In this episode, Andrew Soren of Eudaimonic by Design sits down with personality psychologist Brian Little for a conversation that moves from a mishelved library book to a hockey metaphor for performance reviews, and lands, more than once, on the difference between well-being and well-doing. Brian's research looks past personality traits and into the personal projects that actually organize a life: the things we're trying to sustain, repair, protect, or build, whether that's taking out the garbage or trying to shift an entire field of thought. What makes a project worth studying, in his framework, is that it's personally salient. It reveals what someone actually cares about, not just how they compare to everyone else on a trait scale. Andrew and Brian dig into why meaningful work can be harder to sustain than it looks: a project can matter enormously and still become unmanageable, especially when the surrounding environment isn't built to support it. Brian also introduces free traits and restorative niches. He closes with a definition of flourishing that reframes the whole conversation: not a feeling, but the sustainable pursuit of the core projects in our lives. Key Takeaways Personality can be understood at three levels (how we're like all people, like some people, and like no one else) and traits really only describe the middle level.Personal projects reveal what someone is actually working on beneath their visible role or behaviour.A project can be highly meaningful and still contribute to burnout if it isn't manageable. Meaning and manageability are separate dimensions, and both matter.Standard performance conversations tend to reward "goals" and miss "assists," the support, trust-building, and behind-the-scenes work that make outcomes possible.Free traits explain why people act out of character for people or projects they care about, and why that performance carries a real cost.Restorative niches, the ways people recover after stretching beyond their natural tendencies, aren't one-size-fits-all.Asking about someone's personal projects can surface deeply private material, so leaders need trust and restraint, not a checklist. Why This Episode Matters Most conversations about meaningful work stay at the level of purpose, motivation, or engagement. Brian Little's research goes a layer deeper, into the ongoing, often invisible projects that structure someone's day. The colleague who seems checked out in a meeting might be trying to get a diagnosis for a sick kid. The manager who's uncharacteristically sharp might be holding together a role that's stopped being sustainable. For leaders, coaches, and anyone thinking seriously about meaningful work, this episode makes the case for paying attention to the project behind the performance, and building workplaces that make caring about that project actually possible. About Our Guest Brian R. Little is a personality psychologist whose research has helped shape the study of personality, motivation, personal projects, and human flourishing. He earned his Ph.D. in psychology at the University of California, Berkeley, and has taught or lectured at Cambridge, Oxford, Carleton, McGill, and Harvard. He's best known for developing Personal Projects Analysis, a framework for understanding the personally meaningful pursuits that structure a life, along with his related work on free traits and restorative niches. He is the author of Me, Myself, and Us: The Science of Personality and the Art of Well-Being. Mentioned in This Episode Personal Projects Analysis, Brian Little's framework for studying personally meaningful pursuitsMe, Myself, and Us by Brian R. LittleWalter Mischel's Personality and Assessment and the person-situation debateGordon Allport, one of the founders of personality psychologyKen Sheldon's research on goals, striving, and well-beingAlbert Bandura's work on self-efficacyAdam Grant's work on giving and contributionResearch on "mattering," including work associated with Isaac PrilleltenskyFree traits and restorative niches, Brian Little's own concepts