I like this show and I am interested in Expansion and where teams are landing conference wise. However with a daily show I’d prefer to hear different things not the same expansion and realignment talk every day. Like why can’t we have an episode talking about ACC running back rooms or something like that

Hi

This guy says the holding call in the byu utah game was a bad call??? Look at the freaking video of it, clear holding

Covers the top stories and issues well. As I’ve discovered the array of Locked On podcasts, I’ve found them all to be very informative and entertaining. (I’m an “every dayer” on my team’s, my conference’s and this one, and I listen to the Squad episodes for the power conferences to get ready for each weekend’s action.) To the reviewers that claim SEC/Big10 “bias”: Sorry to burst your bubble but that’s where the top national stories tend to happen. If you want deep dives into your team or your conference, there are Locked On podcasts for those. Spencer is the first one to jump on it when the top stories involve Big12, ACC, Pac12, G5, or FCS (he’s from Pac12 country, lives in Big12/Mountain West country and does play-by-play for FCS.) If you're sad that your team/conference isn’t among the top stories in the nation: Sorry, not sorry. To those who call him rude or dismissive, again, check out a few other Locked On podcasts: All of the Locked On hosts know each other and collaborate regularly - trash-talk is their schtick and, IMO, one of the things that makes them entertaining bc it captures what college football is all about (rivalries & home-town pride).

C’mon. Your program is too SEC centric. Need to reach the other half of the country #BIG10

The problem with this show is that a general “College Football” show isn’t going to have the ability to have a host that is informed enough to talk in a way that shows they’re actually knowledgeable about what’s going on in a conference, simply because there’s so much that goes on. The tendency is that more energy is going to be put towards the SEC and Big 10, which I get…but still, at that point, just have the Locked On Big 10 and Locked on SEC shows handle that. In the end, this show demonstrates a high level of bias; something that I, a fan of college football that wants to be actually informed and doesn’t want to have my time wasted, wants to avoid. I’ll give two stars because, although the guy sounds like a jerk (who was straight up dismissive of a guest host, the host of my rival team’s podcast), he has a nice voice.

Just seems like a rude host. To much hate in the pod seems super negative. Has some of the worst takes i've ever heard in sports.

Everydayer (Utes fan) since Colorado left. Spencer is the best in the business.

Discovered this podcast several months ago and found Spencer entertaining and enjoy how he delivers the content. You can feel his passion for the Pac-12 conference especially when reports were coming out daily regarding the conference crumbling and how angry and upsetting he would report on it. I hope this Locked On podcast remains when it becomes the Pac-2 for the next year or two and Spencer continues to be the host. Regardless, Spencer has a bright future in the world of sports media. Well done and Go Cougs!

My wife, son and I are proud Everydayers. Spencer’s on-point analysis provides insight into PAC-12 “football teams”. Spencer is also a humorous young man. We enjoy his clever segues into his promotions. Another strength is Spencer’s constant clarification that we are not listening to a soccer, badminton or cricket podcast, but a “football” podcast. We would become confused if he was like other more lazy podcasters that merely refer to the “game” or the “team”. Spencer reminds us every 30 seconds or so what sport he is analyzing with “football team” and “football game”. Thank you Spencer for the extra effort!