Law School

The Law School of America
  • 0.0 (0)
  • COURSES
  • UPDATED DAILY

The Law School of America podcast is designed for listeners who what to expand and enhance their understanding of the American legal system. It provides you with legal principles in small digestible bites to make learning easy. If you're willing to put in the time, The Law School of America podcasts can take you from novice to knowledgeable in a reasonable amount of time.

  1. Structural Civil Procedure Part Five: Class Actions and Aggregate Litigation

    8 HR AGO

    Structural Civil Procedure Part Five: Class Actions and Aggregate Litigation

    This comprehensive session explores the intricate legal framework of class actions, focusing on Rule 23, constitutional safeguards, jurisdictional challenges, settlement approval, and policy debates. It provides essential insights for law students, practitioners, and anyone interested in civil procedure and aggregate litigation. Most companies inadvertently undermine their own legal safety net when facing class actions. Why? Because the deep, hidden complexities of Federal Rule 23 reveal a power dynamic that can threaten even the largest corporations — unless you understand the monumental safeguards designed to protect due process. This episode dissects the intricate architecture of class certification, showing you how procedural formalities turn into constitutional shields or swords. Imagine a lawsuit that binds millions without their direct involvement — sounds impossible? It’s not. We explore how the Supreme Court’s landmark rulings, like Walmart v. Dukes, have raised the bar for commonality, demanding that classes show their claims can generate a single common answer capable of resolving the entire case. The navigational challenge: balancing the need for judicial efficiency with fundamental constitutional protections like the right to opt-out and due process. If these guardrails fail, the entire system risks devolving into coercion, stripping individuals of their autonomy and risking massive litigation abuses. You’ll discover: The six critical steps to achieve class certification, from numerosity to adequacy, and why each is a mandatory gatekeeper. How the Supreme Court’s heightened commonality standard now requires demonstrating a central issue capable of resolving the entire class—a far cry from pre-Dukes relaxed rules. The stark difference between mandatory classes (B1 and B2) and damages classes (B3), and why the latter’s opt-out right is constitutionally vital. The constitutional tension behind the limited fund and how due process limits the use of mandatory classes for purely monetary claims — a legal minefield for practitioners. The high-stakes battle over personal jurisdiction, especially after Bristol-Myers Squibb, and how courts grapple with nationwide claims against out-of-state defendants. The critical importance of notice — from traditional mail to social media ads — and how courts balance effective outreach against overreach and privacy concerns. The ethical and procedural oversight required during settlement approval, where the judge must act as a fiduciary, scrutinizing fees, remedy adequacy, and fairness. The profound policy trade-offs: the power of class actions to democratize justice versus their capacity for abuse, highlighting a systemic tension that underpins modern civil procedure. Whether you're preparing for the bar or deepening your understanding of civil rights and mass litigation, this episode reveals how procedural rules shape substantive rights at a fundamental level. Every safeguard and exception we discuss rests on the fragile premise of constitutional due process—an principle that, if undermined, transforms what should be a tool for fairness into a weapon of coercion. Dive in to master the architecture that makes class actions a double-edged sword—powerful enough to hold giants accountable, yet perilous without vigilant enforcement of procedural guardrails. Perfect for law students and practitioners alike, this episode equips you with the critical framework to analyze, argue, and understand aggregate litigation’s profound impact on justice and democracy. Class Actions, Civil Procedure, Rule 23, Due Process, Jurisdiction, Settlement, Policy, Legal System, Litigation, Constitutional Law

    1h 16m
  2. Structural Civil Procedure Part Four: Claim Preclusion, Issue Preclusion, and the Constitutional Meaning of Finality

    1 DAY AGO

    Structural Civil Procedure Part Four: Claim Preclusion, Issue Preclusion, and the Constitutional Meaning of Finality

    Issue Preclusion: The Systemic Power of Finality in Civil ProcedureIn this episode, we dissect the intricate doctrines of claim and issue preclusion—principles that dictate when a lawsuit truly ends and how judgments shape future litigation. Understanding these systemic rules is vital not only for exam success but also for navigating the complex landscape of modern mass litigation.Main Topics Covered:The fundamental distinction between claim preclusion (res judicata) and issue preclusion (collateral estoppel)How final judgments achieve systemic finality and the importance of the power of finalityThe five key elements ensuring proper application of issue preclusionThe constitutional and procedural limits on binding non-partiesThe role of courts' respect for judgments across different jurisdictions via the Full Faith and Credit ClauseHow doctrines adapt to mass litigation, such as class actionsKey Insights:Finality as systemic power: Judgments are more than mere resolutions—they possess a systemic authority that shapes future rights, reinforcing legal stability at the cost of occasional injustices.Claim preclusion is broad: It bars relitigation of claims arising from the same core facts if there’s a final, on-the-merits judgment between the same parties.Transactional test: Modern courts favor a pragmatic approach—claims are considered identical if they stem from the same operative nucleus of fact, preventing strategic claim splitting.Issue preclusion’s surgical precision: It prevents relitigation of specific issues actually litigated and essential to a final judgment, but only if those issues were actually decided and were appealable.Procedural safeguards matter: Default judgments, settlement agreements, and defaulted claims often escape issue preclusion because they’re not actually litigated or decided.Inter-jurisdictional respect: The Full Faith and Credit Clause ensures judgments from one state or federal court are recognized and enforced across jurisdictions, with application of the originating jurisdiction’s preclusion law.Non-party preclusion and due process: Strict mutuality rules have evolved into a more flexible framework allowing certain non-parties to be bound when fairness, representation, or statutory schemes justify it—foremost among them, class actions and statutory proceedings like bankruptcy.Practical Application:Approach complex fact patterns systematically: always start with claim preclusion, then move to issue preclusion if needed.Verify the finality, on-the-merits status, identity of parties, and whether the issue was actually litigated and essential.Always consider whether non-party preclusion applies under the six Taylor exceptions.Recognize the profound systemic importance: judgments are not just personal disputes—they shape real-world rights and systemic authority, often overriding individual participation for societal stability.Resources:Restatement (Second) of JudgmentsBernhard v. Bank of America (California case establishing non-mutual issue preclusion)[Full Faith and Credit Clause - U.S. Constitution](https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-4/)[28 U.S.C. Section 1738](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1738)Taylor v. Sturgell (Supreme Court case on non-party preclusion)Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 13 (Joinder and Counterclaims)Connect with the Experts:Legal Professor on Civil ProcedureCivil Procedure PodcastMaster these doctrines with a structured, methodical approach, and you'll confidently navigate the systemic power of finality in civil litigation—crucial for both exams and real-world practice.

    1h 7m
  3. Structural Civil Procedure Part Three: The Erie Doctrine and the Allocation of Lawmaking Power

    2 DAYS AGO

    Structural Civil Procedure Part Three: The Erie Doctrine and the Allocation of Lawmaking Power

    This deep dive explores the complex and foundational Erie Doctrine in federal civil procedure, covering its historical evolution, key cases, and modern analytical framework. Perfect for law students and legal practitioners aiming to master the balance of federal and state law. Most law students dread the eerie doctrine — often the most intimidating topic in civil procedure. But what if mastering it could unlock your highest exam scores? Imagine transforming this complex, fearsome concept into a crystal-clear decision tree that demystifies federalism, federal court limits, and the true boundaries of judicial power. This episode reveals the structured framework behind the Erie Doctrine, turning insurmountable confusion into strategic mastery. We begin by unpacking the core constitutional challenge Erie addressed: how federal courts navigate the delicate federal-state law balance after jurisdiction is established. Once jurisdiction hurdles are cleared, the final question emerges — whose law governs? This isn’t just about procedural rules; it’s about safeguarding federalism and preventing federal courts from overstepping their constitutional bounds. Learn why Erie rejected the Swift era’s federal common law and reasserted states’ sovereignty over substantive law, cementing the principle that federal courts must respect state law unless a federal rule or statute explicitly applies. Delve into the layered hierarchy of laws: the Constitution sits at the peak, followed by federal statutes and rules, then state substantive law, and finally, federal procedural rules at the base. We break down the pivotal tests: the Rules Enabling Act (REA), which validates federal rules if they regulate procedure without affecting substantive rights; and the twin aims of Erie — avoiding forum shopping and ensuring equitable law administration. Discover the historical flaws of outcome determinative and the refined, flexible approach introduced by Hanna and subsequent cases, which impose a careful, structural balance. You'll uncover the two critical tracks in Erie analysis: Track One, when a federal rule or statute directly conflicts with state law, where the REA controls; and Track Two, which involves assessing whether applying federal practice encourages forum shopping or inequities, using the modified outcome determinative test and the balancing framework from Byrd and Hanna. Our decision tree toolkit offers a step-by-step process, empowering you to evaluate any fact pattern confidently and avoid common pitfalls like mixing procedures and substance or misidentifying the appropriate track. The episode also tackles nuanced issues: federal common law’s limited scope, how to handle novel state law issues through predictions or certification, and the layered hierarchy guiding judicial deferment. Plus, we explore a paradox — federal judges sometimes influence state law via Erie’s dialogue, raising questions about federal-state interactions that could seem almost paradoxical. Perfect for exam takers, practitioners, and law lovers alike, this episode transforms daunting doctrine into an accessible, strategic tool. Master the Erie Doctrine’s architecture, understand its constitutional heartbeat, and confidently navigate federal versus state law questions — all in one comprehensive, actionable guide. Whether you're preparing for the bar, tackling civil procedure, or just love understanding the architecture of our legal system, this episode provides the clarity and confidence to dominate Erie. Don't just memorize rules — understand the structure, so you can apply it seamlessly under exam pressure or in practice. Key Topics Erie Doctrine and its constitutional basis Historical evolution from Swift v Tyson to Erie Railroad v Tompkins Erie Doctrine, Federal Civil Procedure, Federalism, Swift v Tyson, Hanna v Plumer, Rules Enabling Act, Outcome Determinative Test, Twin Aims, Federal Common Law, Legal Analysis

    44 min
  4. Structural Civil Procedure Part Two: Personal Jurisdiction and Constitutional Legitimacy

    3 DAYS AGO

    Structural Civil Procedure Part Two: Personal Jurisdiction and Constitutional Legitimacy

    This comprehensive deep dive explores the evolution and modern framework of personal jurisdiction in U.S. law, from Pennoyer to the latest Supreme Court cases. It covers key concepts like minimum contacts, general and specific jurisdiction, and the impact of digital technology. Most courts struggle to balance a state’s sovereign power with an individual's fundamental liberty. But what happens when technology blurs these lines—making borders practically meaningless? Living in Texas and downloading an app built in Estonia that harms your finances? Serving a company with no physical presence in a state—via the internet—can you really be sued there? If you think personal jurisdiction is still just about "being there," think again. This episode reveals how the centuries-old doctrine has evolved from rigid borders to a flexible, fairness-based framework that now faces its biggest challenge yet: digital globalization. We'll unpack the groundbreaking legal shifts from Pennoyer’s territorial boundaries to the International Shoe revolution, which introduced the "minimum contacts" test. You’ll learn why modern courts distinguish between general jurisdiction—when a defendant is “at home”—and specific jurisdiction—when the claim arises from the defendant’s contacts. Special focus is given to recent landmark cases like Daimler and Bristol Myers Squibb, highlighting how courts have tightened rules around corporate presence, shutting down broad theories of "doing business" in favor of clear, case-specific ties. Ever wondered how a tiny online ad or a lone developer in Estonia can unexpectedly drag a company into court thousands of miles away? This episode dives into the nuanced tests for purposeful availment, including the stream of commerce, Calder’s effects test, and the sliding scale of internet interactions. We explore the mind-bending implications of globalized digital commerce, addressing whether borders still matter in a borderless world—and how courts are struggling to keep up. Crucially, you’ll understand the layered checklist for exam success: how to analyze statutory authority, constitutional limits, the nature of contacts, relatedness, and fairness—step-by-step. Perfect for law students and professionals alike, this episode reveals why the key lies not just in geography, but in whether the defendant “deliberately engaged” with the forum. As the world becomes more interconnected, the traditional borders of personal jurisdiction are under unprecedented pressure. Are the old rules ready for the digital age? Or do we need a new revolution? Tune in to master the doctrine that balances state sovereignty with individual rights—an essential listen for anyone committed to understanding civil procedure’s most dynamic frontier. International Shoe Co. v. Washington - https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/326/310/ Daimler AG v. Bauman - https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/571/117/ Pennoyer v. Neff - https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/95/714/ Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court - https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/582/253/ Burnham v. Superior Court - https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/495/604/ Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-1167_4f14.pdf Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc. - https://cyber.harvard.edu/filter/zippo.pdf Calder v. Jones - https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/465/783/ Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court - https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/592/911/ J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro - https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/564/873/ personal jurisdiction, minimum contacts, general jurisdiction, specific jurisdiction, due process, international shoe, stream of commerce, internet jurisdiction, consent, tag jurisdiction, property, federalism

    1h 16m
  5. Structural Civil Procedure Part One: Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Structural Limits

    4 DAYS AGO

    Structural Civil Procedure Part One: Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Structural Limits

    This episode provides a comprehensive deep dive into civil procedure, focusing on federal jurisdiction, the importance of sovereignty, and procedural rules that govern federal courts. Perfect for law students and bar exam takers, it unpacks complex doctrines with clarity and practical insights. Most legal rules are built on shifting sands—except when it comes to subject matter jurisdiction. This isn’t just bureaucratic red tape; it’s the rigid constitutional boundary that determines which court holds real power. Too often, students and lawyers overlook its fundamental importance, risking catastrophic consequences. If a court rules without proper jurisdiction, the entire case—years of litigation, millions in legal fees—is wiped out. Mastering the core principles of SMJ isn’t optional; it’s the key to understanding federalism itself. In this episode, we unveil the deep architecture of federal jurisdiction—why it exists, how it functions, and the most critical rules that protect the balance of power. You’ll discover how the Constitution sets a high ceiling for federal courts, but Congress grants only a small, precise window of authority through statutes like 1331 (federal question) and 1332 (diversity). We explore the strict “non-waivable” nature of SMJ—meaning no agreement or strategic maneuver can fix a case lacking jurisdiction. This safeguard maintains the separation of powers and preserves state sovereignty. We break down the complex but essential "ladder" approach: Does the case fall under a specific constitutional category? Is there a statutorily granted basis? Are any claims related enough to justify supplemental jurisdiction? And surprise—federal courts can sometimes “expand” their reach, but only within strict limits, and only if it’s constitutionally permissible. Crucially, if courts bypass this process, they violate the constitutional divide, risking the entire case's invalidation. Topics include the famous Motley case illustrating federal question jurisdiction’s face-of-the-pleaded-complaint rule, the importance of complete diversity and the amount-in-controversy, and the pitfalls of removal—like the one-year and 30-day deadlines that trap even seasoned attorneys. We examine how procedural rules—like Rule 12(h)(3) and the Murphy Brothers case—protect the integrity of jurisdictional boundaries, and why courts must decide jurisdiction before addressing the case’s merits. We also analyze the “Steel Company” doctrine: courts cannot speculate and dismiss based on hypothetical jurisdictional issues—they must resolve power questions first and foremost. Perfectly suited for law students and legal practitioners alike, this episode clarifies how procedural and constitutional principles intertwine to maintain the balance of federalism. If you understand the infrastructure of jurisdiction, you grasp the backbone of American legal order. This isn’t just about passing exams—it’s about understanding how power in our legal system is allocated, protected, and preserved through rigid, principled boundaries. Whether you’re facing a tricky IRAC question or trying to grasp the real purpose of “limits” in federal courts, this episode guides you through the essential doctrines with clarity and precision. Learn to see the matrix behind the rules—and why maintaining this structure is vital for our democracy. Key Topics Subject matter jurisdiction as a constitutional boundary The well-pleaded complaint rule and federal question jurisdiction Complete diversity and the amount in controversy requirement Supplemental jurisdiction and the doctrine of the same nucleus of operative facts The non-waivability of subject matter jurisdiction and removal procedures Sound Bites "Subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived" "One-year removal deadline is a strict time bomb" civil procedure, federal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, removal, diversity, federal question, Erie doctrine, procedural rules, law school, bar exam

    1h 2m
  6. Trusts and Estates Part Seven: Future Interests and the Rule Against Perpetuities: Temporal Limits on the Dead Hand

    5 DAYS AGO

    Trusts and Estates Part Seven: Future Interests and the Rule Against Perpetuities: Temporal Limits on the Dead Hand

    The Law of "Mine": 5 Surprising Realities About Property Property law is a complex riddle, less intuitive than commonly believed. It is not about objects but about the invisible legal relationships defining who can use and transfer assets. 1. Property Isn’t a Thing—It’s a Relationship Ownership is a three-way social relationship: owner to thing, others to thing, and owner to others. Property is the legally-backed power to exclude others, not merely the object itself. 2. Why Chasing the Fox Isn’t Enough (The Rule of Capture) The rule from Pierson v. Post mandates Actual Possession (physical seizure) for ownership of a wild animal, not mere pursuit. This clear rule prioritizes certainty and peace over rewarding labor alone. 3. Finders Keepers? (The Doctrine of Relativity of Title) The principle is "First-in-Time, First-in-Right." In Armory v. Delamirie, the court established the Relativity of Title: a possessor has a better right to an object than a stranger, though inferior to the True Owner. This stability is necessary for commerce. 4. The Floor Matters: The Weird Logic of "Lost" vs. "Mislaid" The locus in quo (place of finding) determines title. Lost Property (unintentionally dropped) generally belongs to the finder. Mislaid Property (intentionally placed, then forgotten) goes to the premises owner. This distinction aims to facilitate the item's return to the True Owner. 5. The "Snooze and Lose" Rule (Adverse Possession) This provocative doctrine allows a trespasser to gain title by using the land for a statutory period. It punishes the "sleeping" owner and rewards the productive user, ultimately serving to "quiet titles" and cure conveyancing errors. Conclusion Property law is a dynamic field constantly adapting. As assets become abstract (digital/genetic data), the ancient logic of capture and possession faces new challenges in the 21st century.

    55 min
  7. Trusts and Estates Part Six: Trustee Powers, Duties, and Remedies for Breach

    6 DAYS AGO

    Trusts and Estates Part Six: Trustee Powers, Duties, and Remedies for Breach

    This comprehensive deep dive into trust law covers trustee powers, duties, breaches, and remedies. It explores key concepts like fiduciary duties, self-dealing, investment prudence, and trust modification, providing a detailed framework for exam success. Most trustees kill their own power by ignoring one rule: the duty of loyalty. When Melissa considers buying art from her trust at a premium, she triggers a legal minefield — and the consequences are severe. Bust through the core trust law concepts as we dissect real-world scenarios, revealing the hidden rules governing trustee misconduct, from self-dealing to delegation pitfalls. In this episode, you'll discover: How the split between legal and equitable title creates unique fiduciary duties — and how to spot breach scenarios like unauthorized gifts or inflated sales. The unforgiving "no further inquiry" rule that makes self-dealing a strict liability offense, with limited exceptions like prior court approval or express authorization. How the duty of loyalty enforces strict prohibition against conflicts of interest — including indirect conflicts with family, affiliates, or even post-contract breaches. The modern evolution of the duty of prudence under the Uniform Prudent Investor Act, emphasizing diversification, risk management, and the importance of the decision-making process. The significance of the unitrust adjustment to balance interests of income and remainder beneficiaries, and how to handle conflicts arising from investments, sales, or insurance decisions. Common pitfalls in delegation: selecting, instructing, and monitoring agents properly to avoid personal liability for their misconduct. How courts use remedies like damages, surcharge, disgorgement, or even removing the trustee to enforce strict fiduciary standards. Crucial modification doctrines like the Claflin and Cy-pres doctrines, allowing courts to adapt or end trusts when circumstances change — but only under tight procedural rules. Why does this matter? Because trustees wield immense power over assets that aren’t theirs, and the law demands absolute loyalty and prudence — or face harsh penalties. Ignoring these duties can lead to personal liability, loss of assets, or removal from fiduciary duty altogether. Whether you're facing hypothetical exam questions or real-world disputes, understanding these principles gives you the edge to spot breaches, assess damages, and recommend strategic remedies. This episode is perfect for law students, fiduciaries, or anyone involved in trust law. It equips you with a structured analytical framework, grounded in doctrinal depth and real cases, to approach any misconduct scenario with confidence. Prepare to master the highest standards of legal agency — because in trust law, the stakes are as high as the power trustees hold over others’ wealth. Key Topics Fiduciary duties of loyalty, prudence, impartiality Self-dealing and conflict of interest rules Modern portfolio theory and diversification Trust modification, termination, and the Claflin Doctrine Remedies including disgorgement, constructive trust, removal of trustees trust law, fiduciary duties, trustee breaches, self-dealing, investment prudence, trust modification, fiduciary remedies, trust law exam prep

    56 min
  8. Trusts and Estates Part Five: Creation and Validity of Trusts

    6 MAR

    Trusts and Estates Part Five: Creation and Validity of Trusts

    This comprehensive session demystifies the creation and validity of trusts, covering essential elements, creation methods, and special trust structures. Perfect for law students and legal professionals aiming to master trust law for exams and practice. Most students stumble over the dense world of trusts—and it’s no wonder. Trust law is built on a fundamental concept that often trips up even the brightest: bifurcated title. When you grasp that a trust isn’t a separate legal entity but a fiduciary relationship over property with split ownership—legal in the trustee’s hands, equitable in the beneficiary’s—you unlock the entire doctrine. This insight alone simplifies an otherwise complex legal maze and transforms your exam approach. In this episode, we cut through the jargon and clarify what makes a trust valid: six essential elements that must all align at once—capacity, intent, property, beneficiaries, trustee, and purpose. We dissect each, exposing common pitfalls like misunderstanding a mere expectancy for actual trust property, or confusing a debt with a trust. You’ll learn how to instantly spot issues such as an indefinite class (which kills private trusts), or a passive trustee who causes the entire trust to fail. We also explore critical topics such as the detailed formalities needed for real estate, the power of charitable trusts to last forever, and how to handle trust creation via declaration, transfer, or will—demystifying legal formalities that many students find intimidating. But knowing the rules isn’t enough. The real power lies in mastering the diagnostic methodology: analyze capacity, then intent, property, beneficiaries, trustee, purpose, and formalities—step by step. This systematic approach not only prepares you for exam questions but also trains you to see beyond superficial issues, turning complex fact patterns into straightforward problem-solving. Failing a trust? Don’t panic—your fallback is equitable remedies. When trusts fail, courts impose resulting trusts to revert property to the settlor’s estate, or create constructive trusts to strip fraud or undue influence from wrongdoers. These tools are essential to understanding the full landscape of trust law and will distinguish your answers as comprehensive and insightful. Perfect for law students, future estate planners, and anyone facing the trust creation challenge—this episode is your blueprint to ace trust law questions. Whether it’s creating a revocable living trust, analyzing a charitable purpose, or navigating the formalities required by the Statute of Frauds or Wills Act, you’ll come away with clarity and confidence. Remember: once you understand bifurcated title, the entire structure of trust law opens up. Use this knowledge, apply the systematic checklist, and turn every tricky fact pattern into a clear legal victory. Mastering trusts isn’t just about passing exams—it’s about wielding a powerful estate planning tool confident in its principles. Hit play, and take the first step towards trust law mastery. Trusts hinge on bifurcated ownership, not legal personality The core principle that unlocks trust law is the division of property into legal title held by the trustee and equitable title held by the beneficiary. Why it matters Understanding this split clarifies why trusts are relationships, not entities—crucial for spot-on issue identification and avoiding common pitfalls like mistaking trusts for corporations or LLCs. In practice When analyzing a fact pattern, ask: is the property split into legal and equitable parts? If so, you’re dealing with a trust, not a legal entity. The six elements of a trust must coexist simultaneously at creation Every trust requires six elements: capacity, intent, property, beneficiaries, trustee, purpose. Missing any one invalidates the entire trust from inception. trust law, creation of trusts, trust elements, estate planning, legal trusts, trust validity, trust types, trust formalities, trust analysis, estate law

    51 min
See All (1.8K)

Trailers

About

The Law School of America podcast is designed for listeners who what to expand and enhance their understanding of the American legal system. It provides you with legal principles in small digestible bites to make learning easy. If you're willing to put in the time, The Law School of America podcasts can take you from novice to knowledgeable in a reasonable amount of time.

Information

  • Creator
    The Law School of America
  • Years Active
    2020 - 2026
  • Episodes
    1.8K
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © The Law School of America
  • Show Website
    Law School

You Might Also Like