Why I'm Not

Daniel DeWitt

Inspired by G.K. Chesterton's book Heresy, "Why I'm Not" is a one-season podcast about my journey in and through Christian fundamentalism. Far from an academic treatment of any topic, this is more like a friendly coffee conversation centered around big ideas about God, the Bible, ministry, and life. This project began as simple live video broadcasts on Facebook that surprisingly received thousands of views and inspired no shortage of dialogue, both online and off. After hearing from several folks who wanted access to the content — and since Facebook deletes videos after thirty days — I decided to recreate the material as a single-season podcast. Join me on a journey of verbal processing and theological reflection. The mental road trip is paved with 80s and 90s pop culture references. No apologies. Whether you agree, disagree, or are simply undecided about topics I discuss, I hope these episodes inspire you to think and maybe even crack open your Bible and consider why you believe what you do. Here's the episode list: Episodes 1 and 2 released in late December 2025. A new episode will drop every Monday starting on January 5th. On Heresy & HereticsWhy I'm Not a FundamentalistWhy I'm Not a CalvinistWhy I'm Not a Young Earth CreationistWhy I'm Not a CessationistWhy I'm Not a DispensationalistWhy I'm Not Big Mad About Women in MinistryWhy I'm Not Sure About the Traditional View of HellWhy I'm Not Getting Over JesusPostlogue: I love Jesus, but I will block a bro.You can find more about me and read my regular posts at Theolatte.com

Season 1

  1. Why I'm Not a Fundamentalist

    EPISODE 2

    Why I'm Not a Fundamentalist

    Did you know one of the most influential figures in American fundamentalism was a con artist who ditched his family, did time in jail, and then got rich selling a study Bible? In this episode, I get personal—sharing about my own years in Bible college and how I was shaped by a system built on shaky foundations. I expose the scandal behind the Scofield Study Bible, a book that quietly molded the curriculum of countless Christian colleges through its connection to C. I. Scofield. And I lay out five reasons why I’m deliberately trying not to be a fundamentalist anymore. Show Notes: Kansas gov website with reference to Scofield: https://www.justice.gov/usao-ks/history Article with overview of Scofield: https://www.acton.org/religion-liberty/volume-35-number-2/ci-scofield-gods-self-made-man Overview of influence of the Scofield Reference Bible: https://textandcanon.org/the-bestselling-reference-bible-that-remade-american-evangelicalism/ Academic thesis on Scofield: https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2571&context=etd From the conclusion of the thesis: "This thesis reveals that C. I. Scofield’s claim to be a decorated Confederate hero, a successful lawyer, and a Bible scholar merely reflected a reputation he sought after his political and personal ruin in Atchison, Kansas in 1873. C. I. Scofield used opportunity, confidence, and the good will of others to disguise an unrepentant ambition for recognition as a professional minister. Reverend Scofield’s claim of being a decorated veteran, successful lawyer, or Bible scholar each seem less than compelling individually, but considered together as part of his life story reveals the complex nature of the man and his theology." https://pcusa.org/news-storytelling/blogs/historical-society-blog/beginnings-fundamentalism Lyman Stewart and gift to Scofield's Bible project and he and his brother's funding of The Fundamentals of the Faith. This connection doesn't demonstrate anything sinister or unethical, but rather shows the close connection between Scofiled's views and the coining of the term "fundamentalist." Scofield is one of sixty-four authors of the articles in The Fundamentals of the Faith.

    35 min
  2. Why I'm Not a Dispensationalist

    EPISODE 6

    Why I'm Not a Dispensationalist

    I still have nightmares about a movie my fundamentalist church made me watch as a kid: A Thief in the Night. It was a groovy 1970s horror film built on bad theology—and a lot of fear. That theology was dispensationalism, a system invented in the 1800s by John Nelson Darby and later popularized in the 1900s in America by C. I. Scofield through his reference Bible. Scofield didn’t just explain the text; he smuggled Darby’s ideas into it. Literally. Some critics joke it should be called the Darby Bible because of the level of plagiarism. In this episode, I'll describe why a theology that sees Palestinian Christians as an obstacle to God's work should be left behind. NOTES: N.T. Wright's article “Farewell to the Rapture”: https://ntwrightpage.com/2016/07/12/farewell-to-the-rapture/While I say Darby invented dispensationalism, it can be argued it was more due to the way his views were developed by his followers. To further explore this, here's an interesting interview by Dr. Albert Mohler with Dr. Crawford Gribben from Queen's Colelge about his book, "J.N. Darby and the Roots of Dispensationalism":https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ow9bN5RXVa4You can read more about the displacement of Palestinians here:https://bylinetimes.com/2024/01/17/the-palestinians-and-israel-a-modern-day-trail-of-tears/Here's the Faith on the Road episode I mentioned where we interviewed Palestinian theologian John Munyaer:https://open.spotify.com/episode/1oVKrJmDKrkiggq7TswBlb?si=umPaoeJCQYSfbhmDpsnAIAOpinion piece on why Christians tolerate Israel's genocide against Palestinians:https://politicstoday.org/why-do-evangelical-christians-support-israels-genocide-against-palestinians/Replace Theology is a Heresy by Jack Sara:https://www.comeandsee.com/view.php?sid=1453

    9 min
  3. Why I'm Not Big Mad About Women in Ministry

    EPISODE 7

    Why I'm Not Big Mad About Women in Ministry

    Some doctrinal positions require so much cherry-picking you’d think we were baking a pie. We’re all capable of it. That’s why sensitive topics deserve honest engagement with all the relevant texts—not just our favorites. Because of the complexity of the biblical texts, and the theological whack-a-mole way conservatives handle it, I'm really not big mad about people who might disagree with me. SHOW NOTES: Danvers Statement on Biblical Complimentarianism: https://cbmw.org/about/the-danvers-statement/Baptist Faith and Message 2000: https://bfm.sbc.net/bfm2000/Who Killed Junia: https://juniaproject.com/who-killed-junia-part-one/Junia, a Woman Apostle: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1561521(BRILL) Two Minor Textual Variants in Romans 16:7"Tne variant is Ἰουνίαν (“Junia,” feminine)and the other Ἰουλίαν (“Julia”). It has become clear in recent decades, however,that only “Julia” is a genuine textual variant to the (unaccented) Ἰουνιαν; that the masculine form, “Junias,” is a non-existent name and must be discarded; and that the feminine form, “Junia,” must be restored in the text" (emphasis mine).Another quote from this article regarding the eventual change back to the femine version of Junia: "This change was long overdueand fully justified, for the Apostle Junias (male) was the creation of certainmale scholars – exegetes, lexicographers, and grammarians – and churchmenin Europe, Britain, and North America, who, as is apparent (and occasionallyon their own admission), found it difficult to admit that a woman in earliest Christianity could have been an apostle . . ."Junia – A Woman Lost in Translation: The Name IOYNIAN in Romans 16:7 and its History of Interpretation"Both male interpretations lack evidence to support their existence. The female form, on the other hand, is widely attested outside of the New Testament and, consequently, is not just the wishful reading of female scholars like Brooten but the most natural reading of the text. In light of this evidence, there is not just no good reason to replace the known female name Junia for a hypothetical male name Junias, there is not even the slightest reason to even mention a male alternative to Junia."Video: N.T. Wright on women in ministryI find that a compelling argument against egalitarianism can be made from church history and the Global Church outside of the West. Gavin Ortlund makes a good case for that here. This point that keeps me from changing my position: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/X-Q_ew-u-Zg

    17 min
  4. Why I'm Not Sold on the Traditional View of Hell

    EPISODE 8

    Why I'm Not Sold on the Traditional View of Hell

    Dr. John Stott on annihilationism: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1232&context=pdThree Christion Views of Hell (Dr. Preston Sprinkle): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-DfzRSLFP8Conditional Immortality (Dr. Preston Sprinkle): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nemKBJoCoKIDebate between Dr. Albert Mohler and Chris Date on annihilationism. Link: https://www.premier.plus/unbelievable/podcasts/episodes/should-christians-rethink-hell-dr-al-mohler-amp-chris-date-debate-the-traditional-amp-conditionalist-concept-of-hell-replayYou might need to set up a free account to listen. I had to.You can judge for yourself, but this debate was a bit of tipping point for me in taking a serious look at annihilationism as the arguments for it are far better than what are given against it, which mostly consists of doubling down on the fact the ECT is the traditional view wihtout much substantive arguments. I would encourage you to look for places where instead of dealing with the arguments for annihilationism, they are simply dismissed as not being "the normal reading of the text."Kirk Cameron video on hell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RflbA8Vt_YRay Comfort's response to Kirk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1BAU7cdh8YKirk Cameron's response to all the pushback: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NrwM3Qy-5wKirk Cameron and a panel of experts talking through this topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ds3UbUsIaQsThis website is a repository of articles, videos, and publications on the topic: https://rethinkinghell.com

    19 min

About

Inspired by G.K. Chesterton's book Heresy, "Why I'm Not" is a one-season podcast about my journey in and through Christian fundamentalism. Far from an academic treatment of any topic, this is more like a friendly coffee conversation centered around big ideas about God, the Bible, ministry, and life. This project began as simple live video broadcasts on Facebook that surprisingly received thousands of views and inspired no shortage of dialogue, both online and off. After hearing from several folks who wanted access to the content — and since Facebook deletes videos after thirty days — I decided to recreate the material as a single-season podcast. Join me on a journey of verbal processing and theological reflection. The mental road trip is paved with 80s and 90s pop culture references. No apologies. Whether you agree, disagree, or are simply undecided about topics I discuss, I hope these episodes inspire you to think and maybe even crack open your Bible and consider why you believe what you do. Here's the episode list: Episodes 1 and 2 released in late December 2025. A new episode will drop every Monday starting on January 5th. On Heresy & HereticsWhy I'm Not a FundamentalistWhy I'm Not a CalvinistWhy I'm Not a Young Earth CreationistWhy I'm Not a CessationistWhy I'm Not a DispensationalistWhy I'm Not Big Mad About Women in MinistryWhy I'm Not Sure About the Traditional View of HellWhy I'm Not Getting Over JesusPostlogue: I love Jesus, but I will block a bro.You can find more about me and read my regular posts at Theolatte.com

You Might Also Like