Tosin and Holly Nessling compare a family cinema trip with a home-streamed shark thriller in this week’s value-for-money showdown. The episode is mostly about whether a tired parent is better off spending money on a kids’ movie or a horror-adjacent shark film, but it also turns into a very funny discussion of terrible genre movies, franchise sprawl, and why some films are so bad they become a challenge.We discuss Paw Patrol the Dino Movie, Chum, and a few other recent watches, with Holly giving the sharper critical takedown and Tosin explaining the realities of summer holidays, children, and cinema survival. Key topics In this episode, Tosin explains why Paw Patrol the Dino Movie was the inevitable cinema choice during the first summer holidays as a parent, with his wife on nights and two children to entertain.Holly shares Chum, a Prime Video shark film paid for with Amex points, and the conversation quickly becomes a postmortem on a wildly implausible plot.The hosts compare theatrical Paw Patrol releases with the many TV-style spin-offs, noting how the franchise keeps expanding by adding new pups and new themes.Tosin describes Paw Patrol as a simple rescue-action formula for kids, with Ryder and the pups responding to emergencies in their vehicles, while the Dino Movie adds dinosaurs, an island, and a villain scheme involving diamonds and a volcano.Holly’s review of Chum focuses on the film’s absurd logic, including a grieving husband who uses homeless people as bait, a shark cage with no oxygen, and a revenge plan that makes little sense even by shark-movie standards.The episode contrasts good bad movies with merely bad ones, with the hosts noting that some low-budget shark films are entertaining because they embrace their absurdity, while Chum mostly just confuses.Tosin raises the point that Paw Patrol is clearly made for children, but still compares it unfavorably to Toy Story 5 as a film with more for adults and kids alike.The conversation includes a brief side discussion of Dangerous Animals, Birdpocalypse, Monster Nado, and other benchmark bad-shark or bad-CGI films.Holly notes that Chum at least uses some real great white shark footage, even if the human-shark interactions are clumsy and the script is baffling.Tosin closes by recommending Android on BBC iPlayer as a better next watch for Holly, before the pair wrap up with listener feedback and a quick mention of another movie, Over Your Dead Body.Timestamps00:00 - Cinema or sofa: the week’s big value-for-money question01:25 - How the show compares cinema trips with streaming watches04:42 - Tosin’s cinema pick: Paw Patrol the Dino Movie05:23 - Holly’s home pick: Chum on Prime Video08:05 - What Paw Patrol actually is and why the kids love it10:12 - Snoop Dogg and Paris Hilton voice a yacht rescue setup11:09 - The island, the dinosaurs, and Maya Humdinger’s diamond scheme12:38 - Why every Paw Patrol movie seems to add another pup14:11 - Why Paw Patrol works for exhausted parents but not as a great film17:28 - Holly starts explaining Chum’s Malta shark premise19:38 - The wedding boat trip that goes very wrong21:11 - A grieving husband turns into the real villain22:46 - Why Chum makes almost no sense at all23:14 - Homeless people as bait and the shark cage plan24:42 - Holly’s one-star review and the global warming line that annoys her27:23 - The shark effects: real footage, some CGI, and not much else29:13 - Why bad shark films can be fun, but this one mostly isn’t30:54 - Listener feedback on The Boys season five32:21 - Sign-off, plus a recommendation for Android on BBC iPlayer33:42 - Bonus chat: Over Your Dead Body on Prime Video36:37 - ChatGPT’s surprisingly accurate summary of Chum’s plot38:09 - Why short movies have at least one virtue: they get on with it
