The Ben Ferguson Podcast

iHeartRadio On-Demand
  • 4,8 (4)
  • POLITIK
  • TÄGLICH

If you hate the liberal media but love the 47th President, than this is the podcast for you. Ben Ferguson brings you the commentary on the news that the biased media will not cover.

  1. The Scam Liberals Saw Coming, Cashed In—And No One Stopped!

    VOR 1 STD.

    The Scam Liberals Saw Coming, Cashed In—And No One Stopped!

    Federal Fraud Investigation in Minnesota Daycares Federal, state, and local law enforcement conducted raids on approximately 20–22 childcare-related businesses in Minneapolis. The investigation targets alleged multi‑billion‑dollar social services fraud, particularly involving childcare subsidies. Several centers were reportedly licensed for fewer children than they billed for, a major red flag for fraud. Quality Learning Center Case The “Quality Learning Center” gained attention due to a misspelled sign (“Leering” instead of “Learning”). The center allegedly received around $1.9 million in public funds despite being largely non-operational. It accumulated 95 violations from Minnesota’s Human Services Agency between 2019–2023. Patterns of Childcare Fraud Investigators describe long‑running schemes including: Billing for children who were not present Operating centers with no children or staff Paying kickbacks to parents or partners Former investigators testified that tips about fraud were constant and overwhelming, often involving centers earning $700,000–$1M+ annually. Broader Minnesota Fraud Context The daycare investigation is framed as part of a larger pattern of fraud in Minnesota: The “Feeding Our Future” scandal (~$250M) Autism service fraud schemes (~$14M+) Dozens of individuals have been charged or pleaded guilty in prior cases. Political and Administrative Allegations Critics claim state officials failed for years to act decisively on known fraud indicators. Minnesota’s governor publicly expressed regret for not preventing fraud earlier and later voiced support for enforcement actions. The text alleges political reluctance and mismanagement contributed to the scale of the problem. National Focus on SNAP (Food Stamp) Fraud The text expands to claim record levels of SNAP fraud nationwide, estimated at $20+ billion annually. Alleged abuse mechanisms include: EBT card skimming and theft Benefit trafficking (selling benefits for cash) Improper payments due to weak verification Retailer participation in benefit‑for‑cash schemes Use of deceased or duplicate identities Multi‑state benefit collection Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility (BBCE) Criticism A federal policy loophole (BBCE) allegedly allows individuals with high assets—including millionaires or lottery winners—to qualify for food stamps. States can bypass income and asset limits by granting minimal “benefits” (e.g., pamphlets), which then trigger SNAP eligibility. The text characterizes this as systemic mismanagement or “fraud by design”. Law Enforcement Testimony A retired investigator described: Years of ignored warnings Explicit evidence of intentional fraud Communications showing owners planning to exploit the system for personal enrichment Investigators relied on surveillance, billing comparisons, and forensic analysis of seized devices. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    25 Min.
  2. Microlooting the Normalization of Crime plus The Reason behind the Comey Indicment

    VOR 1 STD.

    Microlooting the Normalization of Crime plus The Reason behind the Comey Indicment

    1. “Micro‑Looting” Some progressive commentators and media voices have normalized or morally justified small‑scale theft (“micro‑looting”) from large corporations. This behavior is a broader ideological shift on the left that excuses antisocial or criminal conduct by blaming systemic injustice. Justification undermines social order and property rights, drawing parallels to looting during the 2020 protests. 2. Criticism of Progressive Media and Elites Liberal hosts and commentators are wealthy or privileged individuals who hypocritically present themselves as defenders of the poor. Their rhetoric is performative, radical, and disconnected from everyday consequences. We condemn perceived casual endorsements of violence, sabotage, or theft expressed in podcasts and commentary. 3. Escalation From Rhetoric to Violence Inflammatory political language—particularly on the left—has contributed to real‑world violence. The concept of “stochastic terrorism” is that left‑wing rhetoric against Donald Trump has radicalized individuals. Examples cited include assassination attempts, threats against conservative figures, and political murders, all attributed to progressive demonization. 4. Democratic Leaders Portrayed as Using Violent Language Multiple Democratic politicians and commentators are quoted using aggressive or absolutist language (e.g., “we have to stop him,” “choke them out,” “eliminate him”). The media and journalists are enabling or excusing this rhetoric rather than condemning it. 5. Media Complicity and Hypocrisy Mainstream outlets (e.g., CNN, ABC, late‑night shows) are portrayed as biased and dismissive of violence against conservatives while amplifying fear‑based messaging. Jokes or dismissive coverage related to attacks on Trump are cited as evidence of moral double standards. Journalists are helping create the ideological environment that motivates violent actors. 6. James Comey Indictment Narrative Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted a second time. The indictment reportedly centers on a social media post showing “86 47” formed from seashells, interpreted as a threat against the 47th president (Trump). Prosecutors allegedly view “86” as slang for “get rid of” or “kill,” framing the post as a threat transmitted across state lines. 7. Reopening of Russia Investigation Scrutiny The discussion revisits the 2016 Russia investigation, portraying it as a “collusion hoax.” New criminal probes are now examining the conduct of investigators themselves, including Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan. Allegations include abuse of intelligence powers, false statements, and mishandling of evidence. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    16 Min.
  3. Security Held the Line even as Funding Failed, Teslas win Food Stamps & The Tragic Math of Liberal Homeless Policy Week In Review

    VOR 1 STD.

    Security Held the Line even as Funding Failed, Teslas win Food Stamps & The Tragic Math of Liberal Homeless Policy Week In Review

    1. Secret Service Funding & Political Conflict The U.S. Secret Service stopped an alleged assassination attempt and they were underfunded due to Department of Homeland Security budget disputes. Democrats repeatedly voted against DHS/Secret Service funding, framing this as irresponsible given security risks. This political rhetoric contributes to political violence. Discusses legal opposition to construction of a White House ballroom with enhanced security features. The court’s temporary halt to construction is portrayed as dismissive of national security concerns. There are repeated threats against President Trump as justification for heightened security. 3. Radicalization & Political Violence Narrative Attributes recent acts of political violence to left‑wing ideology and alleged “Marxist” indoctrination in academia. Cites a purported manifesto to argue that ideological framing of “oppressors vs. victims” is used to justify violence. 4. FBI Raids and Minnesota Fraud Allegations FBI raids on over 20 childcare and nonprofit facilities in Minneapolis related to alleged large‑scale fraud. The fraud is involving misuse of taxpayer funds, particularly in programs tied to childcare and social services. Minnesota political leaders are accused of ignoring or covering up fraud while later taking credit for enforcement. There is widespread abuse of SNAP (food stamp) benefits, including recipients allegedly owning high‑end luxury vehicles. The federal eligibility rules (broad‑based categorical eligibility) are at fault for enabling fraud. Both fraudsters and policymakers who support current rules should be held accountable. Democratic officials are benefiting politically from fraud & welfare expansion. Specific figures are cited as symbols of incompetence, corruption, or ideological extremism. 7. DEI Policies & Homelessness Programs Describes homelessness assistance systems, particularly in Portland, Oregon, as driven by DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) scoring systems. Aid is prioritized based on race, sexuality, or identity over economic need leads to ineffective outcomes. Despite very high spending per homeless individual, homelessness‑related deaths increased significantly. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    35 Min.
  4. America’s Homeless Crisis Goes Full DEI in Portland

    VOR 1 TAG

    America’s Homeless Crisis Goes Full DEI in Portland

    1. Homeless Services Are Allegedly Prioritized by Identity, Not Need Some cities (especially Portland, Oregon) use a point‑based scoring system to allocate homeless services. Points are allegedly awarded for: LGBTQ+ identification Race/minority status Language background Interest in “culturally specific services” These factors sometimes score equal to or higher than: Senior status (55+) Disability Long‑term homelessness Zero income This is an expression of intersectionality ideology, where identity outweighs material need. 2. Portland as a Case Study of Policy Failure Portland reportedly allocated $1.3 billion to homelessness programs by 2024. The text claims spending reached roughly $200,000 per homeless person. Despite this: Homeless deaths allegedly increased fourfold from 2019 to 2023. Heavy spending paired with ideological frameworks led to worse outcomes, not improvement. 3. DEI Is Framed as Actively Harmful DEI systems are: Bureaucratic Performative Detached from practical outcomes DEI: Creates perverse incentives Encourages people to self‑identify strategically Distracts governments from solving root problems (housing, safety, treatment) 4. BBCE (Broad‑Based Categorical Eligibility) Enables SNAP Abuse A major portion of the text focuses on SNAP program fraud. BBCE allegedly allows individuals to qualify for food stamps if they receive any minor government benefit, such as: Informational pamphlets Hotlines This bypasses traditional income and asset checks. Millionaires, lottery winners, and individuals with large assets can legally receive SNAP benefits. 5. Scale and Types of SNAP Fraud Highlighted EBT card skimming and cloning Benefit trafficking (selling benefits for cash) Improper payments due to verification failures Multi‑state enrollment Use of deceased identities Retail collusion Involvement of international crime networks 6. Luxury Vehicle Ownership as Evidence of Abuse Cites that thousands of SNAP recipients own luxury vehicles (Teslas, Porsches, Lamborghinis, etc.). Uses these examples to argue there has been: No accountability No data transparency Intentional evasion of eligibility rules 7. Trump Administration Portrayed as Corrective Force Credits to the Trump administration for: Removing 4.3 million people from SNAP Increasing audits and enforcement Targeting BBCE reform Democrats are portrayed as opposing reform to maintain voter support. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    27 Min.
  5. EXCLUSIVE: The Bureaucratic Trick Costing You Billions-BBC Eligibility for SNAP Explained-

    VOR 1 TAG

    EXCLUSIVE: The Bureaucratic Trick Costing You Billions-BBC Eligibility for SNAP Explained-

    How BBCE Works: Federal law requires asset and income checks for SNAP eligibility. Under BBCE, if a person qualifies for any form of state-designated assistance, they are automatically eligible for SNAP. States exploit this by creating minimal “benefits” (e.g., pamphlets, hotlines, informational flyers) that legally trigger SNAP eligibility. Scale of the Issue: Over 40 states use BBCE. Millions of SNAP recipients reportedly exceed federal income or asset limits. Roughly 1 in 5 enrollees allegedly have assets of $100,000 or more (per the source’s claims). Taxpayer cost is described as hundreds of millions to billions of dollars annually. Fraud Characterization: The system is “fraud by design”, not accidental mismanagement. The program no longer focuses on the “truly needy” but instead expands enrollment intentionally. Additional SNAP Abuse Allegations: EBT skimming and theft by organized criminal groups. Trafficking: selling SNAP benefits for cash. Improper payments due to administrative errors (claimed ~12% rate in FY 2024). Multi-state fraud, identity fraud, and use of deceased individuals. Retail fraud, where stores exchange benefits for cash. International criminal involvement in benefit theft. Luxury Vehicle Example: Cites a single state where 14,000 SNAP recipients allegedly owned luxury vehicles, including Ferraris, Bentleys, Lamborghinis, Porsches, Teslas, and others—used to illustrate misuse. Government Response: USDA and law enforcement conducting investigations and theft replacement. Movement toward chip-based EBT cards for security. Claimed removal of 4.3 million people from SNAP rolls due to fraud detection. USDA food and nutrition administration being reorganized and moved closer to states. Political Framing: Blames Democratic-led states and policies for expanding SNAP to increase voter dependency. Claims “blue states” resist data transparency. Frames SNAP reform as a central midterm election issue. Proposed Reforms: Eliminate or restrict BBCE. Reinstate asset tests and stricter income limits. Tighten work requirements. Reduce enrollment to focus on genuinely needy households. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    16 Min.
  6. Landmark Supreme Court Decision Prohibiting Racial Gerrymandering plus Dems Go w the Nazi Communist in Maine & Out-of-Control DEI Homeless Policies

    VOR 1 TAG

    Landmark Supreme Court Decision Prohibiting Racial Gerrymandering plus Dems Go w the Nazi Communist in Maine & Out-of-Control DEI Homeless Policies

    1. Supreme Court Ruling on Racial Gerrymandering A 6–3 Supreme Court decision invalidated Louisiana’s congressional map because it relied on race-based district drawing, which they describe as unconstitutional. The ruling is a landmark rejection of racial gerrymandering, asserting that race should not be a controlling factor in redistricting, even when justified under the Voting Rights Act. Democrats oppose the ruling because racial districting allegedly benefits their electoral prospects. 2. Maine Democratic Senate Primary Controversy Democratic Governor Janet Mills withdrew from a U.S. Senate race because she could not defeat a more extreme primary challenger. That challenger is a self-identified communist with a Nazi tattoo and a history of inflammatory online statements. This reflects radicalization within the Democratic Party, asserting that extreme ideological views are now tolerated or rewarded in Democratic primaries. 3. DEI-Based Homeless Policy (Portland, Oregon) Homeless services in Portland/Multnomah County, resource allocation is guided by DEI and “intersectionality” scoring systems. Factors such as sexual identity, race, and language status are prioritized over income level or length of homelessness. Despite large public spending per homeless individual, homeless deaths increased sharply, which the speakers attribute to ideological mismanagement rather than effectiveness. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    38 Min.
  7. When will you stop Daycare Scam? When I can Buy a Couple Nice Houses in Nairobi

    VOR 2 TAGEN

    When will you stop Daycare Scam? When I can Buy a Couple Nice Houses in Nairobi

    1. Scope of Fraud The testimony describes large‑scale, systemic fraud within Minnesota’s Child Care Assistance Program (CCAP). Individual childcare centers allegedly billed hundreds of thousands to over $1 million annually, often with no real children present. 2. Organized and Long‑Running Scheme Fraud was not isolated or accidental; it showed characteristics of a loosely organized criminal enterprise operating for years (at least 2014–2019). Some perpetrators reportedly learned about the scheme before arriving in the U.S., indicating cross‑border knowledge of vulnerabilities in the system. 3. Common Fraud Methods Billing for nonexistent children and extended hours (e.g., multiple shifts, 7 days a week). Operating “paper” childcare centers that closed immediately once payments were stopped. Kickback arrangements involving parents, co‑owners, or employees. Reusing addresses and reopening under new business names after enforcement actions. 4. Evidence Gathered by Investigators Physical surveillance showed centers operating without children or staff. Electronic evidence (texts, phones, computers) revealed admissions of fraud and intent to profit. Investigations led to multiple felony convictions, including at least one federal case with prison time and restitution exceeding $1 million. 5. Overwhelming Volume of Fraud Investigators received so many credible tips that they had to prioritize only the highest‑dollar cases. Centers billing less than ~$700,000 often could not be addressed due to limited resources. 6. Internal Resistance and Obstruction According to the whistleblower, senior DHS officials discouraged, undermined, or obstructed investigations once fraud became large and visible. Actions alleged include: Attempts to alter or suppress information sent to the Legislative Auditor Harassment and intimidation of investigators Organizational changes that reduced investigators’ authority Procedural delays that significantly reduced investigative capacity 7. Retaliation Against Whistleblowers Investigators who pushed fraud cases reportedly faced: Threats and bullying Negative performance actions Loss of decision‑making power The whistleblower ultimately resigned, stating he would not be complicit. 8. Failure of Oversight The testimony suggests institutional tolerance of fraud, contrasting sharply with standards enforced in law enforcement agencies. The whistleblower emphasizes that minor theft would not have been tolerated in his prior roles, while millions in losses were allowed to continue at DHS. 9. Federal Intervention Federal agencies (FBI, IRS‑CI, HHS‑OIG) eventually became involved due to the scale and nature of suspected crimes. Raids, indictments, and convictions occurred after years of state‑level warnings. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    36 Min.
  8. MUST SHARE: Kenyans Told "Venture West to Minnesota & Fleece Taxpayers w Fraud"

    VOR 2 TAGEN

    MUST SHARE: Kenyans Told "Venture West to Minnesota & Fleece Taxpayers w Fraud"

    1. Scope of Fraud The testimony describes large‑scale, systemic fraud within Minnesota’s Child Care Assistance Program (CCAP). Individual childcare centers allegedly billed hundreds of thousands to over $1 million annually, often with no real children present. 2. Organized and Long‑Running Scheme Fraud was not isolated or accidental; it showed characteristics of a loosely organized criminal enterprise operating for years (at least 2014–2019). Some perpetrators reportedly learned about the scheme before arriving in the U.S., indicating cross‑border knowledge of vulnerabilities in the system. 3. Common Fraud Methods Billing for nonexistent children and extended hours (e.g., multiple shifts, 7 days a week). Operating “paper” childcare centers that closed immediately once payments were stopped. Kickback arrangements involving parents, co‑owners, or employees. Reusing addresses and reopening under new business names after enforcement actions. 4. Evidence Gathered by Investigators Physical surveillance showed centers operating without children or staff. Electronic evidence (texts, phones, computers) revealed admissions of fraud and intent to profit. Investigations led to multiple felony convictions, including at least one federal case with prison time and restitution exceeding $1 million. 5. Overwhelming Volume of Fraud Investigators received so many credible tips that they had to prioritize only the highest‑dollar cases. Centers billing less than ~$700,000 often could not be addressed due to limited resources. 6. Internal Resistance and Obstruction According to the whistleblower, senior DHS officials discouraged, undermined, or obstructed investigations once fraud became large and visible. Actions alleged include: Attempts to alter or suppress information sent to the Legislative Auditor Harassment and intimidation of investigators Organizational changes that reduced investigators’ authority Procedural delays that significantly reduced investigative capacity 7. Retaliation Against Whistleblowers Investigators who pushed fraud cases reportedly faced: Threats and bullying Negative performance actions Loss of decision‑making power The whistleblower ultimately resigned, stating he would not be complicit. 8. Failure of Oversight The testimony suggests institutional tolerance of fraud, contrasting sharply with standards enforced in law enforcement agencies. The whistleblower emphasizes that minor theft would not have been tolerated in his prior roles, while millions in losses were allowed to continue at DHS. 9. Federal Intervention Federal agencies (FBI, IRS‑CI, HHS‑OIG) eventually became involved due to the scale and nature of suspected crimes. Raids, indictments, and convictions occurred after years of state‑level warnings. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    32 Min.
Alle anzeigen (2.032)

Trailer

Moderation und Gäste

Bewertungen und Rezensionen

4,8
von 5
4 Bewertungen

Info

If you hate the liberal media but love the 47th President, than this is the podcast for you. Ben Ferguson brings you the commentary on the news that the biased media will not cover.

Informationen

  • Kanal
    iHeartRadio On-Demand
  • Erstellt von
    iHeartPodcasts
  • Jahre aktiv
    2018 - 2026
  • Folgen
    2032
  • Bewertung
    Unbedenklich
  • Copyright
    2026 iHeartMedia, Inc. © Any use of this intellectual property for text and data mining or computational analysis including as training material for artificial intelligence systems is strictly prohibited without express written consent from iHeartMedia
  • Sendungswebsite
    The Ben Ferguson Podcast
  • Anbieter

Mehr von iHeartRadio On-Demand

Das gefällt dir vielleicht auch