Necropolitics Covered

Briefly covering studies relating to necropolitics by sharing abstracts of key academic articles on the topic from all over the world. necropolitics.substack.com

  1. Whose turn is it? White diasporic and transnational practices and the necropolitics of the plantation and internment camps

    14 APR

    Whose turn is it? White diasporic and transnational practices and the necropolitics of the plantation and internment camps

    Palombo, L., 2007. Whose turn is it? White diasporic and transnational practices and the necropolitics of the plantation and internment camps. Critical Race and Whiteness Studies, 3. Abstract: The bordering of the Plantation Camps of the 1860s and Internment Camps of World War One (WW1) through the racialised biopolitical and necropolitical relations of the state of exception have controlled local shifts from the position of non-white and white ‘objects of labour’ to ‘political subjects’ or citizens of the nation. The borders of the Camps are violent colonial techniques that re-affirm an anglophilic form of white diasporic and transnational power. This process of instituting borders of control “outside the law” has operated to strengthen white anglophilic sovereignty and its participation and embeddedness in a “global” colonial project. These camps became permanent “exceptional”1 spatial arrangements that diversified but also continued the effects of the dislocation of Indigenous Australians. These camps continued the violent mechanisms that attempted to control Indigenous people’s “life and death” and that in Mbembe’s words have “civilize[d]” them as providers of free labour (see Perera 2002: para 11; Mbembe 2003: 14 This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit necropolitics.substack.com

    1 min
  2. 13 APR

    State of Exception, Necropolitics, and Puerto Rico: Naturalizing Disaster and Naturalizing Difference

    Khoshneviss, H. (2024) ‘State of Exception, Necropolitics, and Puerto Rico: Naturalizing Disaster and Naturalizing Difference’, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 35(1), pp. 75–89. doi: 10.1080/10455752.2023.2279957. Abstract: Right after Hurricane Irma hit Puerto Rico and Florida, Hurricane Maria made landfall in Puerto Rico in September 2017. Around the same time Harvey hit Texas. The vast difference in the treatment of Puerto Rico as a US territory, compared to Florida and Texas on the “mainland,” sparked conversations about the location of Puerto Rico in the US imagination and policies. The media coverage of the disaster and the statements from officials made it clear that while certain populations are protected and saved, certain others are abandoned and “let die.” To provide an explanation for these different treatments, I explore two “naturalizing” processes. First, I show how the historical construction of Puerto Ricans as “naturally” inferior disguised their century-long exploitation. Second, I examine how the framing of Hurricane Maria as a “natural” disaster on the one hand concealed historical interventions by the United States in Puerto Rico and on the other hand, ignored how disaster capitalism has caused an increase in the intensity and frequency of disasters. I suggest that state of exception and abandonment are two concepts that can provide an explanation about how these converging processes have made disasters the norm in the colony, rather than an anomaly. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit necropolitics.substack.com

    2 min
  3. The Biopolitics of Settler Colonialism: Right Here, Right Now

    10 APR

    The Biopolitics of Settler Colonialism: Right Here, Right Now

    Morgensen, S. L. (2011) ‘The Biopolitics of Settler Colonialism: Right Here, Right Now’, Settler Colonial Studies, 1(1), pp. 52–76. doi: 10.1080/2201473X.2011.10648801. Abstract: Settler colonialism is exemplary of the processes of biopower theorised by Giorgio Agamben and Michel Foucault. However, settler colonialism remains naturalised within theories of biopower and theories of its relation to coloniality. White supremacist settler colonisation produces specific modes of biopolitics that sustain not only in settler states but also in regimes of global governance that inherit, extend, and naturalise their power. I extend Patrick Wolfe’s theory that a ‘logic of elimination’ constitutes settler colonialism in the genocide and amalgamation of Indigenous peoples, by indicating that this also indigenises and naturalises white settler nations as projections of the West. Agamben’s work illuminates how Indigenous peoples are eliminated in a state of exception to Western law, which by functioning to erase consanguinity – as the patriarch in Roman law eliminates the defiant son - explains Indigenous peoples’ seemingly contradictory incorporation within and excision from the body of white settler nations. This biopolitical process specific to settler colonialism also structures the manner in which white settler societies demonstrably universalize Western law, both within their bounds and in global arenas. My call to denaturalise settler colonialism in social theory is but a first step towards broader study of how the biopolitics of settler colonialism structure current modes of biopower and require concerted critique at the intersections of Indigenous and settler colonial studies. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit necropolitics.substack.com

    2 min
  4. Welcome to 'Necropolitics Covered'

    SEASON 1 TRAILER

    Welcome to 'Necropolitics Covered'

    This is Necropolitics Covered. A mini audio series covering literature on necropolitics one abstract at a time. My name is Liv Roe. I'm a former elected member of the New Zealand local government, with a Master's in Political Science from Victoria University of Wellington, where my dissertation focused on necropolitics. While doing my post-grad research, I noticed that not a lot of people around me, even the politically savvy, haven’t even heard about it. I supposed it might have something to do with the fact that compared to many political theories that are centuries old, Achille Mbembe's concept of necropolitics was relatively young, only emerging in the early 2000’s. So, in this series I aim to address that gap in knowledge, particularly for people who are interested in learning about necropolitics. Together, we are going to cover the existing body of literature about or relating to the topic of necropolitics by reading through the abstracts, summaries, or excerpts of academic papers from different sectors and industries all over the world. Unfortunately, this is probably not going to be the kind of short-form content that is going to summarise and simplify everything for you. We are only going through the basics of these papers to hopefully encourage you to find their full pieces to read and get into for yourselves. We have become way too used to just consuming a few minutes of bite-sized information during our scroll and then repeating the same talking points to others without further in-depth reading and reflection. Citations for these sources are always provided. So listen through, get to reading, get to thinking, and get to taking some action. Necropolitics Covered episodes are available on Apple Podcasts. You can also find inks, PDF downloadables, and other bonus stuff on Substack: necropolitics.substack.com. And if you would like to get in touch, send me an email on necropolitics@substack.com. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit necropolitics.substack.com

    2 min

Trailer

About

Briefly covering studies relating to necropolitics by sharing abstracts of key academic articles on the topic from all over the world. necropolitics.substack.com

More From 54