IPWatchdog Unleashed

Gene Quinn

Each week we journey into the world of intellectual property to discuss the law, news, policy and politics of innovation, technology, and creativity.  With analysis and commentary from industry thought leaders and newsmakers from around the world, IPWatchdog Unleashed is hosted by world renowned patent attorney and founder of IPWatchdog.com, Gene Quinn.

  1. 3時間前

    Will AI Replace Patent Lawyers? Why Experience and Judgment Still Matter

    Send us Fan Mail This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed, Gene Quinn examines why artificial intelligence is unlikely to eliminate experienced patent lawyers—but will expose practitioners whose work consists primarily of commodity production. AI is already transforming prior-art searching, claim comparison, application drafting, office-action responses, and portfolio analysis. The strategic opportunity is not simply to produce more patents faster, but to use AI to reach a substantially better work product within the time and budget previously required to reach what courts today increasingly find to be incomplete. Quinn discusses the limits of AI-assisted patent practice, including technically impossible embodiments, unsupported combinations, inaccurate characterizations of prior art, and plausible language that collapses under technical scrutiny. AI remains a tool, not an inventor, and the use of AI cannot relieve patent professionals of responsibility for determining what is true, what works, what the inventor actually conceived, and what the law permits them to claim. For patent owners and in-house counsel, the episode offers a direct warning against treating AI as merely a justification for reducing outside-counsel fees while continuing to demand commercially useful rights that can survive scrutiny and diligence in the real world. The episode also addresses a workforce issue that is rarely discussed: if AI performs much of the entry-level work traditionally used to train junior lawyers, patent agents, and searchers, how will the next generation develop professional judgment? Quinn offers a practical roadmap that includes mastering patent-law fundamentals, using AI as a tutor and adversarial reviewer, becoming skilled at inventor interviews, developing technical depth, and studying how patents fail. He also argues for deliberate collaboration between younger professionals who bring AI fluency and experienced practitioners who contribute legal judgment, technical skepticism, and strategic perspective. The future of patent practice will belong to professionals who know not only how to use AI, but also what to question, what to verify, and what matters to the client. Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com. You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

    Will AI Replace Patent Lawyers? Why Experience and Judgment Still Matter
  2. 6日前

    Patent Counts vs. Patent Value: Patent Strategy in the AI Age

    Send us Fan Mail This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed, our host and the founder of IPWatchdog, Gene Quinn, speaks with Joel Meyer. An IP attorney and innovation strategist with more than 30 years of experience building and monetizing technology portfolios, Meyer joins Gene to examine how the AI transformation is reshaping innovation and IP strategy. Drawing on his experience with digital watermarking and other advanced technologies, they explore software and functional claiming, the persistent challenges surrounding patent eligibility, and why many concerns labeled as “abstractness” may be better addressed through Section 112—and, in some cases, Section 103. The conversation then turns to the strategic choices facing startups and growth companies, including when to patent, when to rely on trade secrets, and why simply accumulating patent numbers is rarely the right objective. Meyer and Quinn discuss the importance of building foundational patent specifications that preserve optionality, support protection at multiple levels of generality, and anticipate competitive technologies, alternative implementations and future market developments. They also examine AI-assisted patent drafting and searching, including why an AI-generated application that looks polished may still be little more than a product specification without the strategic architecture necessary to create durable IP value. Finally, Gene and Joel explore the evolving role of IP counsel as a strategic business partner rather than merely a producer of patents. For emerging companies in particular, effective IP strategy requires understanding the technology, competitive landscape, business model and investor expectations—and identifying the protectable advantages that can become meaningful barriers to entry. The takeaway is a forward-looking discussion about using patents, trade secrets and AI tools together to create value, anticipate disruption and preserve strategic options as technologies and markets evolve. Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com. You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

    Patent Counts vs. Patent Value: Patent Strategy in the AI Age
  3. 8月3日

    Patent Monetization Economics: What It Costs to Turn Patents into Revenue

    Send us Fan Mail This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed, Brad Close, Phil Goter, Kyle Vallecillo, and Matheus Ramalho discuss enforcement driven economics. Continuing the podcast’s examination of patent monetization, the conversation moves beyond portfolio diligence to the far more difficult question of execution: what patent owners must understand once they are prepared to pursue licensing or enforcement, and why capital, timing, and deal structure often determine whether valuable patent rights produce a commercial return. The panel examines how non-recourse litigation financing and alternative fee arrangements distribute cost, risk, and potential recovery among patent owners, law firms, and funders. The discussion also explores patent pools, special-purpose vehicles, cross-licensing, and supply relationships, as well as the reputational and strategic considerations that influence whether a company asserts patents in its own name. Throughout, the participants emphasize that litigation is frequently a means of creating negotiating leverage—but that the desired business resolution must remain compatible with the economics of the enforcement campaign. The conversation also highlights Brazil’s increasingly important role in global monetization strategies, including preliminary injunctions, disgorgement-based damages, and other pressure points that may be unavailable in the United States. The panel closes with practical guidance for building monetization-ready portfolios: draft claims with provable infringement in mind, avoid unnecessarily costly limitations, preserve multiple independent patent families, and recognize that one newly issued patent rarely provides sufficient leverage. The result is a candid assessment of what it now takes to move from owning patents to extracting meaningful value from them. Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com. You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

    Patent Monetization Economics: What It Costs to Turn Patents into Revenue
  4. 7月18日

    Patent Damages on Trial: Rule 702 and the Daubert Conundrum

    Send us Fan Mail This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed, we have a special episode moderated by Megan Carpenter, which took place during the IPWatchdog Patent Masters conference last month.  IPWatchdog founder, Gene Quinn, joins along with economist Jon Putnam, and patent litigators Glenn Forbis, and Mark Nelson. The crew examines how the 2023 amendments to Federal Rule of Evidence 702—and the Federal Circuit’s increasingly rigorous review of expert testimony—are changing the way patent damages must be developed, defended, and challenged. The conversation explores why heightened scrutiny does not necessarily favor defendants, how the line between admissibility and weight remains highly judge-dependent, and what recent disputes reveal about apportionment, license comparability, causation, and the limits of scientific proof in the damages context. The panel also revisits the demise of the 25-percent rule and considers the tension between demanding economic rigor and recognizing that a reasonable royalty for a showing of infringement logically cannot begin at zero. The practical takeaway is clear: damages strategy cannot wait until expert reports are due. Patent owners and accused infringers alike need to engage damages experts early, pursue discovery in deliberate waves, connect technical value to economic outcomes, and build alternative theories capable of surviving Daubert scrutiny. The discussion offers a sophisticated roadmap for integrating liability, discovery, economics, and trial strategy from the beginning of the case. Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com. You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

    Patent Damages on Trial: Rule 702 and the Daubert Conundrum
  5. 7月13日

    Patent to Product: What Inventors Must Prove Before They Invest

    Send us Fan Mail This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed, our host and the founder of IPWatchdog, Gene Quinn, speaks with Ben Greenberg. An engineer and product-development specialist, Greenberg works with independent inventors, startups, and small businesses to transform early-stage concepts into functional prototypes, manufacturable products, and commercially viable opportunities. The conversation examines why obtaining a patent is only one component of a successful strategy—and why technical feasibility, market demand, and economic reality must be evaluated together. Quinn and Greenberg explore the critical sequencing of patent protection, prototyping, testing, and market validation. They discuss the value of small-batch manufacturing, proof of sales, crowdfunding, and customer feedback, as well as the risks of securing patent claims before determining whether the claimed product can actually function or be manufactured competitively. The discussion also highlights the need for coordinated input from engineers, patent counsel, manufacturers, marketing professionals, and financial decision-makers. The episode offers a candid assessment of licensing, commercialization, and the low success rates associated with bringing new products to market. Greenberg explains why even a better, faster, or less expensive product may not make financial sense for an established company, while Quinn emphasizes disciplined market-size analysis and incremental investment. Their central takeaway is straightforward: inventors must validate the product, the market, and the business case at every stage—and continue investing only while the evidence supports moving forward. Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com. You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

    Patent to Product: What Inventors Must Prove Before They Invest
  6. 7月6日

    Where Patent Disputes Are Won: Choosing the Right Battlefield to Achieve Victory

    Send us Fan Mail This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed, our host and the founder of IPWatchdog, Gene Quinn, speaks with Anthony Del Monaco, David Goose, Josh Hartman and John White about one of the most important strategic decisions in patent disputes: choosing the right battlefield. In today’s patent environment, outcomes are shaped not only by the strength of the patent, but by where the dispute is fought, how the forum operates, and what leverage each side can create. The conversation covers the shifting role of the PTAB, the rise of discretionary denials, the renewed interest in ex parte reexamination, and the continuing strategic importance of district court venue. The panel also explores when the International Trade Commission can provide patent owners with a powerful path to exclusionary relief, and why arbitration or mediation may sometimes offer a more practical route to resolution. The discussion then moves global, with particular attention to standard-essential patent disputes and the growing competition among China, the United Kingdom, Germany, and the Unified Patent Court to shape worldwide patent licensing outcomes. The result is a candid, practical conversation about forum selection, uncertainty, leverage, remedies, and how sophisticated patent owners and accused infringers should reverse-engineer strategy from the business outcome they need to achieve. Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com. You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

    Where Patent Disputes Are Won: Choosing the Right Battlefield to Achieve Victory
  7. 6月29日

    Patent Monetization Reality Check: Can Your Portfolio Survive Due Diligence?

    Send us Fan Mail This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed, our host and the founder of IPWatchdog, Gene Quinn, speaks with Dean Geibel and Karl Maersch. The conversation explores what patent owners must do before they can credibly monetize, license, sell, finance, or enforce a patent portfolio. Before any revenue strategy can succeed, companies first need to understand what they actually own, which assets are core, which are defensive, which may have value to others, and which patents may be consuming budget without advancing business objectives or portfolio value. Geibel and Maersch discuss the hard, often uncomfortable diligence required to separate valuable assets from deadwood. They examine how patent portfolios should be mapped against products, competitors, market direction, business units, revenue opportunities, and litigation risk. The discussion also addresses the importance of building portfolios with the end in mind, including claims that cover commercial products, claims that competitors will take seriously, and assets that can survive scrutiny from potential licensees, buyers, lenders, and litigation adversaries. The episode also highlights practical portfolio-building lessons, including the role of picture claims, design patents, prior art searching, patent landscapes, trade show intelligence, and ongoing communication with inventors, engineers, business leaders, and outside counsel. Ultimately, the conversation makes clear that patent monetization does not begin with litigation or licensing outreach. It begins much earlier, with disciplined prosecution strategy, market-informed portfolio management, and a clear-eyed assessment of whether the portfolio you have can survive due diligence when revenue opportunities emerge. Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com. You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

    Patent Monetization Reality Check: Can Your Portfolio Survive Due Diligence?

番組について

Each week we journey into the world of intellectual property to discuss the law, news, policy and politics of innovation, technology, and creativity.  With analysis and commentary from industry thought leaders and newsmakers from around the world, IPWatchdog Unleashed is hosted by world renowned patent attorney and founder of IPWatchdog.com, Gene Quinn.

その他のおすすめ