The Ben Ferguson Podcast

If you hate the liberal media but love the 47th President, than this is the podcast for you. Ben Ferguson brings you the commentary on the news that the biased media will not cover.

  1. Letting Americans Keep Their Money — One Reason Why Liberals Hate the Trump Tax Agenda

    13時間前

    Letting Americans Keep Their Money — One Reason Why Liberals Hate the Trump Tax Agenda

    Gas Prices & Energy Narrative: Rising gas prices are blamed on war with Iran and global instability. Democrats and the media are portrayed as using high gas prices politically while simultaneously supporting policies (Green New Deal, high fuel taxes) that intentionally keep energy costs high. California is cited as an example where high gas taxes are used to pressure consumers toward electric vehicles. Small Business as Economic Backbone: Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 is framed as transformative, especially for small businesses and pass‑through entities (LLCs, S‑corps). Lower tax rates, expanded deductions, and investment incentives allegedly shifted businesses from “survival mode” to growth. Key Tax Policies Highlighted: No tax on tips: Benefits service workers (waiters, bartenders, drivers, hotel staff), with claims of refunds up to ~$8,000. Reduced or no tax on overtime: Encourages workers to take extra hours and helps small businesses scale during busy periods. 100% expensing / bonus depreciation: Allows businesses to deduct the full cost of equipment and facilities immediately, improving cash flow and investment. Claimed Outcomes: Increased hiring, higher wages, and stronger GDP growth. Nearly 30 million Americans allegedly benefiting from tip and overtime tax relief. Greater economic confidence among working‑class Americans. Media & Political Framing: The media is accused of ignoring or suppressing positive economic effects because they conflict with a Democratic narrative of economic decline. Democrats are portrayed as hostile to small business, favoring top‑down government control rather than bottom‑up growth. Small Business Summit & Symbolism: A White House Small Business Summit is highlighted, featuring Rick Harrison (Pawn Stars) as an example of small‑business success. Emphasis on cultural symbolism: rewarding work, entrepreneurship, and business success. Geopolitical Escalation: Strait of Hormuz Iran is described as attacking or harassing ships using small, fast attack boats. The Strait of Hormuz is portrayed as a critical global chokepoint for ~20% of the world’s oil supply. The U.S. Navy claims to have sunk several Iranian boats and is escorting commercial shipping. Military Strategy Explanation: Iranian tactics rely on small, fast, easily concealed boats swarming large, slow tankers. The U.S. is acting defensively to maintain open shipping lanes and deter escalation. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    34分
  2. Iran’s Mosquito Fleet Turns Strait of Hormuz into a Battlefield

    14時間前

    Iran’s Mosquito Fleet Turns Strait of Hormuz into a Battlefield

    1. Strategic Importance of the Strait of Hormuz The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most critical maritime choke points in the world. Over 20% of the global oil supply passes through it daily, not including broader commercial shipping. Although often perceived as narrow and easily controlled, the strait is ~21 miles wide at its narrowest, making comprehensive surveillance extremely difficult. Large commercial vessels are confined to two-mile-wide shipping lanes due to depth requirements, making them predictable and vulnerable. 2. Vulnerability of Commercial and Naval Shipping Massive oil tankers and cargo ships: Cannot maneuver quickly or stop. Take miles to change course. Become “sitting ducks” within narrow sea lanes. The remaining waters outside the main lanes provide cover for hostile actors. 3. Iranian Asymmetric Naval Strategy Iran avoids direct, conventional naval confrontation with the U.S., which it previously lost decisively. Instead, it relies on small, fast, low-profile attack boats operated by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). These boats: Are often smaller than recreational boats. Use multiple engines for high speed. Are armed with heavy machine guns, rockets, and anti-ship missiles. Operate in swarms from multiple directions. 4. Concealment and Tactical Advantage Iranian fast boats: Operate in shallow waters close to shore. Blend in with fishing vessels and heavy commercial traffic. Remain difficult to detect by radar until moments before attack. The Persian Gulf’s dense maritime traffic makes threat identification even harder. 5. Recent Military Developments The U.S. reportedly sank six Iranian fast attack boats attempting to harass vessels. U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) stated: Iran typically deploys 20–40 such boats, but only six were observed in this clash. U.S. naval and air assets (Apache and Seahawk helicopters) are heavily positioned in the area. Iran’s naval capabilities have been significantly degraded. 6. U.S. Position and Policy The U.S. frames its role as defensive, focused on: Protecting commercial shipping. Ensuring freedom of navigation. Hundreds of ships from 87 different countries are currently backed up in the Persian Gulf. The U.S. has offered escorted passage through the strait. 7. Escalation Risks and Political Messaging President Trump issued strong warnings to Iran, threatening overwhelming retaliation if U.S.-flagged or escorted ships are attacked. Iran insists ships must coordinate with Tehran before transiting the strait. Recent incidents include: A South Korean vessel explosion and fire. A Panama-flag cargo ship engine fire. A UAE oil tanker reportedly targeted by an Iranian drone. These events raise questions about: The durability of a fragile ceasefire. Whether strikes could expand to Iranian territory or leadership targets. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    17分
  3. Temporary Gas Pain, Permanent Security — Media Stayed Silent Under Obama and Biden

    1日前

    Temporary Gas Pain, Permanent Security — Media Stayed Silent Under Obama and Biden

    1. Gas Prices Linked to Iran Conflict and Strait of Hormuz Current high gas prices are temporary and primarily driven by Iran’s disruption of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy claims that once the strait reopens, gas prices will drop immediately, though a full recovery will take longer. The conflict is a national security issue, not a domestic energy policy failure. 2. Media and Democratic Criticism of Trump Politicizing gas prices to harm President Trump ahead of elections. Ignoring or justifying high gas prices under Obama and Biden while criticizing Trump. There is selective outrage when Republicans are in power. 3. Trump Administration’s Iran Strategy President Trump is: Taking decisive military and diplomatic action to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. Being open to negotiations but demanding Iran “pay a price.” Trump announces “Project Freedom”, where the U.S. Navy will escort stranded international ships through the Strait of Hormuz to stabilize global trade and energy supply. Iran is described as a long‑standing destabilizing force that sponsors terrorism and threatens global shipping. 4. NATO and U.S. Troop Realignment The U.S. plans to relocate thousands of troops from Germany, prompting concern from European leaders, especially Poland. The move is pressure on NATO allies to contribute more fairly to collective defense. European concern about NATO unity is depicted as intentional leverage by the Trump administration. 5. Spirit Airlines Collapse The shutdown of Spirit Airlines is attributed to government intervention, specifically: The Biden DOJ, Department of Transportation, and Senator Elizabeth Warren blocking Spirit’s merger with JetBlue. The merger is: Broadly supported by shareholders, unions, and employees. Necessary for Spirit’s survival. Non‑monopolistic (9% market share vs. 80% held by the “big four” airlines). 6. Economic Consequences of Blocking the Merger Reported impact of Spirit’s collapse includes: Over 14,000 direct jobs lost, plus tens of thousands of indirect jobs. Service cuts to 30+ small airports and 90 routes abandoned. Airfare increases averaging ~14%, with some routes seeing much larger jumps. Low‑cost carriers drive competition and lower prices, citing Southwest Airlines’ long‑term consumer savings as precedent. 7. Critique of Elizabeth Warren Elizabeth Warren is: Promoting anti‑market, “socialist” policies. Blocking the merger under the claim of protecting consumers, while allegedly causing job losses and higher fares. Mischaracterizing Spirit’s bankruptcy as unrelated to regulatory actions. Warren is disconnected from real‑world business and employment realities. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    30分
  4. Elizabeth Warren & Dems Cheer — Another EVIL BIG Corp brought down by Socialism

    1日前

    Elizabeth Warren & Dems Cheer — Another EVIL BIG Corp brought down by Socialism

    1. Merger Block as the Central Turning Point JetBlue offered $3.8 billion in cash to acquire Spirit Airlines in 2022. According to the author, the deal was widely supported by: Spirit shareholders Unions Employees The DOJ sued to block the merger on antitrust grounds. A federal judge invalidated the merger in January 2024, which the author frames as the moment Spirit entered a “death spiral.” 3. Argument Against Antitrust Rationale The merger would not have reduced competition, citing: The combined JetBlue–Spirit market share would have been ~9% The “Big Four” airlines allegedly control ~80% of the U.S. market Regulators misrepresented the risks, arguing that blocking the merger actually: Reduced consumer choice Increased airfare prices Eliminated an ultra‑low‑cost carrier 4. Job Losses and Economic Impact The temployment and downstream economic damage: Over 14,000 Spirit employees lost jobs Additional furloughs and layoffs occurred before final closure Indirect job losses affected: Catering Fuel services Baggage handlers Gate agents Airport retail, hotels, and rental car services Using a government multiplier estimate 1 airline job supports 3 additional jobs, leading to an estimated ~40,000 total jobs lost 5. Consumer Impact and Fare Increases Spirit is framed as an essential airline for low‑income and budget travelers The author argues Spirit’s removal caused: Abandonment of ~90 routes Average fare increases of ~14% on former Spirit routes Several route examples are cited to show sharp fare increases The text argues this outcome contradicts regulators’ stated goal of protecting consumers 6. Political Accusations and Ideology The argument uses strong ideological language, labeling officials as: “Socialists,” “communists,” or “Marxists” Elizabeth Warren is portrayed as: Obsessed with blocking the merger Misleading the public about consumer benefits Being disconnected from private‑sector realities The Biden administration is portrayed as anti‑market and interventionist 7. Criticism of Government Competence The author asserts government officials: Do not understand how private businesses survive Overestimated theoretical consumer savings Caused real‑world harm through regulatory action DOT Secretary Pete Buttigieg is criticized for agency overreach and lack of crisis leadership 8. Broader Industry Comparison Spirit is compared to: Southwest Airlines in its early low‑cost era Low‑cost carriers historically drive prices down for entire markets Spirit could have played a similar long‑term role if allowed to survive Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    17分
  5. Democrats Kill your Spirit—How Biden, Warren & Buttigieg Destroyed Spirit Air

    1日前

    Democrats Kill your Spirit—How Biden, Warren & Buttigieg Destroyed Spirit Air

    Merger Blocked by Antitrust Action: JetBlue offered $3.8 billion to acquire Spirit in 2022. Shareholders, unions, and both companies supported the merger. The DOJ and Department of Transportation, urged by Elizabeth Warren and supported by Buttigieg and Biden, sued to stop it. A federal judge blocked the merger in January 2024. Consequences Claimed: Spirit declared bankruptcy and shut down, leading to: ~17,000 direct job losses Estimated 40,000+ indirect jobs affected Loss of service to dozens of smaller cities Reduced airline competition and higher fares on former Spirit routes (examples cited include increases of 15–66%). Critique of Antitrust Reasoning: Speakers argue antitrust law should protect consumers, not competitors. They claim the DOJ incorrectly defined the market as “ultra‑low‑cost airlines” instead of the broader airline market, making Spirit and JetBlue appear dominant when they were actually small players. They assert the decision strengthened the Big Four airlines (American, Delta, United, Southwest), which already control ~75–80% of the market. Rebuttal to Alternative Explanations: Democrats are criticized for blaming Spirit’s failure on fuel price increases or Trump-era policies. The speakers argue fuel price volatility affects all airlines and that Spirit would have been better positioned to withstand it with the merger funds. Internal Democratic Dissent: A Biden White House policy official publicly questioned whether blocking the merger was the right decision, though later softened the statement—used as evidence of internal doubts. Government Bailout Rejected: A proposed $500M government bailout (for 90% ownership) was discussed but rejected. The speakers strongly oppose government ownership of airlines, labeling it socialism and economically incompetent. Broader Ideological Argument: The collapse is framed as an example of government overreach, poor understanding of business, and ideological decision-making harming workers and consumers. The episode is used to argue that free‑market competition—not government control—is essential to lower prices and innovation. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    32分
  6. How Teachers’ Unions, Media Rhetoric & Radical Politics Lit the Fuse for Political Violence”

    2日前

    How Teachers’ Unions, Media Rhetoric & Radical Politics Lit the Fuse for Political Violence”

    Political Violence Is Being Normalized Multiple assassination attempts against Donald Trump are evidence that political violence—especially among Democrats—is becoming accepted and justified. 25% of Democrats believe political violence is justified, presenting this as a dangerous societal turning point. Teachers’ Unions is a Primary Villain Teachers’ unions (notably the NEA and AFT) are spending over $1 billion on left‑wing political causes, diverting resources away from education. These unions are engines of political indoctrination, shaping children to hate conservatives, Christians, and the United States itself. Education System as an Ideological Tool Democrats intentionally “took over” education—from elementary schools to universities—to mold political beliefs over generations. Poor academic outcomes (reading, writing, arithmetic) are framed as evidence that ideology has replaced education. Media and Public Figures Accused of Inciting Violence Late‑night hosts, journalists, and Democratic politicians are quoted (or paraphrased) making harsh or aggressive statements about Trump. These statements are presented as rhetorical fuel that allegedly encourages real‑world violence. Selective Use of Examples and Anecdotes A montage of extreme quotes is used to express a systemic Democrat endorsement of violence. Individual figures (e.g., Jimmy Kimmel, Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, Ilhan Omar, Hassan Piker) are cited as emblematic of the broader problem. Expansion Into Fraud and Corruption Narratives FBI raids on childcare centers in Minnesota. Allegations involving Somali‑owned businesses and Democratic officials. SNAP (food stamp) fraud highlighted by recipients allegedly owning luxury vehicles. These sections reinforce the theme of Democratic corruption, lack of accountability, and misuse of taxpayer funds.   Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    30分
  7. The Scam Liberals Saw Coming, Cashed In—And No One Stopped!

    3日前

    The Scam Liberals Saw Coming, Cashed In—And No One Stopped!

    Federal Fraud Investigation in Minnesota Daycares Federal, state, and local law enforcement conducted raids on approximately 20–22 childcare-related businesses in Minneapolis. The investigation targets alleged multi‑billion‑dollar social services fraud, particularly involving childcare subsidies. Several centers were reportedly licensed for fewer children than they billed for, a major red flag for fraud. Quality Learning Center Case The “Quality Learning Center” gained attention due to a misspelled sign (“Leering” instead of “Learning”). The center allegedly received around $1.9 million in public funds despite being largely non-operational. It accumulated 95 violations from Minnesota’s Human Services Agency between 2019–2023. Patterns of Childcare Fraud Investigators describe long‑running schemes including: Billing for children who were not present Operating centers with no children or staff Paying kickbacks to parents or partners Former investigators testified that tips about fraud were constant and overwhelming, often involving centers earning $700,000–$1M+ annually. Broader Minnesota Fraud Context The daycare investigation is framed as part of a larger pattern of fraud in Minnesota: The “Feeding Our Future” scandal (~$250M) Autism service fraud schemes (~$14M+) Dozens of individuals have been charged or pleaded guilty in prior cases. Political and Administrative Allegations Critics claim state officials failed for years to act decisively on known fraud indicators. Minnesota’s governor publicly expressed regret for not preventing fraud earlier and later voiced support for enforcement actions. The text alleges political reluctance and mismanagement contributed to the scale of the problem. National Focus on SNAP (Food Stamp) Fraud The text expands to claim record levels of SNAP fraud nationwide, estimated at $20+ billion annually. Alleged abuse mechanisms include: EBT card skimming and theft Benefit trafficking (selling benefits for cash) Improper payments due to weak verification Retailer participation in benefit‑for‑cash schemes Use of deceased or duplicate identities Multi‑state benefit collection Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility (BBCE) Criticism A federal policy loophole (BBCE) allegedly allows individuals with high assets—including millionaires or lottery winners—to qualify for food stamps. States can bypass income and asset limits by granting minimal “benefits” (e.g., pamphlets), which then trigger SNAP eligibility. The text characterizes this as systemic mismanagement or “fraud by design”. Law Enforcement Testimony A retired investigator described: Years of ignored warnings Explicit evidence of intentional fraud Communications showing owners planning to exploit the system for personal enrichment Investigators relied on surveillance, billing comparisons, and forensic analysis of seized devices. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    25分
  8. Microlooting the Normalization of Crime plus The Reason behind the Comey Indicment

    3日前

    Microlooting the Normalization of Crime plus The Reason behind the Comey Indicment

    1. “Micro‑Looting” Some progressive commentators and media voices have normalized or morally justified small‑scale theft (“micro‑looting”) from large corporations. This behavior is a broader ideological shift on the left that excuses antisocial or criminal conduct by blaming systemic injustice. Justification undermines social order and property rights, drawing parallels to looting during the 2020 protests. 2. Criticism of Progressive Media and Elites Liberal hosts and commentators are wealthy or privileged individuals who hypocritically present themselves as defenders of the poor. Their rhetoric is performative, radical, and disconnected from everyday consequences. We condemn perceived casual endorsements of violence, sabotage, or theft expressed in podcasts and commentary. 3. Escalation From Rhetoric to Violence Inflammatory political language—particularly on the left—has contributed to real‑world violence. The concept of “stochastic terrorism” is that left‑wing rhetoric against Donald Trump has radicalized individuals. Examples cited include assassination attempts, threats against conservative figures, and political murders, all attributed to progressive demonization. 4. Democratic Leaders Portrayed as Using Violent Language Multiple Democratic politicians and commentators are quoted using aggressive or absolutist language (e.g., “we have to stop him,” “choke them out,” “eliminate him”). The media and journalists are enabling or excusing this rhetoric rather than condemning it. 5. Media Complicity and Hypocrisy Mainstream outlets (e.g., CNN, ABC, late‑night shows) are portrayed as biased and dismissive of violence against conservatives while amplifying fear‑based messaging. Jokes or dismissive coverage related to attacks on Trump are cited as evidence of moral double standards. Journalists are helping create the ideological environment that motivates violent actors. 6. James Comey Indictment Narrative Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted a second time. The indictment reportedly centers on a social media post showing “86 47” formed from seashells, interpreted as a threat against the 47th president (Trump). Prosecutors allegedly view “86” as slang for “get rid of” or “kill,” framing the post as a threat transmitted across state lines. 7. Reopening of Russia Investigation Scrutiny The discussion revisits the 2016 Russia investigation, portraying it as a “collusion hoax.” New criminal probes are now examining the conduct of investigators themselves, including Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan. Allegations include abuse of intelligence powers, false statements, and mishandling of evidence. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    16分

ホストとゲスト

番組について

If you hate the liberal media but love the 47th President, than this is the podcast for you. Ben Ferguson brings you the commentary on the news that the biased media will not cover.

iHeartRadio On-Demandの他の作品

その他のおすすめ