PRay TeLL, Dr. Hash

Martin Hash

Politics & Philosophy by Dr. Martin D. Hash, Esq.

  1. 1d ago

    1523 Three Ways to Find Wisdom

    In the past, the definition of wisdom has been nebulous; Confucius said, “By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” But other than the quote itself, Confucius didn’t expand any further so throughout history, other people have been offering interpretations of what his words meant. Reflection is mindfulness, another difficult word to define, but it mostly means self-examination. However, studies show that no more than 10% of the population have that ability, though the ones that can could be considered wise. Imitation might fool other people into thinking that you have wisdom but unless you absorb it, you don’t actually have any. Experience can certainly lead to at least specific kinds of wisdom. Albert Einstein said “Wisdom is not a product of schooling but of the lifelong attempt to acquire it,” but he was smart not wise so his definition is only half right because wisdom requires a lifetime of schooling to acquire, both formal and informal. I offer my own humble definition of wisdom; one that’s both succinct & objective. In fact, it’s actually a measurement, and anything that can be measured is real. Wisdom is the breath & depth of knowledge times the breath & depth of experience times self-awareness. As an example, if you were school-taught knowledgeable in medicine, law, science, business, travel, sports, philosophy, politics & family, and your lived experience in those fields was demonstrably accomplished as designated by licensing, and marriage, and you were high in self-awareness, you’re probably as wise as a human can get.

    3 min
  2. 3d ago

    1522 Loss of Faith in Institutions

    Up until the current generation, Gen-Z, people respected institutions: law, medicine, government, education, entertainment, news. They had reason to because life was continually improving; each successive generation was doing better than the last, and the people in those institutions seemed to have earned their place. Now it seems all institutions are inadequate, incompetent, even counter productive, and people have lost faith in the opinions of "experts." One by one, our institutions have been shown to be corrupted: medicine was dishonored by COVID, the judicial system was disgraced by the lawfare on Trump, education is tainted by usurious student loans & politically-biased faculty, Climate Change put science into disrepute, and business has consolidated into monopoly. Most previously trusted fields, economists for example, fall into the same category as pollsters & hedge fund managers. Then along came affirmative action, followed by DEI; not to mention increasing levels of nepotism. Merit is derided as White Supremacy, which is defined as thinking that conscientiousness, punctuality & integrity are good things. Of course, this is coming from the people who are none of those things, and got their positions of authority through questionable means. Combine that with general social & economic degradation that comes with the fall of empires, and nobody believes in anything anymore. There has been a resurgence of religious fervor, and maybe that can save us and the institutions too, but it seems doubtful.

    3 min
  3. May 22

    1518 Live Or Die Choices

    If there’s a choice between saving my child or a million people, I would pick my child. The logic being: if there is a god and he thinks those people are worth saving then he’ll save them; and if there isn’t a god then the universe is random and can’t be predicted; I certainly would only be guessing about what would happen to those people, and it would be hubris to act otherwise, hence I’ll make the choice that means the most to me. This justification applies to all the moral dilemmas that propose saving 2 lives rather than 1; you should not act to save any because God will take care of it. The question then becomes are you the tool God was intending to use to save the life? If God only has 1 option, then he’s not much of a god; he can leave you out of it, and you don’t have to be beating yourself up about being responsible one way or the other. In fact, all moral conflicts in life can be solved with this basic premise: you can’t predict the future but God can. This brings up the uncomfortable option that there is no god; that only you can act to save anybody, especially yourself: it’s called free agency. There are no morals if there is no god. The reason someone is a hero for rescuing a life at the risk of his own is because there is no moral obligation to do so. A world without God or morals wouldn’t be much different than the one we have now where half the population wants the other half dead for simply sharing a different opinion than them. It’s certainly not the first time in history something like this has happened, and those wise enough to recognize it came up with the God & morals indoctrination to prevent it.

    3 min

Ratings & Reviews

4.2
out of 5
9 Ratings

About

Politics & Philosophy by Dr. Martin D. Hash, Esq.

You Might Also Like