EUVC

EUVC is your go-to podcast for everything European VC. Co-hosted by Andreas Munk Holm and David Cruz e Silva, EUVC features some of the most prominent people from the European VC industry, giving you a fresh new perspective on the industry and geo we love. Follow us and stay in the loop with everything European VC on eu.vc

  1. E706 | Jo Slota-Newson & Marc Sabas, Almanac Ventures: Systemic Deep Tech for Industrial Decarbonisation

    13 HR AGO

    E706 | Jo Slota-Newson & Marc Sabas, Almanac Ventures: Systemic Deep Tech for Industrial Decarbonisation

    Industrial systems are responsible for 75% of global emissions, yet only a quarter of climate-focused VC money flows into them. Not because investors don’t care — but because these systems are hard. They’re interconnected. Capital-intensive. Slow-moving. Technically dense. And deeply under-innovated. Almanac Ventures is built to change that. In this episode of the EUVC Podcast, Andreas Munk Holm sits down with Jo Slota-Newson and Marc Sabas, co-founders of Almanac Ventures — a new European seed and pre-seed deep tech fund laser-focused on unlocking decarbonisation in industrial systems through scientific breakthroughs and commercial discipline. This is a pitch episode — a chance for the EUVC LP & GP community to hear directly what Almanac stands for, how they invest, and why the next decade of industrial innovation will be shaped by specialist deep tech funds with true scientific and financial edge. Here’s what’s covered: 00:49 | What Almanac Ventures is — a European seed/pre-seed deep-tech fund backing scientific breakthroughs applied to industrial systems 01:31 | The founding team — Jo’s nanoscience PhD + 18 years commercialising deep tech, Marc’s finance → CVC → impact VC journey (and Jo’s 37km Channel swim) 03:52 | The complementary edge — technical rigor meets financial/commercial structuring, evidenced through 45 investments and a 2.3× MOIC track record 05:22 | The industrial innovation gap — 75% of emissions come from industry, yet only ~25% of climate VC targets it (because the systems are hard, complex, and interconnected) 06:11 | Why industry is ripe for deep-tech disruption — 20th-century inefficiencies, high value pools, and the need for performance + cost + decarb together 10:17 | “Deep tech works for venture—if you know where to look” — how to identify capex-efficient, scalable industrial technologies vs. science projects that need different capital 12:25 | Case study: Hot Green — a new compressor architecture enabling industrial heat pumps for 200–400°C processes (F&B, manufacturing) with electrification upside 13:49 | Case study: ReClinker — Cambridge spinout recycling cement inside steel arc furnaces, piggybacking heat, removing the CO₂-heavy chemistry step 15:19 | Do you need to be an operator to invest in deep tech? — why complementary experience (science + venture + corporate + some ops) beats any single “must-have” 18:35 | Investment strategy — first-check investor at TRL 4–7, pan-Europe, €300k–€1M tickets, aiming for a 25–30 company portfolio with follow-on capacity

    17 min
  2. E705 | Martin Schilling, Deep Tech Momentum: Why Europe’s Deep Tech Problem Isn’t Funding

    1 DAY AGO

    E705 | Martin Schilling, Deep Tech Momentum: Why Europe’s Deep Tech Problem Isn’t Funding

    Europe does not have a deep tech problem. It has a commercialisation problem. The last European companies to reach €100B+ market caps were SAP and ASML, both founded 40–50 years ago. If Europe wants a new generation of deep tech champions, venture capital alone won’t get us there. Customers have to step in. In this episode, Andreas Munk Holm is joined by Martin Schilling, former operator, investor, and founder of Deep Tech Momentum, to unpack why Europe excels at funding breakthroughs, but consistently fails to industrialise them. This is a conversation about: why enterprise buyers are the missing link in European deep tech what corporates are doing wrong (and how they can fix it) how founders actually win large customers in complex, regulated markets and why courage — not grants — is Europe’s real constraint Share 🎧 Here’s what’s covered: 01:15 Martin’s background: from N26 operator to deep tech ecosystem builder 01:52 What is Deep Tech Momentum (DTM)? 03:00 Why commercialisation — not capital — is the real bottleneck 04:19 The age gap: Europe’s top companies vs the US 06:26 Why US corporates acquire twice as many startups as Europe 06:54 The uncomfortable truth: Europe funds innovation others industrialise 08:54 Why corporates (not just VCs) must change behaviour 10:49 Neo-primes: the new system integrators Europe desperately needs 12:50 The four things corporates must fix to work with startups 15:06 Why startup collaboration must be CEO-owned 17:14 Buyers first: why conferences get this wrong 19:03 Money + customers: the only two things founders really need 21:27Trust, speed, and why procurement kills startups 23:25 Why trust starts inside the corporate, not with founders 27:03 Selling deep tech to enterprises & governments: what actually works 32:03 When CVCs help — and when they hurt 33:08 Enterprise sales mistakes founders keep making 38:28 Deep tech sales reality: defense, policy, and long cycles 44:57 Why DTM is not EU-funded — by design 49:07 The state’s real role: customer, not grant machine 49:23 Final takeaway: Europe needs courage, not more programs

    48 min
  3. E704 | This Week in European Tech with Dan Bowyer, Mads Jensen & Lomax Ward

    3 DAYS AGO

    E704 | This Week in European Tech with Dan Bowyer, Mads Jensen & Lomax Ward

    Welcome back to another episode of Upside where Dan Bowyer, Mads Jensen of SuperSeed, and Lomax Ward of Outsized Ventures go behind the headlines shaping European tech, capital, and power.This week felt less like a market update and more like a structural reset.Nvidia posts another blowout quarter — and the market barely reacts.Ukraine, four years into war, is quietly becoming Europe’s most important defence innovation engine.Anthropic adjusts its safety posture as AI labs collide with geopolitics and procurement reality.And beneath it all, questions around margins, sovereignty, and capital allocation are getting sharper.This isn’t just a tech cycle.It feels like a systems cycle.This is Upside, where optimism is earned, not assumed.What’s covered:03:30 Nvidia earnings: perfection priced in?09:40 Ukraine four years on: from aid recipient to defence capability supplier17:30 Europe’s defence spend: real budgets or slow procurement?23:30 AI safety becomes conditional: competitive pressure meets ethics31:00 Distillation at scale: China, IP leakage, and national security35:00 SaaSpocalypse vs SaaS redemption: systems of record vs systems of action40:30 OpenAI & Anthropic margins: the hidden constraint under the hype46:00 Chips & quantum: Europe’s deep tech wedge — if scale capital shows up54:30 Abundant intelligence: what breaks if intelligence gets cheap?#euvc #VC #VentureCapital #Investing #TheEuropeanVC #Podcast #Tech #Startup

    59 min
  4. E703 | Max Bray and Juliet Bailin, Kindred Capital VC: LP Conviction, $15B Funds & The Venture Barbell

    6 DAYS AGO

    E703 | Max Bray and Juliet Bailin, Kindred Capital VC: LP Conviction, $15B Funds & The Venture Barbell

    What exactly are LPs buying when they allocate to venture today and do they still believe in it? In this episode, Andreas sits down with Max Bray and Juliet Bailin, both Venture Partners at Kindred Capital VC to unpack what’s really happening beneath the fundraising headlines. Max brings the raw perspective of trying to raise a first-time fund in 2025 with unicorn-founder GPs, strong angel track records, and still struggling to secure second meetings. Juliet brings the sharper counterpoint: LP frustration isn’t always ignorance. Sometimes it’s a rational response to how venture has been practiced, especially around transparency, liquidity discipline, and the unrealistic expectation that a GP should be world-class at everything. This is a conversation about: LP behavior in uncertain cycles The myth of the “full-stack investor” Why solo GP economics are brutal Whether software still needs venture And why the fund model is splitting at the extremes Not hot takes. Not doom. Just honest mechanics. Share What’s Covered: 01:04 Max’s 2025 fundraising reality: even strong “on-paper” stories struggle to get second calls 03:46 LP rotation: capital moving toward liquidity, security, and shorter-duration bets 05:08 LP frustration: transparency gaps + liquidity decision-making 07:09 LPACs as sparring partners, not governance theatre 09:31 Europe’s structural issue: too few LPs and GPs have lived full cycles 12:47 The “full-stack investor” myth: investing + fund management + compliance + IR 14:46 Solo GP economics: why 2/20 breaks at the small end 26:08 The barbell thesis: platforms on one end, specialists on the other 27:56 Software defensibility compression in the AI era 30:24 Will AI decentralize outcomes — or centralize them further? 33:10 The rise of AI roll-ups and alternative capital models 35:19 The “middle-market squeeze” — real or overhyped? 39:34 What founders actually care about when choosing a fund

    37 min
  5. E702 | Lubomila Jordanova, Plan A: Climate Isn’t “Over”

    25 FEB

    E702 | Lubomila Jordanova, Plan A: Climate Isn’t “Over”

    Climate isn’t “over.” But building in climate has entered a new chapter, defined by shifting regulation, politicized narratives, buyer confusion, and a market that funded dozens of overlapping platforms. In this episode, Andreas and co-host Carmel Rafaeli, Founding Partner at The Table, sit down with Lubomila Jordanova, Co-founder & CEO of Plan A, just weeks after Plan Ajoined forces with Diginex, the NASDAQ-listed sustainability technology company, at the end of 2025. The conversation is part of Leaders Shaping a Resilient Planet, a series spotlighting exceptional founders in climate tech who happen to be women. The focus is not identity as a theme, but execution as a discipline. These are operators building in some of the most complex and capital-intensive parts of the real economy. This is not an acquisition recap. It is a clear-eyed discussion about what it takes to build and responsibly exit a climate tech company in a market that is maturing quickly. What’s covered: 00:52 The Table: co-investing community + the Foundation’s recoverable grants model 02:05 Introducing Lubomila Jordanova and Plan A 02:45 The acquisition: why Plan A chose to lead consolidation 04:35 Fundraising logic → acquisition logic: what changed 06:40 Founder outcome vs VC outcome: how alignment works in an exit 11:30 “The truth is where the real economy sits”: what carbon software actually sells 13:30 The uncomfortable line: “glorified consulting with a digital angle” 15:05 What VC portfolios get wrong in climate: return distribution, capital stack, secondaries 16:55 Why “climate” can’t be one bucket: hardware vs SaaS vs reporting 20:00 Managing investor perception: visibility, bias, and boardroom baggage 23:15 The broader financial pyramid: VC vs public markets vs real-economy signals 27:35 Post-exit reality: why a public-company KPI lens changes the conversation 31:10 Three founder learnings (humility, ecosystem, real-world problems) 33:55 A rare founder truth: pregnancy during the exit + building with “more hats than one”

    35 min
  6. E701 | Andy Lurling, Lumo Labs: Smart Capital from Eindhoven and Investing in AI for Health

    24 FEB

    E701 | Andy Lurling, Lumo Labs: Smart Capital from Eindhoven and Investing in AI for Health

    In a market where “AI fund” can mean almost anything, Lumo Labs is unusually specific: digital deep tech, deployed early, and anchored in one of Europe’s densest innovation clusters—Eindhoven, home of Philips’ legacy and the High Tech Campus (“smartest square kilometer” energy). In this EUVC pitch episode, Andreas sits down with Andy Lurling, founder & GP of Lumo Labs, to unpack how an entrepreneur-turned-investor built a fund that’s deliberately more than money: a structured support program, deep technical selection, and a thesis shaped by real-world constraints, health systems under pressure, and cities as the source of most emissions and pollution. Share What’s covered: 00:59 Why “Labs” and why Eindhoven: origin story + Philips legacy 02:31 Andy’s founder journey: EyeOpener, ESA as first investor, and the exit 06:15 From angel tickets to a fund: two cornerstone LPs pull them into fund building 08:26 Fund I recap: €20m, 23 pre-seed/seed investments 08:58 Fund II status: just over €40m raised, targeting €100m final size 10:34 The actual thesis: AI + digital deep tech (security, IoT, AR) 13:12 SDG focus: health, education, sustainable cities + climate action (urban) 15:31 Why these sectors: prevention over curing, and cities as the “source problem” 19:22 Where they invest: Netherlands/Belgium/Germany core; Spain/Portugal + Nordics via scouts 20:30 “Smart capital” in practice: leadership, market fit, storytelling, follow-on readiness 23:30 Track record snapshot: 30 companies; 3 dead; 9 (soon 11) moving into scale-up territory

    22 min
  7. E700 | This Week in European Tech with Dan Bowyer, Lomax Ward & Eyal Malinger

    23 FEB

    E700 | This Week in European Tech with Dan Bowyer, Lomax Ward & Eyal Malinger

    Welcome back to another episode of Upside where Dan Bowyer and Mads Jensen of SuperSeed go behind the headlines shaping European tech, capital, and power. This week we’re joined by Eyal Malinger, co-founder of Resurge Growth Partners, to unpack a genuinely strange week in global tech. China unveils humanoid robots that look disturbingly battlefield-ready. Anthropic tries to draw moral lines in defence AI. Peter Steinberger leaves Europe almost as fast as he went viral. Munich becomes less “security conference” and more “Europe, wake up.” And in the background, billion-dollar AI seed rounds and quantum mega-funds quietly signal that the frontier is accelerating again. This isn’t just a tech cycle. It feels like a systems cycle. This is Upside, where optimism is earned, not assumed. What’s covered: 02:10 China’s humanoid robot moment: hardware dominance meets AI brains 06:20 Battlefield AI and the ethics problem Anthropic can’t avoid 14:00 Raspberry Pi, edge AI, and Europe’s accidental meme stock 20:30 Anthropic vs Palantir: moral lines vs deterrence logic 25:10 Peter Steinberger leaves Europe — ecosystem gravity in action 31:00 AI inside venture: workflow automation vs real alpha 43:00 Munich Security Conference: defence budgets, sovereignty, and Stark vs Thiel 52:10 Psychedelics and glucose monitors: Europe’s quiet biotech strength 55:30 Quantum funds and Europe’s billion-dollar AI seed round

    54 min
  8. 20 FEB

    EUVC Live at GoWest | The Outlook for European Capital Sovereignty feat. Olivier Tonneau, Jeppe Høier, Paolo Pio, Fergus Bell and Prashant Agarwal

    In this EUVC Live at GoWest episode, Olivier Tonneau, Founding Partner Quantonation, Jeppe Høier, Co-Host at EUVC Corporate, Paolo Pio, Co-founder and General Partner at Exceptional Ventures, Fergus Bell, Founder and Managing Partner at The Players Fund, and Prashant Agarwal, Chairman and Managing Director at Scandian xplore one defining question: How does Europe turn frontier innovation into global scale? Across quantum, corporate capital, longevity, and sport, the same pattern emerges: Europe doesn’t lack talent or research. It lacks the capital and market architecture required to scale strategic industries fast enough to stay independent. Olivier opens with Europe’s quantum paradox. Europe supplies a meaningful share of deployed quantum computers globally, with strong startup and research clusters across the Nordics, France, Germany, and the UK. The science is world-class — but the financing is breaking. Over the last 12 months, the funding ratio between Europe and the US has shifted from roughly 1:2 to nearly 1:7, accelerating US scale-up, public listings, and acquisition pressure. Europe has 12–24 months to respond — not to avoid failure, but to avoid becoming the lab while others become the market. Jeppe shifts the lens to corporates. Corporate venture capital represents roughly 25% of global VC volume, yet the average lifespan of a CVC unit is only 3.7 years. His argument is blunt: most corporates launch venture arms believing they are “doing VC,” when they are actually building a strategic instrument without the operating system required to sustain it. Without durable governance — and a clear Build, Buy, Partner model — corporate venture becomes fragile instead of strategic. Paolo reframes health and longevity as deep tech moving at software speed. Genome sequencing has collapsed from decades to hours. mRNA proved that biology timelines can compress dramatically. With AI now embedded in diagnostics and discovery, health is entering an exponential era — and venture is being pulled with it. The session closes with a thesis most investors still underestimate. Fergus and Prashant argue sport is no longer entertainment — it is venture infrastructure. Athletes and rights holders are becoming capital allocators and distribution rails. Elite sport has evolved into a real-world deployment environment for deep tech, health tech, AI, and performance systems — where validation happens under pressure and at global scale. The takeaway across all five perspectives is clear: Europe invents early. But scale requires architecture. Late-stage capital depth. Liquidity. Corporate integration. Coordination. What’s covered: 00:30 Europe’s scale question — five lenses on one problem 02:00 Quantum’s paradox — Europe leads in science, not in financing 05:00 The 1:7 funding gap — why the next 12–24 months matter 07:00 What Europe can do — capital architecture, procurement, scale funds 11:30 Corporate venture — 25% of global VC, but structurally fragile 13:30 Why CVCs fail — the 3-year vs 6-year test and governance gaps 16:30 Longevity as deep tech — health moving at software speed 21:30 AI in health — diagnostics, discovery, and exponential biology 27:30 Sport as venture infrastructure — athletes and rights holders as rails 34:30 Deep tech in sport — validation, performance systems, adoption under pressure 40:00 Final takeaway — Europe has innovation; it needs scale architecture

    43 min

About

EUVC is your go-to podcast for everything European VC. Co-hosted by Andreas Munk Holm and David Cruz e Silva, EUVC features some of the most prominent people from the European VC industry, giving you a fresh new perspective on the industry and geo we love. Follow us and stay in the loop with everything European VC on eu.vc

More From EUVC

You Might Also Like