A Ghost in the Machine by Daniel D

A Ghost in the Machine: part absurdist humor, part armchair philosophy, and part political dissidence! It's all part of Life's rich pageant!

A Ghost in the Machine features hot takes on modern life from Daniel D, a regular human in a world gone mad. Daniel is nerdy and philosophical like Woody Allen, loud and angry like Sam Kinison, and full of shit like a clogged gas station toilet. It's all part of Life's rich pageant! aghostinthemachine.substack.com

  1. 15 JUL

    Pride and Identity

    Greetings and salutations! This episode is about pride and identity, and the fact that pride based on an unstable or unhealthy identity is 100% of the time the kind of pride that “goeth before the fall,” if it’s not dealt with. Of course, Life has a way of dealing with that kind of pride, sometimes gently dropping hints, other times knocking you on your ass, and of course that’s always unpleasant in the moment, but it’s definitely a blessing in the long run. Think about what an insufferable asshole you would be if you had always gotten all the validation and rewards you ever wanted! I’ve been thinking about both healthy and unhealthy forms of pride, as well as the kinds of identities that people take pride in. It’s a big, very important topic that is fundamental to so many other issues, and one that I plan to address more fully in a proper written post I’m working on. For now, this podcast episode is me thinking out loud on this topic, a rough audio draft of an upcoming essay. Some of it’s humorous and satirical, some of it’s contemplative and somber, some of it’s me blackpilling about the state of our civilization, and some of it is me finding hope and meaning the extremes of both (1) the small-scale and personal and (2) the ultimate reality of the True God, whose light and life somehow do shine through even the darkest nights of this fallen world. Hope you enjoy it. (And stay tuned for a fuller discussion of this theme.) A Ghost in the Machine is a reader and listener supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit aghostinthemachine.substack.com/subscribe

    1 hr
  2. 23 JUN

    The PsyOps Only Work Because We Want Them To ...

    Warning: this episode gets a bit schizo. For some of you, this is right up your alley. For others, well, just think of all the things you once thought you knew for sure and how many of those narratives have since been exposed as sophisticated confidence tricks. I’m not asking anyone to believe or disbelieve anything I say. I’m just putting it out there because I have found it helpful and think it might be helpful to others, so if it resonates with you, cool. If not, that’s okay too. I discuss the latest “current thing” crisis, the USA getting involved in the war between Israel and Iran, briefly. I don’t want to dwell on it. There is little that I can really do. I have written to my senators and congressman urging that we not involve ourselves in any more needless foreign conflicts, even though I know that doesn’t really do much (the form letter I got back from one of them showed that no one in his office even read what I wrote). With such high-level geopolitical issues, the outcome is pre-ordained. The politicians are just actors reading from their respective scripts. I can determine that a red line for me is that I will not allow my children to be conscripted to fight and die for Jared Kushner’s real estate portfolio or Netanyahu’s government or anything else like that. The powers that be would have to kill me, and they would no doubt happily do so if I stood in their way of drafting my children, but that’s my red line. Otherwise, there is not much I can do about this escalating Middle East conflict, so I plan to NOT pay much attention to it. Because I have learned (better late than never) that there are spiritual costs when we pay attention and get emotionally invested in the social engineers’ narratives (either for them or in opposition to them). I was watching Owen Benjamin’s breakdown of the movie A Cabin in the Woods, which shows some profound truths about how social engineering works, and I was really hit with something: the social engineering tricks work only because, on some level, we want them to. If we didn’t want anything the regime’s confidence men were selling, they would not be able to convince us to buy it (especially not more than once). We do live in a realm of bullshit piled on top of bullshit, and we start getting hit with the magic spells and propaganda before we can even talk, mostly by people who have, themselves, been mesmerized and propagandized into believing these lies as if they were gospel truth. The social engineers are combining ancient techniques of advanced spell-casting with technological marvels that are even greater than whatever the public has access to. Like the devil these social engineers serve, they (usually) know us better than we know ourselves. Whereas we tend to lie to ourselves about our flaws and weaknesses, they carefully study these vulnerabilities and work them into their sales pitches. By lying to ourselves, we give them the opportunities they need to exploit us. The PsyOps work only because we want them to work. On some level, we wanted whatever they were selling, and for the most part, what they were selling was (and continues to be) something for nothing. Maybe it’s a false certainty that everything is under control, that the adults are in charge, and that we can “trust the plan.” Maybe it’s that by wearing a piece of cloth or getting an injection we will be healthy. Maybe it’s that we can just stay home all day every day for weeks or months on end and that the world will keep working like it always has even as we withdraw from it. Maybe it’s a sense of moral superiority that our empire is being maintained because of our commitment to such ideals as freedom and human rights. Maybe it’s a belief that we shouldn’t have to bear any responsibility for the crimes of our empire because one particular tribe of people and their country in the Middle East tricked us into all of it, and maybe this belief is coupled with (usually) a contradictory belief that we have a *right* to enjoy the lifestyle of comfort and convenience that living in the heart of our bankster-run empire, with its world-reserve currency, once allowed Americans to have. In other words, maybe it’s a belief that we should be able to have our cake and eat it too, and then blame the cake merchant and the credit card company when the bill comes due. Maybe we believed the regime’s founding myths about World War II because they allowed us to feel like the good guys who deserved all that postwar economic success. Maybe we believe that we can accept the benefits of empire but save our souls by condemning the people and practices that make that empire possible. Maybe we believe that we are one of the very few smart one who see how hopeless everything is, and that we have a rare form of psychological courage that allows us to take the blackpill with no chaser. Maybe we believe that this, in turn, gives us standing to judge and condemn everyone who lacks the insight and courage to take the blackpill too, thereby absolving us of any moral responsibility towards those around us. We can eat as much, and drink as much, and be as merry as we like, because the whole thing is going to hell anyway, and we don’t owe anyone else a damned thing, because what have they ever done for us? There are lots of luxury beliefs that are based in, or that implicate, some falsehoods that we’d rather not have to confront (especially about ourselves). “The truth shall make you free,” said Jesus. But that freedom isn’t free. It requires giving up some of our most cherished beliefs about ourselves and our world. But the alternative is remaining in deception, and as long as we want to be deceived, there will be evil sorcerers willing to enchant us with their spells. They lend us some illusion of goodness or rightness, or some comfort or convenience, or they give us some nice-sounding justification for our hypocrisy or an excuse for our cowardice. This leads to a “reality debt,” and eventually, we have to make payments on that debt. How do we pay? One way is by “paying attention” — they really want our attention devoted to some things and diverted from other things, and if you notice where and how they direct people’s attention, you can see some interesting patterns. Another way is by rolling over our original reality debt into a new loan, some kind of new narrative or justification or excuse that allows us to maintain our illusions about ourselves and our involvement with the world. The only way out is to acknowledge that their confidence tricks worked on us because we, on some level, were willing partners: we wanted what they were selling and were willing to compromise to get it. None of this is to minimize the evil of the regime’s wicked witches and fraudulent wizards. They have consciously chosen evil and rejected good and are spiritually dead because of it. They have their reward, and their punishment. But just as you can condemn a burglar who broke into a car, so too you can derive lessons from car burglaries: don’t leave valuables in plain sight, don’t park in poorly lit or out of the way areas, etc. Even as we condemn the pathocratic elites for their crimes, so too can we derive valuable lessons from the devastating effectiveness of their confidence schemes. In this podcast episode, I discuss the PsyOps I have fallen for and the lessons (I think) I have learned from those experiences. And even those PsyOps I didn’t fall for, I see how the regime’s wizards had presented me (and millions of others) with a “magicians’ choice” that redirected my attention and energy back into their desired outcome, and I participated in their “trick” because on some level I wanted what they were selling. Remember how their dialectic works: they will send you a “bad cop” to sell you a bad idea, and if you see through it and reject it, they will have one of their “good cops” come up to you with the opposite idea. But as has often been said, the opposite of a bad idea is probably also a bad idea. Or as Aristotle noted about vicious extremes, their opposite is another vicious extreme (but it is one that will probably be packaged and sold to you as if it is a virtuous fix for your problems). So what is the virtuous mean that avoids vicious extremes? The life of Christ. The Good, the True, and the Beautiful. Impossible to define, but you can experience it and abide in it in a very real way, even in this fallen, f****d up world. “The thief comes only to steal, to kill, and to destroy, but I have come that they may have life, and have it more abundantly.” (John 10: 10.) We are like sheep without a shepherd, and the world we inhabit is a factory farm governed by bloodthirsty wolves. It makes sense to blackpill about the future of this world; even from a Christian perspective, the New Testament repeatedly says that, in the end, this world is doomed. But in the here and now, we can experience the beginnings of Christ’s abundant life and be an instrument through which that light brightens the world around us. Whatever is eternal about our being can be improved by the struggle to be Good in a world that rewards evil, to discern Truth in a world that enshrines falsehood, and to create Beauty in a world that celebrates ugliness. The True God cannot give us the experience of overcoming the corrupting influence of a fallen world without allowing us to experience living in such a world, and I think the sobering truth is that this world reflects back to you much of what you bring to it; the world can corrupt you because something in you is corruptible, something in you wants to be corrupted and willingly accepts the bargains the devil offered you. God is real, and Christ is the way, not *out*, but *through*. In this episode, I cite or discuss the following: Owen Benjamin’s analysis of the movie Cabin in the Woods, which is behind a paywall on Ladle.

    2h 7m
  3. 3 JUN

    The Inversion of Good & Evil in Vampire Stories

    Welcome back to another episode of the regular A Ghost in the Machine Podcast. As many of you already know, I’ve started doing a separate podcast series called “Paging the Everlasting Man,” in which I read chapters of G. K. Chesterton books, starting with Heretics, and give some commentary after each reading. If you like Chesterton, check it out. While not reading Chesterton, I have I recently read (or rather, listened to the audio books of) a couple of vampire novels: The Delicate Dependency, by Michael Talbot (who also wrote The Holographic Universe), and Dracula by Bram Stoker. I figured Talbot would infuse the story with esoteric symbolism, and he delivered on that expectation in some interesting ways. For better or worse, it is a thoroughly Gnostic-ish novel, but while I am sympathetic to some aspects of the Gnostic perspective, I have noticed that Gnosticism has a dark side: it has a disturbingly high correlation with LGBT-adjacent perversions and inversions. (Speaking of, I guess it’s Pride-Goeth-Before-the-Fall-Month now.) Case in point, the Wachowski sisters, formerly known as the Wachowski brothers, directors of that most explicitly Gnostic-themed movie of them all, The Matrix. While I think you can certainly adopt a Gnostic perspective without becoming a tranny or a fruitcake, the correlation is nonetheless there. And although there is nothing explicitly gay about The Delicate Dependency, there are definitely gay-ish overtones, with male vampires being depicted as youthful in appearance, physically attractive, and androgynous — something that appears to have become the norm in contemporary vampire literature (because what could possibly be more romantically appealing than a parasitic entity that drinks blood and avoids sunlight?). There’s a spirit behind the LGBT movement and lifestyle that represents an inversion of Human Nature, that takes what is bad and false and ugly and tries to pass it off as good and true and beautiful. Talbot was openly gay. He wrote thoughtfully and artfully, but there’s a bit of that unnatural spirit that permeates The Delicate Dependency. So I reread Dracula. I know people have argued for an interpretation of Dracula as an allegory for Bram Stoker’s supposed struggle with his identity as a deeply closeted gay man. (Sure Stoker was married, but he managed a theater, which is basically the same thing as sodomy; plus, if you want to get published in literary journals and get tenure and all that, you can’t go wrong by reinterpreting nineteenth-century novels like Dracula through the postmodern lens of “queerness.”) Be that as it may, Dracula was refreshingly clear and orthodox in its morality. That’s not to say that the vampires aren’t compelling and well-developed characters in the novel, just that they’re not meant to deceive us into calling good “evil” or evil “good.” They may strike their victims as enticing, but it is a sinister kind of allure that is unmistakably evil and will lead to ruin. To clarify what I mean, consider narcotics instead of vampirism. The contemporary treatment of vampires as elegant and attractive is like making a movie of a 70s rock band on tour, partying, snorting, and shooting up, and making it all look so glamorous and carefree, but never really showing what that kind of lifestyle can (and often does) lead to. Dracula, on the other hand, is like showing an addict’s life spiraling out of control; maybe there are moments where the rock-and-roll party lifestyle seems alluring, but we see the devastating ruin that awaits people who venture too close to the edge. Anyway, as I thought about the evolution of vampire literature from Dracula (1897) to The Delicate Dependency (1982) and beyond (it appears to have gotten more inverted since then), I was struck by the way in which the trend in vampire literature maps onto the trend towards moral inversion in the culture more broadly. With all that being said, I still would recommend reading both The Delicate Dependency and Dracula. Each novel is engaging and thought-provoking on its own, but they are really profound when taken together. A Ghost in the Machine is a reader and listener supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit aghostinthemachine.substack.com/subscribe

    57 min
  4. 23 MAY

    Good Artists Gone Bad (Rachel Zegler, Syd Barrett & Charles Manson)

    I know what my audience wants more of, even though nobody asked for it: more Rachel Zegler! But that’s not all! How about some Syd Barrett, after acid had eaten a hole through his head and his mind had fallen out of it? And while we’re at it, let’s add Charles Manson and his happy, ritual-sacrifice-performing family to the mix! Yes, ladies and gentlemen, we will be discussing good artists gone bad: a Marxcissist, a maniac, and a murderer. In the last podcast episode, I discussed the question of what makes us Human (in the context of what sets us apart from “artificial intelligence”), and I argued that one essentially human attribute is Man’s capacity for creating great art that captures, however imperfectly, some aspect of the Good, the True, and the Beautiful. My man G.K. Chesterton made a similar argument in The Everlasting Man (and of course he did it much better, though in the context of comparing Man to the beasts, rather than to A.I.). The upshot of all this is that I am convinced that a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for a person to become a true artist is that he or she has that divine spark that sets souled humans apart from Hylics/NPCs. Then, I did a post humanizing Rachel Zegler (the face of insufferable Disney girlbossery), in which I honed in on her talent as an artist. Because whatever else you may think about her, Rachel Zegler, has the soul of a true artist. Don’t believe me? Think I’m ridiculously exaggerating? Then check out her song Twisted (video embedded below — the song starts around the 2:00 mark), and understand that she composed this song, arranged it, sang all the vocals, played all the instruments, and then recorded and “produced” it on amateur equipment at home, at the age of seventeen. This was before Hollywood got ahold of her. Just as Darth Vader became “more machine than man,” so too has Rachel Zegler become more actress than musician … but she still has the heart of a musician, just like Vader retained the heart of a man. Maybe one day she will have a daughter who confronts her the way Luke Skywalker confronted Vader at the end of Return of the Jedi, only instead of a light saber, her daughter will be wielding a guitar, and instead of the Death Star, her daughter will be rescuing her from the bowels of Hollywood (when it comes to planet-destroying capabilities, the Death Star could never have been a match for America’s movie industry). I bring up Zegler’s age because, what do you think, say, Roger Waters’ compositions were sounding like at age seventeen? Keep in mind that he was almost 30 when he finally hit his stride with Dark Side of the Moon, and the first several songs he wrote for Pink Floyd after Syd Barrett went crazy (more on Syd Barrett in a minute) were comparatively amateurish. In my opinion, Waters’ early songwriting efforts failed to rise to the level of Zegler’s song Twisted. All I’m saying is, Rachel Zegler has a real gift. She has shown that she has the potential to tap into something transcendent and bring it down to earth and make its melancholic beauty accessible to others in the form of a catchy three-minute song. And then she showed that she also has the potential to chant idiotic clownworld political slogans like a braindead NPC. If the embedded video doesn’t play (I’ve had YouTube say there’s something wrong with my IP address, probably because of my VPN), you can access it on YouTube «HERE». And then there’s Charles Manson. Charles Manson’s Look at Your Game, Girl is legitimately a good song. (Video embedded below.) It’s got a similar kind of vibe: simple acoustic accompaniment and haunting, plaintive vocals (zero processing or auto-tune). This song is easily better than 95% (if not more) of the “music” that’s currently popular; it’s not mass-produced with computerized inputs following a mechanical formula, but is created by a real human playing a real instrument and singing naturally and doing so in an interesting and innovative way. Regardless of how evil the artist who created it was, this song is genuine art. For comparison, here’s Guns ‘N Roses version (starts around 2:18, because it was the “secret” or “hidden” track on Spaghetti Incident?): And last but not least, here’s Syd Barrett singing and strumming an acoustic guitar on the outro of Pink Floyd’s Jugband Blues. “What exactly is a dream? And what exactly is a joke?” I wonder if he ever found an answer? Or if he just blotted out his capacity to formulate the question, so that it no longer bothered him anymore? His compositions, guitar work, and singing on Pink Floyd’s first album, Piper at the Gates of Dawn, really make the album memorable, but on Pink Floyd’s second album, Saucerful of Secrets, Barrett’s parting song, Jugband Blues, is like a song from another planet, and its closing stanza is like the last letter home from an astronaut who has no intention of ever coming back to earth again. “Haunting” doesn’t even begin to describe it. Maybe those legends are true about Lucifer having been heaven’s leader of worship music before he fell, and the same with stories about the Sirens enchanting sailors with their song and beguiling them towards calamity. Somehow the song’s ending captures both terrible beauty and terrible spiritual danger. So we have three musicians — Rachel Zegler the Marxcissist, Charles Manson the Murderer, and Syd Barrett the Maniac — who serve as examples of good artists gone bad. If good art necessarily captures some aspect of the Good, the True, and the Beautiful, then these three artists connected in some very real and meaningful way with the Good, the True, and the Beautiful … and then they went to hell (some more literally than others). This strikes me as a problem, pointing towards a paradox of some sort that I am having trouble articulating, although I feel it deeply in my gut. Because I could have picked any number of other artists. Layne Staley. Jimi Hendrix. Kurt Cobain. Different names and faces and styles of art, but a similar pattern of getting eaten alive and killed by their Muse. Anyway, on that heartwarming note, I invite you to share your thoughts on the matter. It’s one thing when a one-dimensional NPC with a chat-bot personality embraces a death cult like Marxcissism, or seeks to create a death cult like the Manson family, or just takes Timothy Leary’s mantra of “tune in, turn on, drop out” to the furthest possible extreme and fries their brain like the eggs in an 80s anti-drug commercial, but it seems far more tragic and evil when someone with a human soul and a spark of divinity does it. There’s something about the stories of Rachel Zegler, Syd Barrett, and Charles Manson that really puts the fear of God in me. [If you are listening to this on a podcast app or streaming platform, check out the Substack post for this episode to view embedded media and share your comments …] A Ghost in the Machine is a reader and listener supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit aghostinthemachine.substack.com/subscribe

    52 min
  5. 4 MAY

    Man vs AI; Ethnonarcissistic Abusive Relationships & Linguistic Black Magic; and Texas Gov Abbott Leaves Wheelchair, Stands with Israel!

    This episode covers a few recent posts and controversies. I discuss AI, Aristotle, and what it means to be Human; the EthnoNarcissistic Abusive Relationship between whites and blacks and how the magic spell seems to be breaking around certain one-sided taboos; and how Texas Governor Gregory Q. “Hotwheels” Abbott has heroically left his wheelchair to stand with Israel (but not Texas). Man vs AI and what it means to be human… Check out More Than Just Autocomplete: What Anthropic’s New Paper Reveals About AI by Tree of Woe, which discusses what appears to be a major breakthrough in AI learning. After reading his post, it made me think about Aristotle’s conception of Human Nature that served as the basis for much of his ethics, and which has influenced the development of Western thought ever since . . . Maybe that understanding was incomplete? Maybe there is more than Reason that makes us Human? (I am also reminded of G.K. Chesterton’s book The Everlasting Man, which I did not discuss in this episode, but which I plan to devote a lot of time to in the near future, because Chesterton really gets to the heart of our modern misunderstanding of Human Nature.) For a different perspective on these and related issues, also check out What Reaches Back: Panpsychist kingdoms, superbiologics, and the discarnate mind by Mark Bisone. It’s a very long read, but it is worth well worth the time and attention it takes to read it. EthnoNarcissistic Abusive Relationships and Linguistic Black Magic Go down a list of warning signs of codependency (e.g., being overly apologetic and self-deprecating in order to avoid conflict, minimizing or ignoring one’s own needs and desires, guilt or anxiety when doing something for oneself, etc.). Those red flags sound a lot like the pathological reflexes that the powers that be (i.e., government policies, mainstream media agitprop, public education brainwashing, arbitrary and capricious punishments and public humiliations doled out to any whites who dared question the mainstream narrative, etc.) have conditioned whites to have to racial issues and conflict throughout my entire lifetime. Now go down a list of warning signs of malignant narcissism (e.g., extremely arrogant and self-centered, hypersensitive and vengeful whenever criticized, behaving violently and/or aggressively towards others, etc.), and those red flags sure sound like black group identity, especially in relation to whites. Unsurprisingly, in recent decades, blacks have had higher rates of narcissistic personality disorder than whites (see, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0092656611000912). Whatever “original sin” means, it seems to refer to an incipient predisposition towards narcissism that requires good parenting and proper socialization to overcome. With the “black community,” not only has there been a dearth of good parenting (especially from fathers) and proper socialization, but blacks have been actively encouraged to adopt ethno-narcissistic personality disorder as their group identity. So at the group level, white have been the codependents in an ethno-narcissistic abusive relationship. A lot of whites (myself included) really got red-pilled on these issues during the BLM hysteria of 2020 (when the powers that be carved out a major exception for the dangers of COVID-19 for BLM protesters — people couldn’t be at their mothers’ bedsides as they died because the virus was so deadly, but black rioters could gather in dense mobs in urban areas and run amok for St. George Floyd), because so many “blacktivists” dropped their mask of sanity and let their demonic grins show as they celebrated the prospect of racial violence and vengeance against whites. Here we are five years later, and the black magic spell around certain taboos (but only ever applied against whites) is finally breaking. We are done. We’ve had enough, and we are quitting this sick and criminally insane mind-game. Maybe Karmelo Anthony getting rewarded and praised by his fellow blacks for murdering Austin Metcalf was the straw that broke the camel’s back — especially when contrasted with the humiliation rituals Metcalf’s dad has put himself through to earn black approval and countersignal the angry whites. Anyway, now we’re supposed to care deeply that a lower-class white mother used the term “nigger” in a verbal altercation — as recorded by a Somali immigrant (a.k.a., “invader”) and alleged pedophile who was standing around a children’s playground without any children of his own, but who wanted to play the role of tattle-tale and use social media outrage to bully the white woman in her own home country — and the response from whites has been, well, the kind of response that victims of narcissistic abuse finally exhibit when they have had all they can take and refuse to take any more. John Carter discusses this reaction in his post Stripping the Word of its Power: Language taboos die when people stop being afraid of them. I also give props to Owen Benjamin for his pioneering work on dismantling these kinds of insane black magic spells with his hilariously hard-hitting comedy — that he performed live back during the heyday of woke antiwhite insanity. Texas Gov Abbott leaves wheelchair, stands with Israel (but not Texas) And I talk about Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s recent guest post on my Substack: Forget Texas, Don't Mess with ISRAEL! . . . Harrison Koehli has a new book you should check out … Plus, my “Stupendous Six” homie Harrison Koehli has a new book out: Beyond Disclosure: Underground Bases, Higher Dimensions, Alien Abduction and Cryptozoology. It’s an excellent one-stop shop for the information and “conspiracy theories” surrounding these bizarre phenomena, for which the official cover story by the regime is obvious bullshit. It’s available on Amazon at https://www.amazon.com/Beyond-Disclosure-Underground-Dimensions-Cryptozoology/dp/1734907479/. Summing up … If you’re listening to this on a podcast app or streaming platform, be sure to check out the Substack post for this episode to see embedded content. Also, if you haven’t already done so, don’t forget to subscribe, so you don’t miss out on all the great blog posts and podcast episodes I drop on this world-class ‘Stack! As an added bonus, I unveil my new intro theme music and my outro song in this episode. Like the Jefferson’s, we are “moving on up” on this podcast. Here are the rough time-stamps for this episode: 0:00 Intro (including my kicking new intro music) 3:21 Shout out to Harrison Koehli and his new book (check it out) 5:47 Man vs AI (discussing Tree of Woe’s post and Mark Bisone’s post) 22:43 Ethno-narcissistic abusive relationship between blacks and whites (discussing John Carter’s post) 1:21:09 Getting outta that wheelchair and standing up for Israel (Gov. Greg Abbott’s recent guest-post on my blog) 1:31:30 Outro (including an extended jam serving as my rocking new outro music) Y’all come back now, ya hear! A Ghost in the Machine is a reader and listener supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit aghostinthemachine.substack.com/subscribe

    1h 38m
  6. 23 MAR

    Navigating Marriage, Parenthood, and the Culture Wars in a Post-Feminist World

    Greetings and salutations, podcast listeners! I am excited to bring you this latest episode featuring Aly Dee, Substacker at Femlosophy (ladydrummond.substack.com) and YouTuber at RealFemSapien. We discuss the always-controversial but vitally important issues surrounding gender roles, marriage, and parenthood in a post-feminist world. Though Aly is too humble to declare this about herself, I will say that she and her husband are examples of people who are absolutely crushing it. Though they’ve surely had to overcome intense challenges and have doubtless made their share of painful mistakes along the way, they are presently making it work and creating the life they want for themselves and their children. It is always wonderful to talk to people like this. First, they are living proof that, in spite of how much of an uphill battle it is to live well in an evil and inverted culture, you can still live well. It is possible. Difficult, yes. Diabolically and unnaturally difficult. But it is possible. And believing it is possible is a very real and crucial first step in achieving that kind of life. Second, they have learned valuable lessons about what works and what doesn’t and have insights to share that could help you see your own situation in a new way. Although, as Aly repeatedly cautions, there aren’t any one-size-fits-all platitudes that you can just mindlessly slap onto your problems like duct tape and, voilà!, solve them once and for all, you can nevertheless find something of value in other people’s experiences and insights and adapt those lessons to the circumstances of your own life. There are two separate and distinct conversations to be had on these kinds of topics. First, there are the big-picture culture war issues: there are very real and historically unique cultural pathologies that prevent people from marrying and forming healthy, happy, stable, and flourishing families together. Billionaire Psycho articulates the young male perspective on this with posts like Crocodile Tears and the Conservative Movement, and Elise Unleashed voices the young female perspective with posts like The Epidemic of Mediocre Men with Sky- High Standards. Their complaints are valid and legitimate. This unnatural state of affairs isn’t working well for anyone, male or female. Second, there is the personal and practical question of how to get on in life and make the most of it, given these harsh realities. Having the second conversation is necessary and beneficial. Sometimes it involves making criticisms of men and of women that may hit close to home. Hey, I get it. I’m flawed and have made plenty of mistakes. (I am a divorced father of three myself, so most of whatever “wisdom” I have is the fool’s kind of wisdom that I learned the hard way: I can more easily tell you what NOT to do, than I can tell you what to do.) So if you hear people engaging in the second conversation, don’t take it personally and spam the comment section with your version of “How dare you?!” and “Must be nice!” I get it. The struggle is real. Now, what are you going to do about it? Here’s another conversation Aly had on YouTube with fellow Substacker Megha Lillywhite on these kinds of issues: Be sure to check out and subscribe to Aly’s substack and YouTube Channel. You can also follow her on X at @realfemsapien. Oh, and while we’re on the subject of gender-related culture-war issues, if you want to check out an esoteric analysis of gender dynamics through the lens of The Barbie Movie (which is basically a high-level Kabalistic retelling of the Adam and Eve story), then check out my post on that here: And if you enjoyed this podcast and want to support what I’m doing and are able to do so, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription. It costs less per month than a soda at most restaurants, and nine out of ten dentists agree that subscribing to A Ghost in the Machine is better for your teeth than drinking soda. (That tenth dentist is a lying bastard, bought and paid for by big soda, so you should listen to the other nine.) [If you’re listening to this on a podcast app or streaming platform, visit the Substack post for this episode to view embedded media and what not, as well as to leave a comment or reply to the comments of others.] A Ghost in the Machine is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit aghostinthemachine.substack.com/subscribe

    1h 31m
  7. 14 MAR

    Hacking Away at the Roots of the Regime Narrative

    The one and only Rurik Skywalker, writer and podcast host of The Slavland Chronicles, is back. This time we discuss the nature of the enemy and how to exploit its weaknesses by hacking away at the roots of its narratives. We also delve into some interesting conspiracy theories. It’s a fun conversation. I’m reminded of the story of Jack and the Beanstalk. As long as Jack stays in the Giant’s magical realm up in the clouds, he’s helpless and vulnerable, but when the Giant chases him back down to earth, the Giant is the one who is vulnerable, and Jack is able to destroy him. The regime seems to need things from us. It invests incredible resources to get us to pay attention to certain things — and think about what that phrase means, to *pay* attention, like attention is a type of currency, or something being traded away for something else. The regime also goes all out to distract us from what it doesn’t want us to see. Their black magicians are devastatingly adept at the art of misdirection. Whatever the nature of this realm is, the powers and principalities that govern it seem to need our participation and agreement, even if they have to resort to fraud and duress to get it. For whatever reason, they do not — and maybe cannot — simply force us to do things without some form of consent from us. (So be careful what you agree to!) Politics is downstream of culture, and culture is downstream of metaphysics, belief, and the overarching cultural narrative, i.e., the logos or dao of the regime (which is a bad imitation and inversion of the real and ultimate Logos or Dao). In this episode, Rurik shares his insights about where the enemy’s vulnerabilities are and how best to exploit them as we wage this crazy cultural guerilla war. (This discussion arose from Rurik’s reply to my post asking blackpillers for ideas about what we can do. We also discuss Neoliberal Feudalism’s response to that same post.) Be sure to check out Rurik’s substack, especially his posts about metaphysics and his excellent podcast: And if you enjoyed this podcast and want to support what I’m doing and are able to do so, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription. It costs less per month than a soda at most restaurants, and nine out of ten dentists agree that subscribing to A Ghost in the Machine is better for your teeth than drinking soda. (That tenth dentist is a lying bastard, bought and paid for by big soda, so fuck him and his opinion.) [If you’re listening to this on a podcast app or streaming platform, visit the Substack post for this episode to view embedded media and what not, as well as to leave a comment or reply to the comments of others.] If you haven’t already, be sure to also check out my first podcast discussion with Rurik (from January 26, 2025). A Ghost in the Machine is a reader and listener supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit aghostinthemachine.substack.com/subscribe

    1h 55m
  8. 9 MAR

    Bronze Age Pervert is to the Dissident Right what the Sackler family was to American healthcare

    In this episode of the podcast, we discuss a recent post on X by Bronze Age Pervert (BAP). Below is a screenshot of his post. And the community note: Here is a link to BAP’s tweet: https://x.com/bronzeagemantis/status/1898073885884731702 and a link to my response: https://x.com/DanielDHumor/status/1898777504610992421. BAP is doing a lot in this post. The word “almost” is doing some very heavy lifting when he claims that “almost all the girls at Epstein Island were 18 or over.” Then BAP straight up lies when he claims that “there’s no evidence of anything under 17 or of abuse.” As the Community Note says, “Epstein was indicted for sexual abuse of girls as young as 14.” We’re talking middle-school age girls. And these weren’t girls who came from stable, intact homes where a father or even an older brother was looking out for them, helping them to avoid psychopathic predators, like a 50-year-old Israeli spy who pimped them out to powerful American oligarchs and public officials. Then there’s the sneaky rhetorical push BAP gives his readers to send them careening down a slippery slope. It starts with a screenshotted tweet in which someone criticizes 30-year-old men who are in relationships with “18 to 23 year old” women. Is that kind of relationship inappropriate? Maybe, maybe not. That would depend a lot on the facts and circumstances and whether the woman is on the older side of that age range. But regardless, there is a vast difference between what Jeffrey Epstein and his clients did to middle-school aged girls, and a 30-year-old man dating a 23-year-old woman. BAP’s rhetorical sleight-of-hand is like an abortion activist saying, “Well, since we can’t point to the precise moment that an embryo becomes an actual baby, there’s no difference between killing a nine-month-old viable fetus and aborting a nine-day-old embryo, so we should just go ahead and allow all of it.” Chesterton fences exist for a reason! Why might a smart guy like Bronze Age Pervert bust out his rhetorical spellcasting to minimize the evils of Epstein Island? I wonder if BAP made a similar case to minimize the harms done by the UK’s Pakistani rape gangs? “Oh, come on, you prudish, Puritannical Brits! Almost all of these white girls were 18 or over! This is just hysteria over natural attraction to fully grown women! You Limeys need to lighten up!” Why would people like BAP want to mollify everyone’s outrage about Epstein Island, but not the Pakistani rape gang scandal in the UK? To borrow a phrase from BAP (Bullshitter Apologist for Pedophiles), “Wut means?” Basically, BAP is to the dissident Right what the Sackler family was to healthcare. He’s trying to sell you poison to make a fast buck while promoting degeneracy and the destruction of your civilization. He’s trolling for clicks and book sales and has no moral principles that he holds sacred and no commitment to America as a nation or to Americans as a people. BAP is a contrarian, but there are interesting limits to his contrarianism. For those with eyes to see, there are dots to connect and patterns to recognize. I see the game BAP is running, and I detest him for it. A Ghost in the Machine is a reader and listener supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit aghostinthemachine.substack.com/subscribe

    23 min

About

A Ghost in the Machine features hot takes on modern life from Daniel D, a regular human in a world gone mad. Daniel is nerdy and philosophical like Woody Allen, loud and angry like Sam Kinison, and full of shit like a clogged gas station toilet. It's all part of Life's rich pageant! aghostinthemachine.substack.com

You Might Also Like