The Ben Ferguson Podcast

iHeartRadio On-Demand
  • 5.0 (1)
  • POLÍTICA
  • CADA DÍA

If you hate the liberal media but love the 47th President, than this is the podcast for you. Ben Ferguson brings you the commentary on the news that the biased media will not cover.

  1. Kansas Governor playing the Liberal hits again w Bathroom Politics plus Iranian War Games in Hormuz

    HACE 13 H

    Kansas Governor playing the Liberal hits again w Bathroom Politics plus Iranian War Games in Hormuz

    1. Kansas Transgender Bathroom Bill Kansas Governor Laura Kelly vetoed a Republican‑backed bill requiring individuals to use bathrooms/locker rooms based on biological sex in government buildings and schools. Republican legislators argue the bill reflects social norms and protects women and girls; they seek to override the veto, and they have the votes to potentially do so. The bill also: Prevents changing sex markers on driver’s licenses and birth certificates. Allows exceptions for young children with caregivers and coaches in locker rooms. Governor Kelly said the bill is “poorly drafted” and may have implications beyond bathroom use. 2. Gender‑Affirming Care for Minors in Kansas In 2025, Kansas lawmakers overrode a previous veto to pass a law banning gender‑affirming medical treatments for minors. Supporters say the law protects minors from irreversible decisions; opponents describe it as limiting healthcare. 3. Iran Military Activity & U.S. Response Iran conducted naval drills in the Strait of Hormuz, signaling readiness amid upcoming nuclear talks. The U.S. has deployed a second aircraft carrier (USS Gerald R. Ford) to the region, increasing military presence. Iranian officials insist they will pursue a “fair and equitable” nuclear deal but “will not submit to threats.” The U.S. maintains that Iran must curb nuclear ambitions; Trump administration statements emphasize willingness to act militarily if necessary. 4. Global Iranian Protests Large demonstrations by the Iranian diaspora occurred worldwide, including major rallies in Toronto and Los Angeles, calling for change in Iran’s leadership. 5. U.S. Visa Issuance to High‑Corruption Countries Analysis from the Center for Immigration Studies notes the U.S. issued visas to many migrants from countries ranked as highly corrupt by Transparency International. Examples include: South Sudan Somalia Venezuela Afghanistan The report argues that corruption makes reliable vetting difficult, due to risks of forged documents and bribery. 6. Statements From U.S. Political Figures Hillary Clinton stated that migration “went too far” and was “disruptive,” calling for humane reform with secure borders. Barack Obama criticized what he described as “rogue behavior” by federal agents. These comments are presented alongside criticism of the Biden administration’s immigration approach. 7. Border Security & Enforcement Debate There is great contrast between the immigration policies of the Trump and Biden administrations. Border enforcement Vetting of immigrants National security risks Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    27 min
  2. From Corrupt Nations to U.S. Neighborhoods Biden Let Them In

    HACE 13 H

    From Corrupt Nations to U.S. Neighborhoods Biden Let Them In

    1. Claims about U.S. immigration and corruption The U.S. has historically admitted immigrants from countries labeled as “highly corrupt” by Transparency International. Examples mentioned include South Sudan, Somalia, Venezuela, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Afghanistan, among others. Vetting immigrants from these countries is “nearly impossible” due to poor record‑keeping, bribery, and document fraud. 2. Reference to Trump administration policies Donald Trump previously restricted immigration from certain nations via executive orders. These restrictions were due to corruption concerns and an inability to verify documents from those regions. 3. Criticism of the Biden administration The Biden administration continued issuing visas to individuals from these “corrupt” nations, citing specific visa numbers (e.g., Venezuelan admissions). Allowing potentially unvetted migrants into the U.S. 4. Concerns about fraudulent documents Applicants in corrupt nations can obtain fake documents—birth certificates, police records, passports, diplomas—via bribes. This is presented as a major risk to U.S. vetting systems. 5. Political commentary on Democratic leaders Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Gavin Newsom are criticized for acknowledging migration problems while also condemning Trump’s approach. Democrats are both: admitting migration has become “destabilizing” and simultaneously criticizing U.S. border enforcement agencies. 6. Claims of “chaos” caused by Democratic policies The narrative argues that Democrats created disorder at the border and in U.S. cities. The author asserts Trump is “cleaning up the mess” and that this angers political opponents. 7. Accusations of unfair comparisons to authoritarian regimes Democrats comparing U.S. immigration enforcement agencies to authoritarian “secret police” or Nazi‑like forces. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    12 min
  3. Munich Mayhem as Democrats Torch Their Own Foreign Policy Credibility

    HACE 1 DÍA

    Munich Mayhem as Democrats Torch Their Own Foreign Policy Credibility

    1. Focus on Democratic politicians’ performance at the Munich Security Conference Several Democratic Party politicians—Alexandria Ocasio‑Cortez (AOC), Gavin Newsom, and Gretchen Whitmer—and how they handled foreign‑policy questions and public statements during the Munich Security Conference. 2. AOC’s Taiwan Question Response AOC was asked whether the U.S. should defend Taiwan militarily if China invades. The document characterizes her answer as unclear and non‑committal. It highlights U.S.–Taiwan ambiguity and ongoing tensions with China as contextual background. 3. Gavin Newsom’s Comments on U.S. Law Enforcement Newsom referenced images of masked federal agents during domestic unrest. He compared aspects of federal law‑enforcement actions to “secret police” and invoked imagery associated with Germany and authoritarianism. This comparison is presented as controversial given the setting. 4. Gretchen Whitmer’s Difficulty With Ukraine Question Whitmer reportedly struggled to answer a question about what Ukrainian “victory” looks like. She deferred to others on the panel, including a former U.S. ambassador. Her comments suggested she felt less versed in foreign policy relative to others on stage. 5. AOC’s Comments on U.S. Aid to Israel AOC suggested U.S. military aid should not be “unconditional,” referencing U.S. laws related to human‑rights violations. She stated that unconditional support contributed to suffering in Gaza. The document notes the sensitivity of making such statements in Germany. 6. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton Quotes Obama Raised concerns about “rogue behavior” by federal agents. Compared such behavior to what is seen in authoritarian countries. Clinton Discussed migration, political ideology, and historical inequities. Suggested U.S. border practices under certain administrations were harmful. Commented on broader debates between conservative and liberal worldviews. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    27 min
  4. Trump was RIght! There was Election Oversight Meltdown from Minnesota to Connecticut

    HACE 1 DÍA

    Trump was RIght! There was Election Oversight Meltdown from Minnesota to Connecticut

    1. Mentioned Voter Fraud Cases / Investigations Michigan:– Individuals convicted for forging signatures on nominating petitions. Connecticut:– Two defendants received suspended sentences/probation for improper handling of absentee ballots. Wisconsin:– Election clerks referred 46 suspected cases of irregularities after the 2024 election. Ohio:– Over 1,000 alleged voter‑fraud cases reportedly referred to the U.S. Department of Justice. 2. General Types of Alleged Irregularities Cited Double voting Improper registration Ballot tampering Non‑citizens allegedly registered or voting Duplicate or incomplete voter‑roll entries 3. Minnesota Case Highlighted A Minnesota state representative (Pam Altendorf) claims: Thousands of voter‑roll entries in Hennepin County contain missing information (e.g., names, addresses, birth dates). Possible duplicate voter records. Some voters listed as over 100 years old. The Minnesota Secretary of State allegedly attempted to block access to voter-roll data. 4. Broader Argument Presented Voter fraud is widespread and growing. Democrats are portrayed as resisting election‑integrity efforts, allegedly to maintain opportunities for cheating. The narrative concludes with rhetorical questions about whether votes are secure and why certain politicians oppose stricter election measures. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    10 min
  5. Dem Presidential Candidates Crash & Burn on Foreign Policy, plus Obama goes on the Attack

    HACE 1 DÍA

    Dem Presidential Candidates Crash & Burn on Foreign Policy, plus Obama goes on the Attack

    1. Democratic Candidates Struggle on Foreign Policy At the Munich Security Conference, AOC, Gretchen Whitmer, and Gavin Newsom are portrayed as unprepared on major foreign‑policy questions. AOC gives vague and confused answers regarding whether the U.S. should defend Taiwan against China. Whitmer appears unsure when asked what “victory” in Ukraine looks like, deflecting the question to an ambassador. Commentary suggests this reflects a broader weakness in foreign‑policy understanding among potential 2028 Democratic contenders. 2. Criticism of Far‑Left Ideology The intellectual foundation of the far left is hollow compared to past decades. They claim AOC’s comments reflect ideological simplicity, reliance on identity politics, and lack of deep geopolitical knowledge. Suggestion that cultural Marxism and DEI-style frameworks have replaced rigorous foreign‑policy thought. 3. AOC’s Israel Comments AOC is criticized for saying U.S. aid to Israel should be conditioned and alleging Israel committed “genocide” in Gaza. The hosts argue her position is ideologically driven and historically insensitive, especially when stated in Germany. They also claim Hamas statements contradict the genocide narrative. 4. Predictions About 2028 Politics: AOC will likely run for president. Chuck Schumer may encourage her to do so to avoid competing with her for Senate. If AOC runs, Mondaire Jones / Mondami (context suggests a progressive challenger) could run for Schumer’s Senate seat. 5. Obama’s Recent Commentary Barack Obama is criticized for: Calling certain ICE actions “rogue behavior.” Comparing Republican messaging to demagoguery while presenting Democrats as unifying. Hosts claim Obama is historically partisan and argue many current Democratic positions stem from his ideological influence. 6. Claims That Democrats Are Anti‑Law‑Enforcement Gavin Newsom is accused of comparing American law enforcement to “secret police.” The hosts argue Democrats are reviving rhetoric similar to segregation‑era resistance to federal authority. 7. U.S. Foreign Policy Under Obama and Biden Allegations that Obama and Biden’s foreign policy empowered Iran and weakened global deterrence. Claim that U.S. ambiguity over Taiwan is mishandled by the left. 8. Potomac River Sewage Issue Over 1 billion gallons of wastewater spilled into the Potomac. Washington, DC officials say repairs will take up to nine months, criticized as incompetence in government management. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    37 min
  6. U.S. Athletes Criticize America During the Games plus CA’s ‘Jock Tax’ Turns Win Into a $71K Loss

    HACE 2 DÍAS

    U.S. Athletes Criticize America During the Games plus CA’s ‘Jock Tax’ Turns Win Into a $71K Loss

    1. Criticism of U.S. Olympic Athletes’ Political Statements Several U.S. Olympians expressed discomfort representing America due to political issues. Freestyle skier Hunter Hess said representing the U.S. brings “mixed emotions.” A viral photo and comments also show anti‑ICE sentiments. Media outlets (Washington Post, Reuters, Guardian) are portrayed as supportive of athletes’ criticism of America. This behavior is encouraged by left‑leaning media and harms national unity. 2. American-born Skier Competing for China Skier Eileen Gu, born and trained in the U.S., competes for China and publicly defended Hunter Hess. Her designer suit referenced Chinese cultural elements. The narrative frames her as benefiting from America while choosing to represent China instead. 3. Super Bowl & California “Jock Tax” NFL quarterback Sam Darnold, lost money after winning the Super Bowl due to California’s “jock tax.” California taxes non‑resident athletes based on “duty days” spent in the state, which for the Super Bowl week totaled around eight days. As a result, Darnold owed $249,000 in taxes, exceeding his $178,000 Super Bowl bonus, meaning he netted a loss of about $71,000. This is evidence of California’s economic mismanagement and high‑tax policies. Sports analysts argue players and the NFLPA should push to avoid holding future Super Bowls in California. 4. Trump, Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell Newly referenced 2019 FBI interview with a Palm Beach police chief claims: Trump told police in 2006 that Epstein’s behavior was “well‑known.” Trump said Maxwell was “evil” and encouraged police to focus on her. Trump claimed he once saw Epstein with teenagers and left. Trump claimed to have banned Epstein from Mar‑a‑Lago. Document contrasts this with media narratives suggesting Trump was hiding something. 6. Maxwell’s Congressional Testimony Maxwell appeared virtually before the House Oversight Committee. She invoked the Fifth Amendment to every single question: Her relationship with Epstein Her role in recruiting or trafficking minors Her involvement in directing girls to provide sexual favors The identities of co‑conspirators She is already serving a 20‑year sentence, but her lawyers say she remains silent to protect ongoing appeals. Lawmakers received no additional information, leaving the public frustrated. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    31 min
  7. Entertainment is a Matter of National Security w Rich Greenfield & Clete Willems

    HACE 3 DÍAS

    Entertainment is a Matter of National Security w Rich Greenfield & Clete Willems

    Netflix–Warner Bros. Discovery Acquisition Debate 1. Senate Antitrust Hearing Congress is holding a hearing to examine Netflix’s proposed ~$70B acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. Core issues: competition, consumer harm, and market definition (streaming vs. all entertainment, including YouTube and social platforms). 2. Changing Media Landscape YouTube is now the #1 source of TV‑screen viewing time—more than all Disney, Netflix, and Amazon content combined. Regulators struggle to define the “market” because consumers now treat YouTube, Netflix, cable, TikTok, and broadcast TV as interchangeable for entertainment. 3. Job Creation vs. Job Cuts Netflix-side argument Netflix claims the merger would create U.S. jobs, not cut them. Netflix is building a major production studio in New Jersey and says it: Films in all 50 states Tripled its workforce Supports 140,000+ production jobs Generated $225B+ in economic output Paramount competing bid Paramount and Skydance are pursuing a hostile bid. They’ve already announced major layoffs and claim $6B in “synergies” (interpreted as job cuts). Concern exists about whether a smaller, highly leveraged Paramount could handle Warner Bros. scale. 4. Foreign Investment Concerns Netflix deal = American company, American financing. Paramount bid = majority of equity from Middle East sovereign wealth funds. Critics raise concerns about: Foreign influence in cultural products Regulatory issues (CFIUS review, EU scrutiny) Loss of American control over culturally influential media 5. Vertical vs. Horizontal Merger Netflix + Warner Bros. (Vertical) Netflix lacks a century-old studio, theatrical distribution, and major IP library. Combining complements rather than duplicates. Vertical mergers usually receive friendlier antitrust treatment. Paramount + Warner Bros. (Horizontal) Paramount already has: A studio A distribution system Massive content overlap A merge would likely force elimination of redundant operations, meaning more job cuts and higher regulatory risk. 6. Consumer Impact: Bundling Example: Disney+ + Hulu bundle offers huge consumer savings compared to buying individually. Suggestion: Netflix + HBO/Warner Bros. could deliver similar value efficiency. 7. Concerns from Conservatives / Ideology Debate Some conservatives worry Netflix pushes “woke” content. Netflix’s Chief Global Affairs Officer (a Trump White House alumnus) argues: Netflix provides content for all ideologies, including faith‑based and conservative-friendly shows. Netflix supports free speech and resisted calls to censor Dave Chappelle. Netflix refuses to operate in China due to censorship demands. 8. Paramount’s Debt Issues Paramount is heavily leveraged and would need far more debt to fund acquisition. Experts warn that a highly leveraged media company is risky in a rapidly changing industry. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    29 min
  8. Netflix Goes All-In as Foreign Money Targets Paramount

    HACE 3 DÍAS

    Netflix Goes All-In as Foreign Money Targets Paramount

    1. Netflix Emphasizes American Job Creation Netflix highlights major growth in U.S. jobs: tripled its workforce in recent years. Filming now occurs in all 50 states and 1,200 locations, supporting: 140,000 production jobs $225 billion in economic output Netflix presents itself as expanding investment while others pull back. 2. New $1.2B New Jersey Studio Project Netflix is building a world‑class production studio on a former military base in New Jersey. Intended to bring filming back to the U.S. from places like the U.K. Promoted as strengthening American production infrastructure and jobs. 3. Netflix–Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Framed as a “Vertical Merger” Netflix argues its merger is complementary, not redundant, because: Netflix is newer to content production (only ~10 years). Warner Bros. brings 100 years of IP, an existing major studio, and theatrical distribution. They say the combined assets would increase content output and maintain multiple buyers in the industry. 4. Paramount–Skydance Deal Portrayed as Risky “Horizontal Merger” Paramount’s deal is a horizontal merger, which would create redundancies (“two of everything”) leading to major job cuts. Example given: 3,500 jobs already cut due to the Skydance merger 15% CBS workforce reduction announced $6B in “synergies” (interpreted as more job cuts) Netflix positions its own merger as job‑preserving, unlike the Paramount deal. 5. Foreign Investment Concerns Paramount–Skydance deal involves more Middle Eastern equity than U.S. equity. Concerns raised: Possible foreign influence on American media and cultural output Potential problems during CFIUS review or EU regulatory review, especially relating to news networks like CNN Netflix contrasts this with: “An American deal with American dollars.” 6. Addressing Conservative Concerns About “Woke” Content Netflix acknowledges conservative skepticism about its programming. Reassurances offered: Netflix’s mission is to “entertain everyone,” across all political and cultural segments. Examples of conservative‑friendly content (e.g., Cobra Kai, military documentaries, faith‑based shows). Netflix highlights its free speech stance, citing the Dave Chappelle controversy as an example of resisting cancellation pressures. Netflix claims it does not operate in China because it refuses censorship demands. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    12 min
Ver todo (2 k)

Tráiler

Anfitriones e invitados

Acerca de

If you hate the liberal media but love the 47th President, than this is the podcast for you. Ben Ferguson brings you the commentary on the news that the biased media will not cover.

Información

  • Canal
    iHeartRadio On-Demand
  • Creador
    iHeartPodcasts
  • Años de actividad
    2018 - 2026
  • Episodios
    2 k
  • Clasificación
    Apto
  • Copyright
    2026 iHeartMedia, Inc. © Any use of this intellectual property for text and data mining or computational analysis including as training material for artificial intelligence systems is strictly prohibited without express written consent from iHeartMedia
  • Mostrar sitio web
    The Ben Ferguson Podcast

Más de iHeartRadio On-Demand

También te podría interesar