What's New in Adapted Physical Education

What's New In Adapted Physical Education

Podcast by What's New In Adapted Physical Education

  1. MAR 11

    Collaborating with Speech and Language Pathologists in APE

    In this episode, Amanda Young from Cal State Long Beach leads a conversation with Lanita Yarborough, a bilingual speech-language pathologist and assistant professor at Texas Christian University, about the practical and ethical dimensions of collaboration between speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and APE specialists. The discussion emphasizes how intentional partnership, co-treatment, and classroom design can enhance outcomes for disabled children. Lanita frames her approach around cultural humility and bilingual ethics, describing how respect for families’ linguistic resources enable more effective communication and learning. She explains the advantages of embedding typically developing peers in classrooms as natural peer models, noting benefits that flow to both disabled children and their peers. Throughout the episode she shares concrete examples of co-treatment: thematic gym activities that align speech and motor goals, multimodal strategies using signs and prosody, and practical adaptations for itinerant clinicians who must create collaboration opportunities across sites. Finally, Lanita offers actionable guidance for practitioners and programs seeking to build or strengthen partnerships: reach out proactively to local SLPs, design shared thematic activities, plan in-person trainings or lecture sessions for students, and center DEI practices in program development. Her message is both practical and aspirational: collaboration across disciplines not only improves child outcomes but fosters reciprocal learning among professionals.

    54 min
  2. JAN 6

    Fear and Teaching Disabled Children in Physical Education: A Conversation with Dr. Fabián Arroyo-Rojas

    In this episode of the What's New in APE podcast, we dive into a topic that is rarely named out loud in PE and APE: fear. Drawing on a recent qualitative study by Dr. Fabian Arroyo-Rojas (Hofstra University) and his co-author Dr. Justin Haegele (Old Dominion University), our conversation explored how fear shapes the day-to-day practices of PE teachers working with disabled students. More specifically, their study examined the lived experiences of PE and APE teachers working in integrated PE settings. Their findings demonstrated that even experienced PE teachers often described experiencing feelings of being watched by administrators and parents lead to feelings of fear and influenced their instructional decisions. Indeed, one key finding was around how fear narrows practice. Wherein when teachers experience fear, they often default to avoiding risk and using overly cautious activities. The discussion continued by investigating Dr. Arroyo's future plans around this research topic. In this discussion, we explored ideas around creating more structured opportunities for PE teachers to openly discuss emotions, uncertainty, and fear without judgment. In addition, Dr. Arroyo emphasized the need to shift the narrative in APE away from deficit-oriented thinking and toward what disabled students can do, experience, and become through high-quality PE. Furthermore, Dr. Arroyo discussed future research needed to be conducted in this area to better understand the phenomena of experiencing fear when working with disabled children in PE, such as: exploring fear in more segregated settings, centering the voices of disabled students themselves, and examining how cultural and regional contexts shape fear. The citation for the research article that guided this podcast discussion is below: Arroyo-Rojas, F., & Haegele, J. A. (2025). (De) constructing the meaning of fear when teaching disabled students in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 1-14.

    49 min
  3. 10/01/2025

    Legal Analysis: Adapted Physical Education and the Law

    In this exciting episode of What's New in APE, Scott McNamara is joined by co-authors Dr. Wesley Wilson and David Woo to unpack their recent article examining the legal interpretation of adapted physical education (APE) under U.S. law. Together, they explore how the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) has been applied in federal court cases since 2004, revealing that parents prevailed in only two out of seven key cases. Their discussion highlights: The central role of IEPs in defining services and outcomes for students with disabilities. Why APE teachers must have a seat at the IEP table to ensure meaningful and legally defensible programming. The gap between federal policies and local implementation, and how judicial philosophy may shape future cases. The urgent need for greater legal literacy among educators, so they can advocate effectively for their students and their profession. In their discussions, they also highlight the complexities of legal decision-making, the importance of precise documentation, and the ways in which IDEA’s promises often clash with on-the-ground realities in schools. Looking forward, they discuss their hopes for IDEA reauthorization, including clearer recognition of APE, stronger attention to social-emotional outcomes, and increased funding. The citation of the article discussed is: McNamara, S. W., Wilson, W. J., & Woo, D. (2025). Legal Analysis of the Interpretation of Adapted Physical Education in US Law. Exceptionality, 33(2), 106-117.

    55 min

Ratings & Reviews

4.7
out of 5
19 Ratings

About

Podcast by What's New In Adapted Physical Education

You Might Also Like