Law School

The Law School of America
  • 0.0 (0)
  • Courses
  • Updated daily

The Law School of America podcast is designed for listeners who what to expand and enhance their understanding of the American legal system. It provides you with legal principles in small digestible bites to make learning easy. If you're willing to put in the time, The Law School of America podcasts can take you from novice to knowledgeable in a reasonable amount of time.

  1. Torts Before 1L: Negligence Part Two - Actual Cause, Proximate Cause, Damages, Emotional Distress, and Wrongful Death

    14 hr ago

    Torts Before 1L: Negligence Part Two - Actual Cause, Proximate Cause, Damages, Emotional Distress, and Wrongful Death

    📘View Study GuideUnderstanding Causation and Liability in Negligence Law This episode clarifies the complex layers of causation law, exploring how courts determine responsibility for harm amid the chaos of multiple forces, unforeseeable events, and fragile victims. It's essential listening for anyone looking to deepen their grasp of negligence, causation doctrines, and the philosophical underpinnings that shape liability. When does negligence truly turn into legal liability? Today’s deep dive unpacks the tangled, often counterintuitive world of causation—where physics meets policy, and fairness is often the first casualty. If you’ve ever wondered why a negligent bump can trigger a catastrophic train derailment in reality but not in court, this episode reveals the secrets behind how the law draws its lines: from "but-for" causation to the colorfully named "substantial factor" test, and why some collisions are so bizarre they defy all logic. In this section, we examine the fundamental principles that distinguish the physical reality of actual causation from the legal standards of liability. You'll discover how courts handle multiple independent forces, the infamous Summers v. Tice case that shifted the burden of proof, and why the law refuses to hold someone liable for unforeseeable meteor strikes. We also explore how the law recognizes that sometimes, even a "clean" chain leads to fairness dilemmas—like when tiny vulnerabilities amplify injuries under the eggshell skull rule, or why emotional distress claims are tightly rationed to prevent epidemic lawsuits. Why does the law go to such lengths—requiring real harm, foreseeable risks, and specific causation—even when moral outrage might suggest otherwise? Because the stakes are colossal: infinite liability, chaos, and undermining the very purpose of deterrence. This episode equips you with a sophisticated, approachable map through the landscape of negligence causation, showing how courts balance physics, policy, and fairness—often in ways that challenge your intuitions. Perfect for law students, legal practitioners, or anyone passionate about understanding how real-world chaos is tamed by legal principles. If you want clarity on when a careless act results in liability—and when it doesn’t—this masterclass will change how you see responsibility forever. Main insights include: The difference between physical causation (but-for test) and legal causation (proximate cause) The impact of multiple independent causes and the introduction of the substantial factor test How the law handles cases where causation evidence is destroyed (summers v. Tice) through alternative liability The conception of foreseeability in proximate cause and the boundaries of liability with intervening or superseding causes The “eggshell plaintiff” rule emphasizing defendants’ liability for all damages resulting from foreseeable injuries, even unexpected severity Special rules around emotional distress (NIED), including the zone of danger, bystander, and familial relationship requirements The distinction between wrongful death and survival actions, and their importance in compensation for victims and their families

    58 min
  2. Torts Before 1L: Negligence Part One - Duty, Breach, Reasonable Care, and Special Duty Rules

    1 day ago

    Torts Before 1L: Negligence Part One - Duty, Breach, Reasonable Care, and Special Duty Rules

    📘View Study GuideMastering Negligence: Duty, Breach, and Structural Analysis for the Bar Exam In this comprehensive deep dive, we explore the core principles of negligence law, emphasizing a structured, element-by-element approach. Whether you're prepping for finals or bar, understanding how duty, breach, causation, and damages fit into an ordered circuit is essential for scoring high on your exam. Most law students overlook the single biggest mistake that destroys their negligence essays—failing to establish duty and breach with surgical precision. In this power-packed episode, we unravel the complex architecture of negligence from the threshold duty to the nuanced standards of care that vary by client, activity, and circumstance. If you’re aiming for exam mastery, understanding how to methodically build your case step-by-step will dramatically boost your scores and sharpen your legal thinking. We dive deep into the core elements—duty, breach, causation, and damages—and explore the secret frameworks that help you frame your analysis confidently. Discover why the objective reasonable person standard is your baseline, how physical and mental disabilities adjust that standard, and why mental impairments are generally judged as if the defendant was fully capable. You’ll learn to distinguish between statutory shortcuts like negligence per se and evidentiary rules like res ipsa loquitur, turning abstract concepts into actionable steps for every exam scenario. Key insights include specific test strategies for differentiating between landowner categories, understanding the special duty rules to rescue, and applying the hand formula for risk utility balancing. We also cover powerful doctrines like the locality rule and the evolving modern trends that shift duty standards, giving you the edge to adapt your answer to any jurisdiction. And just when you think you’ve cracked the code, we warn about the butterfly effect of causation—how liability can stretch or shrink when chain reactions occur far downstream of the initial act. This episode is perfect for students and bar candidates who want to transcend rote memorization and develop a structured, analytical approach to negligence. Master duty and breach now, and you’ll unlock the rest of torts with clarity and confidence. Push your understanding past the superficial—this is how top exam-takers think, structure, and score. Whether you’re outlining a practice essay or prepping for the big day, tuned-in listeners will walk away equipped with the precise tools to issue spot like legal pros. Harness these frameworks to turn intricate rules into simple, logical steps—and watch your scores soar. Key Topics: Why negligence law is like an electrical circuit—current passes only if all switches are on The difference between criminal and tort liability How to determine duty: foreseeability and legal boundaries The objective reasonable person standard—why it’s harsh but necessary Adjustments to standard of care: physical disabilities, emergencies, mental impairments, and youth Legislative shortcuts: negligence per se and res ipsa loquitor Special duty rules, including affirmative rescue obligations and landowner liabilities The significance of landowner classifications: trespasser, licensee, invitee The modern trend towards a general reasonable care standard and exam tips

    1hr 3min
  3. Torts Before 1L: Intentional Torts - Battery, Assault, False Imprisonment, Trespass, Conversion, and Intentional Emotional Harm

    2 days ago

    Torts Before 1L: Intentional Torts - Battery, Assault, False Imprisonment, Trespass, Conversion, and Intentional Emotional Harm

    .spotify-style-link { display: inline-flex; align-items: center; background-color: #1e293b; /* Deep Slate for authority */ color: #ffffff !important; text-decoration: none; font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 800; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.5px; border-radius: 4px; border: 1px solid #334155; transition: background 0.2s; padding: 2px 16px; } .spotify-style-link:hover { background-color: #0f172a; border-color: #fbbf24; /* Amber highlight on hover */ } .icon { margin-right: 8px; color: #fbbf24; } 📘 View Study Guide Mastering Intent and Fundamental Torts in Civil Liability In this episode, we dissect the core principles of intentional torts, emphasizing how legal intent differs from everyday notions and the significance of precise analysis during exams. You'll learn to identify protected interests, navigate doctrinal traps, and understand defenses—skills essential for law school exams and the bar. Most tort law defenses are about controlling what is legal and what isn't — but one defense stands out as a masterclass in defending the unexpected. Consent isn't just about permission; it’s about understanding the deeply subjective boundary of what society considers acceptable contact, and when that boundary is crossed, liability follows. If you want to excel in legal exams and truly grasp how liability can be shifted or avoided, this episode reveals the precise frameworks, common traps, and subtle nuances you must master. Dive into the complex landscape of intentional torts, where the law’s focus isn't just on harm but on the underlying protected interests: bodily integrity, personal dignity, and emotional security. You’ll discover how intentionality works—clarifying the purpose prong versus the knowledge prong—and learn why transferred intent applies strictly to classic torts like battery and trespass, but seriously not to modern claims like IIED. We break down: The objective standard for offensive contact and the fascinating extended personality doctrine demonstrated in landmark cases like Fisher v. Carousel. How assault is about creating a reasonable apprehension of imminent contact—not fear—and how verbal threats can become actionable assault depending on context, proximity, and social dynamic. The precise parameters of false imprisonment, including the crucial role of awareness and reasonable escape routes, plus how the shopkeeper's privilege can shield stores from liability when detaining suspected shoplifters. The stark difference between trespass to land, trespass to chattels, and the extreme remedy of conversion, highlighting why a small scratch results in different liabilities than full theft. Critical property defenses like private necessity, where the law balances individual survival against property damage, and the famous case of Vincent v. Lake Erie, illustrating why pushing property rights past the point of human safety is simply illegal. And the key to mastery? A meticulous, element-by-element analytical approach that ignores emotional reactions or notions of fairness. Focus on what the law protects, the intent behind actions, and when privileges apply—ensuring you’re prepared for the trap-filled multiple-choice questions that decide your exam score. Whether you’re preparing for law school exams, the bar, or just want to think differently about how the law values human life over property (and how those principles are evolving in the digital and AI age), this episode arms you with the insights and frameworks to dominate the law with clarity and confidence. Perfect for law students, paralegals, or anyone interested in how legal principles shape our rights—and how they might adapt to the future of technology and virtual spaces. Hit play and elevate your understanding of the most fundamental yet nuanced areas of intentional tort law. Key insights: The distinction between legal intent and colloquial malicious intent; intent is satisfied by purpose or substantial certainty The concept of transferred intent, its scope, and critical limitations (not applicable to IIED) The mental state requirements across different torts, including objective tests for offensive contact and imminence for assault How physical boundaries—such as the extended personality in Fisher v. Carousel—expand protection beyond skin contact The importance of contextual factors in defining whether conduct is unlawful or outrageous The crucial role of defenses like consent, privileges (self-defense, necessit

    1hr 9min
  4. Torts Before 1L: What Is Tort Law? Civil Wrongs, Protected Interests, and the Structure of Liability

    3 days ago

    Torts Before 1L: What Is Tort Law? Civil Wrongs, Protected Interests, and the Structure of Liability

    Click Here for the Review Guide: What Is Tort Law Mastering Tort Law: The Essential Map for Success This episode decodes the complex world of tort law, guiding you through key doctrines, frameworks, and practical tips to excel in law school and on the bar exam. Whether you're a student, a future lawyer, or just curious about society’s hidden rules, gain clarity on how responsibility for injury is allocated and understood. Most people assume tort law is straightforward—damage equals liability. But dig deeper, and you'll find it's a complex web of deliberate distinctions that shape responsibility. How does the law decide whether an injury creates liability? Why are some harms punishable, while others just lead to compensation? If you want to understand society’s unspoken rules for responsibility—and master one of the most heavily tested areas in law school—this episode is your essential guide. We peel back the layers of tort law’s intricate architecture, starting with the core question: what is a tort? You’ll discover how tort law differs sharply from criminal law and contracts, and why society treats accidental injuries so differently from crimes or voluntary promises. We break down the three main categories—intentional torts, negligence, and strict liability—and show how each protects specific human interests like bodily safety, property, reputation, and emotional well-being. Key insights include masterful frameworks for analyzing complex fact patterns, from when intent transforms a harmless act into a tort to how causation and foreseeability determine liability. You’ll learn the six sequential questions every lawyer uses to dissect liability—questioning interest invaded, applicable tort family, elements, defenses, causation, and policy. This disciplined approach empowers you to read any scenario—be it a reckless driver or a defective product—and craft a clear, compelling liability analysis. Why does all this matter? Because ignoring these distinctions risks misjudging responsibility, missing opportunities for fair compensation, or worse—failing to hold the right parties accountable. Whether you’re a law student prepping for exams, a future lawyer honing your analytical rigor, or simply curious about society’s hidden rules of responsibility, this episode transforms complex doctrine into an accessible, strategic map. This isn’t just theory—it's society’s silent safety net, placed through every speed bump, warning sign, and product label. Tap into this knowledge and see how responsible behavior is quietly orchestrated by the shadow of tort law. Perfect for exam prep and real-world understanding alike—hit play and see the law behind the invisible boundaries we all navigate daily. In this episode: The fundamental nature of tort law as the law of civil injury The difference between tort law, criminal law, and contracts The three major families of liability: intentional torts, negligence, and strict liability How to map protected interests to relevant tortories The six sequential questions to analyze any injury situation How to apply the master nine-step blueprint for case analysis Key policies underpinning tort decisions, illustrated through real-world scenarios

    41 min
  5. Contracts Before 1L: Expectation, Reliance, Restitution, Specific Performance, and Contract Exam Strategy

    4 days ago

    Contracts Before 1L: Expectation, Reliance, Restitution, Specific Performance, and Contract Exam Strategy

    Click Here for the Review Guide: Remedies — Expectation, Reliance, Restitution, Specific Performance, and Contract Exam Strategy Deep Dive into Contract Remedies and Damages In this episode, we explore the dense yet crucial landscape of contract remedies, emphasizing how law constructs a precise architecture to ensure parties are compensated but not punished. The discussion reveals how expectations, limitations, and strategic frameworks shape legal analysis and exam success. Most legal systems treat broken promises in contract law quite differently from criminal or tort cases—they reward economic efficiency rather than punish misconduct. But what if breaking a contract deliberately, or even maliciously, actually benefits one side financially? This episode unpacks the surprising philosophy behind contract damages, revealing a dense but clear framework for analyzing, calculating, and argumentatively mastering damages on any exam. We dive into the core principle: expectation damages—the legal equivalent of "getting what you bargained for." You'll discover how courts value hypothetical future performance, adopt the famous Hawkins v. McGee case to understand expectation calculations with human bodies, and apply this logic to real-world scenarios, from breached software contracts to agricultural sales. Learn why punitive damages are rare in contracts, and how the law promotes efficient breaches—breaking promises in certain cases to benefit society overall. Beyond expectation, we break down practical limitations: foreseeability, certainty, and mitigation—three critical hurdles you need to expertly navigate during exams. We explore case studies like Luten Bridge, Shirley McLean, and Michael Jordan endorsements to see what happens when these limits are tested. Plus, discover fallback remedies like reliance, restitution, and the latest theories like the "restoration of contractual equivalence," which adjust damages based on proportional bargained value or delayed delivery. We then cross into equitable remedies—specific performance and injunctions—highlighting which circumstances justify forcing performance and which do not, with real examples like land sales and celebrity singing contracts. We also examine liquidated damages clauses: when they’re enforceable, and when they’re disguised penalties—a common exam trap. Finally, we stitch it all together with a nine-step exam architecture—think of it as building a legal house from foundation to roof. You'll learn how to structure your answer, from identifying the law governing your facts, through formation, breach, defenses, to the final remedy. We finish with a provocative question: does contract law, emphasizing efficiency over morality, erode the very idea of moral promises? This isn’t just theory; it’s the lens through which top exam-takers see the entire law of remedies. Perfect for students preparing for finals or the bar, this episode transforms complex doctrines into a logical, actionable framework. If you want to see contracts in a new light and master the art of legal analysis, this is your essential guide to remedy theory, strategy, and the architecture of penalty-free, efficiency-driven law. In this episode: The philosophical shift from moral blame to economic substitution in contract damages The concept of expectation damages: benefit of the bargain, expectation math, and historical cases like Hawkins vs. McGee Key limitations: foreseeability, certainty, and mitigation—illustrated through landmark cases like Hadley v. Baxendale and Parker vs. Fox Alternatives to expectation damages: reliance, restitution, and the modern doctrine of Restoration of Contractual Equivalence (RCE) The role of equitable remedies: specific performance, injunctions, and their strict boundaries Contract remediation tactics: liquidated damages clauses, defenses, and the importance of a strategic exam architecture The nine-step contract exam framework: from governing law to remedy analysis, built as a hou

    1hr 7min
  6. Contracts Before 1L: Performance, Conditions, Breach, Excuse, and Third-Party Rights

    5 days ago

    Contracts Before 1L: Performance, Conditions, Breach, Excuse, and Third-Party Rights

    Click Here for the Review Guide: Performance, Conditions, Breach, Excuse, and Third-Party Rights In this episode, we explore the high-stakes, real-world implications of contractual obligations—focusing on how performance is measured, when breaches occur, and how legal doctrines of excuse operate to handle impossible or unfair situations. Whether you're a law student, a legal professional, or simply interested in the mechanics of contract law, this breakdown delivers clarity on the nuanced ways law allocates risk amidst human unpredictability.  Most construction projects, like pipelines, run into delays that threaten entire businesses—and many fail to grasp why performance timing is everything. This episode uncovers the real-world importance of performance, conditions, and breach, going beyond the theory to show how legal concepts translate into practice when stakes are high and delays costly. Imagine you're 58 days into a multimillion-dollar pipeline build, only 15 miles laid despite tight schedules and market volatility. Your contractor’s progress seems impossible, and crucial deadlines are slipping away. This scenario highlights why understanding whether performance is due, excused, or breached can make or break you. We break down how to diagnose if a failure originates from broken promises or failed conditions—name-dropping the crucial distinction between promises and conditions, and how this impacts legal obligations in practice. You'll discover: The difference between express conditions—triggered by words like "if" or "provided that"—and constructive conditions, implied by law to facilitate fairness and order. How the "perfect tender" rule under the UCC demands absolute conformity for goods, and the exceptions that prevent economic sabotage. The multi-factor test for "substantial performance" and how courts evaluate whether project imperfections justify partial payment or total breach. The stark contrast between material breaches that justify cancellation, and minor deviations that require damages. When anticipatory repudiation allows the non-breaching party to act immediately, and the delicate timing around retraction and adequate assurances. How doctrines like impossibility, impracticability, and frustration of purpose serve as legal escapes when external forces make performance impossible or pointless. Why does this matter? Because ignoring these nuances can lead to catastrophic mistakes—either by hasty breach or unknowing acceptance of defective performance. The path to mastery lies in understanding the precise seismic shifts that turn promises into enforceable obligations, and breaches into strategic decisions. Whether you’re a law student facing exams or a professional navigating high-stakes contracts, this episode arms you with clarity on performance and breach, ensuring you're prepared for real-world and test scenarios alike. Perfect for anyone who needs to decode contractual failure and navigate the fine line between compliance and breach, this is essential listening to see performance in a new light. Get ready to see through the chaos, master the performance grid, and approach breach law with confidence—and perhaps even a little daring. Key Topics:The distinction between promises and conditions and their impact on performance timing Substantial performance doctrine in common law and perfect tender rule under the UCC Classifying breaches: material versus minor, and their remedies Anticipatory repudiation: how clear refusals to perform can be addressed early The doctrines of impossibility, impracticability, and frustration of purpose as excuses How third-party beneficiaries, assignments, and delegations influence contractual rights and obligations Critical analysis of contractual modification standards under common law versus UCC The importance of specificity in drafting, especially related to express vs constructive conditions Practical exam tips: decoding contractual language, applying multi-factor analyses, and

    59 min
  7. Contracts Before 1L: Defenses to Enforcement — When an Agreement Exists but the Law Refuses to Enforce It

    6 days ago

    Contracts Before 1L: Defenses to Enforcement — When an Agreement Exists but the Law Refuses to Enforce It

    Click Here for the Review Guide: Defenses to Enforcement — When an Agreement Exists but the Law Refuses to Enforce It Understanding Contract Law Defenses: A Deep Dive into When Agreements Don't Enforce This episode unpacks the complex landscape of contract defenses, revealing how the law protects fairness, prevents exploitation, and when it refuses to enforce agreements. Navigating these principles is essential for legal mastery—whether you're preparing for exams or practicing law. Most contracts are presumed enforceable — until they aren’t. What if a seemingly perfect deal is actually flawed from the start? In this episode, we reveal the hidden cracks in contract law that can undo even the most airtight agreements, often before they’re even signed. Whether you’re a law student, a legal professional, or a savvy businessperson, understanding these defenses could mean the difference between enforceability and total nullity. Imagine a subtle word — like “Peerless” — leading to a multi-million dollar dispute, or a minor clerical error costing a billion-dollar project. We break down the exact mechanisms courts use to pull the plug on contracts, from capacity issues with minors and the mentally incapacitated, to coercion subtle enough to escape notice but powerful enough to invalidate agreements. You’ll discover: How legal capacity varies sharply for minors versus adults, and why only minors can disaffirm most contracts The nuanced difference between physical duress (a gun to your head) and economic duress (a demand forced by economic pressure) Why “undue influence” is an insidious form of manipulation rooted in trust, not overt threats The critical distinction between fraud in the factum (no true assent) and fraud in the inducement (a poisoned agreement you still intended to sign) How mutual mistakes about existing facts can destroy a deal, while mistaken predictions about the future generally don’t When unfair or unconscionable terms allow courts to strike down or reshape contracts, prioritizing fairness over free-market zeal Knowing these defenses is essential—not just for legal exams, but to protect your rights in real-world negotiations. Ignoring them risks binding yourself to deeply oppressive or fundamentally flawed deals. Conversely, mastering them opens the door to strategic negotiations, risk mitigation, and confident contract drafting. The stakes are high: a poorly understood defense can turn a valid agreement into a void contract—and vice versa. This episode equips you with a precise, step-by-step framework to identify, analyze, and apply contract defenses in any context. From formation to performance, from supervening impossibility to public policy, we cover the core principles with clarity and confidence. By the end, you’ll see that legal doctrine isn’t just dry rules—it’s a nuanced lens into the complex anatomy of human bargaining, designed to shield the vulnerable and uphold fairness. Whether you’re preparing for exams or negotiating your next deal, these insights give you the analytical edge to navigate contract law’s murkiest waters with certainty. Perfect for law students, lawyers, or business professionals who want a clear roadmap to contract analysis—this episode unlocks the hidden architecture of enforceability and defenses that every savvy participant must understand. In this episode: The three stages of contract formation and why understanding their chronology is critical Major defenses to enforcement: capacity, assent defects, information defects, and public policy The nuanced differences between void, voidable, and unenforceable contracts Detailed analysis of capacity issues involving minors and mental incapacity, including exceptions for necessities The critical distinctions between duress and undue influence, with practical examples How misrepresentation, mistake, and misunderstanding affect contracts, including mutual and unilateral mistakes The role of unconscionability, illegality, and public policy in

    1hr 19min
  8. Contracts Before 1L: Terms of the Contract — UCC, Gap Fillers, Battle of the Forms, Interpretation, and Parol Evidence

    28 May

    Contracts Before 1L: Terms of the Contract — UCC, Gap Fillers, Battle of the Forms, Interpretation, and Parol Evidence

    Click Here for the Review Guide: Terms of the Contract Mastering Contract Terms: The Hidden Mechanics of Legal Agreements Navigating the intricacies of contract law goes far beyond simply identifying offer and acceptance. This episode reveals how understanding contract terms, interpretation, and the law's flexible doctrines equips you to architect legal realities with precision—whether in academic exams or real-world practice. Most companies miss the boat on their biggest deals because they overlook one critical detail: the precise language of their contracts. One overlooked clause can limit liability from ten million dollars to just fifty grand—horrifically undercutting your safety net. This episode unpacks how subtle words and ambiguous terms can make or break multibillion-dollar transactions — and how you can master these hidden traps. Dive into the core principles that separate an enforceable deal from a disaster in disguise. You’ll discover why the actual wording, not just the existence of an agreement, determines your legal obligations. We break down the difference between the rigid, credit-baring common law and the flexible, business-friendly UCC rules. Learn how the law’s default settings—like price, delivery, and quantity—innovatively fill gaps when parties leave details vague, saving countless deals from collapse. But beware: some missing terms, like quantity, are non-negotiable. We unpack the battlefield of contract formation in the digital age—how boilerplate forms, knockouts, and the "battle of the forms" can create chaos or clarity. You’ll understand how to interpret complex language using a strict hierarchy—express terms, course of performance, dealings, and trade usage—ensuring you grasp the true intent behind every word. Plus, the powerful doctrine of parol evidence shields written agreements but has critical exceptions—like subsequent modifications—that can dramatically alter legal outcomes. And what about warranties? We explore how express promises and implied guarantees—merchantability and fitness—protect or expose sellers in product disputes. Discover the strict rules around disclaimers, how to spot major legal traps in fine print, and how to wield these doctrines like a pro. Whether you’re examining high-stakes international supply chains or dissecting everyday transactions, understanding these foundational concepts applies universally. If you’re tired of leaving money on the table or risking catastrophic legal gaps, this episode is your blueprint. Perfect for lawyers, business leaders, and students aiming to see the big picture behind legal language, it’s about transforming the way you think about contracts—moving from mere formalities to strategic power plays. When you know how to manipulate contract doctrines, you’re not just reviewing paperwork—you’re designing the architecture of commercial success. Key Topics: The essential difference between contract formation and defining enforceable terms How UCC gap fillers preserve commercial deals with open or missing terms The revolutionary impact of UCC Section 2-207 on the battle of the forms Hierarchical approach to interpreting contract language under UCC versus common law Crucial role of the Parol Evidence Rule in controlling extrinsic evidence The importance of merger clauses and partial versus complete integrations How significance and materiality alter the incorporation of additional or conflicting terms Distinguishing express warranties and implied warranties, and the legal hurdles to disclaim them

    1hr 10min
See All (1.8k)

Trailers

About

The Law School of America podcast is designed for listeners who what to expand and enhance their understanding of the American legal system. It provides you with legal principles in small digestible bites to make learning easy. If you're willing to put in the time, The Law School of America podcasts can take you from novice to knowledgeable in a reasonable amount of time.

Information

  • Creator
    The Law School of America
  • Years Active
    2020 - 2026
  • Episodes
    1.8k
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © The Law School of America
  • Show Website
    Law School

You Might Also Like