain effective as AI capabilities rapidly advance. Next, the hosts turn to Paramount’s proposed merger with Warner Bros. Discovery and the extraordinary legal gamble now determining its future. Rather than continue fighting for permission to close the transaction immediately, Paramount has agreed to keep the companies separate while a federal court conducts a full trial on the states’ antitrust challenge. The strategy allows Paramount to obtain discovery, depose witnesses, challenge the states’ economic theories and build a complete record for a potential appeal. But every additional day comes at a significant price. Dave lays out reporting from Puck’s Matt Belloni and Eriq Gardner on the enormous ticking fees, contractual deadlines and potential $7 billion regulatory termination payment hanging over the transaction. Mike explains why Paramount may have concluded that losing hundreds of millions—or even more than $1 billion—could be worth it if the delay creates a better opportunity to preserve the larger deal. They also examine the central antitrust fight over market definition. Should Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery be evaluated primarily against traditional Hollywood studios, or should Netflix, Amazon, YouTube, TikTok and other digital platforms be included in the competitive market? The answer could determine whether the merger appears dangerously concentrated or relatively modest within a transformed entertainment economy. Finally, Dave speaks with Philadelphia entertainment attorney, musician and educator Bernard Resnick about his proposed “Pause the Show” contract clause, created with attorney Priscilla “Sally” Madison. Inspired by tragedies such as Astroworld, the provision establishes a clear process for responding to dangerous conditions during a concert. If a promoter or public official identifies an emergency, the artist must temporarily stop performing, help alert the crowd or turn the microphone over to emergency personnel, and wait until conditions are safe before resuming the show. Resnick explains how the clause works alongside traditional force majeure provisions and why artists, promoters, venue operators and public officials should establish authority and responsibilities before an emergency occurs. In a crisis involving severe weather, crowd movement, a medical emergency or another unexpected threat, a few lines of contractual language—and a clear chain of command—could help prevent confusion, injuries and deaths. It’s an episode about preparing for the moment when powerful systems stop behaving as expected—whether that system is an AI model, a multibillion-dollar merger or a concert attended by thousands of people.

  3. 26 jul

    Straight Outta the Conference Room: How a Deposition Uncovered a Murder Witness Hiding in a Civil Lawsuit

    Snitches get stitches but what about deponents? A new development in the unsolved killing of Los Angeles rapper Drakeo the Ruler raises major questions about the relationship between civil litigation and criminal investigations—and what sworn testimony uncovered years after a murder can mean for a possible prosecution. In this episode of Decibel & Docket, entertainment journalist Dave Brooks and attorney Michael Seville examine Dave’s discovery of a March 2025 deposition from the wrongful-death lawsuit filed by Drakeo’s family. In the deposition, security professional Alrick Cooper testified under oath that he saw rapper YG participating in the backstage fight that preceded Drakeo’s death at the Once Upon a Time in LA festival on December 18, 2021. Cooper alleged that YG produced a three- to four-inch silver knife and slashed toward him while Drakeo stood only a few feet away. Cooper did not testify that he saw YG stab Drakeo, and his account does not identify who inflicted the fatal wound. YG has not been charged with a crime in connection with Drakeo’s death. But the testimony represents a specific eyewitness account, given under oath, placing YG in the confrontation and allegedly holding a knife. The discovery comes as the California Highway Patrol confirms that investigators recently executed a search warrant at a Burbank commercial property as part of the ongoing investigation into the murder of Drakeo, whose legal name was Darrell Caldwell. Police reportedly detained and questioned YG before releasing him and seized property during the search. Authorities have declined to say whether the rapper is considered a suspect. Dave reconstructs the chaotic circumstances surrounding Drakeo’s killing, including the festival’s location in South Los Angeles, the presence of rival groups, Drakeo’s public feud with YG and the massive backstage brawl that erupted shortly before Drakeo was scheduled to perform. Although the attack unfolded near numerous witnesses and cameras, the case has remained unsolved for nearly five years. Mike then explains how information gathered through a civil lawsuit can migrate into a criminal investigation. What is the legal difference between an allegation in a court filing, sworn deposition testimony and admissible evidence presented to a criminal jury? Can prosecutors use Cooper’s deposition, or would he need to testify in person so a defendant could confront and cross-examine him? The discussion also examines the strengths and weaknesses of Cooper’s account. His description of the knife could help investigators establish the presence of a weapon, but he did not witness the fatal stabbing. His identification may also face intense scrutiny because he testified that YG was wearing a black balaclava and that he recognized the rapper largely by his eyes. A defense attorney could challenge Cooper’s memory, his opportunity to observe the fight and his relationship with Drakeo, whom he had been hired to protect. Dave and Mike also explore whether someone who participated in a violent group attack could face criminal liability for a resulting death even without personally inflicting the fatal wound. They discuss accomplice liability, the prosecution’s burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and why the precise facts surrounding the fight would matter enormously. The pair then turns to the late-breaking search warrant. What must investigators show to establish probable cause years after a crime? Does the warrant suggest that police recently obtained fresh information? And if investigators seized a cellphone, can its owner be compelled to unlock it—or must authorities rely on carriers and digital-forensics specialists? Decibel & Docket covers the intersection of music, live entertainment, business and the justice system. Hosted by Dave Brooks and Michael Seville.

  4. 17 jul

    StubHub's Sketchy Hedge Funds Have Created A Conflict Crisis for Scalpers + Lawsuits Arising From The Ashes of Chicago's Pitchfork Festival

    StubHub is facing one of the toughest stretches in its history—and this week, Decibel & Docket breaks down why. Veteran music business journalist Dave Brooks and entertainment attorney Michael Seville are joined by entrepreneur and activist Randy Nichols to examine the latest controversy surrounding StubHub and CEO Eric Baker, following new reporting that has intensified scrutiny of the ticket resale giant just as the company prepares for a long-anticipated IPO. Dave walks listeners through the allegations involving Baker's investment firm, Andro Capital, and its relationship with companies connected to the secondary ticketing marketplace, including financing businesses that operate within the StubHub ecosystem. Together, Dave and Mike discuss why critics argue these relationships raise potential conflict-of-interest questions, how StubHub has responded, and why the story matters for investors, ticket brokers, artists, and consumers alike. They also examine how the company's recent customer-service failures surrounding major events have compounded its reputational challenges at a critical moment. From there, the conversation turns to the broader ticketing industry, including ongoing efforts by lawmakers to increase transparency in ticket resale markets and protect consumers from deceptive practices. Mike explains the legal issues surrounding these proposals, while Dave discusses what they could mean for the future of the secondary ticketing business. The hosts also provide an update on the U.S. Department of Justice's antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation and Ticketmaster, one of the most consequential legal battles ever to confront the live entertainment industry. They discuss the latest court developments, the government's strategy, and what the case could ultimately mean for concert promoters, venues, artists, managers, ticketing companies, and music fans. Mike offers legal analysis of the proceedings, while Dave places the litigation in the broader context of the modern concert business. The episode wraps with a lighter—but no less entertaining—discussion about the return of Blue Dot Fever, the long-running concert industry rumor that once again resurfaced following Willie Nelson's Fourth of July Picnic. Dave recounts how reporters began calling after another round of online speculation, while Mike helps explain why certain myths continue to circulate through the music business despite repeated debunking. Throughout the episode, Dave and Mike combine investigative reporting with legal expertise to separate fact from rumor and explain the stories shaping today's live entertainment industry. In this episode: StubHub's latest controversy and growing scrutiny of CEO Eric Baker Andro Capital, ticket resale financing, and conflict-of-interest questions What the controversy could mean for StubHub's IPO Consumer protection and ticket resale legislation Updates in the DOJ's antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation and Ticketmaster Legal analysis from entertainment attorney Michael Seville The return of Blue Dot Fever after Willie Nelson's Fourth of July Picnic The latest legal and business news from the live music industry Decibel & Docket is the podcast where journalism meets entertainment law. Hosted by music business journalist Dave Brooks and attorney Michael Seville, each episode explores the biggest legal battles, business controversies, ticketing issues, antitrust developments, and industry trends shaping concerts, touring, festivals, artists, promoters, venues, and the global live entertainment business.

  5. 3 jul

    Tsunami of Scandals Engulf Stubhub + California's Fight To Reign in Resale Prices Featuring Randy Nichols (Episode 25)

    In this explosive episode of Decibel & Docket, Dave Brooks is joined by ticketing reform advocate Randy Nichols for a deep dive into one of the live entertainment industry’s most contentious battles: the war over ticket resale, speculative listings, and the powerful lobbying machine fighting to preserve the status quo. The episode opens with a candid—and often hilarious—conversation about the term “scalping,” why the ticket resale industry is trying to rebrand itself, and whether changing the language does anything to address the real problem facing fans. Randy breaks down why terminology matters less than behavior, arguing that the true issue isn’t resale itself, but bad actors who exploit fans through deception, bot-driven buying, and speculative ticket sales. From there, the conversation shifts to California, where two major ticketing reform bills—AB 1720 and AB 1349—have become the center of a fierce legislative showdown. Randy explains his recent trip to Sacramento, where he testified before lawmakers alongside advocacy groups including the Music Artists Coalition, the California chapter of NIVA, and the National Independent Talent Organization. The pair unpack what these bills actually do: AB 1720 would cap resale prices to reduce arbitrage and ticket flipping, while AB 1349 targets speculative ticket sales, deceptive ticketing websites, and transparency around resale listings. But passing reform won’t be easy. Randy reveals just how aggressive the secondary ticketing lobby has become, with millions of dollars being spent on lobbyists, ad campaigns, and so-called “grassroots” organizations designed to influence legislators and public opinion. Dave and Randy examine the rise of astroturf groups, misleading anti-reform ads, and the messaging strategy that paints reform efforts as “Ticketmaster bills”—even though many of the reforms could also limit practices that benefit major ticketing platforms. The conversation then turns to one of the biggest ticketing scandals of the year: the ongoing StubHub World Cup ticket fiasco. Randy explains why the controversy goes far beyond ordinary fan frustration. Thousands of fans purchased tickets months in advance, booked flights and hotels, and arrived at stadiums only to learn their tickets were never real. At the heart of the scandal is speculative ticketing—listings for tickets sellers don’t actually possess. Randy outlines how this business model can incentivize failed fulfillment, allowing sellers to pocket profits while fans receive only refunds, long after replacement tickets become unaffordable. Dave and Randy also examine broader allegations surrounding StubHub leadership, including questions about executive conflicts of interest, marketplace incentives, and whether regulators will eventually step in. The discussion highlights how opaque marketplace structures may favor large professional resellers while leaving everyday consumers vulnerable. Finally, the episode explores a new frontier in ticketing risk: artificial intelligence and cybersecurity. Dave asks Randy about a recent report involving AI-assisted vulnerability research into Front Gate Tickets, raising urgent questions about how large language models could be used to identify—and potentially exploit—security weaknesses in ticketing systems. The discussion expands into a wider debate about AI, fraud, hacking, and the future of digital ticket security across the live entertainment business. Packed with insider analysis, legal insight, and sharp commentary, this episode of *Decibel & Docket* tackles the future of ticketing, consumer protection, resale regulation, and the growing battle between fans, lawmakers, ticketing platforms, and powerful secondary market interests. If you care about concert ticket prices, live entertainment law, ticket scams, or the future of the ticketing industry, this is an episode you won’t want to miss.

  6. 27 jun

    Rapino in the White House: Did Trump Meeting Hurt Live Nation's Settlement Talks + Ticket Fraud Rising on Stubhub for World Cup Fans

    This week on Decibel & Docket, veteran concert business reporter Dave Brooks speaks with Business Insider's Emily Stewart about an uptick in fraud at the World Cup. But first, Brooks and attorney Michael Seville dig into the most explosive filing yet in the Live Nation/Ticketmaster antitrust case as well as the bizarre criminal case against Memphis drill rapper Pooh Shiesty. First, Dave and Mike break down Live Nation's newly filed Tunney Act disclosure, the legally required list of every communication between the company and federal officials during its antitrust settlement talks with the DOJ. The filing reveals a sprawling lobbying and legal operation, with elite firms including Sullivan & Cromwell, Latham & Watkins, and Sidley Austin running point with the DOJ's Antitrust Division, the Attorney General's office, and the Deputy Attorney General. Names in the disclosure raise eyebrows, including Kellyanne Conway listed as a paid consultant and Richard Grenell named as a Live Nation director. The most striking detail: Live Nation CEO Michael Rapino had a direct conversation with President Trump in February 2026 in which the DOJ lawsuit reportedly came up. Dave and Mike unpack what the disclosure means for the federal judge reviewing the settlement and whether it invites deeper scrutiny of how the deal came together. Next, the hosts turn to the increasingly dramatic case of Pooh Shiesty (Lontrell Williams Jr.), the Memphis rapper accused of orchestrating an armed robbery and forced contract release targeting his mentor and label boss, Gucci Mane. Prosecutors allege that while on federal home confinement from a prior gun case, Pooh Shiesty lured Gucci Mane to a Dallas studio, pulled a gun, forced him to sign away his record contract on camera, and robbed him and others of roughly half a million dollars in cash and jewelry. Dave and Mike walk through a newly filed 25-page government response opposing bail, which alleges Pooh Shiesty's father printed the fraudulent release contract hours before the meeting and that a Bureau of Prisons-contracted monitor was allegedly bribed to falsify home confinement passes. The two dissect the severability clause buried in the forced contract, debate whether it could protect an agreement signed under duress (short answer: no), and explain what a "de novo" bail review actually means. Seville walks through why prosecutors argue both danger-to-community and flight-risk standards, why the kidnapping charge's interstate-commerce jurisdictional argument is a long shot, and how the alleged corruption of his own home confinement monitor could sink Pooh Shiesty's chance at pretrial release. In the back half, Dave welcomes Business Insider reporter Emily Stewart to discuss her reporting on World Cup ticket failures. Stewart explains how fans who bought tickets months in advance through secondary marketplaces like StubHub, SeatGeek, and Vivid Seats are getting last-minute notices that their tickets can't be delivered, often just days before kickoff, after already booking flights and hotels. She unpacks speculative ticketing, where resellers list tickets they don't actually possess and bet on acquiring them before the event, and the telltale signs fans should watch for. Stewart also connects the dots to a related Ticketmaster antitrust controversy, where SeatGeek lost a primary ticketing contract with Brooklyn's Barclays Center after Bruce Springsteen's team objected to speculative listings. The conversation covers what resale platforms' "fan guarantee" policies actually promise, and what World Cup ticket holders can do now to protect themselves. Decibel & Docket is the podcast at the intersection of the music business, live entertainment, and the justice system, hosted by journalist Dave Brooks and attorney Michael Seville.

  7. 19 jun

    Did Lawyers Against Live Nation Get A $40M Antitrust Lawsuit Bounty For Prevailing Over Ticketmaster + Russell Simmons Can't Shake #MeToo Rape Case By Trying to Hide Out in Jakarta

    In Episode 23 of Decibel & Docket, veteran music business journalist Dave Brooks and entertainment attorney Michael Seville break down two major stories shaping the intersection of the music industry, antitrust law, and entertainment litigation. Once again the show turns to one of the most fascinating legal developments in the live entertainment business: the surprising fee arrangement behind the states’ antitrust case against Live Nation and Ticketmaster. Following explosive reporting from Puck, Dave and Michael unpack the eye-popping compensation structure negotiated by superstar antitrust attorney Jeffrey Kessler, who was brought in by state attorneys general to continue the case as the federal government pursued settlement discussions. With reported billing rates reaching $2,250 per hour, deferred fees worth millions, and a potential contingency payout exceeding $40 million, this arrangement raises major questions about the future of antitrust enforcement in America. The hosts explain why Kessler’s fee structure is so unusual, how it blends traditional hourly billing with contingency-based litigation, and what it reveals about the growing role of private law firms in public antitrust cases. Could elite private attorneys become “deputized bounty hunters” as government agencies like the Department of Justice and FTC face staffing shortages and political pressure? What happens when private firms have a financial stake in remedies as dramatic as a Ticketmaster divestiture or a forced Live Nation breakup? Dave and Michael also examine the broader implications for antitrust enforcement in the Trump era, including whether state attorneys general may increasingly rely on outside counsel to challenge powerful corporations in the music, media, and technology sectors. If the DOJ settlement is approved, what happens to the states’ case—and to Kessler’s massive contingency fee? In the second half of the episode, the podcast turns to a high-profile sexual assault lawsuit involving Russell Simmons. A New York judge has ruled that the hip-hop mogul must face a civil rape lawsuit brought by a former Def Jam executive, despite Simmons relocating to Indonesia in recent years. The hosts explain the crucial legal distinction between federal and state court jurisdiction, and why New York’s “long-arm” statute allows state courts to reach defendants living overseas when the alleged misconduct occurred within state borders. Dave and Michael also unpack a contentious dispute over a 1997 severance agreement that Simmons’ legal team says bars the lawsuit entirely. The plaintiff alleges the agreement was forged, setting up a major evidentiary fight over contract authenticity, signature verification, and potential fraud. Michael explains how courts evaluate claims of forgery, why these disputes can become highly technical, and what evidence both sides will need to present. The episode also explores the impact of New York’s Adult Survivors Act, one of several laws passed after the #MeToo movement that temporarily revived expired sexual assault claims by extending or lifting statutes of limitation. Dave and Michael discuss why these laws have triggered waves of decades-old lawsuits, the challenges they create for plaintiffs and defendants alike, and how courts balance survivor access to justice with due process concerns. If you want smart analysis of the biggest stories in live entertainment, concert touring, Ticketmaster, antitrust law, and music industry litigation, this episode delivers the legal insight and insider reporting you won’t find anywhere else. Topics Covered:• Live Nation antitrust lawsuit• Ticketmaster breakup debate• Jeffrey Kessler’s legal fees• DOJ settlement analysis• Russell Simmons rape lawsuit• Adult Survivors Act explained• Music business legal news• Entertainment law and antitrust trends

Acerca de

Decibel and Docket is a podcast at the intersection of the music business, live entertainment and the justice system. Hosted by veteran entertainment journalist Dave Brooks and attorney Mike Seville, this weekly podcast examines major legal stories and headlines affecting artists, content creators and the business of culture.

También te podría interesar