Speaking Out

Médecins Sans Frontières

The MSF “Speaking Out” podcasts are adapted from the original Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) Speaking Out Case Studies (SOCS). Like the case studies, the podcast examines the challenges and dilemmas surrounding speaking out. Each series offers an in-depth look into humanitarian dilemmas in a specific crisis through the narration of extracts from MSF documents and press archives to help establish the facts. Interviews with the main MSF protagonists at the time of the events also provide insight into, and personal analysis of, the positions adopted.  *** The MSF Speaking Out Case Studies (SOCS) is a series of case studies that openly examines and analyses MSF’s actions and decision-making processes during humanitarian emergencies that have led it to speak out or not. The SOCS project assists all MSF members, as well as a growing external audience, in understanding how speaking out articulates with humanitarian interventions.     Download all SOCS in English and French on: https://www.msf.org/speakingout/all-case-studies Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  1. MSF and the Rohingya 1992 - 2014 - Episode 1: Bangladesh in the 1990s

    25-11-2025

    MSF and the Rohingya 1992 - 2014 - Episode 1: Bangladesh in the 1990s

    Episode 1: Bangladesh in the 1990s  In 1991–1992, Myanmar’s military repression forces over 250,000 Rohingya to flee to Bangladesh, where they settle in refugee camps. In the camps near Cox’s Bazar, MSF observes dire living conditions and violence, while Bangladeshi authorities limit aid and force repatriations. MSF engages in “silent advocacy,” raising concerns only with political stakeholders in order to maintain activities in the camps. This episode highlights enduring dilemmas in MSF’s humanitarian approach with the Rohingya: publicly speaking out versus staying silent to preserve access. * * * This podcast series is adapted from the MSF Speaking Out Case Study “MSF and the Rohingya 1992 – 2014”. It brings to light two decades of MSF advocacy activities as part of its humanitarian assistance to the Rohingya people in Bangladesh and Myanmar. It examines the challenges that MSF teams in the field and headquarters encountered when deciding whether and how MSF could publicly speak out about the plight of the Rohingya facing persecutions and violence in Myanmar and Bangladesh. During the 1992-2014 period, MSF worked mostly through diplomatic channels “behind closed doors” to advocate about the Rohingya’s plight with foreign diplomats and United Nations agencies. This “silent advocacy” was challenged within MSF by those who felt that the lack of public speaking out meant MSF was abandoning a persecuted population. To maintain an operational presence without speaking out publicly was not seen as an ethically justifiable option for an independent and impartial humanitarian organisation like MSF. Over 7 episodes, the podcast explores the challenges, dilemmas and internal disagreements underlying MSF’s humanitarian response to assist the Rohingya under the Myanmar authoritarian regime. * * * This podcast series is written, produced and mixed by Andrea Rangecroft.   Editorial direction is from Nancy Barrett and Laurence Binet.  The narrator is Claire Lubert.  Extracts are read by Clive Hayward and Lucy Scott   The voiceovers are by Kevin Halliwell, Charles Nove and Alex Vincent.   The music is by Lost Harmonies and Peter Sandberg.   Photo crédits: Generic MSF A special thanks to Rian Landman   Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    41 min
  2. MSF and the Rohingya 1992 - 2014 - Episode 2: Years of growth and silence

    25-11-2025

    MSF and the Rohingya 1992 - 2014 - Episode 2: Years of growth and silence

    Episode 2: Years of growth and silence  In Myanmar an increasingly authoritarian regime is taking shape, inhibiting the return of refugees and making the lives of the Rohingya who’ve remained in Rakhine State increasingly difficult. MSF documents systematic persecution but is divided over how to approach the dilemma of access versus speaking out. While from 1994, MSF Holland opts for “silent diplomacy” in order to expand its malaria and HIV/AIDs programmes in Myanmar, MSF France decides to withdraw in 2006, denouncing the authorities lack of transparency. * * * This podcast series is adapted from the MSF Speaking Out Case Study “MSF and the Rohingya 1992 – 2014”.   It brings to light two decades of MSF advocacy activities as part of its humanitarian assistance to the Rohingya people in Bangladesh and Myanmar.   It examines the challenges that MSF teams in the field and headquarters encountered when deciding whether and how MSF could publicly speak out about the plight of the Rohingya facing persecutions and violence in Myanmar and Bangladesh. During the 1992-2014 period, MSF worked mostly through diplomatic channels “behind closed doors” to advocate about the Rohingya’s plight with foreign diplomats and United Nations agencies. This “silent advocacy” was challenged within MSF by those who felt that the lack of public speaking out meant MSF was abandoning a persecuted population.  To maintain an operational presence without speaking out publicly was not seen as an ethically justifiable option for an independent and impartial humanitarian organisation like MSF.  Over 7 episodes, the podcast explores the challenges, dilemmas and internal disagreements underlying MSF’s humanitarian response to assist the Rohingya under the Myanmar authoritarian regime.   * * * This podcast series is written, produced and mixed by Andrea Rangecroft.   Editorial direction is from Nancy Barrett and Laurence Binet.  The narrator is Claire Lubert.  Extracts are read by Clive Hayward and Lucy Scott   The voiceovers are by Kevin Halliwell, Charles Nove and Alex Vincent.   The music is by Lost Harmonies and Peter Sandberg.   Photo crédits: Carlos Quarenghi A special thanks to Rian Landman   Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    32 min
  3. MSF and the Rohingya 1992 - 2014 - Episode 3: A slow opening at MSF

    25-11-2025

    MSF and the Rohingya 1992 - 2014 - Episode 3: A slow opening at MSF

    Episode 3: A slow opening at MSF  In 2006, following MSF’s internal reorganisation, MSF Operational Centre Amsterdam (OCA) refocuses advocacy on the Rohingya marking a shift in its approach to testimony. To bypass Myanmar’s restrictions, strengthened through violent crackdowns on protesters after 2007’s Saffron Revolution, most of the speaking out concerns the fate of unregistered refugees in Bangladesh. Nonetheless, in Myanmar, MSF OCA speaks out on the humanitarian consequences of state-sponsored discrimination, repression, and lack of access to healthcare for both the Rohingya and people living with AIDS. * * * This podcast series is adapted from the MSF Speaking Out Case Study “MSF and the Rohingya 1992 – 2014”.   It brings to light two decades of MSF advocacy activities as part of its humanitarian assistance to the Rohingya people in Bangladesh and Myanmar.   It examines the challenges that MSF teams in the field and headquarters encountered when deciding whether and how MSF could publicly speak out about the plight of the Rohingya facing persecutions and violence in Myanmar and Bangladesh. During the 1992-2014 period, MSF worked mostly through diplomatic channels “behind closed doors” to advocate about the Rohingya’s plight with foreign diplomats and United Nations agencies. This “silent advocacy” was challenged within MSF by those who felt that the lack of public speaking out meant MSF was abandoning a persecuted population.  To maintain an operational presence without speaking out publicly was not seen as an ethically justifiable option for an independent and impartial humanitarian organisation like MSF.  Over 7 episodes, the podcast explores the challenges, dilemmas and internal disagreements underlying MSF’s humanitarian response to assist the Rohingya under the Myanmar authoritarian regime.   * * * This podcast series is written, produced and mixed by Andrea Rangecroft.   Editorial direction is from Nancy Barrett and Laurence Binet.  The narrator is Claire Lubert.  Extracts are read by Clive Hayward and Lucy Scott   The voiceovers are by Kevin Halliwell, Charles Nove and Alex Vincent.   The music is by Lost Harmonies and Peter Sandberg.   Photo crédits: Giulio Di Sturco A special thanks to Rian Landman   Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    20 min
  4. MSF and the Rohingya 1992 - 2014 - Episode 4: Myanmar opens up

    25-11-2025

    MSF and the Rohingya 1992 - 2014 - Episode 4: Myanmar opens up

    Episode 4: Myanmar opens up  In 2008, Cyclone Nargis devastates Myanmar’s Irrawaddy Delta, killing over 130,000 people. The crisis opens a humanitarian space. From 2009 onwards, MSF intensifies its public advocacy on the Rohingya including the “Fatal Policy: How the Rohingya Suffer the Consequences of Statelessness” report that highlights the health consequences of restrictive policies in Myanmar. Though never publicly published, it becomes a key tool in diplomatic exchanges. Throughout, MSF balances the need for advocacy with operational access, gradually developing a comprehensive regional strategy that highlights the Rohingya crisis as a major humanitarian and political issue. * * * This podcast series is adapted from the MSF Speaking Out Case Study “MSF and the Rohingya 1992 – 2014”. It brings to light two decades of MSF advocacy activities as part of its humanitarian assistance to the Rohingya people in Bangladesh and Myanmar. It examines the challenges that MSF teams in the field and headquarters encountered when deciding whether and how MSF could publicly speak out about the plight of the Rohingya facing persecutions and violence in Myanmar and Bangladesh. During the 1992-2014 period, MSF worked mostly through diplomatic channels “behind closed doors” to advocate about the Rohingya’s plight with foreign diplomats and United Nations agencies. This “silent advocacy” was challenged within MSF by those who felt that the lack of public speaking out meant MSF was abandoning a persecuted population. To maintain an operational presence without speaking out publicly was not seen as an ethically justifiable option for an independent and impartial humanitarian organisation like MSF. Over 7 episodes, the podcast explores the challenges, dilemmas and internal disagreements underlying MSF’s humanitarian response to assist the Rohingya under the Myanmar authoritarian regime. * * * This podcast series is written, produced and mixed by Andrea Rangecroft.   Editorial direction is from Nancy Barrett and Laurence Binet.  The narrator is Claire Lubert.  Extracts are read by Clive Hayward and Lucy Scott   The voiceovers are by Kevin Halliwell, Charles Nove and Alex Vincent.   The music is by Lost Harmonies and Peter Sendberg.   Photo credits: Generic MSF A special thanks to Rian Landman   Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    39 min
  5. MSF and the Rohingya 1992 - 2014 - Episode 5: Renewed violence and loss of access to Myanmar

    25-11-2025

    MSF and the Rohingya 1992 - 2014 - Episode 5: Renewed violence and loss of access to Myanmar

    Episode 5: Renewed violence and loss of access to Myanmar  In 2012, violence breaks out in Myanmar’s Rakhine State between Buddhists and Rohingya after a Buddhist woman is allegedly killed by Rohingya men. Retaliatory attacks displace tens of thousands and create widespread insecurity. MSF struggles to provide healthcare amid harassment, access restrictions, and arrests of Rohingya staff, forcing a suspension of operations. MSF faces ethical challenges in maintaining neutrality and impartiality while being seen by other communities in Rakhine as biased toward Muslims. With the regime detaining two MSF staff members, the organisation finds itself once again in a difficult position when it comes to speaking out. * * * This podcast series is adapted from the MSF Speaking Out Case Study “MSF and the Rohingya 1992 – 2014”. It brings to light two decades of MSF advocacy activities as part of its humanitarian assistance to the Rohingya people in Bangladesh and Myanmar. It examines the challenges that MSF teams in the field and headquarters encountered when deciding whether and how MSF could publicly speak out about the plight of the Rohingya facing persecutions and violence in Myanmar and Bangladesh. During the 1992-2014 period, MSF worked mostly through diplomatic channels “behind closed doors” to advocate about the Rohingya’s plight with foreign diplomats and United Nations agencies. This “silent advocacy” was challenged within MSF by those who felt that the lack of public speaking out meant MSF was abandoning a persecuted population. To maintain an operational presence without speaking out publicly was not seen as an ethically justifiable option for an independent and impartial humanitarian organisation like MSF. Over 7 episodes, the podcast explores the challenges, dilemmas and internal disagreements underlying MSF’s humanitarian response to assist the Rohingya under the Myanmar authoritarian regime. * * * This podcast series is written, produced and mixed by Andrea Rangecroft.   Editorial direction is from Nancy Barrett and Laurence Binet.  The narrator is Claire Lubert.  Extracts are read by Clive Hayward and Lucy Scott   The voiceovers are by Kevin Halliwell, Charles Nove and Alex Vincent.   The music is by Lost Harmonies and Peter Sendberg.   Photo credits: Kaung Htet A special thanks to Rian Landman   Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    41 min
  6. MSF and the Rohingya 1992 - 2014 - Episode 6: Under pressure in Myanmar

    25-11-2025

    MSF and the Rohingya 1992 - 2014 - Episode 6: Under pressure in Myanmar

    Episode 6: Under pressure in Myanmar  In January 2014, in Du Chee Yar Tan, Rakhine State, MSF OCA treats wounded Rohingya after a violent attack and issues a public statement. The Myanmar government denies the violence, pressures MSF for patient details, and accuses it of exaggeration. Over the following weeks, MSF issues cautious public statements emphasising neutrality and commitment to medical needs. Teams face harassment, protests, and accusations of misinformation from the Myanmar government. Negotiations over the renewal of MSF’s Memorandum of Understanding in the country collapse. On 27 February 2014, MSF OCA is ordered to close all programs in Myanmar. * * * This podcast series is adapted from the MSF Speaking Out Case Study “MSF and the Rohingya 1992 – 2014”.   It brings to light two decades of MSF advocacy activities as part of its humanitarian assistance to the Rohingya people in Bangladesh and Myanmar.   It examines the challenges that MSF teams in the field and headquarters encountered when deciding whether and how MSF could publicly speak out about the plight of the Rohingya facing persecutions and violence in Myanmar and Bangladesh. During the 1992-2014 period, MSF worked mostly through diplomatic channels “behind closed doors” to advocate about the Rohingya’s plight with foreign diplomats and United Nations agencies. This “silent advocacy” was challenged within MSF by those who felt that the lack of public speaking out meant MSF was abandoning a persecuted population.  To maintain an operational presence without speaking out publicly was not seen as an ethically justifiable option for an independent and impartial humanitarian organisation like MSF.  Over 7 episodes, the podcast explores the challenges, dilemmas and internal disagreements underlying MSF’s humanitarian response to assist the Rohingya under the Myanmar authoritarian regime.   * * * This podcast series is written, produced and mixed by Andrea Rangecroft.   Editorial direction is from Nancy Barrett and Laurence Binet.  The narrator is Claire Lubert.  Extracts are read by Clive Hayward and Lucy Scott   The voiceovers are by Kevin Halliwell, Charles Nove and Alex Vincent.   The music is by Lost Harmonies and Peter Sendberg.   Photo credits: Chris Huby A special thanks to Rian Landman   Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    26 min
  7. MSF and the Rohingya 1992 - 2014 - Episode 7: Introspection at MSF

    25-11-2025

    MSF and the Rohingya 1992 - 2014 - Episode 7: Introspection at MSF

    Episode 7: Introspection at MSF  Eventually, the Myanmar Government backs down and limits the ban to MSF activities in Rakhine. This still leaves the organisation with a dilemma: speaking out on Rohingya persecution versus preserving life-saving programmes in other states. After tense debates, MSF OCA leadership decides to withdraw from Rakhine to retain access elsewhere. Many argue that this compromises principles for access. In 2017, mass violence drives Rohingya into Bangladesh with thousands killed, which MSF documents and publicly denounces. International legal cases accuse Myanmar of genocide, while abuses persist. MSF continues to question its 2014 choices and the balance between speaking out and access. * * * This podcast series is adapted from the MSF Speaking Out Case Study “MSF and the Rohingya 1992 – 2014”.   It brings to light two decades of MSF advocacy activities as part of its humanitarian assistance to the Rohingya people in Bangladesh and Myanmar.   It examines the challenges that MSF teams in the field and headquarters encountered when deciding whether and how MSF could publicly speak out about the plight of the Rohingya facing persecutions and violence in Myanmar and Bangladesh. During the 1992-2014 period, MSF worked mostly through diplomatic channels “behind closed doors” to advocate about the Rohingya’s plight with foreign diplomats and United Nations agencies. This “silent advocacy” was challenged within MSF by those who felt that the lack of public speaking out meant MSF was abandoning a persecuted population.  To maintain an operational presence without speaking out publicly was not seen as an ethically justifiable option for an independent and impartial humanitarian organisation like MSF.  Over 7 episodes, the podcast explores the challenges, dilemmas and internal disagreements underlying MSF’s humanitarian response to assist the Rohingya under the Myanmar authoritarian regime.   * * * This podcast series is written, produced and mixed by Andrea Rangecroft.   Editorial direction is from Nancy Barrett and Laurence Binet.  The narrator is Claire Lubert.  Extracts are read by Clive Hayward and Lucy Scott   The voiceovers are by Kevin Halliwell, Charles Nove and Alex Vincent.   The music is by Lost Harmonies and Peter Sendberg.   Photo credits: Eddy McCall A special thanks to Rian Landman   Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    30 min
  8. War Crimes and Politics of Terror in Chechnya - Episode 1: The First War in Chechnya

    25-11-2025

    War Crimes and Politics of Terror in Chechnya - Episode 1: The First War in Chechnya

    Episode 1: The First War in Chechnya The first war of independence of Chechnya with the Russian Federation starts in 1994 and runs for two years during which access was regularly blocked by Russian forces. MSF feeds the press with information on the rapidly deteriorating conditions and the Russian’s refusal to let them into many areas of the country.  This podcast series is written, produced and mixed by Andrea Rangecroft. Interviews are recorded by Lucy Dearlove.  Editorial direction is from Nancy Barrett, Laurence Binet and Rebecca Golden Timsar.  The narrator is Nick Owen.  Extracts are read by Didi Bellos and Matthew Wade.  The voiceovers are by Lucy Dearlove and Mark Fairclough.  The music is by Lost Harmonies and Peter Sendberg.   Photo credits: © Generic MSF   A special thanks to Dr Alain Devaux.    This podcast is adapted from the case study “War Crimes and Politics of Terror in Chechnya, 1994 – 2004”. Over 9 episodes, it explores the challenges and dilemmas MSF faced during the two wars in Chechnya between 1994 and 2004. These wars raised many questions for MSF on when and how the organisation should speak out publicly about the war crimes its staff witness and the chilling effects of the politics of terror on the Chechen people.  Through MSF press releases, internal reports, speeches, and news articles of the time as well as eyewitness testimonies from MSF staff, this podcast series examines the challenges MSF faced when access to those in need was repeatedly blocked by the Russian authorities, forcing international staff to operate and train Caucasus teams at a distance. Later on, when staff members were kidnapped, MSF was confronted with a new dilemma - whether to raise a voice or lay low until their colleagues were released? To read the full study and discover other case studies, please go to our website: msf.org/speakingout   Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    24 min
Bekijk alles (29)

Info

The MSF “Speaking Out” podcasts are adapted from the original Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) Speaking Out Case Studies (SOCS). Like the case studies, the podcast examines the challenges and dilemmas surrounding speaking out. Each series offers an in-depth look into humanitarian dilemmas in a specific crisis through the narration of extracts from MSF documents and press archives to help establish the facts. Interviews with the main MSF protagonists at the time of the events also provide insight into, and personal analysis of, the positions adopted.  *** The MSF Speaking Out Case Studies (SOCS) is a series of case studies that openly examines and analyses MSF’s actions and decision-making processes during humanitarian emergencies that have led it to speak out or not. The SOCS project assists all MSF members, as well as a growing external audience, in understanding how speaking out articulates with humanitarian interventions.     Download all SOCS in English and French on: https://www.msf.org/speakingout/all-case-studies Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Informatie

  • Maker
    Médecins Sans Frontières
  • Jaren actief
    2K
  • Afleveringen
    29
  • Beoordeling
    Veilig
  • Copyright
    © Médecins Sans Frontières
  • Website van aflevering
    Speaking Out
  • Provider