Balance your Brain

James Christensen

Love, Dating, and Relationships with James Christensen LMFT

  1. 6 APR

    37. Taking Off the Mask in Your Marriage

    Catherine Roebuck: https://catherineroebuck.comJames Christensen: https://jamesmchristensen.comIN THIS EPISODE: Why revealing the messy stuff in your mind builds trust — but only when paired with responsibility and thoughtfulness about timing and impact The case for telling your partner about an affair: the harm already exists whether you reveal it or not, and secret "cleanup" is just continued deception How apologies become tools for control when you expect instant forgiveness, and why sitting with your partner's reaction IS the real work The concept of male fragility — James shares how learning he was "fragile" in marriage therapy changed everything about how he handles his wife's criticism Congruence vs. masking: the relief your partner feels when what you say finally matches what they can already sense Why James steers couples away from "I feel / I need" language and toward specific behavioral requests — and Catherine's pushback on where vulnerability fits in The difference between sharing your feelings and weaponizing them: "I'm angry right now" vs. "You made me feel this, now fix it" How adult relationships rewire childhood attachment patterns — and why expecting your partner to regulate your emotions doesn't work between equals A powerful therapy moment: a therapist told James's wife to pull her hand back and let him sit with his own pain Practical tools for unmasking: improv classes, self-compassion, learning to restore your own dignity after embarrassment Growth model vs. defect model: you're fine as you are AND you can become a better partner

    45 min
  2. 20 FEB

    How to Ask Your Partner to Change Without Triggering Their Defenses

    A conversation between James Christensen and Catherine Roebuck Catherine: We were talking the other day about pathological demand avoidance — with neurodivergent clients and their partners — and you offered a different term that I just loved. James: Yeah. The other term is persistent drive for autonomy, which I think is just a normal human trait. Catherine: Yes, I agree. And that term is so much nicer because having "pathological" in a term is a little pathologizing, right? James: Just a bit. Catherine: Persistent drive for autonomy — you're right, this is something that we all have, and people can have it to more extreme degrees. Sometimes that can be more difficult to work with, but I love framing it that way. Everyone wants to belong to themselves, and of course they do. James: I think some of us who have it to more extreme degrees had more difficulty finding autonomy in childhood. Catherine: That makes a lot of sense. And there could be other things that make someone's brain more focused on this. Even in the same family, some people may be more focused on it than others. But I really find it helpful to think about it as a healthy drive to be your own person — maybe taken too far at times, but healthy at its core. James: I think it is a healthy drive. What we do with it matters. What I was thinking about this morning is relating to myself with warm acceptance versus cold rejection. I had this dream last night where people were relating to me with cold rejection, and it was so off-putting to be treated that way. I actually woke up in a bit of a panic and was lying in bed thinking, "Can I relate to myself with warm acceptance? Can it be okay for me to be up in the middle of the night with a bit of a panic?" I would obviously rather be relaxed and sleeping, but I just lay there and practiced relating to myself with warm acceptance — that was the phrase that came to mind. And it seems that if I don't want to set my partner's drive for autonomy against me, what I should do is relate to my partner with warm acceptance instead of cold rejection. Catherine: That makes sense. So you're talking about what you do if you have a partner who tends to lean toward autonomy even when it costs the relationship. James: Yeah. Catherine: This comes up in every partnership where you want your partner to do something different. And a lot of times, depending on how you approach them, you might actually get in your own way and work against having the best chance at them being receptive to that request. James: It happens all the time. And I think it happens internally too. The way I think about my brain is that the parts that developed when I was really young are still there, and there isn't anything I can do to make them go away. They're always going to be there. Those parts of my brain also respond with this drive for autonomy. Like, "No, I'm going to be in control." And that has harmful effects for me. When I woke up in the middle of the night in a panic, there was a part of my brain convinced that it needed to defend me from something, even though there was nothing to defend me from. The way I relate to that part of my brain has a similar effect to how I relate to my wife. I can relate to it in a way that induces it to push against me harder — to push harder for autonomy — or I can relate to it in a way that induces it to relax and accept that I don't have to push so hard for my autonomy. In a way, I'm already autonomous. I'm already free. Another way of thinking about it is: am I enhancing my partner's sense of freedom, or am I diminishing it? Catherine: And you're saying you could do this with yourself or with another person — that you could enhance your own sense of freedom based on how you relate to yourself. James: Yeah. What I was doing in bed this morning was enhancing my sense of being okay, which is kind of like being free. It's okay for me to feel what I'm feeling right now, even though that feeling is unpleasant. It didn't go away for a while. But my default setting is to get upset about being upset, and it just makes it worse. It's like I'm feeding harsh energy into the feeling, and it just gets bigger and bigger. Catherine: So if you're trying to get either yourself or your partner to engage differently — which plenty of us struggle with — and what your brain produces automatically isn't getting you there, what's the ineffective approach you might need to start noticing? And how do you shift to create conditions for change? James: The most common ineffective approach I see is using judgment or condescension or superiority to try to get someone to change. Another way of saying it is: I'm going to paint a picture that what you're doing is so bad that it's making my life not okay, and that's going to induce you to change. But I usually see that have the opposite effect. If I emphasize the degree to which I'm not okay because of what you're doing, it actually induces the other person to not change — because they feel controlled. If I'm doing that, I'm emphasizing my victim status to induce you to change. I'm claiming victim status to make you feel uncomfortable, and then you're going to do something to stop feeling uncomfortable. But people don't like being controlled that way. My partner is likely to say, at least on a subconscious level, "I can see what you're doing. I can see how you're using your unpleasant emotions to try to control me. I'm not going to be controlled. I'm going to do even more of what you don't like, just to make it clear that you can't control me." Catherine: So you're sending a message that you want your partner to change, but the actual message is: when I'm deciding what you should do and who you should be, I'm pretty hard on you. I can be shaming or judgmental or cold. And so if your partner complies with that request, they're setting themselves up for more of the same treatment. They're reinforcing a pattern where you're going to keep treating them that way, and they don't like how you're treating them. It's like, "I don't want you to run my life because you're not very nice to me." To try to belong to themselves and not be controlled by a mean, critical person, they can't actually do what you're asking. They would be losing if they did that. James: Yeah, that's the way I often frame it. If your partner does what you want, do they feel like they just won, or do they feel like they just lost? And what they're actually losing or gaining is autonomy. The kind of changes that most of us need to make in our relationships have to be driven by autonomy, because the brain doesn't change when it feels controlled and manipulated. It locks itself down. It's like, "This is not a safe environment for me to loosen things up and start rewiring." If I have some behavioral pattern that's really annoying to my wife, for me to rewire and change that pattern, I have to get myself into a state of emotional safety where I feel like I'm going to be okay and I'm in charge. That's when my brain is going to unlock and say, "Okay, I'm in a sufficiently safe place to do some rewiring work." When I work with clients, I would never try to get them to rewire in a state of excessive emotional arousal. I would never get them feeling all defensive and then say, "Okay, now let's rewire your brain." It just doesn't work. The more defensive they're feeling, the less open they are to changing. I think that's just the way we are. Catherine: That makes so much sense. If you're in an interaction where you feel threatened by the people around you, you don't want to accept outside influence. When you're under attack, you're focused on maintaining your own autonomy, your sense of being your own person, while somebody is threatening that. It's just going to reinforce resistance and rigidity and "don't tell me what to do." James: I have some ex-military clients, and in the military we had a concept called threat con — threat condition. How threatened are we right now in this location? It goes through levels. I used that with clients and said, "When your brain's at a high threat con level, it's not going to rewire. So what can you do to help yourself come down into lower threat con so that you can do some rewiring? And what can you do to help your partner come down into lower threat con level so they can do some rewiring too?" Catherine: So what if somebody has a request that really matters to them, and they're trying to figure out how to make it in a good way — where they stand a chance at their partner taking it in, considering their perspective, and making a change? James: I think the best place to start is with warm acceptance. Can I offer you warm acceptance exactly the way you are? My favorite definition of the word "respect" is to accept a person just as they are. Can I offer you warm acceptance just the way you are, and also ask you to change? I'm not going to qualify you as a bad person. I'm not going to make it seem like your behavior is so extreme that it's ruining my life. I'm just going to start from the idea that I'm okay and I'm going to be okay, and I want you to change. Catherine: So if you want to make a request of your partner and set it up so it could be a win-win — where they wouldn't have to give up their autonomy or sense of self to make a change that benefits you — how would you go about that? James: The focus is on what is my emotional state when I make the request. Am I making it from a place of cold rejection, or from warm acceptance? Warm acceptance means I have to go through the work of figuring out whether or not I'm going to be okay if you say no. If I approach you and I've already decided in my mind that you have to say yes, I'm going to be putting a lot of pressure on you. I'm going to be making it seem like my okayness depends on your response, which feels like control — because it basically is a kind of emotional control lever. You're going to be tempted to say no even

    25 min
  3. 26/12/2025

    34. Loving on Purpose with Catherine Roebuck

    https://jamesmchristensen.com catroebuck.com James: Loving from the heart and loving unilaterally is fundamentally an adult task, not a childhood task. Catherine: When you first told me that, my reaction was, "Well, I know kids can love—I felt a lot of love as a kid. I felt love from my kids." But it's the feeling aspect that matters here. What kids are able to do is take warm, pleasant, affectionate feelings and do actions that align with those feelings. That feels like love. And that's how a lot of adults do it too. Early in a relationship, it's really easy—you have all kinds of warm, affectionate feelings for your partner, so you just line your actions up with your feelings. You don't have to put a lot of effort in. But as the relationship goes on, or anytime someone's not doing what you want, you have to deal with the question: How can I love in the absence of that pleasant feeling? That's the part children are way less capable of doing than adults. It's fundamentally a developed capacity—to act loving when you're not feeling love. James: When we're falling in love, it's the first kind. My biology is doing so much work, pushing me toward kindness and caring and being concerned about my partner. But those feelings fade after a while, and then I'm stuck in adult love—which I probably don't know how to do. That's why relationships fall apart after a couple of years. I was able to get into the relationship with childlike love, but I'm not able to build a long-lived relationship with childlike love. It has to be adult love, which is a capacity I have to develop. Catherine: Right, and not every adult has it. If you're lucky, you had parents who modeled this kind of unilateral love and investment. If you're not lucky, you didn't have that. You're trying to offer something you've never been on the receiving end of. James: I think basically we all have to face this challenge in adulthood. What you're talking about is that it's harder for some of us than others depending on how much of it we saw and received as children. When I was a kid, if I treated my parent poorly, did they respond by treating me well? Or did they just amplify the poor treatment and do the same back to me—or even worse? Catherine: How many people have had the experience of a parent yelling at them, "No yelling!" or hitting them because they hit a sibling? The parent is doing the very thing they're telling the child not to do. That reactivity—that reactive expression where you're just acting out what you're feeling—works so well in the honeymoon phase. But at some point, when the hormones wear off and you can't rely on biology so much, you have to shift from your actions being driven by feelings to your actions being value-driven. You can feel angry at your partner and still figure out how to treat them well. James: It's interesting—I got married right at the two-year point of my relationship. I had known my wife for two years, and we'd been more or less together for almost two years when we got married. That's right at the point where things started to fall apart. Right after we got married, we faced these intense challenges of not knowing how to love each other as adults. We had known how to respond to these amazing feelings we'd had, but those feelings really went away pretty quickly after we got married. Then we were just stuck in this swamp of, "I want to love you. I want to create a good relationship. It just seems impossible." The way my mind put it together was that there was something she was doing that made this impossible. I instinctively blamed her. Realistically, neither one of us knew how to generate love or experience love from a generative place. Catherine: That's that more childlike instinct. When you're a little kid, it's easy to be warm if that's how you're being treated. When those warm feelings go away in childhood, it's easy to give up and think, "There's not much I can do about this until my parents start treating me better again. I'm just not going to feel good." When you start getting upset at your wife, you're playing out the same thing. That makes sense in childhood because you don't have an option to realistically shift this unilaterally from your side. But as an adult, you can. Just because you have the capacity doesn't mean you have any awareness that you have it, or any idea how to use it. The other thing about the timeline is that there's a lot going on biologically and hormonally to drive you into a committed dynamic where you might be able to raise a baby. As soon as the relationship uncertainty is resolved—which marriage is one of the main ways that happens—all of this biological help tends to fall off. For some people, you might get two or three years of hormonally-driven honeymoon euphoric bonding. But it won't last longer than that no matter what. If you're going to have a long-term happy relationship, you have to figure out how to love on purpose when you're not feeling warm or kind. James: It's crazy that I got married without having any idea those feelings were going to fade. Catherine: Was that your first long-lasting relationship? James: Yeah, my first serious one. I'd had relationships before—one that lasted almost a year, a couple of six-month relationships—but they weren't serious. There was no real commitment, no expectation we were going to end up together. My relationship with my wife was much more serious. It was my first experience of that. I had never considered the idea that the way I felt about her would change soon after getting married. If someone had sat me down and said, "Let me talk to you about what's going to happen over the next five years of your relationship and what you can do about it"—that would have been incredibly useful. Catherine: I think that catches most people by surprise. Even if you've had some multi-year relationships, if this is the first time you've ever married someone, lived with somebody, really solidified "you're my person and we're committed"—it's going to play out differently than it ever has before. Ironically, it's the security of the commitment that resolves this biological drive to a great degree. That's not a bad thing, but it is challenging to navigate. Creating a Secure Base James: There's another component to this. As a child, I didn't have the kind of secure base from which you can love in an adult way. Children can't guarantee their own safety and security and okayness. As an adult, if I want to really love my wife, I have to create a secure base to start from. I have to feel like I'm going to be okay. In the absence of that feeling, there's very little chance of me reaching out to her with kindness and generosity. It's like I'm living with this idea of scarcity—there's not enough love to go around, not enough safety, not enough okayness. So I'm not going to reach out generously and say, "Let me offer love to you." I feel like it's a scarce resource. I feel like I'm not going to be okay. If I'm fighting a bear, I'm not worried about how the bear is feeling. If I'm fighting with my wife, I'm also not worried about how she's feeling. I'm just thinking about protecting myself. Catherine: This is the biggest difference between how your brain works in childhood versus adulthood. In childhood, there's a real limitation—you can't take care of yourself. By definition, you're dependent. Your happiness, safety, and wellbeing genuinely depend, in a life-or-death way, on maintaining a relationship with your caregiver. But for almost all adults, that's not the case. Most adults really are able to take care of themselves. They might not feel that way. They might not know it yet. They might have practical things to work out—earning their own money, handling logistics. But adults are pretty able to care for themselves. There's real opportunity there to invest more in another person, to do it unilaterally, because you can be unilaterally okay. James: You can make this shift where instead of being primarily concerned about my wife's impact on me, I can be primarily concerned about my impact on her. But that's only going to happen after I believe that I'm going to be okay. I might feel like I'm not going to be okay—anxious feelings, panic. But I can do some work with that panic and say, "Even though I feel like I'm not going to be okay, I have a belief, a faith, an understanding that I actually will be okay." That belief is the foundation for loving action. If I believe I'm going to be okay, that sets me free to be kind and loving and generous toward my wife—to be more concerned about my impact on her than about her impact on me. Catherine: A lot of this comes down to taking in the reality of your circumstances as an adult. Anytime someone starts talking about fear of abandonment—that's such a different thing for an adult than for a child. The intensity of that panic feels very similar. But the reality of what it means to be abandoned as a child versus having your partner leave you as an adult—they're extremely different circumstances. One is a crisis. The other is heartbreak. But it's not a survival-level problem to have a specific other adult decide they don't want to take care of you when you're an adult. You can survive that. Getting Through the Fog James: It's so easy to say what you're saying and so hard to actually believe it. I've thought about this as being like the fog that covers the ground in winter where I live. The ground's still there, but you can't see it. All you see is this white blanket. You don't know where the trees are, where the ditches are, where the rocks are. But if I can get below the fog or come into contact with the ground, now I know what's actually there. You're talking about this idea that I'm going to be okay, that this isn't as dangerous as it seems. But the process of coming into contact with reality to that extent is pretty difficult for most of us. Most of us are used to

    30 min
  4. 19/10/2025

    32. How Couples Therapy Works

    Transcript: Matt: On today's show, we have James Christensen with Roseville Couples Counseling. He provides therapy for couples—husbands and wives, marriage counseling.1 So James, thanks for being on today. It seems like our society is in a crisis when it comes to marriage. It just doesn't seem like it's a priority anymore, and more marriages than ever have been failing. That's not just amongst non-Christians; that's amongst Christians as well. What's going on? What are you seeing in your counseling sessions as the issues causing marriage not to work out these days? James: I think marriage has always been really hard. Today, people just know that there are other options, so they quit. Maybe a few hundred years ago, that wasn't as much of an option as it is now. Matt: What are those options that you're referring to? James: Well, people get divorced, or they do what I call "quiet quitting," where they don't really participate in the marriage, but they don't really leave either. They leave without leaving, I guess is another way of saying it. Matt: So they are just kind of coasting through their marriage? James: Yeah, checking out, not participating. The way marriage works—I've been married for a long time—is if you focus on it, if it's your primary focus and the most important thing in your life, then you can make it work. Matt: Does it need to be a priority? Is it something that couples should be working on, or is marriage kind of like this old tradition that's not really necessary anymore? James: No, I think it's the most important thing in life. It's the foundation of the family, which is then the foundation of society. When the marriage falls apart, everything else falls apart. Matt: Why is it that more and more younger people are waiting longer to get married or don't see it as something they need to have in their life? James: I think we're scared. We look at our parents and our grandparents and think, "Wait a second, marriage was really hard for them." People think if they wait longer, it's going to work better. I'm not sure that's necessarily true. I got married when I was 25, and if I'd waited until I was 30, maybe it would've been a bit better, but I'm not sure that waiting is better. Matt: We've heard from folks like Charlie Kirk who have said that it's important to get married young and have more kids than you can afford. Do you think that rings true? Is it better to get married younger or older? What are the benefits of getting married younger that you lose out on as you age? James: I don't know that I have an opinion on what age you get married. I do think he's right that getting married and having kids is one of the best things in life, and people do a lot less of that these days. Sometimes, a young couple in their twenties with a couple of kids will come into my office, and it makes my day. I'm just glad that people still do that because, as you were saying, it's becoming less common. I think it's a great thing to do. I had kids in my twenties and don't regret it at all. Matt: Let's talk about Roseville Couples Counseling. Tell us about the kind of services you provide. James: All I do is couples counseling. It's my passion in life. The reason I'm passionate about it is that it's what saved me. I have a history of a lot of psychological problems—narcissism, psychological immaturity—and what saved me wasn't individual therapy; it was couples therapy. There's some power in couples therapy that doesn't exist in individual therapy. So when I'm talking to someone who has some pretty severe problems to work through, I ask, "Do you have a partner, and is your partner willing to come with you?" The worst of me comes out in my marriage, and if I can bring my marriage into the therapy office, then we can deal with that. Matt: We hear from a lot of spouses that the opposite is true—that when they're in counseling sessions, nobody agrees on anything. How do you get couples to a point where they're actually being productive and not just arguing and disagreeing, with the woman blaming everything on the husband and the husband just shutting down and saying, "This is stupid. I told you I didn't want to come here in the first place"? James: It is a whole thing. I've devoted my life to learning how to do exactly what you're talking about. It's quite difficult. I start by saying the way you're treating each other is unjustified; there is no excuse for it. Everybody comes in saying, "Well, I'm only doing it because she did this," or "because he did that." We're making these excuses. But if I go home today and treat my wife poorly, I'm sorry, but there's no excuse for that. It starts with, "This is not justified. It needs to stop." You are the one who's responsible for your behavior; your partner is not responsible. Most couples come in starting from the place that they're not responsible for what they're doing. So we start from the idea that, no, you're responsible for what you do, and they're responsible for what they do. That's the first step. Matt: Do you see a lot of selfishness within partners? Do you have to figure out how to overcome that and teach them that to be successful in a relationship, especially marriage, you have to overcome the idea that it's all about you and that you're there to serve the other person? James: The way I look at it is that the human brain isn't natively capable of marriage. We need to upgrade our brains. It's like my friends who run hundred-mile races. If I really wanted to do that, I probably could if I was willing to put in thousands of hours a year of training. Marriage is kind of like that. When I got married, I was honestly not capable of being a good husband, not even remotely. Now I am. That's something I deliberately learned how to do. I didn't know how to care about my wife, how to be courageous and kind, or how to communicate in any reasonable way. I had to face the fact that I am not capable of being a good husband, and if I want a good marriage, I'm going to have to change that. Matt: For wives listening right now who say, "I'm willing to go to counseling, but my husband is not. He just doesn't seem interested in making this relationship successful," but she doesn't want to quit or say the word divorce—what do you advise her to do? James: It's a tough situation. Sometimes I tell people that you each have 80% of the power in your marriage. If I go home today and treat my wife really well, then she is living in an environment that makes it easier for her to treat me well. And treating her well isn't coddling or pretending. If there's something she's doing that I think I should talk to her about, I will, but I'm not going to be mean about it. That's the difference. If I need to talk to my wife about something she's not going to want to hear, do I care about her enough in that moment to make it easier for her to hear what I'm saying? That's the key. So if I were in a situation where my wife didn't want to go to therapy with me, that would be really hard. But I still have the power to make the relationship better on my own. It's basically always 50/50. Each partner carries about 50% of the responsibility for the problems. If I deal with my side, it makes it a lot easier for my wife to deal with hers. Matt: Tell us about your counseling sessions. How do they work for people who have never been to marriage counseling? Can you paint them a picture of what that looks like when they reach out to you? James: I offer my first session for free because I want everyone to try it out. It's a 50-minute session. Most of the people I work with have never been to therapy before. You just come in, and I get to work right in the first session. We start talking about relationship dynamics immediately. There's no filling out forms, no assessment, and I don't meet with people individually. We start by talking about the biggest problem in your relationship right now. I usually ask, "What do you want to change about your relationship?" People usually say they want to improve communication, which is interesting because communication is usually not the problem. It's usually a behavior problem. The problem is we're being mean to each other, but it feels like a communication problem because you start being mean when you're trying to communicate. Matt: So what are you hoping to achieve in that first session? Obviously, the marriage isn't going to be fixed right away. James: What I hope to achieve is that each of them resolves a blind spot of some kind. I want them each to walk out the door knowing something about themselves they did not previously know. Blind spots cause a ton of problems in marriage. What usually happens is we grow up in a home where our parents did certain things, and we end up doing those same things without knowing it. If I can point out in the moment, "The way you just talked about your wife was full of condescension and dismissiveness, and that's going to be really hard for her to be on the other side of," that person might see something about themselves they weren't aware of. That's key. If I can learn something about myself, I might see it in a way that makes me say, "I actually don't want to be that way anymore." Matt: So they walk away from that first session trying to be a little more observant and aware. Where do you take them from there? James: I usually ask couples to come in for four weeks in a row, and after that, it's every other week or every month as we get into more difficult pieces that take longer to work on. It's always about personal power and personal responsibility. Couples often come in feeling hurt, stuck, and powerless. I'm going to talk to you about one thing you can do right now that will have a positive impact on your relationship, and I'm going to take away your excuses. You're not going to get to say it's your wife's fault or your husband's fault. No, this is on you. This is what you can do. With women in particular, I'll often ask,

    31 min
  5. 16/10/2025

    How to Rebuild Trust after Infidelity

    There are three components to trust in a relationship: 1. Trust that your partner will do the right thing 2. Trust that you'll be able to read your partner accurately 3. Trust in yourself to take care of yoursefl no matter what. Transcript:If you recently found out that your partner has cheated on you, this video is for you. I'm going to talk about the three components of rebuilding trust after infidelity, and I think of these as three legs on a three-legged stool. The first leg is that your partner needs to stop cheating. They need to start behaving in a more trustworthy way. Trust is something that is lost quickly and regained slowly. You will need to observe your partner being trustworthy over an extended period of time, and your trust in them will gradually increase as a result of that. The second leg is about your ability to accurately read your partner and to assess how trustworthy they are. When your partner cheated on you, you lost trust not only in them, but you also lost trust in your ability to not be deceived because you thought that they were being more faithful than they actually were. So there are two components of trust that were lost here: the trust in their behavior being within the normal limits of monogamy, but also your trust in your ability to accurately see what is going on in your relationship. How much does your partner care about me and how faithful are they? Your partner needs to change their behavior, and it's just as important for you to learn to accurately perceive: Is this person being deceptive? Does this person care about me? How important am I to my partner? This loss of trust in your own ability to perceive your partner accurately is just as devastating as your loss of trust in their behavior itself. The third leg of the stool is building trust in your ability to take care of yourself no matter what your partner does. This is critical because you had a certain level of confidence in the solidness of your relationship, that your partner was going to be there for you to a certain extent, which fed into your idea of, "I'm going to be okay." When your partner cheated on you, they broke that agreement. Now, you have to reassess, "Am I going to be okay?" and "What am I going to do to make sure that I'm okay?" When you get cheated on, your brain often goes into an abandonment panic, which is a survival circuit left over from childhood that was designed to keep you from being abandoned by your parents. If you're three years old and you get abandoned by your parents, that becomes a survival situation. It's really important for you to maintain a close and emotional connection with your parents. You need someone to really care about you when you're young or you're not going to survive. So when your partner cheats on you, it activates this abandonment panic circuit. But the difference is that as an adult, you can't really be abandoned because you will never abandon yourself. One way of thinking about this is, what if your partner decides to leave you for somebody else? Are you going to figure out a way to create a life that is rich and rewarding for yourself despite your partner's choices? You have a choice to stay or go, but they also have a choice to stay or go. After infidelity, they've made it clear that, hey, this is a choice that they're considering. You have to face the fact that your future well-being is mostly your responsibility. Obviously, we all want someone to care about us a lot. I want my wife to be devoted to me just like everybody else does. But in the end, it's mostly my responsibility to take care of myself and to ensure that I have a good, rich, and rewarding life. That's up to me. One way you can do this is you can imagine, "Let's say my partner does leave. What does my life look like one year after they leave me? What do I do to take care of myself? How do I manage my living situation? Where do I live? How do I get money? How do I care for my children or whatever other responsibilities I might have? And what am I going to do about trying to create the kind of relationship that I want to have in my life, whether that's with my current partner or, if they leave, maybe with someone else?" This third leg helps you shift out of an attitude of victimhood towards an attitude of, "I'm a person who is powerful. I'm a person who can take care of myself. I'm a person who has choices, and I've decided to choose to try to build something special with my current partner. That's not my only choice; it's just the choice that I'm making." I realize that my partner also has that same choice, and they can choose to leave me basically whenever they want. That's a terrible truth, but it is true. So what I'm facing is that I have a choice about whether or not to stay in this relationship, and my partner also has a choice about whether or not to stay and about how faithful they want to be. So those are the three legs of the stool, and I want to come back to the second leg, which is improving your ability to accurately discern how faithful your partner is. The best indication of that is how much this person cares about you. I want you to think about two different kinds of relationships. The kind of relationship where infidelity happens, and the kind of relationship where infidelity doesn't happen. In the second kind of relationship, you have two people who care about each other a lot more than they do in the first kind. The first kind of relationship I would call a "normal" relationship because most relationships are prone to infidelity, both emotional and physical. Then over here, you have the lucky few who have built relationships where there's so much caring going back and forth that neither one would really consider cheating. It's just not on the agenda because "I care about my wife so much that I'm not really interested in trying to get validation from someone else." I've focused all my efforts on: What does it look like for me to do what I can do to build a better relationship, to have the kind of relationship that I want to have? And what power do I have to change my energetic input into the relationship so that it makes it easier for my wife to be the kind of partner that I want her to be? If infidelity has forced you to face the terrifying reality that you don't have control over your partner, can you find a way to make peace with that reality? Can that be okay? Can you start down the path of doing what you can do to improve your relationship while also remembering the fact that your partner gets to make all of their own choices and they can abandon you for someone else if they really want to? One unfortunate outcome of infidelity is that the person who got cheated on often tends to retreat into a victim place where they start to see themselves as an innocent victim. "I didn't really contribute to the problems in my relationship at all. I'm just a victim and I have no power, and all I can do is try to make my partner behave in a better way or maybe try to punish my partner for what they did." All of those things make it harder for the relationship to recover. So, if I was in the position of being cheated on, the best thing for me to do would be to focus on what I can do to be a better partner and what I can do to improve my ability to accurately assess how much this person cares about me. And paradoxically, one of the things that I can do is ask, "Can I learn to care more about my partner?" When I focus on what it looks like for me to care more about my wife than I do, it makes it easier for my wife to do the same. That is the pathway towards building a relationship that is not susceptible to infidelity.

    8 min

About

Love, Dating, and Relationships with James Christensen LMFT