Career Footprints

Reed Smith LLP

In each episode, we’ll ask our guest, a Reed Smith alum, to share their career story, how their time at Reed Smith contributed to their success, and their advice for early-career lawyers. Our goal is to surface insights from these inspiring professionals’ careers that will help you find your way to professional success, however you define that.

  1. 10/09/2025

    Yoni Tammam: Creating value and building a career through a unique skill set

    Throughout his career, Yoni Tammam has cultivated a unique skill set and strategically applied it to drive success for both teams and clients. In this episode of Career Footprints, Yoni traces his journey from undergrad business major, to tax associate at Reed Smith, to vice president at the tax insurance practice at CAC Group where he advises clients on managing tax risks in high-stakes transactions. Yoni focuses his practice on using tax insurance to accrete value to his clients. In the episode, he offers practical advice for law firm associates – especially those aspiring to move in to business roles – on making the most of their law firm experiences, building a marketable skill set, and asking the right questions when exploring their first business opportunity after Big Law. ----more---- Transcript: Intro: Welcome to the Reed Smith podcast, Career Footprints. In each episode of Career Footprints, we'll ask our guest, a Reed Smith alum, to share their career story, how their time at Reed Smith set them up for success, and their advice for early career lawyers. Our goal is to surface insights from the careers of these inspiring professionals that will help you find professional success, however you define that.  Lauren: Greetings, everyone, and welcome to another episode of Reed Smith's alumni Career Footprints podcast. This is your host, Lauren Hakala, Reed Smith's Global Director of Learning and Development. Today, I'm excited to be speaking with Reed Smith alum Yoni Tammam. A lawyer by training, Yoni currently works in a business role, serving as vice president, tax and insurance practice at insurance broker and advisory firm CAC Group. He started his career as a tax associate in Reed Smith's Global Corporate Group, based right here in our New York office, where I also sit. Yoni, welcome. How are you today?  Yoni: I’m doing well. Thanks for having me on, Lauren.  Lauren: Thanks for being here. So if it's okay with you, we'll jump right in because there's a lot to cover.  Yoni: That sounds great.  Lauren: Okay, so you currently work in a specialized area of the transaction insurance industry. How would you describe what you do and the product you sell to like a total layperson?  Yoni: Sure. So I work as a tax insurance broker for a company called CAC Group. CAC Group itself is a leading insurance broker and advisor that provides expertise and placement capabilities across the spectrum of insurance. Within CAC Group, I work for one of the entities called CAC Specialty, which is an industry-leading specialty broker dealing a lot with transactional insurance. And the subset that I deal with is tax insurance. So at a high level, what I do is help clients, again, protect against tax risk in high stakes transactions. The product is now actually evolving such that you don't need a transaction for tax insurance anymore. You can use it in a whole bunch of different variety of ways. And basically what it does is it protects a position that a taxpayer is putting on a tax return. So for example, if a company is undergoing a merger and they structure it to be a tax-free merger, and there's a question as to whether or not the analysis will be respected by the IRS, me and my team will work to help our clients come up with a insurance solution to mitigate that risk and allocate that risk amongst the transaction parties.  Lauren: Got it. So you mentioned that your customers are companies engaged in transactions. How do you spend most of your days with them?  Yoni: Sure. So tax insurance really comes down to high level three buckets. There's our tax credit insurance, there's M&A transactional insurance, and then there's call it ordinary course of business, which is really helping companies protect their balance sheet when taking on certain tax positions in the ordinary course of business with internal restructurings and things like that. Most of my time is spent talking with clients and or underwriters, our trading partners, and or their advisors. What we're doing initially is we're getting the intake and figuring out what the issue is that's either coming from the client's lawyers or coming from the client themselves. Discussing the risk with them, getting an understanding of it, using our tax technical expertise from our prior careers to really understand what the issue is and whether or not it's insurable and what that would look like. From there, internally, we're talking about how to best present the risk to the tax insurance market, put together that risk profile, submit a request for terms to the underwriters. And then we're on the phone with the underwriters talking about the risk and coming up with terms and negotiating what that would look like for our client. We're dealing with it in a lot of different ways, coming up with clever structures or just general down the middle tax and understanding of what the transaction parties are looking to accomplish by virtue of obtaining an insurance policy.  Lauren: So it sounds like it sounds like a having been a tax lawyer must be super useful for what you're doing now. And the work you're doing is similar in some ways to to the work of a tax lawyer. So I'm wondering, what do you like the most about now being on kind of the business side of things?  Yoni: Yeah, what I love most about my role is it allows me to wear multiple hats. I'm not just practicing law in the traditional sense anymore, but I still get to dive into legal and tax analysis and lean on that tax technical background. I'm still sharpening my skills, still taking the tax CLEs and those types of things. And I really get to enjoy that because the way I describe it sometimes is I'm in the solution-oriented world of tax law. And really what we're doing is helping clients find a solution for an issue that could be impacting their business, preventing them from taking the next step in their business, or otherwise just increasing their stakeholder and shareholder value. So really, I get to be entrepreneurial in a sense that I'm getting to deal with clients, go out and source and build a book of business. I get to be working in a tax technical space, utilizing the years of tax law practice and my specialized education. And also, I get to deal with people a lot and not just documents. And so it really is really rewarding for me to be able to help a client with their business and come up with solutions similar to how I would do it as a lawyer.  Lauren: Got it. No, it sounds like you're using a lot of different aspects of your background. So on that note, I want to rewind to the very beginning of your career, because I noticed that you studied business undergrad, and that's a really valuable degree. So I'm wondering, when you graduated, what made you decide to go on to law school?  Yoni: Yeah, I had always had an idea that I wanted to go to law school from a young age, you know, probably for the traditional reasons that kids growing up think they want to be a lawyer. I was good at arguing. I liked negotiating, those types of things. But I also knew I really liked being on the transaction side of things. And I felt I was a little bit more analytical in that sense than just the number crunching on some of the finance stuff. And quite candidly, I graduated from college right after the 2008 recession. So going to law school for a few years while the job market sorted itself out was also not a bad option. And I was very fortunate enough to have a full scholarship to law school so that it really just became kind of an easy decision for me. I was able to come back to school in New York City and really come back, be closer to my family and get to explore a whole bunch of different areas. When you're dealing as a business major, sometimes you're kind of stuck with finance or you're in one marketing or you're in one particular area. Law, I think, kind of gave me the ability to see all the different areas of business and finance, but from a different analytical standpoint and kind of looking at the building blocks of them and not just the numbers.  Lauren: That's really interesting. So how did you then decide to concentrate in tax law and then go on to get your LLM and taxation?  Yoni: Yeah. So tax, if you had told me I was going to be a tax lawyer when I started law school, I probably would have called you crazy. Having said that, it ended up being that perfect mix for me of where I thought business and law mixed. I was able to kind of understand my tax law classes. From the early onset because of my finance major, where there was certain financial and accounting type of concepts put into tax law that kind of made sense to me. It was the first time I had a study group that I was the leader of the study group because I seemed to know the most. So it just kind of came naturally to me in that sense. And similar to what I was talking about before, in terms of breadth of industry, I said, everyone pays taxes and nobody wants to pay taxes. So there's a lot of value in being the person who can help people with those taxes. It does not matter the industry you're in. And frankly, I kind of had always thought that I wanted to go into sports and be in that industry. And during law school, I actually worked for the Minnesota Vikings at one point. And one of the pieces of career advice that somebody gave me was, go be an industry expert. Go be a technical expert on something and your skillset will be marketable no matter what the industry is. And tax seemed to me the place where I could best build that skillset. I had a phenomenal professors in law school, Laura Cunningham, who's one of the masterminds of the tax world. And she really gave me a lot of really strong, good career advice and really kind of guided me towards the tax industry. And to me, it's the perfect combination of analytical rigor and real world impact.  Lauren: So I think you kind of foreshadowed what my next question was going to be

    24 min
  2. 11/07/2025

    Jamie Welborn Knauer: The power of relating to clients primarily as people

    The power of personal relationships has been transformative at every stage of Jamie Welborn Knauer’s career – from law school student, to global commercial disputes litigator at Reed Smith, to his current role as senior counsel, Product & Regulatory at DoorDash. Jamie discusses how people’s investments in his career and in him, as a person, have been invaluable. Whether it was the gift of feedback as a means to improve his core legal skills or informational interviews as a catalyst to explore new career opportunities, Jamie explains how this people-first mindset translates to aligning himself with the mission of his DoorDash colleagues and customers and how the power of personal relationships influences how he hires and works with outside counsel. ----more---- Transcript:  Intro: Welcome to the Reed Smith podcast, Career Footprints. In each episode of Career Footprints, we'll ask our guest, a Reed Smith alum, to share their career story, how their time at Reed Smith set them up for success, and their advice for early career lawyers. Our goal is to surface insights from the careers of these inspiring professionals that will help you find professional success, however you define that.  Lauren: Greetings, and welcome to another episode of Reed Smith's alumni Career Footprints podcast. This is your host, Lauren Hakala, and I'm Reed Smith's Global Director of Learning and Development. Today, I'm excited to be speaking with Reed Smith alum, Jamie Welborn Knauer. Jamie currently serves as senior counsel, Product and Regulatory at DoorDash, based in San Francisco. Jamie joined DoorDash from Reed Smith's San Francisco office, where he practiced for about four years as an associate in our Global Commercial Disputes group. Jamie, welcome. How are you today?  Jamie: Doing great. How are you?  Lauren: Awesome. Excited for this conversation. So let's jump in because there's a lot to cover. So I'd like to just start by asking you a little bit about what you currently do at DoorDash.  Jamie: Yeah, so I'm what's called a product counsel. It is a role that is very specific to tech companies. Essentially, what it is, is I work with product teams. So with the business, with software engineers, with product managers, it's a highly cross-functional role. And I get to have the fun of building the products that you interact with and millions of people interact with on a daily basis. Ensuring regulatory compliance, making sure everything is crystal clear to the consumer, marketing, you know, the Dasher side as well, ensuring that the delivery is safe and compliant and the best possible product we can provide. So it's a lot of fun.  Lauren: That sounds fun. And a product that pretty much all of our listeners will be familiar with. But what's the best part of it, like being in-house at a company like that?  Jamie: I would say no two days are the same. I really like being in a dynamic role. I will never be bored in this job, which is probably one of the best things about it. I get to cover a pretty wide swath of areas too. So I cover, I'm on the new verticals team, which is essentially fancy tech jargon for all of our newer business lines that are non-restaurant. So grocery delivery, pharmacy, alcohol, all of those are new verticals. And I specifically get to cover retail, so everything from Sephora to Best Buy to Home Depot to PetSmart. I cover our whole convenience business, so that's pharmacies and convenience stores, as well as everything health-related, including prescription delivery. And I also get to cover SNAP, which is Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. It's a government benefit, food benefit for low-income individuals and families. And it's a way that folks can order groceries on our platform using their benefits. So you can tell even from just my description of my job, all of those things are very different, which makes it a lot of fun. So that's one. And then I think the second thing is I like that I get to build. You know, I feel like I am aligned with the mission of the company in the sense that I'm working to help it succeed as opposed to more of the litigation past I was in where I'm trying to resolve disputes. You know, it's a lot more proactive rather than reactive, which is exciting. And yeah, I like contributing to the success of the company. That really is invigorating.  Lauren: Yeah, that sounds really rewarding to be building new product lines with the business people.  Jamie: Yeah, absolutely.  Lauren: Okay, so I want to rewind and just figure out how you've gotten to such an engaging role. So let's go all the way back to college and you're deciding to go to law school. So I see that you majored in poli-sci undergrad at USC. And I'm wondering, did you always know that you wanted to be a lawyer? Was that the plan or did that kind of come in time?  Jamie: Yeah. So no is the short answer. I always had an inkling that law might be for me, but I wasn't sure. So when I went to college, I was actually in journalism and communication school at first because I figured being a good writer would help me no matter what field I chose. Those courses did not appeal to me. And I ended up taking a constitutional law class in undergrad that was actually taught by a law school professor in the style of a law school class. So we actually read court opinions. Our tests were just like law school, issue spotting. And it was all the like sexy con law stuff that, you know, is in the news. Freedom of speech issues and equal protection. And I was totally drawn to it. I had a great professor too, but that really solidified for me that this was something I was passionate about. And I switched my major to poli-sci, loved those classes. I got to take everything from the more political side to legal classes to also philosophy, which was really kind of neat to think about how societies are built and our norms and. It just really aligned with, I think, my natural way of thinking. I think I am a critical thinker by nature. And so I think I realized there was alignment in the legal field and how lawyers have to work with kind of my natural way of looking at the world and approaching problems.  Lauren: That's really interesting because I feel like I talked to so many people who, when they got to law school, the way law school is taught was so alienating to them. And they really felt almost kind of traumatized by it. But it sounds like I felt the same way I loved law school and that, you know, the approach to problem solving really kind of drew you in.  Jamie: Yeah, I loved law school. And I, you know, it was like, it felt like a lot of work at the time. But now when you're in a 40 plus hour a week job, it seems like a joke that we thought that was hard. But it was, I mean, I went to UC Davis also, which was a very collegial environment. I think not everybody has that in law school, but that was really a lovely place to be. And I actually miss, we had so many lunchtime talks with professors, like opining about things going on in the news and the Supreme Court and, It was cool to have that at my fingertips and people who are really engaged with, you know, significant happenings in the world and having a forum to just hear her perspectives and also have like, you know, brown bag discussions. I miss that. Like some of the things going on today, I wonder what some of my professors would say and would love to have those conversations. So, yeah, there was never a point where I questioned what I was doing. I think before I decided to go to law school, a lot of people tried to talk me out of it because of the debt, you know, possibilities. And I'm very glad I didn't listen to them.  Lauren: Well, so it sounds like you had a great experience at Davis for law school. And then you came to Reed Smith. So can you talk about how you decided to go from law school? And it sounds like a very kind of like academic, calm, law-focused thing to being a big law litigator.  Jamie: Yeah, I had no idea what I wanted to do when I went to law school. And listeners will probably know this term, but we had something called OCI, which stands for on-campus interviewing, where law firms and regulatory agencies and other organizations, nonprofits to come to campus and actually interview Davis law students. And this is common at schools across the country. And I and a lot of big law firms come every year and I wasn't even going to put my hat in the ring I just had heard horror stories about like selling your soul and having no free time and it just being pretty miserable and I'm very grateful for a classmate who said don't limit yourself just throw your hat in the ring and you don't have to say yes and just see what you think. And that was a passing comment that changed my life because it was really good advice. And so I applied and you really get a sense interviewing of the personality of a law firm. I think if law firm, some of the law firms who I interviewed with, whoever decided to send those lawyers should be re-evaluated because they, as the face of the law firm, made me certain I didn't want to work there. And the reverse was true. I had interviews where I just got a really good feel. Reed Smith was one of those firms in fact I actually had a really positive impression of Reed Smith going in because Reed Smith had come to Davis and done a lunchtime talk and I’ll give a shout out to Jessica Sisco who's the recruiter and SF for a long time. She is one of a kind so charismatic and charming and she led like a myth busters panel with a few a current Reed Smith attorney is, and it was funny and relaxed, and everybody seemed to genuinely be happy. These things sound obvious, but they are appealing, especially for folks who've heard horror stories about big law. And so, yeah, I remember interviewing at Reed Smith. I loved the people I met, and I chose it because of the feel.  Lauren: No, and you are so smart. I mean, I feel like a

    31 min
  3. 11/06/2025

    Cara DeCataldo: Thinking strategically about things to come

    Mentorship – and being a good mentee – has been important to alum Cara DeCataldo since the beginning of her career. Cara shares insights into how mentors and others in her professional network helped her to prepare for and thrive in her first role at a small regional firm, then as a product liability litigator in Reed Smith’s Life Sciences Health Industry Group and more recently in her current position as assistant general counsel at global pharmaceuticals company Eisai Inc. She reflects on some of the important lessons that each of these moves taught her and explores the exciting and liberating idea that your next role might not be the one you first expected. ----more---- Transcript: Intro: Welcome to the Reed Smith podcast, Career Footprints. In each episode of Career Footprints, we'll ask our guest, a Reed Smith alum, to share their career story, how their time at Reed Smith set them up for success, and their advice for early career lawyers. Our goal is to surface insights from the careers of these inspiring professionals that will help you find professional success, however you define that.  Lauren: Welcome to another episode of Reed Smith's Alumni Career Footprints podcast. This is Lauren Hakala, Reed Smith's Global Head of Learning and Development. Today, I'm excited to be speaking with Reed Smith alum Cara DeCataldo. Based in New Jersey, Cara currently serves as Assistant General Counsel at Eisai, a global pharmaceutical company headquartered in Japan. Cara joined Eisai eight years ago after practicing as a product liability litigator in Reed Smith's life sciences and health industry group, what we sometimes call LSHI. So I want to start by asking you about just your professional life currently. Can you tell us a little bit about your role at Eisai and what you do and how you spend most of your time there?  Cara: Yes, definitely. We are a midsize pharmaceutical company, and we have a pretty lean legal department of about 20 attorneys across the entire company. So I support our commercial side of the business, including our medical affairs colleagues. So mostly marketing, sales, and I have an assigned product, which right now is an Alzheimer's drug, which was approved roughly two years ago. And so I am, you know, I sit on our promotional review committee. We review all the materials that are used for sales and marketing. As you know, the life science industry is so heavily regulated. So, you know, we take special care in how we promote the product. And so I sit on those committees and then just generally advise clients on interactions with HCPs and our customers, market access issues. So anything sort of commercially related to the product that I support is the legal work that I do.  Lauren: Wow. So it sounds like you're just really embedded in the day-to-day operations of a large pharma company.  Cara: Yeah, absolutely.  Lauren: Could you tell us a little bit about what you like the most about that kind of pace and that sort of focus of your work?  Cara: Yeah, I really like being part of the team who can sort of think strategically about things to come rather than sometimes when we're in a law firm, we're reacting to things that have already happened. And you're, you know, a ton of strategy involved in preparing for litigation, of course, but it's just sort of different. You're more partnered with your business colleagues and can think about ways to mitigate risk, but doing so in a way that really helps to achieve the business's objectives. I like in the work that I do, I use this term a lot. I'm a bit of a connector because I do see such a variety of questions that are posed to me or materials that are sent to me for my review. And I can really, a lot of times, sometimes our business colleagues are in a silo and they're working. And I kind of see the bigger picture sometimes. I'll say, hey, did you know so-and-so was working on a project that sounds somewhat similar? You know, you might share learnings. And so I really like that part of my job, this connector role that I get to play just by nature of the legal questions and issues that come to me. So I think that's fascinating. And then I really like being part of the pharmaceutical industry. Like I do have deep belief in the science that is achieving remarkable goals to help patients in the field that I mentioned in Alzheimer's disease. It's obviously an incredible unmet need, just a dearth of treatments and just a lack of hope for these patients. And so that's been incredibly exciting to me in my way, in my legal way, my non-scientist contributing way. But contributing to that is really something that I enjoy.  Lauren: That's amazing. It sounds like you have that sort of double crown of loving both what you do and then also feeling good about the mission.  Cara: Exactly.  Lauren: Well, thank you so much for sharing that. So I want to kind of figure out how you ended up in such a great and fulfilling position. And when we spoke the other day, you mentioned to me that you graduated law school back in 2009, which was right in the middle of the global financial crisis. I was a few years ahead of you. I was law school class of 2004. So I remember what a really tough year 2009 was for law school grads. So I'm wondering, can you tell us a little bit about how you landed your first role at a law school in that environment?  Cara: Yeah, it was interesting times. Hopefully not like anything the 2025 graduates will be facing. But as we're talking, it's April. So who knows? Hopefully not. But I did have a summer internship at a regionally based New Jersey law firm, and I was lucky enough to secure an offer. And I thought I would be doing, you know, more business litigation. That's sort of what my offer was extended to in that particular group. But, you know, life unfolded and unfortunately a lot of offers were rescinded at that time to my colleagues. But there was one particular partner who was in the product liability litigation practice in a different office of this regional New Jersey firm that I worked for. And he still had, you know, had a need for an associate. And You know, they said, listen, are you willing to go to this other office, which wasn't terribly far away? New Jersey's not a terribly big state as it is. So I said, yes, of course. And so I did get some great experience. I was doing more like automotive, some asbestos litigation. And it was wonderful because when you got, I didn't know much. I knew not much of anything. I had some great, more senior associates that were really friendly, open door. Like I could ask them those really dumb questions of this partner said to do, you know, get the interrogatories. And I just, what does that even mean? Where do I look? You know, those are just very basic questions. So I was just fortunate I was surrounded by good people, willing people, people generous with their time. And so I learned a lot. But even at that time, I just felt that I wasn't busy enough. And I know that sounds silly, but I think even then I recognized it wasn't the type of experience that I wanted to have when I had the time to get more experience to get me where I sort of wanted to go long term. And so I started looking for other jobs, and a friend of mine from law school had ended up at Reed Smith, And at one point, I think we had just talked over the years, I was kind of like, I'm looking, I'm not terribly, I could use more work. I wanted different experiences, more experiences. And she reached out to me and said, oh, the Princeton office is hiring, you know, a litigator in their product liability, their life science group. So it wasn't, you know, exactly, I wasn't as familiar yet with the pharma industry, but I had those general early associate litigation product liability thought processes, certainly understood that. And so we connected and I interviewed with Melissa Geist and I was just fortunate enough to get hired into that group. And that was just such a great experience overall.  Lauren: Oh, gosh, that must have been like a big change. I want to kind of ask you about that. So you were at a regional firm, New Jersey-based firm, I understand. And then you made this move to Reed Smith and suddenly you were at a global firm with colleagues all over the world. How was that for you?  Cara: Yeah, it was super exciting. And I do always say that I have the best of both worlds work standing in the Princeton office because, you know, it's sort of a smaller office with the resources of a national farm, which was super exciting. So it definitely had the clients and the sophisticated type of work that I knew that I would have ample opportunity to grow my skill set. It also just had, you know, the ability to network with other attorneys of these like great minds and different groups. And they had, you know, different networking events and just seeing the leadership structure, like. You know, the firm chair. And that's really like running more of a business, you know, certainly all law firms are running a business, but at a large scale. And so all of those opportunities to meet people doing such a wide variety of legal work and networking with those people, trying to understand the work that they did, that was really exciting and important because you can never grow your network, you know, big enough to know, because none of us are going to be experts in every area of the law. It's really not possible. It's about, you know, having a network to rely upon. And so that was super exciting to me. And then really just, again, I started with this point, but the focusing on the nature of the work. So at that time, there were some large, you know, multi-district litigations going on at which we were, you know, chief defense counsel. And so the exposure to, you know, drawing up expert reports and helping to develop them in the context with expert witnesses. The ability, at one point, some judge went nuts and ordered

    31 min
  4. 10/04/2025

    Stuart Kuntz: Becoming a collaborative and agile deal lawyer

    Reed Smith alum Stuart Kuntz shares his path from senior M&A associate to associate general counsel of a public company, including what drew him to in-house practice and the mindset and approach to client service that contributed to his success. He shares his insights from two decades of dealmaking on how outside counsel – from partners to junior associates – can make a strong impression, and how junior associates can prepare for a career path that leads to success like his. ----more---- Transcript: Intro: Welcome to the Reed Smith Podcast, Career Footprints. In each episode of Career Footprints, we'll ask our guest, a Reed Smith alum, to share their career story, how their time at Reed Smith set them up for success, and their advice for early career lawyers. Our goal is to surface insights from the careers of these inspiring professionals that will help you find professional success, however you define that.  Lauren: Welcome to another episode of Reed Smith's Alumni Career Footprints Podcast. I am your host, Lauren Hakala, Reed Smith's Global Director of Learning and Development. And today, I'm excited to be speaking with Reed Smith alumni, Stuart Kuntz. Stuart is Associate General Counsel, M&A, and Ventures at a company that many of our listeners will be very familiar with, and that's Foot Locker. He joined Footlocker two and a half years ago after spending about 17 years in legal roles of increasing responsibility at Verizon. Earlier in his career, Stuart practiced as a transactional associate here at Reed Smith. Stuart, how are you today?  Stuart: Hi, Lauren. I'm doing great. Thanks.  Lauren: So I'd like to start by asking you just about your current role at Foot Locker. How do you spend most of your time and who do you mainly interact with during your work days there?  Stuart: You know, I spend most of my time, I'm a transactional lawyer, spend most of my time on M&A transactions. I spend some amount of time on international franchising transactions. as well. I also, as part of my role, I support our treasury group. So I do spend some time, not as much, but some time supporting treasury, either with regard to our credit facility or other agreements or questions they have. So that's, you know, that's the bulk of my practice at Foot Locker. There's an occasional, you know, occasional commercial contract I need to help out with, you know, a little this, a little that. But I would say the bulk of it is disposition work, international franchising, and some treasury support.  Lauren: So it sounds like you are a real deal lawyer. And I'm curious, how would you describe your style or your approach to helping your clients get transactions done and closed?  Stuart: You know, it's a lot of, you know, we talk about style and approach, you somewhat want to mirror your client's style and approach. And it can change from deal to deal. There are transactions that, you know, we got, you know, we have to take one for the team. Essentially, this is something We got to get done and, you know, we're going to have to bite our lip and do it because it's, it's critical and, you know, generally, you know, disposition of business that just isn't strategic, for example, you know, you're going to have to get done. There are others that are more nice to have where you can take stronger negotiation positions. It also depends on the counterparty. There are people who are very easy to deal with commercially reasonable professional people. There are people who, you know, are, it can be very difficult and, you know, everything's a fight and there can be people who, you know, maybe they're not difficult, but they They're not particularly sophisticated, and there's a lot of almost educating the other side when you're doing a deal. So it varies from transaction to transaction, but you try to get a feel for the deal. I try to be collaborative. I try to generally be fairly reasonable. I don't start from where I think I'm going to end up, but I would not necessarily set out an agreement that has every single issue biased in my favor in extreme ways because it's just not productive. So, you know, I would say, you know, try to start, you know, kind of, you know, somewhere near where you think you're going to wind up. You get exceptions here and there, but that's kind of my style, collaborative, approachable. Does that make sense?  Lauren: Yeah. No, I'm hearing a lot of almost like situational awareness, right? And being able to read a room and adapt your style. So I definitely want to come back to that later when we talk about your advice for junior lawyers.  Stuart: Sure, sure.  Lauren: So you started your career as a law firm associate, like I did, and you were including at Reed Smith.  Stuart: Yeah.  Lauren: So I'm curious, when and why did you decide to move to an in-house role?  Stuart: I moved in-house probably about six years into my practice, which I think is fairly typical for associates. I don't think that's particularly unusual. I went originally to MCI, which was a predecessor company of Verizon. They were bought by Verizon fairly shortly after I got there, actually. You know i like the idea of having one client really getting to know your client's business your client's style your client's you know pain points you know even your client's neuroses because you know everyone's got everyone's got neuroses and you know just knowing your clients is helpful i like the idea of being involved very very early on the idea of kind of even giving you know giving and strategic thought to, you know, deals and whether we should do it and how it should be done are things I really enjoy about being in-house and things that, reasons I thought I wanted to go in-house. After six years, I got in a point where I knew how to run a deal. And so, you know, I didn't need hand-holding to actually do the nuts and bolts of running a deal, which is important because in-house, there isn't, you know, that level of support that you get in a law firm from more senior lawyers, you know, who you're doubled up with on a deal, teaching them how to do a deal. It's, you know, this is your transaction, you know, call me when it's done. So, you know, so yeah, I think, you know, a lot of that I liked, I, there are things, you know, I, about the law firm life that I think long-term probably were not going to be for me. You know, I never saw myself as a big rainmaker, being able to bring a lot of business if something's not a concern in-house, obviously, you know, I'd be honest, I don't miss the billable hour.  Lauren: I’ve never heard anyone say that they do.  Stuart: I know, I know. Look, my time is my time, and I do my work. If I'm busy, I'm busy, I'm busy. And if I'm not, I don't stress about not making hours. I just, you know, whatever comes, I take care of it, and I'll track it or worry about it or even really pay attention to it. You know, today, you know, after being in-house for 20 years, I have no idea how much I spend on something. I just, you know, just do it however long it takes to take.  Lauren: Yeah, no, I like what you said about being a sixth-year and knowing you could run a deal and, you know, being ready to do that at the company. So when you landed at MCI and you had that kind of expectation, was it what you thought? Did anything surprise you about in-house practice?  Stuart: It was a lot of what I thought. A couple of things, I guess when you think about surprising, the level of support is not what it is in a law firm. And that took a little bit of adjusting is, you know, there's no word processing department. You know, the level of support staff for the legal department is much, much smaller. You know, so you're a little bit more on your own in those ways, or you somewhat rely on outside counsel in those ways. Learning how you know certain skills i wasn't prepared for learning how to manage outside councils is nothing you experience at a law firm so you kind of learn that on the fly talking to other in-house lawyers how do you kind of keep control of that process how do you know you need to prioritize your outside counsel they're not going to know necessarily so that was a skill that you know i think was new to me and maybe you know something I really hadn't thought about before i came on board as well, if that makes sense.  Lauren: Yeah, yeah. And so it sounds like you did have some learning to do about the new role.  Stuart: Oh, yeah, sure.  Lauren: And fast forward nearly two decades later, you're now Associate GC, so you moved up consistently. What do you think it was that you did right looking back that allowed you to become quite senior now?  Stuart: I think it's a number of things. Do good work, right? No matter what you're doing, do good work, you know, be a good deal lawyer. You know, those skills are always valued. Develop good relationships with your internal counterparts, whether it be your clients, which are probably your most important relationships, but with other lawyers in the legal department. As an M&A lawyer, every deal has subject matter expert questions. And, you know, especially at Verizon, which had a huge legal department, you know, I had to be, you know, in tight with the IP lawyer, the tax lawyer, the benefits lawyer, the commercial lawyers, because, you know, I'm creating work for them. You know, I need you to review this. I need you to do this diligence. I need you to get on a call and negotiate this provision, you know, and, you know, people don't always love having work created for them. So, you know, you want to make sure your buddies with them, you know, give them a real skin in the game. They feel like they have a stake in a transaction so that, you know, that you can move them along, you know, communicating up to senior management in the legal department is important. You know, they're very busy people. My general counsel, she's not interested in a 30 page memo on why w

    26 min
  5. 17/02/2025

    Molly Campbell: Mastering complexity

    Reed Smith alum Molly Campbell shares how her passion for learning novel and complex subjects and her powerful interactions with mentors enabled her to excel as a litigation associate and then partner at Reed Smith. She details how careful reflection and strong professional and personal relationships paved her path from trial lawyer to in-house counsel at Astellas Pharma advising on cutting-edge regulatory issues. ----more---- Transcript: Intro: Welcome to the Reed Smith podcast, Career Footprints. In each episode of Career Footprints, we'll ask our guests, a Reed Smith alum, to share their career story, how their time at Reed Smith set them up for success, and their advice for early career lawyers. Our goal is to surface insights from inspiring professionals' careers that will help you find your professional success, however you define that.  Lauren: Welcome to another episode of Reed Smith's Alumni Career Footprints podcast. This is Lauren Hakala, Reed Smith's Global Director of Learning and Development. Today, I'm really excited to be speaking with Reed Smith alum Molly Campbell. Molly is currently the Legal Regulatory Lead for Gene Therapy at Astellas Pharma. She joined Astellas from Reed Smith’s Washington, D.C. office, where she most recently was a partner in the Global Commercial Disputes Group. Molly, welcome. How are you today?  Molly: Hi, thank you so much. So nice to be here. I'm doing quite well.  Lauren: Awesome. So let's dive right in. We've got a lot to cover. So I'd love to start by asking you about your current role. What are your main areas of responsibility at Astellas?  Molly: Well, you touched on one. So I am the legal lead for the Astellas Gene Therapy Division, but I actually have quite a diverse role here at Astellas. I also support our government pricing and state transparency teams, and I'm the global social media subject matter expert and serve as the legal representative for the U.S. Specific committee dealing with sort of any novel social media initiative. And finally, I've most recently taken on the role of providing any legal guidance and support necessary for any independent medical education grants.  Lauren: That sounds like a very wide area of responsibility. I'm curious, what do you like best about the role?  Molly: Well, like you mentioned, I love the variability. I'm never, ever bored. Sometimes I do feel a little bit like whack-a-mole. I'll be thinking in one area of the law and then have to pivot to something completely different. But I think my favorite part is really the relationships I've been able to build since coming to Astellas. It's interesting, of course, I had good relationships with clients when I was at the firm. But as a litigator, you also have some fairly adversarial relationships. And as professional as those may be, you certainly don't want the same thing as your opposing counsel. But in-house, the business partners that I work with every day know that I want the things that they want. And it's really our process together, finding the best solution to balance risks and getting to the great answer and the good outcome that they want. That's been my favorite part of being in-house. I set sort of a goal for myself originally that I would be an attorney that people want to include on the calls and I think based on some of the feedback that I've received to date I've made some very good inroads into developing that reputation because I know it can be so difficult everybody knows right the lawyers are the people that they love to hate and that was something that I just didn't want to have happen in-house. And it's been wonderful to try to make sure that people value what it is I can contribute to the conversation and know that it's my goal to do everything I can to support their, you know, all of the opportunities and all of the desires that they have as a business.  Lauren: That's so cool how intentional you were about, I want to be a lawyer that people want to have on calls. Such an important part of building those relationships, I can imagine, especially when you're going from being a litigator to being like a counselor.  Molly: Exactly. Totally different. I absolutely did a 180 here.  Lauren: Like a big transition. Okay. So I want to now rewind to the very beginning of your career. When we spoke, you shared with me that after law school, you clerked in federal court for two years. And I'd love to hear more about that experience.  Molly: What an invaluable experience, I have to say. Anyone who would have the opportunity to clerk, I certainly recommend it. I was very fortunate that my judge was a teacher through and through. In fact, he was a teacher before he came to be a judge and an attorney. And to hear his thoughts about... The case law that we were working with, the facts of the cases that were before us, how we would structure a holding, for instance, whether that be very narrow or whether we try to say more in an opinion and why, was it provided such an incredible value add, particularly at such an early stage in my career that I carry through to today. You know, understanding how to advocate for a particular issue, understanding what kind of arguments to make that will be the most successful in light of the facts of the situation and not dealing necessarily with cases any longer, but always the facts of any situation. And I actually did and I get this question quite often give up a full time position that I was offered after my second year summer to do that the firm that I summered with did not hold offers open and in the moment that created a small amount of panic and in hindsight honestly it it was not something that I ever needed to be concerned about. And so I would absolutely say to anyone in that same position to go for that clerkship because that experience was truly invaluable.  Lauren: Sounds amazing. And very glad to hear that that we at that other firm lost the opportunity to hire you because the next thing you did after that that second year of a clerkship is you joined Reed Smith. And it sounds like you had some pretty broad and pretty good experience compared to someone who was going straight from law school into the law firm. So given that you had two years of cooking for an amazing teacher, could you tell us a little bit about how, what was your experience of the first few years of practice?  Molly: Absolutely. And I have to say, I did interview at a number of firms before landing on Reed Smith. And one of the reasons I did so was, well, firstly, because the people were so incredible. I felt very enthusiastic about the opportunity to work with every single person who interviewed me. And I know they didn't just give me the good ones because when I came back again for a more sort of substantial second round with additional people, it just seemed like everyone truly had a similar mindset and it was mine, right? It was what I wanted to do. And one of the things that I gathered from that interview process and what proved to be true later was how much real experience I was able to have immediately. And I did work on such a diverse caseload when I first arrived, actually really probably for about five years. Everything from financial services work, the global regulatory work, labor, appeals, commercial litigation. I sort of had my hands in everything. And I was fortunate that because I came in from a clerkship, you know, people really valued my perspective as a writer and an advocate. So I did a lot of writing motions. And then I was very interested in arguing those motions and immediately was encouraged to do so. And of course, with pretty good success, at least initially, I was able to continue doing so. And people really encouraged that. So one of the things that I, again, really value about Reed Smith is that they allowed me to be so adventurous and curious about what I ultimately wanted to do. And really, I pretty much touched every practice group that we had, it's safe for the corporate M&A, which I still have no idea what they do or how they do it.  Lauren: So that’s, well, that’s, it's so funny. I feel like I say this in conversation with each of our alumni because so many have said what you just said about the fact that you were able to jump in and, you know, given that you were enthusiastic about the work and you built trust with people, you were permitted to get a lot of substantive real experience straight off the bat.  Molly: I think I even did my first deposition that first year that I was at Reed Smith. So just came in and said, oh, I'm interested in doing a deposition and got handed a deposition to you. It was a it was they nobody threw me in the deep end. It was a very reasonable deposition of a very friendly witness. But it what a fantastic opportunity again, straight away.  Lauren: That's incredible. OK, so you said that for the first five years, really, you have this opportunity. You took cases in a variety of subject matters. At some point, you got promoted. So can you talk a little bit about how you thought about positioning yourself for promotion and maybe narrowing down and picking a specialty? That's something that associates ask about a lot. So it'd be great to hear how you thought about that as you got more senior.  Molly: They're right to be thinking about it. So good for them. I think perhaps I thought I started thinking about that a little bit too late. It still worked out, but I recommend considering all of your options perhaps a bit sooner than I. And so I'll talk about this in two stages. First, I was in the Philadelphia office of Reed Smith for the first two and a half years of my practice and then moved to Washington, D.C. And that was a result of my husband getting a job in Washington, D.C. And this was before the times of remote work and comfort with the technology of doing so. And I recall requesting to move offices and having it be a considerable request. Peo

    36 min
  6. 11/12/2024

    Doug Sayranian: From M&A lawyer to general counsel working in cyber threat intelligence

    Reed Smith alum Doug Sayranian shares his journey from M&A senior associate in New York to his current role in-house as general counsel at cyber threat intelligence company Intel 471.  ----more---- Transcript: Intro: Welcome to the Reed Smith podcast, Career Footprints. In each episode of Career Footprints, we'll ask our guests, a Reed Smith alum, to share their career story, how their time at Reed Smith set them up for success, and their advice for early career lawyers. Our goal is to surface insights from inspiring professionals' careers that will help you find your professional success, however you define that.  Lauren: Greetings, and welcome to another episode of Reed Smith's Alumni Career Footprints podcast. This is Lauren Hakala, Reed Smith's Global Director of Learning and Development. Today, I'm excited to be speaking with Reed Smith alum Douglas Sayranian. Doug is currently the general counsel of cybercrime intelligence company Intel 471. He joined Intel 471 from Reed Smith's New York office, where he was a senior M&A associate. Doug's career has included roles at three other global law firms, where, as we're about to hear, he built significant chops in public, private, and private equity M&A. Doug, welcome.  Doug: Hi, Lauren. Thanks for having me. I'm really excited to be here.  Lauren: So I would love to start our conversation by hearing a little bit about Intel 471. What does your company focus on, and what is your role over there?  Doug: Absolutely. Intel 471 is a cyber threat intelligence company, and our specialty is focusing on gathering and reporting hard to get information about what's happening in the criminal underworld when it comes to cybersecurity threats, vulnerabilities, and tactics. A good example might be the solar winds breach or government investigations into Telegram or trying to help protect hospitals and businesses from ransomware. My role at the company as the head of legal covers the normal everyday contractual matters, but also things like risk, privacy, compliance, HR, and strategic positioning of the corporation.  Lauren: Wow. So it sounds like you're really, or at least your company in the business is working on some things that are in the headlines that we're all seeing every day. So exciting. So as someone who spent most of your career so far at law firms, what's been the best thing about making the jump to in-house? It was a really difficult decision for me when I was considering whether to continue pursuing partnership at a large law firm, specifically at Reed Smith, or to leave for Intel 471, which was actually one of my clients when I was in private practice. The best thing about being in-house is the ability to really put my skills to use and solve problems for the business outside of a narrow legal channel being able to have an impact and an influence in a variety of different aspects of the organization has been really rewarding and it's also allowed me to learn entirely new skills and develop different aspects of existing skills to be a better practitioner and a business leader.  Lauren: Great. No, thanks for that. So you mentioned developing new skills in your new role, and I want to ask you more about that. So in what areas have you had to do the most learning? Like where was the biggest learning curve? And how was that for you coming from being, you know, quite a successful senior associate?  Doug: I think that there are probably two areas that I would identify as the low-hanging fruit or the steepest learning curves for me when I first went in-house. One is practical, and that is reframing an analysis of any situation or a solution to a problem or a strategy to tackle a certain obstacle. In terms of practicality, the fact that the world is in an imperfect place. In private practice, obviously, attorneys seek to be experts on a wide variety of topics, but understand both the perfectly impossible and imperfectly possible solutions to a client's problem. It was difficult for me when I first went in-house to let go of the impulse to want to apply the best solution, as opposed to applying the solution that was commercially practicable. The second area where I've done quite a lot of reading, both technical and non-technical material, is obviously in the context of artificial intelligence and large language models. It's an exciting new development for technology for humanity and it's really changing the way my business and businesses in general conduct themselves in the world.  Lauren: Interesting. So really getting down into the details of the business. Because I imagine as outside counsel, you also try to be practical and business-like, but it sounds like now that you're on that other side, it's a different level of solution-oriented thinking for the business.  Doug: Absolutely. I used to joke that when I was an M&A practitioner, I was functionally a wedding planner.  Lauren: I love that.  Doug: I helped companies fall in love and start a family. It's a little bit different when you're part of the family and you have to think about day-to-day things like getting groceries and taking out trash as opposed to planning for the big party.  Lauren: Oh, wow. I love that metaphor. Okay, so let's go back to the beginning of your career now that we have seen where you've landed so successfully. So you went to Northwestern Law School in Chicago, and knowing that, you must have had plenty of options when you started out your career. So can you tell us a little bit about when and how you chose to come to New York and do M&A at a global law firm?  Doug: When I was in law school, I had the privilege of taking corporate law courses from Professor Carl Lutz, who was formerly a private equity M&A partner at Kirkland & Ellis. And one of the courses he taught was on M&A transactions, where we actually read through sample deal documents and thought through the negotiation of the commercial terms, the legal terms, and the implications it might have for the fictional business. I enjoyed that work so much that I knew in law school that I wanted to be an M&A attorney. And when I was interviewing with firms, I met with a number of really wonderful partners and associates from all over the country. But it was fairly obvious to me that New York as a market was where most of the activity and the skill and the resources for U.S.-based M&A was located. And the line that I used in my on-campus interviews when I was still a 2L trying to get a summer associate position was, you don't choose to become a gladiator and then refuse to go to Rome. Because of all the places in the world to do M&A, New York is the most competitive and the fastest moving and the most intense. And I knew that if I was in New York City, I would find mentors and teachers and challenges that would help me grow.  Lauren: So you just fell in love with the subject matter in law school and then, as you said, made it to the capital of the excitement. And I'm curious, when you landed here as a first-year associate, what surprised you? Was it all that you had expected and hoped for and what was different from what you might have expected?  Doug: I joke with people that being a big law M&A associate is not as bad as people say it is, but it's worse than you imagine. In that it's exceptionally rewarding and challenging and changes constantly. And so there's an adaptability and versatility that's required that makes doing the work fun, genuinely interesting on the other hand the lifestyle is quite intense and i think to be excellent all of the time and push for perfection and look for errors or mistakes or gaps is a difficult thing to do. It's a method of mental training that is quite taxing. And so I was really surprised when I first started practicing and started learning from my teachers how consistent you have to be in your thinking. And not rigidly consistent, but just how demanding you have to be on yourself to deliver a high level of practice.  Lauren: Yeah, that sort of image that's coming up is just like this relentlessness of having to get it right, even though you're working on difficult timelines, I imagine. So you've shared that M&A practice is particularly demanding. And in my former life, I was also a corporate lawyer. I did securities. So I know, and you've shared that you worked long and unpredictable hours. And I'm just curious, what kept you going throughout those tough times and maybe some sleepless nights?  Doug: I had the benefit of working with really wonderful teams of lawyers, associates, senior associates, partners, and also support staff. This was also pre-pandemic, and so most of the time we were in an office. If we had weekend work or late nights, I was almost never alone. Even if I was the only person working on my matter in my office, there would be other people in the office, on my floor, in the cafe. And the feeling of camaraderie, of doing important work, of collaboration, of excitement, really removed a lot of what I would call the distress of long, late nights. And so it was stressful, but it wasn't distressing.  Lauren: Now, it's so interesting when I think about what made it so hard for so many people during the pandemic, I think it was just the absence of what you said, right? Having other folks around who you can talk to and who understand what you're going through, and then having all that just physical support, right? Having a cafe that you can go to and take a break in. So that's really, it's interesting to hear that that's what got you through. So just kind of continuing on with this theme of the intensity of your career as interesting and great as it was. I want to ask you to go back to a particularly difficult moment and all of that and give your younger self some advice? What was one of the toughest times and what would you say to yourself when you're in a very intense period?  Doug: It's interesting because looking back, the moments I would sa

    30 min

About

In each episode, we’ll ask our guest, a Reed Smith alum, to share their career story, how their time at Reed Smith contributed to their success, and their advice for early-career lawyers. Our goal is to surface insights from these inspiring professionals’ careers that will help you find your way to professional success, however you define that.