99 episodes

Hosts Melanie Marlowe and Christopher Preble debate their way through some of the toughest and most contentious topics related to war, international relations, and strategy. This podcast is brought to you by War on the Rocks.

Net Assessment War on the Rocks

    • News
    • 4.5 • 354 Ratings

Hosts Melanie Marlowe and Christopher Preble debate their way through some of the toughest and most contentious topics related to war, international relations, and strategy. This podcast is brought to you by War on the Rocks.

    America's Report Card in Southeast Asia

    America's Report Card in Southeast Asia

    Chris, Melanie, and Zack debate the 2024 ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute State of Southeast Asia Survey, in which regional experts assess power trends and perceptions among the members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. The report yields some warning signs for the United States in the region, suggesting that the Biden team has much more work to do in Southeast Asia. Chris and Melanie worry about American shipbuilding while Zack commends and critiques American and Japanese leaders for announcements connected to Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's visit to Washington.
    This episode's reading.

    • 1 hr 8 min
    The 2024 Annual Threat Assessment

    The 2024 Annual Threat Assessment

    Chris, Zack, and Melanie sit down to talk about the 2024 Annual Threat Assessment, created by the U.S. intelligence agencies. The report focuses on state actors and transnational issues that could be challenges to the United States in the coming year. What major threats does the United States face in the next year? What are we too worried about? What should we be concerned about that we aren’t paying attention to? With so many challenges, where should our focus be?
    Zack congratulates contributors to the new BlueBlaze newsletter, Chris commends the Veterans Studies Association, and Melanie wonders why New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez is still in Congress and getting classified briefings.
    This episode's reading.

    • 1 hr 5 min
    Competing for Influence in Latin America

    Competing for Influence in Latin America

    Chris, Melanie and Zack take a close look at the United States’ relationship with countries in Latin America. Why has the United States neglected Latin America in the last several decades? Should the United States government up its game in order to compete for influence with China in its own hemisphere? And, if so, how? And will improving U.S. ties in the region help to alleviate the immigration situation on the southern border?
    Grievances for Donald Trump's love for TikTok, Americans ignoring Haiti, and Emmanuel Macron and Olaf Scholz who can't get along. Attas to Sen Roger Wicker for noting for months that there won't be enough money for shipbuilding — and being right!; to the members of the House who voted to compel TikTok to divest from Bytedance; and to Sen. Bernie Sanders and five other senators for calling for a new Truman Commission to root out wartime profiteering.
    This episode's reading:

    • 1 hr
    Are the U.S. and Europe Never Ever Getting Back Together?

    Are the U.S. and Europe Never Ever Getting Back Together?

    Chris, Melanie, and Zack discuss an article on the concept of unbalanced multipolarity by Emma Ashford and Evan Cooper. They debate what might happen if the United States pulls back from its leadership role in Europe and the rest of the world. Would America’s absence lead to global or regional disorder? Would allies step up to take some of the burden off Washington? Or would competing regional blocs emerge? Melanie laments the lack of progress on funding the Compacts of Free Association, Chris criticizes a publication decision by the New York Times, and Zack questions JD Vance’s approach to addressing defense industry shortfalls.
    Full episode reading.

    • 1 hr 3 min
    Debating the New National Defense Industrial Strategy

    Debating the New National Defense Industrial Strategy

    Chris, Zack, and Melanie sat down to talk about the new National Defense Industrial Strategy. Is this document really a strategy? What are the biggest problems we need to fix with respect to our defense industrial base? Considering the state of where we are now, is it even possible to get our industrial house in order in the near term to deter or prevail in a conflict with an adversary?
    Chris has a grievance for those who couldn’t believe Donald Trump’s recent NATO comments (where have they been for the last eight years?), Zack thanks Rep. Mike Gallagher for his service, and Melanie is unhappy with the response to legislators trying to come to an agreement on the difficult issue of immigration reform.
    This episode's reading.

    • 1 hr 6 min
    Rating the Top Threats to U.S. National Security

    Rating the Top Threats to U.S. National Security

    Chris, Melanie and Zack review the Council on Foreign Relations’ annual Preventive Priorities Survey, which asked foreign policy experts to rank 30 current and possible future conflicts relative to their likelihood and impact on U.S. national interests. The leading threat, according to these experts, was of political violence or domestic terrorism in the United States associated with the 2024 presidential election. Other leading threats were the possibility of a wider war in the Middle East arising out of the conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, and of continued migration from Central America and Mexico. The three consider these, as well as others that fell farther down the list, and asked, how can these be prioritized? What is being done to stop them? And what is the broader value in engaging in these ranking exercises in the first place?
    Grievances for the Biden administration’s short-sighted new regulations on liquified natural gas, U.S. Middle East policy (does it make sense to anyone?), and the way our broken politics manages to infect even an all-American love story like Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce. Can we just give it a rest?
    Attaboys to Navy Comptroller and friend-of-War of the Rocks Russell Rumbaugh, and Capt. Chris “Chowda” Hill, the commanding officer of the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69), and to the show for reaching 1 million downloads.
    This episode's reading.

    • 1 hr 5 min

Customer Reviews

4.5 out of 5
354 Ratings

354 Ratings

MToyBoy ,

Great show, incredibly infrequent

I have to say first of all that I love the show—each person has their own unique and thoughtful take on relevant geopolitical events (even if it’s not the hot topic of the moment).

The other thing I have to say: this is NOT a twice-a-month show. This is barely a once-a-month show at this point, and the most recent tail-end-of-June episode announced (with about 20 seconds left in the episode) that they will be putting the show on hiatus for the ENTIRE summer.

To be fair, this podcast is free, so I don’t have too much room to complain, but the unreasonably long gaps between episodes, compounded with taking the entire summer off, has transformed this show into something I highly anticipate every two weeks to something I forget about completely until a new episode pops up once in a blue moon and I think “oh yeah, that show.”

TL;DR: Great show and content, but not even close to a twice-a-month show, and now will be on hiatus for the entire summer.

Nathanfootball17 ,

The best foreign affairs podcast out there

among the war on the rocks groups net assessment is surely the best. The 3 hosts balance each other greatly, with Melanie Marlowe being the most outspoken (in a good way). They are all very qualified, educated, and concise in their info, plus they’re also funny which helps lol. Recommend to any of my peers in the FA/IR realm. 10/10 stuff

enelsonpa ,

Dec 11th Podcast: Dysfunction In Washington

From a topic Melanie raised in this podcast as a US general public natsec nerd, I heartily agree with her point that the US public needs more explaining on the Pentagon budget and primary contractors. For a Robert Gates "Let's have the Pentagon do more and smarter" push, the US public needs to know the justifications for expenditures, especially the proportionality of the big items in the news, and the success/setbacks of expenditures. A sizable share of the American public has little trust in the Pentagon budget.
I follow 30 DC procurement experts on Twitter, but no think tank, journalist, or Substacker is writing about this for the public.
Do any US think tanks like CNAS publish infographics, or have dynamic graphs on their website, showing the total armaments and fires expenditures at an 80,000 level?
One example of the public education's importance is the Ukraine debate. The public is alarmed by $65B, but as you know, there is little proportionality awareness.
Can you do a show(s) explaining the proportions of the defense expenditures, highlighting a couple of points?
Or, some procurement expert could do a Substack on this, and make some good money.

Top Podcasts In News

Serial
Serial Productions & The New York Times
The Daily
The New York Times
Up First
NPR
The Tucker Carlson Podcast
Tucker Carlson Network
Prosecuting Donald Trump
MSNBC
The Ben Shapiro Show
The Daily Wire

You Might Also Like

Horns of a Dilemma
Texas National Security Network
War on the Rocks
Ryan Evans
Modern War Institute
Modern War Institute at West Point
Irregular Warfare Podcast
Ben Jebb
Defense One Radio
Defense One staff
Geopolitics Decanted by Silverado
Silverado Policy Accelerator