Summa Contra Everybody

Patrick Flynn, Ethan Muse
  • 0,0 (0)
  • Christentum
  • Zweiwöchentlich

Pat Flynn and Ethan Muse defend the Catholic faith. New Episodes every other week.

Folgen

  1. 4. Sept.

    Divine Simplicity: The Doctrine, the Arguments, and Objections

    Pat Flynn and Ethan Muse explore the doctrine of divine simplicity, the motivation behind it, and how it can be defended from objections.  Time codes:  00:00 - Introduction 01:38 - Ethan's journey to classical theism 13:10 - What is divine simplicity? 23:20 - Distinctions, composition, and the trinity 41:05 - Why believe in divine simplicity? 1:04:40 - Can a simple God have distinct attributes? 1:16:28 - Does divine simplicity lead to modal collapse? 1:22:02 - Modal collapse, free will, and the PSR 1:34:53 - God's knowledge of a contingent world 1:49:33 - Final thoughts & recommended resources Pat's substack: https://journalofabsolutetruth.substa... Ethan's substack: https://motivacredibilitatis.substack...

  2. 23. Aug.

    Ep. #3 - Papal Infallibility Isn't What You Think

    In the third episode of Summa Contra Infallibility, Pat Flynn and Ethan Muse go deep into the doctrine of Papal Infallibility, what it means, what it doesn't mean, and how to understand important historical examples often invoked to disprove the doctrine. 00:00 Introduction 03:40 The surprising consistency of Catholic doctrine 08:55 What papal infallibility actually means 14:47 Indefectibility explained 20:03 The logic behind infallibility 20:39 What exactly is the Church? 30:33 The Church as a perfect society 35:54 Why indefectibility entails infallibility 37:40 Infallibility protects the Church from the Pope 46:21 Why the limits of infallibility aren't ad hoc 49:50 Authority vs. credibility 57:17 Did Israel need an infallible authority? 1:02:24 Infallibility in the Old Testament 1:05:24 Alleged counterexamples 1:06:32 Maximalist vs. minimalist errors 1:08:59 How often is papal infallibility used? 1:12:59 Documents aren't infallible—definitions are 1:17:39 Pope Honorius 1:22:38 The SSPX and Vatican II 1:26:10 How reliable must the Magisterium be? 1:30:14 Can the Novus Ordo be harmful? 1:34:17 Are canonizations infallible? 1:39:53 The death penalty 1:46:09 Natural law vs. the evangelical law 1:52:05 Vatican II and religious liberty 1:55:21 Does "error have no rights" contradict Vatican II? 1:58:44 What Dignitatis Humanae actually says 2:02:03 The limits of religious liberty 2:05:47 Does Vatican II reject integralism? 2:08:04 Why infallibility is evidence for Catholicism 2:10:32 Conclusion

  3. 23. Aug.

    Ep. #2 - Everything Wrong with the Case Against Hell | Response to Randal Rauser

    In the second episode of Summa Contra Everybody, Ethan Muse and Pat Flynn respond to Miles Donahue and Randal Rauser's recent case against Hell. 0:00 Introduction 4:00 Who Has the Burden of Proof? 7:13 The "Easy" vs. "Hard" Problem of Hell 9:41 The Emotional vs. Intellectual Problem of Hell 17:27 Children, Mortal Sin, and "Maximal" Punishment 23:01 Do You Have to "Make Yourself Stupid" to Believe in Hell? 25:47 Can We Trust Our Moral Intuitions? 33:23 Catholic Authority, Miracles, and Hell 43:15 Whose Saints Are Better? 47:52 Are Human Beings Wicked Enough to Deserve Hell? 54:58 Original Sin, Determinism, and Culpability 1:02:38 Does Stealing a Pack of Gum Deserve Eternal Punishment? 1:13:08 Ignorance, Culpability, and Knowing God 1:16:17 Are All Sins Equally Severe? 1:20:33 What Mortal Sin Actually Is 1:24:12 Why Doesn't God Simply Rehabilitate Everyone? 1:35:08 Massa Damn​ata: Are Most People Damned? 1:41:57 Jesus, the Fewness of the Saved, and the Saints 1:50:33 Does Hell Make Creation a "Net Negative"? 1:56:56 Did Jesus Really Teach Eternal Hell? 2:06:22 Miles Donahue's Central Argument Against Eternal Hell 2:11:11 Is Retributive Punishment—or "Torture"—Wrong? 2:17:15 How Much Weight Should We Give Moral Intuitions? 2:22:03 The Noetic Effects of Sin 2:29:44 Do the Noetic Effects of Sin Undermine Catholicism? 2:34:01 Can We Appeal to Holy People as Moral Authorities? 2:43:09 Moral Disagreement and the Reliability of Intuition 2:49:27 Are There Different Degrees of Punishment in Hell? 2:55:03 Final Thoughts Ethan's Substack: https://motivacredibilitatis.substack.com/ Pat's Substack: https://substack.com/@journalofabsolutetruth

  4. 22. Aug.

    Why Naturalism Can't Trust Reason | The Argument from Reason

    In the inaugural episode of Summa Contra Everybody, Pat Flynn and Ethan Muse explore the argument from reason. Pat's Substack: https://substack.com/@journalofabsolu... Ethan's Substack: https://substack.com/@ethanmuse Pat's Book: The Best Argument for God

  • 4 Folgen

Info

Pat Flynn and Ethan Muse defend the Catholic faith. New Episodes every other week.

Informationen

  • Erstellt von
    Patrick Flynn, Ethan Muse
  • Jahre aktiv
    2026
  • Folgen
    4
  • Bewertung
    Unbedenklich
  • Copyright
    © 2026
  • Sendungswebsite
    Summa Contra Everybody