The Ben Ferguson Podcast

iHeartRadio On-Demand
  • 5.0 (1)
  • POLITICS
  • UPDATED DAILY

If you hate the liberal media but love the 47th President, than this is the podcast for you. Ben Ferguson brings you the commentary on the news that the biased media will not cover.

  1. Woke Watchdog Exposed — SPLC Accused of Funding the Hate It Claims to Fight

    19 HR AGO

    Woke Watchdog Exposed — SPLC Accused of Funding the Hate It Claims to Fight

    Fraud Against Donors SPLC allegedly solicited donations by claiming it would dismantle hate groups. Instead, donated funds were allegedly funneled to the leadership of those same extremist groups. The was intentional deception and donor fraud. Funding Hate Groups SPLC funded organizations such as: Ku Klux Klan National Socialist Movement Aryan Nations United Clans of America Unite the Right (Charlottesville rally‑linked) Alleged payments total over $3 million between roughly 2014–2023. Money Laundering & Shell Companies SPLC is accused of creating fictitious entities and shell companies Funds were allegedly routed through fake bank accounts, prepaid cards, and layered transactions to conceal their origin. This is cited as the basis for conspiracy and money‑laundering charges. Use of Informants SPLC justified payments by labeling recipients as “informants.” Supervised racist postings Coordinated transportation to extremist rallies Helped facilitate criminal activity rather than dismantling it Charlottesville Example An SPLC‑paid individual allegedly participated in leadership chats planning the 2017 Unite the Right rally. SPLC allegedly helped fund and coordinate that individual’s activity. Political Weaponization Claim SPLC is accused of: Targeting conservative, Christian, and right‑leaning organizations Designating them as “hate groups” Publishing “hate maps” that allegedly put individuals at risk Turning Point USA and Charlie Kirk are cited repeatedly as examples. High Executive Compensation There were large executive salaries (over $500,000 annually) The evidence SPLC operated primarily as a profit‑driven organization. Long‑Term Pattern Alleged SPLC engaged in this behavior for decades Accusations include offshore accounts, excessive fundraising, and donor manipulation Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    31 min
  2. Were America’s Scientists Targeted? plus One‑Third of Voters Say Deport Them All & Newsom's Migrant Machine

    1 DAY AGO

    Were America’s Scientists Targeted? plus One‑Third of Voters Say Deport Them All & Newsom's Migrant Machine

    1. Missing or Dead U.S. Scientists The FBI is investigating multiple cases involving deaths or disappearances of scientists tied to sensitive U.S. research facilities (e.g., NASA, Los Alamos). Around 10 cases are referenced. FBI, DOE, and other agencies are coordinating. No confirmed link between cases, but public speculation and conspiracy theories are widespread. President Trump is quoted as calling the issue “serious” but possibly coincidental. Some lawmakers suggest possible foreign adversary involvement (China, Russia, Iran), though no evidence is presented. 2. Public Opinion on Illegal Immigration (Polling Data) Immigration opinions are more divided than media narratives suggest. ~31% of voters say all illegal immigrants should be deported. ~60% support deporting illegal immigrants convicted of serious crimes. Very small percentages support deporting: Long-term non-criminal immigrants Those brought to the U.S. as children Sharp party-line differences: Majority of Republicans favor mass deportation. Democrats and independents mostly focus on criminals only. 3. ICE Arrests and Crimes by Illegal Immigrants DHS highlights arrests of illegal immigrants convicted of violent or sexual crimes. Examples include child sexual abuse, manslaughter, robbery, and assault. DHS claims ~70% of ICE arrests involve individuals charged with or convicted of crimes. 4. Virginia Redistricting Referendum Blocked by Courts A voter-approved redistricting referendum in Virginia was voided by a circuit court. Procedural violations in placing the amendment on the ballot Misleading ballot language Conflict with the existing bipartisan redistricting system Implications: Would have shifted Virginia’s congressional map to heavily favor Democrats. Case is heading to the Virginia Supreme Court. Existing maps remain in place for now. 5. National Political Consequences of Redistricting Virginia is a national flashpoint in the midterm election battle. Democrats argue courts are overturning voter will. Republicans argue courts stopped an unconstitutional power grab. Other states (e.g., Florida) may respond with counter-redistricting. 6. California and Taxpayer-Funded Migration Programs California is accused of spending over $1 billion to support and import undocumented migrants. Funds allegedly went to NGOs and activist groups. Programs framed as benefiting the Democratic political ecosystem. Migrants are portrayed as: Low-wage labor Welfare dependents Future Democratic voters Examples Used: Housing overcrowding in San Francisco Rising rents Population decline in Los Angeles County 7. Sanctuary Cities and ICE Opposition Sanctuary city leaders (e.g., NYC mayor) openly oppose ICE enforcement. ICE described by critics as “cruel and inhumane.” Sanctuary policies portrayed as shielding criminals and undermining federal law. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    34 min
  3. Public Opinion Blows a Hole Through Immigration Spin plus Trump Calls Missing Scientists ‘Serious Stuff’

    1 DAY AGO

    Public Opinion Blows a Hole Through Immigration Spin plus Trump Calls Missing Scientists ‘Serious Stuff’

    1. Public Opinion on Illegal Immigration and Deportation A recent poll reports shifting voter attitudes toward illegal immigration. 31% of registered voters say all illegal immigrants should be deported. Overall views: 43% support allowing illegal immigrants to stay and eventually apply for citizenship. 40% favor deportation in general (with differing criteria). 7% support allowing them to stay without citizenship. On who should be deported: 60% agree that illegal immigrants convicted of serious crimes should be deported. 19% support deportation for minor crimes. Only 3% support deportation of: Long‑term, law‑abiding undocumented immigrants Those brought to the U.S. as children Party-line differences are significant: 57% of Republicans favor deporting all illegal immigrants. This view is held by 24% of Independents and 7% of Democrats. Strong bipartisan agreement exists on deporting those convicted of serious crimes. Immigration enforcement is a major political issue heading into elections. Department of Homeland Security statements highlight ICE arrests involving serious crimes, reinforcing public safety concerns raised by immigration critics. 2. Reported Disappearances and Deaths of U.S. Scientists At least 10 cases are under review, involving personnel from: NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory Other high‑level research institutions The FBI is leading the investigation, coordinating with: Department of Energy Department of Defense Department of State Local law enforcement Cases span several years and include: Disappearances Homicides Unexplained deaths A high‑profile case involves a retired Air Force Major General who disappeared under unusual circumstances. Officials caution against conspiracy theories, noting: No confirmed links between the cases Large scientific workforces statistically experience unrelated deaths Some lawmakers speculate about possible foreign adversary involvement, though no evidence has confirmed this. Federal agencies, including NASA, state there is no current indication of a national security threat. The House Oversight Committee has launched its own inquiry amid public pressure for transparency. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    13 min
  4. Qatar’s Billion‑Dollar Influence Machine, Clarence Thomas Challenges Progressivism & the Liberal Heckler’s Veto Playbook Week In Review

    1 DAY AGO

    Qatar’s Billion‑Dollar Influence Machine, Clarence Thomas Challenges Progressivism & the Liberal Heckler’s Veto Playbook Week In Review

    1. Allegations of Qatar’s Influence Campaign in the U.S. Qatar spends billions of dollars funding U.S. universities to influence American public opinion and academic culture. Qatar hires Washington, D.C.–based PR and lobbying firms to “whitewash” its image, particularly regarding claims of support for extremist groups. Qatar’s status is the largest foreign funder of U.S. universities, surpassing countries like China, and suggests this funding correlates with campus political activism. Specific universities (e.g., Harvard, MIT, Stanford, Carnegie Mellon) are highlighted as major recipients of foreign funds. Financial relationships will limit criticism of foreign governments, citing an example of a U.S. university campus in Qatar allegedly restricting speech about the Qatari regime. 2. Clarence Thomas’s Judicial Philosophy Thomas is emphasizing: Judicial restraint and discipline Originalism and adherence to the Constitution’s original meaning The belief that rights come from God, not government, grounded in the Declaration of Independence His personal background (raised by his grandfather, strict discipline, plainspoken style) is presented as shaping his judicial approach. Thomas’s views with progressivism, which characterizes asserting that rights derive from government authority rather than natural or divine sources. A Senate hearing anecdote is used to illustrate this ideological divide, portraying progressive views as mainstream within the modern Democratic Party. 3. Free Speech Conflicts on College Campuses At UCLA Law School, protesters disrupted a talk by a Department of Homeland Security lawyer. The disruption is a “heckler’s veto,” preventing speech rather than expressing dissent. Similar past incidents at Stanford Law School are cited to argue that some law students’ conduct is incompatible with professional legal standards. University administrations are failing to protect speech and enforce order during such events. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    32 min
  5. 50 Governors Put on Fraud Notice-Clean Up Medicaid or Face the Consequences

    2 DAYS AGO

    50 Governors Put on Fraud Notice-Clean Up Medicaid or Face the Consequences

    Federal Crackdown on Medicaid FraudCMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz, working under President Donald Trump’s administration, has initiated a nationwide effort to combat Medicaid fraud, citing billions of dollars in losses due to noncompliant and fraudulent providers. All 50 Governors Put on NoticeEvery U.S. governor—regardless of party—has received identical letters requiring immediate action, signaling that Medicaid fraud is viewed as a national, not partisan, problem. Strict Deadlines Imposed 10 business days: Governors must confirm whether they will conduct rapid revalidation of high‑risk Medicaid providers. 30 days: States must submit a broader Medicaid provider revalidation strategy. Two‑year plan: States must outline long‑term methods for verifying provider legitimacy and compliance. Focus on High‑Risk Providers CMS is prioritizing providers with: Weak enrollment standards Less rigorous billing oversight Missing or invalid National Provider Identifiers (NPIs)These providers are considered most vulnerable to fraud, waste, and abuse. Escalated Federal Oversight Failure to comply with revalidation requirements will be used as a risk indicator of fraud and could affect future federal Medicaid funding decisions. Law Enforcement Coordination States are instructed to work closely with law enforcement agencies, indicating that criminal investigations and prosecutions are expected to increase. Catalyst: High‑Profile Fraud Cases Major scandals—especially in Minnesota and California—have intensified scrutiny: Minnesota’s “Feeding Our Future” case (~$250M) A state review estimating up to $1.7B in improper payments over four years These cases highlighted systemic vulnerabilities. Potential Funding Deferrals CMS is considering Medicaid payment deferrals in states deemed noncompliant, setting the stage for legal and political conflicts between state and federal governments. Policy Framed as Taxpayer Protection The initiative is presented as safeguarding resources for intended beneficiaries—low‑income individuals, seniors, children, and people with disabilities—by removing corrupt actors from the system. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    11 min
  6. DOJ Says SPLC Cashed In on 'Hate for Sale' & Weaponized Activism

    2 DAYS AGO

    DOJ Says SPLC Cashed In on 'Hate for Sale' & Weaponized Activism

    1. Allegations of Criminal Conduct by the SPLC (Primary Theme) The document repeatedly claims that the Southern Poverty Law Center: Was indicted by the U.S. Department of Justice and investigated by the FBI. Engaged in wire fraud, money laundering, bank fraud, and conspiracy. Deceived donors by claiming to fight extremist groups while allegedly financially supporting those same groups. Used shell companies and illicit banking structures to conceal financial transactions. Funded multiple extremist organizations and figures over many years, including: Ku Klux Klan affiliations Neo-Nazi and white nationalist groups Individuals connected to the 2017 “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville The alleged total funding cited is millions of dollars, presented as evidence of a long‑term, intentional scheme. 2. SPLC Framed as Ideological Weapon The text argues that: The SPLC maintained “hit lists” and “hate maps” that allegedly targeted conservatives, Christians, and right‑leaning organizations. Conservative groups (e.g., Turning Point USA) and individuals were labeled alongside extremist organizations, which the document portrays as irresponsible and dangerous. The SPLC’s leadership is accused of becoming increasingly partisan after 2020. The document presents SPLC as a political enforcement arm of the left, rather than a civil rights organization. 3. Claims Linking SPLC Actions to Violence A significant claim in the text is that: SPLC’s labeling and targeting of conservative groups allegedly placed individuals “in the crosshairs”. The document asserts a connection between SPLC actions and a violent outcome involving a conservative figure, framing this as a consequence of the organization’s rhetoric and practices. These claims are presented as vindication of long‑standing conservative warnings about SPLC. 4. Corporate and Donor Criticism The document criticizes: Major corporations for donating to SPLC without sufficient scrutiny. Donors for allegedly enabling fraud, extremism, and conservative targeting through virtue signaling. SPLC leadership compensation levels, portraying them as evidence of self‑enrichment. 5. Media and Institutional Cover‑Up Allegations The text alleges that: Mainstream media outlets downplayed or ignored SPLC wrongdoing. Warnings from commentators (e.g., John Stossel in earlier years) were dismissed until now. Government action came only after years of alleged misconduct. 6. Separate Segment: Medicaid Fraud Enforcement (Secondary Topic) Toward the end, the document shifts away from SPLC to claim: The Trump administration, through CMS and Dr. Oz, is aggressively addressing Medicaid fraud nationwide. All U.S. governors were put on notice to re‑validate high‑risk Medicaid providers. Large‑scale fraud cases in states like Minnesota and California are cited as justification. The issue is framed as systemic, bipartisan, and urgent, with enforcement tied to federal funding. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    28 min
  7. Southern Poverty Law Center FUNDS the Klan, plus UCLA Law Students Silence Conservatives

    2 DAYS AGO

    Southern Poverty Law Center FUNDS the Klan, plus UCLA Law Students Silence Conservatives

    1. Allegations Against the Southern Poverty Law Center The Southern Poverty Law Center: Was criminally indicted by the U.S. Department of Justice. Funded or financially supported extremist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazi organizations, and organizers of the 2017 “Unite the Right” rally. Engaged in wire fraud, money laundering, and donor deception. The SPLC is operating a fraudulent fundraising model, allegedly exaggerating or manufacturing extremism to increase donations. The SPLC funding of extremists is: Intentional Long‑term Central to its fundraising success Corporate donors (Apple, JPMorgan, MGM, etc.) are cited as unwitting enablers, accused of donating for “virtue signaling.” 2. Media and Institutional Complicity Mainstream media ignored or covered up SPLC wrongdoing. Corporate America gave millions without oversight. Political and cultural elites protected SPLC due to ideological alignment. Past warnings from commentators (e.g., John Stossel) are cited as evidence that concerns were longstanding. 3. Political Impact The Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville is described as: Financially linked to SPLC funding, according to the show’s claims. Used politically to attack conservatives and Donald Trump. The SPLC allegedly used extremist events to drive massive fundraising growth, citing revenue increases after major controversies. 4. Free Speech and Campus Controversies A UCLA Law School event where progressive students allegedly disrupted and silenced a conservative speaker from the Department of Homeland Security. The behavior is a “heckler’s veto”, framed as: Antithetical to free speech A sign of ideological intolerance on the left Comparisons are made to similar incidents at Stanford Law School. Law students are criticized as being unfit for the legal profession if they engage in such conduct. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    36 min
  8. Economic Strangulation-$500M a Day Lost in Iran plus Court Slams Brakes-VA Vote Voided

    3 DAYS AGO

    Economic Strangulation-$500M a Day Lost in Iran plus Court Slams Brakes-VA Vote Voided

    1. U.S.–Iran Ceasefire and Maritime Escalation President Trump extended a ceasefire with Iran indefinitely while maintaining a strict naval and economic blockade, described as “economic fury.” The administration claims the blockade is costing Iran $500 million per day, crippling oil exports and internal stability. Despite the ceasefire extension, Iran allegedly attacked or seized multiple commercial ships in the Strait of Hormuz, escalating tensions. Western and Iranian accounts conflict: Western sources report unprovoked attacks on vessels. Iranian state media claims ships violated rules and tampered with navigation systems. Talks with Iran are framed as possible within 36–72 hours, but the administration insists the blockade will remain until Iran submits a unified proposal. The Strait of Hormuz is emphasized as a critical global trade chokepoint, raising concerns about broader economic and security fallout. 2. Virginia Redistricting Referendum Voided Virginia voters narrowly approved a referendum to return congressional redistricting power to the Democratic-controlled legislature. A Virginia circuit court invalidated the referendum, blocking certification of the vote. The ruling cited three main issues: Procedural violations in how the amendment was placed on the ballot. Misleading ballot language that may have confused voters. Conflict with Virginia’s existing bipartisan redistricting commission, approved by voters in 2020. The new maps would have allegedly shifted Virginia’s delegation to a 10–1 Democratic advantage, raising national stakes. The case is expected to move to the Virginia Supreme Court, with implications for control of the U.S. House. Republicans frame the ruling as a victory against gerrymandering; Democrats argue courts are overriding voter intent. 3. California Immigration Spending Allegations The text alleges Governor Gavin Newsom spent $1 billion in state funds to support and import approximately 400,000 migrants. Funds are said to have been directed to nonprofits and advocacy groups, including immigration legal services and activist organizations. The narrative claims these groups: Coordinate resistance to ICE enforcement. Mobilize protests and political activism. Migrant inflows are linked to: Rising housing costs Depressed wages Population flight (e.g., tens of thousands leaving Los Angeles County annually) The commentary frames immigration as fueling a political machine, benefiting Democratic power while harming working-class Americans. Historical comparisons are made to Tammany Hall–style political machines, arguing history is repeating itself. Sanctuary city policies are portrayed as protecting criminals and undermining federal law. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    32 min
See All (2k)

Trailer

Hosts & Guests

About

If you hate the liberal media but love the 47th President, than this is the podcast for you. Ben Ferguson brings you the commentary on the news that the biased media will not cover.

Information

  • Channel
    iHeartRadio On-Demand
  • Creator
    iHeartPodcasts
  • Years Active
    2018 - 2026
  • Episodes
    2k
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    2026 iHeartMedia, Inc. © Any use of this intellectual property for text and data mining or computational analysis including as training material for artificial intelligence systems is strictly prohibited without express written consent from iHeartMedia
  • Show Website
    The Ben Ferguson Podcast
  • Provider

More From iHeartRadio On-Demand

You Might Also Like