The Rundown with Kansas Legislative Division of Post Audit

Legislative Post Audit
  • 5.0 (3)
  • GOVERNMENT
  • UPDATED MONTHLY

The Rundown is your source for news and updates from the Kansas Legislative Division of Post Audit including conversations with staff discussing the findings of performance audits released to the Kansas Legislature.

  1. NOV 10

    Reviewing Available Options for Acquiring State Office Spaces [November 2025]

    The Rundown with Kansas Legislative Division of Post Audit

    16 min

  2. NOV 10

    Reviewing Counties' Costs and Obligations to Meet State Requirements [November 2025]

    We estimate the 3 counties we reviewed spent $28.8 million providing a selection of 3 services in fiscal year 2024, which was partially offset by $9.7 million in state, federal, and user fee funding. State law requires counties to provide a variety of core services, such as election administration, law enforcement, and motor vehicle registration. Counties are primarily funded by local tax revenue, and they generally use this revenue to cover the costs of providing the services state law requires. We selected 3 core services and 3 counties to review. The services included criminal prosecution, motor vehicle registration, and ad valorem tax collection. The counties included Gove, Johnson, and Labette counties. We worked closely with county officials to determine how much the 3 counties spent to provide the 3 core services during fiscal year 2024. In total, we estimate the 3 counties we reviewed spent $17.3 million on criminal prosecution in fiscal year 2024, which was slightly offset with $846,000 in grants and user fees. In total, we estimate the 3 counties we reviewed spent $8.3 million providing motor vehicle registration services in 2024, which was partially offset by $5.0 million in user fees. In total, we estimate the 3 counties spent $3.2 million collecting ad valorem taxes in fiscal year 2024, which was fully offset by $3.9 million in user fees and fines. The 3 counties’ costs for the 3 services we reviewed were generally related to meeting requirements in state law. We estimate it would cost the state $19.1 million to cover the 3 counties’ fiscal year 2024 costs for the services we reviewed, but this likely isn’t consistent each year. Officials from the 3 counties we reviewed told us state process improvements would be more helpful than additional state funding. Other estimates for counties’ motor vehicle registration service costs used reasonable methods but differed from ours because we had more detailed and updated data.

    19 min

  3. NOV 10

    Follow Up Audit: Reviewing Agencies’ Implementation of Selected Performance Audit Recommendations [November 2025]

    This audit evaluated whether entities implemented 9 previous audit recommendations. We determined that 4 of the 9 recommendations have been implemented. The 5 Groundwater Managmeent Districts implemented 1 recommendation from our 2023 audit. of them? The Departments of Revenue and Commerce implemented the recommendation from our 2023 audit of the Rural Opportunity Zones Program. The Secretary of State's Office implemented 1  recommendation,  partially implemented 1 recommendation, and didn't implement the third recommendation from our 2023 audit of election security (part 2). The Department of Revenue implemented 1 recommendation and partially implemented 3 recommendations from our 2024 audit of motor vehicle sales taxes.

    12 min

  4. SEP 16

    Evaluating Access Controls of School District Accounting Systems [September 2025]

    Of the 20 districts we reviewed, only some had adequate access controls for their accounting systems, and very few had adequate written policies. School districts use accounting systems to manage their expenses and report on their financial information. It’s critical that school districts protect their accounting systems against unauthorized access. School districts are not required to follow the state’s IT security policies. We compiled a set of IT security and accounting best practices to evaluate school districts’ access controls for accounting systems. We reviewed accounting system access control policies and practices for 20 judgmentally selected school districts across Kansas. None of the 20 districts we reviewed had adequate IT security access control practices in all 3 categories we evaluated. Almost all school districts we reviewed (19 of 20) lacked all expected account management control practices within their accounting systems. Most school districts we reviewed (16 of 20) also did not have all expected identity management practices in place within their accounting systems. About half of the school districts we reviewed (11 of 20) had all expected controls in place to limit user access to their accounting systems, and most school districts had at least 4 of the 5 controls we reviewed. Finally, very few of the 20 districts we reviewed had adequate written policies related to any access controls for their accounting systems. Smaller school districts tended to lack more access controls for their accounting systems, but all districts could benefit from formalized policies. KSDE told us that districts have been moving to computerized systems quickly, and it was not surprising that districts have very few policies.

    18 min

  5. SEP 16

    Reviewing Tax Credits Awarded and Used through the High Performance Incentive Program and the Kansas Affordable Housing Tax Credit (Limited-Scope) [September 2025]

    The High Performance Incentive Program (HPIP) allows qualifying businesses to earn state income tax credits based on their expenditures on employee training and education and on qualifying capital investments. We couldn't report how much HPIP credit businesses earned and used in recent years because of reliability issues with KDOR's HPIP data. We identified inconsistencies in the data that KDOR officials told us they were trying to resolve. The Kansas Affordable Housing Tax Credit (KAHTC) is a state income tax credit that matches the federal low-income housing tax credit. Both credits help subsidize the creation of affordable rental housing. The Kansas Housing Resources Corporation (KHRC) administers both credits. Since 2023, when the KAHTC was first allowed, KHRC has awarded rental housing development projects about $73 million in KAHTC credits. It may award an additional $34 million in tax credits by the time the KAHTC ends in 2028. At the time of our audit, no taxpayers had used the KAHTC to reduce their income tax liabilities. However, they will likely begin doing so soon. Over the next approximately 15 years, taxpayers' use of KAHTC credit awards may result in the state forgoing about $1 billion in income tax revenues.

    12 min

  6. JUL 22

    Follow Up Audit: Reviewing Agencies’ Implementation of Selected Performance Audit Recommendations

    This audit evaluated whether agencies implemented 6 previous audit recommendations. We determined that 3 of the 6 recommendations have been implemented. The Kansas Department for Children and Families (DCF) and Department for Aging and Disability Services (KDADS) implemented 2 recommendations and partially implemented 2 other recommendations from our 2022 audit of foster care services. The Kansas State Department of Education (KSDE) implemented the recommendation from our 2022 limited-scope audit of social workers employed by school districts. Finally, KSDE partially implemented the recommendation from our 2022 limited-scope audit of scholarship granting organizations' compliance with distribution requirements for the Tax Credit for Low Income Students Scholarship Program.

    16 min

  7. JUL 21

    Reviewing BASE 1.0 and BASE 2.0 Grant Program Matching Contributions (Limited-Scope) [July 2025]

    The Building a Stronger Economy 1.0 and 2.0 grant programs (or BASE grant programs) awarded almost $150 million in federal funds to Kansas businesses for infrastructure development. The Department of Commerce selected which program applicants would be awarded funding. It required BASE grant recipients to provide matching funds equal to at least 25% of the project cost. We reviewed the planned matching expenditures in all 72 BASE grant award agreements. Commerce approved planned matching expenditures in 3 main categories, with construction costs (including materials, labor, and site work) being the largest. Commerce approved almost half of planned matching expenditures for costs recipients incurred prior to signing a BASE grant agreement. Department officials told us they allowed pre-award matching expenditures to give recipients credit for project expenses incurred prior to the BASE grant award. Finally, we identified several issues with the accuracy and completeness of the BASE grant award agreements that could not be reconciled by the department.

    14 min

  8. JUL 21

    Evaluating Aging and Disability Resource Center Contract Changes (Limited-Scope) [July 2025]

    The Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services (KDADS) oversees Aging and Disability Resource Center (ADRC) services to help older adults and people with disabilities. Until 2024, KDADS contracted with Area Agencies on Aging (AAAs) to provide ADRC services. In 2024, KDADS split the one AAA contract for ADRC services into 2 contracts, one for the Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) assessments and one for the remaining ADRC services. KDADS officials told us they changed the ADRC services contract to mitigate the appearance of a conflict-of-interest and to address longstanding performance issues with HCBS waiver assessments.

    8 min
See All (30)

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
3 Ratings

About

The Rundown is your source for news and updates from the Kansas Legislative Division of Post Audit including conversations with staff discussing the findings of performance audits released to the Kansas Legislature.

Information