Delicate Fire

Forrest Landry and Jared Lucas

0.0 (0)
PHILOSOPHY
UPDATED WEEKLY

Delicate Fire is a podcast and teaching space co-created by Jared Lucas and Forrest Landry, exploring how effective choice, metaphysics, and love converge to guide humanity through the meta-crisis. It invites deep thinkers and seekers into dialogue on ethics, technology, and the art of living well and fully — rekindling wisdom for a world in transformation. delicatefire.substack.com

16 JAN

Thought, Feeling, Emotion: The Core Distinction (Foundations 1/3)

In this conversation, Forrest Landry lays out a simple distinction that changes how you relate to your inner world: * Thought is form and pattern (like rhythm or melody) * Feeling is quality (like timbre, color, or tone) * Emotion is intensity and energy-in-motion (like volume, force, or flow) We use clear metaphors (music, lasers, rivers) and point to why this matters: if you can name what’s happening inside you, you can navigate it. Key ideas you’ll hear * Every experience includes all three: form, quality, intensity * Why “emotion = messy” is a misunderstanding * How these distinctions improve self-awareness and choice Chapters 0:00 Intro0:53 Thought vs Feeling vs Emotion (music metaphor)4:51 Laser pointer metaphor8:35 River metaphor10:14 Sequence: thought → feeling → emotion13:54 Emotion and action19:18 “Don’t trust emotions?” response30:20 Closing Get full access to Delicate Fire at delicatefire.substack.com/subscribe

31 min
9 JAN

DISCUSSION | Non-Relativistic Ethics | AEC06

Jared Lucas and Forrest Landry explore the foundations of ethics, focusing on the principles of effective choice, the distinction between relative and non-relative ethics, and the interconnectedness of truth, beauty, and goodness. They delve into the importance of symmetry and continuity in ethical considerations, emphasizing how these concepts manifest in relationships and communication. Chapters 00:00 The Roots of Ethics 05:24 Understanding Non-Relativistic Ethics 10:50 The Concept of Symmetry in Ethics 16:14 Continuity and Its Role in Ethical Principles Get full access to Delicate Fire at delicatefire.substack.com/subscribe

29 min
6 JAN

READING | Non-Relativistic Ethics | AEC06

What are the absolute foundational principles of a “non-relativistic ethics”? The Principle of Ethical Symmetry: Where the objective/external context is different, and where the subjective/internal context is the same, the content of expression shall be the same. The Principle of Ethical Continuity: Where the objective/external content is different, and where the subjective/internal content is the same, the context of expression shall be the same. The symmetry ethics is an expression of the notion of consistent expressions. The continuity ethics is an expression of the notion of equal valuations. What are the meanings of the various parts of these two statements of principle? The content of expression refers to one’s statements, assertions, actions, choices, and expressions. The context of expression refers to one’s beliefs, attitudes, understandings, and philosophies. Objective content refers to any thing, event, being, or that which is ‘other’ than self. Objective context refers to the environmental circumstances in which an event occurs (when and where). Subjective content refers to the specific quality, unique nature, and/or the identity that is the being of Self. Subjective context refers to the integrity, unity, wholeness, and degree of integration of the self. How am I, in general, to understand how to apply these principles? It is best to maintain symmetry in all aspects of relationship with the world (that which is objective, of or relating to form and substance, experience, causality, perception, content, the seen, the macroscopic, and actual intradomain interactions). It is best to maintain continuity in all aspects of relationship with the self (that which is subjective, of or relating to feeling and essence, creativity, choice, expression, context, the unseen, the microscopic, and potential interdomain relations). Get full access to Delicate Fire at delicatefire.substack.com/subscribe

3 min
19/12/2025

DISCUSSION | Ethics in Communication and Action | AEC05

Jared Lucas and Forrest Landry explore the intricate relationship between ethics and communication. They discuss how every action and choice we make communicates something to the world, emphasizing the importance of ethical communication in fostering understanding and connection. Landry introduces the concept of the 'three rights of communication'—the right to speak, the right to be understood, and the right to know one has been understood—highlighting the mutual responsibilities involved in effective communication. The discussion delves into the dynamics of interaction, the significance of choices in ethical behavior, and the role of questions in deepening understanding. Chapters 00:00 The Essence of Communication and Ethics 06:13 The Three Rights of Communication Get full access to Delicate Fire at delicatefire.substack.com/subscribe

20 min
16/12/2025

READING | Ethics in Communication and Action | AEC05

Each “action” is a form of communication between self and world; it involves aspects of both perception and expression. In this sense, ethics is the study of the ‘best way to communicate’. In connection with the nature of effective choice, the principles of effective expression and communication (all of which are involved in any real practice of ethics) are all ultimately defined in terms of the attainment of the basal motivations. The process of communication is best facilitated when each participant freely, honestly, and fully grants to the other these three rights:. 1) the right to speak, 2) the right to be understood, and 3) the right to know that one has been understood. Communication between people does not happen unless and until all three of these rights have been (at least implicitly) granted from each to the other. These rights of communication cannot be taken; they can only be given. The essence of all communication acts are resolved into exactly and only two aspects: All statements (in all domains of communication) either define a representation or make a commitment (or both; no other roles or purposes are fundamental). Representative statements reflect what is (an actuality). Commitment statements reflect what could be (a potentiality). A representation is a statement of perception, of actuality, which describes a quantity, a pattern, or a form. A commitment is a statement of expression, of potentiality, which proscribes a quality, an essence, a feeling. The event of forming a representation is the event of a change/transformation of actualities. It is a transformation or mapping of some aspect to the form of something in some world (as an actuality) to a form or structure within a domain of language (itself also an actuality). The event of forming a commitment is the event of a change/transformation of potentialities. It is a change in the potentialities of the future expressions of the one making the commitment, and it is a change in the potentialities of the perceptions of the common future of the one receiving the commitment. Get full access to Delicate Fire at delicatefire.substack.com/subscribe

4 min
05/12/2025

DISCUSSION | What is Ethics? | AEC04

Jared Lucas and Forrest Landry delve into the distinctions between morality and ethics, exploring how moral codes are context-specific while ethics provide a more abstract framework. They discuss the evolution of moral codes, the necessity for updates in response to societal changes, and the importance of grounding ethical principles in deeper truths. The dialogue emphasizes the need for nuanced understanding in moral philosophy, moving beyond binary classifications to embrace a spectrum of ethical considerations. Chapters 00:00 Understanding Ethics and Morality 08:17 The Need for Updating Moral Codes 11:36 The Nuances of Good and Bad Get full access to Delicate Fire at delicatefire.substack.com/subscribe

18 min
02/12/2025

READING | What is Ethics? | AEC04

What is ethics? Ethics: organized thought concerned with the study of, and adherence to, the principles of effective choice. Ethics is the study of the principles of the most effective means of self-expression, in both words and actions. It is about how to make one’s choices more effective, for all of oneself and for all others, in both form and feeling. In contrast, morality is an externally defined set of rules in a particular domain, generally applicable to all selves in that domain. Morality also refers to the apparent degree that the choices of a given self happen to adhere to those rules. Morality is the application of a collection of statements or codes which (hopefully) represent the principles of ethics in terms appropriate to that specific domain/world. Rather than being about public/visable actions within a domain, ethics is internal to oneself and independent of any particular domain. The relationship between ethics and morals is similar to the relationship between philosophy (metaphysics) and science (physics). Ethics is always the ultimate basis for any moral, statutory, or civil code in much the same way that the scientific method (a theorem of metaphysics) is always the ultimate basis for any physics. A statement of ethics is a statement of principle. It originates from and has its basis within self. In contrast, a statement of morals is a statement of statutory or civil law. A statement of morality originates from and has its basis within a specific world, domain, or culture. It is a command or directive to be followed by all selves in that world. The study of ethics is ultimately about identifying and applying the principles of effective choice. It is not about whether any given choice is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ in some absolute sense. Only morality can be considered in such a binary (unconscious) manner. To develop the principles of ethics is to determine a method and, therefore, a practice of making maximally effective choices. An effective set of ethical principles will positively specify and characterize effective choices. To assert “positive specification” is to have an ethics which describes what or how to choose -- which choices are best -- rather stating only what not to choose (which choices are worst, to be avoided). All negatively defined ethical systems must be regarded as incomplete. Ethics focuses simultaneously on the value, meaning, and purpose of expressions (choices and events), with an emphasis on meaningfulness. In ethics there is no right or wrong, there are only varying degrees of effectiveness, of enhancement of life and evolution, and of the capacity to nurture (mindful) consciousness. This is in contrast with a system of morality, which is defined as a fixed set of rules concerning what is right and what is wrong. Morality is usually defined in terms of goodness and virtue. Regardless of the degree to which a philosophy, religion, or society may confuse ethical concerns with moral ones, ethics cannot be considered as having externally fixed rules of right or wrong. To the extent that a moral code defines some things as “good” (valued, of virtue) and others as “bad” (some actions as right and others as wrong), there exists the risk of being inherently unethical in proportion to the degree that the boundary between the good and bad is ‘sharp’ (an expression of discontinuity). Systems of morality which are defined in ‘black and white’ terms are fundamentally antithetical to life and consciousness and are to be avoided. The absolute principles of ethics are common to all of consciousness (all individuals). The absolute practice of ethics is particular and unique to each individual; it cannot be prescribed from without. Ethics is always implemented relative to the self and to the situation. The realization of ethics is unique in each choice. Ethical principles (laws) are natural, and cannot be enforced. Moral codes (rules/laws) are civil, and can only be enforced. Get full access to Delicate Fire at delicatefire.substack.com/subscribe

6 min
28/11/2025

DISCUSSION | The Basal Motivations of All Life | AEC03

Jared Lucas and Forrest Landry delve into the fundamental motivations of creation and experience, exploring the philosophical concept of the plane of perception. They discuss the importance of maximizing creativity and experience, the interplay between surface and deeper desires, and the role of love in enabling choice. The dialogue emphasizes the need for skillfulness in both perception and expression, and how these concepts relate to community and individual well-being. Chapters 00:00 Exploring Basal Motivations of Life 06:16 Maximizing Creativity and Experience 11:44 Ineffective Choices and Clarity of Self 20:14 The Power of Love in Enabling Choice Get full access to Delicate Fire at delicatefire.substack.com/subscribe

32 min

Delicate Fire is a podcast and teaching space co-created by Jared Lucas and Forrest Landry, exploring how effective choice, metaphysics, and love converge to guide humanity through the meta-crisis. It invites deep thinkers and seekers into dialogue on ethics, technology, and the art of living well and fully — rekindling wisdom for a world in transformation. delicatefire.substack.com

Creator

Forrest Landry and Jared Lucas
Years Active

2025 - 2026
Episodes

14
Rating

Clean
Copyright

© Delicate Fire
Show Website

Delicate Fire