![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
940 集
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Opening Arguments Opening Arguments Media LLC
-
- 新聞
-
-
5.0 • 1 個評分
-
Opening Arguments is a law show that helps you make sense of the news! Comedian Thomas Smith brings on legal analysts to help you understand not only current events, but also deeper legal concepts and areas!
The typical schedule will be M-W-F with Monday being a deep-dive, Wednesday being Thomas Takes the Bar Exam and patron shoutouts, and Friday being a rapid response to legal issues in the news!
-
Hunter Biden's Trial Is Everything MAGA Thinks The Trump Trial Was
OA1040
We begin in Florida with yet more of Judge Aileen Cannon's efforts to delay Donald Trump's federal case, including a demand for Jack Smith to be nicer to Trump's lawyers and her decision to allow non-parties to join the fun and make arguments in an upcoming hearing about whether Smith was properly appointed to prosecute Trump at all.
Hunter Biden's federal trial began this week in Delaware on charges relating to his purchase and possession of a gun which he owned for 11 days in 2018. Matt breaks down the history of this investigation, the charges, and how this case ended up going to trial before a quick time jump in which we return to review what we know one week into these proceedings. How does this trial compare to the one which concluded a week earlier with the conviction of a former President Donald Trump--and would these charges ever have been brought against someone whose last name wasn’t Biden?
11th Circuit order instructing the clerk's office to stop taking complaints about Judge Cannon
Mar-A-Lago search warrant
Jack Smith's Motion for Modification of Conditions of Release
Quick Facts on 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) Firearms Offenses (US Sentencing Commission)
Delaware indictment of Robert Hunter Biden (gun charges)
“How to Think About the Hunter Biden “Laptop,” Marcy Wheeler (6/6/2024)
If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law! -
Biden’s Border Action - An Objective, Nuanced Explainer
OA1039
Trump’s prosecution for election interference in Georgia was just stayed by the Court of Appeals, leaving no chance that this trial will proceed before November. What happened, and how unexpected was this delay? We investigate.
We then turn to our main story: Biden administration’s executive actions to “shut down the border” and close the door to asylum for many people who would otherwise be eligible. Matt explains what’s actually going on here and how much of it was already in place before we consider the practical and political consequences of Joe Biden effectively carrying out the border bill which Trump bullied Republicans not to pass.
We end by spending a few minutes discussing a recent opinion from Judge Frank Easterbrook of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, who has very strong--and extremely appropriate--opinions about fonts.
Georgia appeals court order staying Trump’s criminal trial
“A Proclamation on Securing the Border” (June 4, 2024)
Interim Final Rule (“Securing the Border”)(June 4, 2024)
Attorney Taylor Levy’s donation page
If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law! -
OA Bar Prep with Heather! T3BE27
OA's Official Bar Tutor returns! We've got the answer to Question 26, but with Heather's signature style where we're going to learn a whole lot along the way. Then, in Question 27, we've got some Constitutional Law!
Be sure to play along by submitting your answer! Use #T3BE, or play on reddit.com/r/openargs! -
Supreme Court To Decide If Being Homeless Can Be A Crime
OA1038
Today we're joined by Vox Senior Correspondent, Ian Millhiser! In his reporting, Ian focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States. Ian gives us an excellent and comprehensive breakdown of Grants Pass v. Johnson, a case that could be decided any day now. As usual with this Court, the question is: How scared should we be?
Check out Ian's excellent article and other reporting here.
If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law! -
Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty and… GUILTY
OA1037
THE JURY IS IN! Opening Arguments is coming at you LIVE AND UNEDITED today as we react in realtime to the announcement of the verdict in People v. Trump--conveniently timed for exactly the time that we had already planned to record this week! We also take a look at the lengthy closing arguments from both sides and Matt answers patron questions about some of New York’s more unusual trial practices before getting into what we can expect next.
We finish out the fun with Thomas’s dramatic reading of Samuel Alito’s indignant, mendacious, and entirely unsolicited response to the Senate Judiciary Committee’s demands to speak with the Supreme Court’s manager and take a moment to appreciate his full-throated defense of a woman’s absolute right to choose (flags).
Jury instructions in People v. Trump
People v. Owens, 69 N.Y.2d 585 (1987)(providing jury with written excerpt of jury instructions was reversible error)
Alito’s letter to Senators Dick Durbin and Sheldon Whitehouse dated May 29, 2024 -
OA Bar Prep with Heather! T3BE26
Heather is back for another bar question! Yay! Except... it's real property... NOOOOO
We only do the question on this one, since we did both the Q and A last time. So, this is just a short little uncharged episode to get us back on track. It also allows me to catch up on Patron thanks!
Note: two new Gavel Gavels are out, with more coming very, very soon!
If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!