True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

True Crime Today
True Crime Today
  • 4.2 (580)
  • News Commentary
  • Updated Daily

🔎 Daily True Crime Stories | Unsolved Mysteries | Criminal Investigations | Cold Cases True Crime Today is your go-to daily true crime podcast, bringing you the latest murder cases, ongoing trials, criminal psychology insights, and shocking unsolved mysteries. Whether it’s breaking crime news, high-profile trials, serial killers, missing persons, or cold cases, we cover it all with expert analysis, investigative storytelling, and real-time updates. 🎙️ Hosted by leading crime analysts, we uncover the psychology of killers, forensic breakthroughs, police investigations, and courtroom drama—giving you the full story behind the headlines. From notorious cases to little-known crimes that deserve attention, we break down what really happened and why. If you're obsessed with true crime podcasts, criminal psychology, and investigative reporting, subscribe to True Crime Today on Apple Podcasts now! 🎧 New episodes daily.

TRUE CRIME TODAY +PLUS

LISTEN AD-FREE to ALL of our True Crime Podcasts!

$5.99/mo or $39.99/yr after trial

  1. 7h ago

    How Donna Adelson Controlled and Destroyed Wendi's Marriage to Dan Markel

    Two of Donna Adelson's three children took the stand at her murder trial in August 2025. Both said the same thing in different words. Robert — estranged since 2016 — said she was controlling, that compliance was the only way to stay in the family. Wendi — sitting across from her mother in a Tallahassee courtroom — said: my mom micromanaged my life. The prosecutor asked if she'd once described Donna as someone who operates with emotional subterfuge. She didn't deny it. This episode traces the documented trail of Donna Adelson's interference in her daughter's marriage to FSU law professor Dan Markel — not the murder that followed but the control pattern that filled every year of the relationship. The evidence is Donna's own words, entered into the trial record. The pattern started at Wendi's wedding in 2006 when Donna ran the catering and served non-kosher food despite Dan's one request. The rabbis walked out. A friend of the marriage called Donna the third person in the relationship. Six years later, Donna staged Wendi's departure like a military extraction — renting an apartment under her maiden name, arranging movers, and timing the call to land when Dan walked onstage. Robert testified she sounded gleeful. After a judge denied Wendi's relocation petition permanently, Donna wrote the email that would become the centerpiece of four trials. She told Wendi to exploit Dan's weak points: money, religion, control. She proposed offering a million dollars. She proposed dressing their Jewish grandchildren in costumes to psychologically break their Jewish father. She told Wendi to put on the performance of her life. Dan filed the Grandma Motion after his sons came home repeating Donna's insults. That motion was never heard. He was killed before the court date. Within days, every goal Donna had fought for was accomplished. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #HiddenKillers #WendiAdelson #AdelsonFamily #TrueCrime #MurderForHire #Tallahassee #CustodyBattle #AdelsonExposed

    How Donna Adelson Controlled and Destroyed Wendi's Marriage to Dan Markel

  2. 9h ago

    Lindsay Clancy Mistrial: The Jury Failure, the Defense Strategy, and the Cost of a Retrial

    The Lindsay Clancy murder trial ended in a mistrial on September 4, 2026, after the twelve-member jury spent over 38 hours across seven days of deliberation without reaching unanimity. The panel was split 11 to 1 in favor of acquittal by reason of lack of criminal responsibility. Multiple jurors have since spoken publicly, stating the lone holdout acknowledged reasonable doubt but refused to deliver the corresponding verdict. Defense attorney Bob Motta provides a comprehensive legal analysis across three areas. The jury room: the legal constraints preventing Judge Sullivan from removing the holdout, the defense's emergency SJC appeal, and the voir dire challenges both sides face in screening for bias against psychiatric defenses if the case proceeds to a second trial. The post-mistrial legal maneuvering: Reddington's Rule 25(b)(2) motion filed September 10 seeking acquittal, the double jeopardy argument underlying it, the September 29 hearing, and the negotiation dynamics when Reddington publicly refuses incarceration and the Plymouth County DA's office has a documented history of rarely entering plea agreements. The human and systemic costs: the toll of a second trial on Patrick Clancy and the family, the practical implications of prosecuting a defendant who is reportedly paralyzed and confined on suicide watch at a state psychiatric facility, the limitations of the first-degree murder framework for cases of documented maternal psychiatric crisis, and the broader implications for how the criminal justice system processes severe postpartum psychosis. Eleven of twelve jurors reportedly accepted Dr. Resnick's testimony that Clancy's actions originated in a psychotic state rather than criminal intent. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyMistrial #TrueCrimeToday #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #KevinReddington #TimCruz #Retrial #MaternalMentalHealth #TrueCrime

    Lindsay Clancy Mistrial: The Jury Failure, the Defense Strategy, and the Cost of a Retrial

  3. 11h ago

    Siders 16 Kids: Why the Grandfather Won't Face a Jury

    On September 9th, Gary Siders Senior was ruled incompetent to stand trial in Vinton County, Ohio. The seventy-three-year-old patriarch was facing sixteen counts of child endangerment after investigators found sixteen children in a single room of his family's home in June. The children were living in filth. Some couldn't speak. The floor was rotted through. Seven were hospitalized. He's already out of jail. His attorney says the case is effectively over. But the real question in this case was never just about Gary Senior. Gallia County CPS documented these children's conditions twice — in 2020 and 2021. A seven-year-old who'd never seen a doctor. A five-year-old with no clear language. Medical professionals told the court the children would stop receiving care if the case was closed. The court closed it anyway. Three more defendants have now filed for competency hearings. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #GarySiders #SidersFamily #HiddenKillers #ChildEndangerment #VintonCounty #OhioCPS #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeNews #SystemFailed #JusticeForChildren

    Siders 16 Kids: Why the Grandfather Won't Face a Jury

  4. 13h ago

    Why a Lindsay Clancy Retrial Raises Questions the System Wasn't Built to Answer

    A second trial in the Lindsay Clancy murder case would require Patrick Clancy and the families to endure another extended proceeding in which the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan Clancy are presented in clinical and evidentiary detail to a new jury. The 911 audio, expert psychiatric testimony, and forensic evidence from the first trial — which lasted seven weeks and included over 80 witnesses — would be substantially replicated. Defense attorney Bob Motta examines the practical implications of continued prosecution. Lindsay Clancy is reportedly confined at Tewksbury State Hospital, paralyzed and under suicide watch with severe ongoing psychiatric illness. Motta analyzes what a conviction would change in terms of her custody and treatment conditions — and whether the legal distinction between commitment to a secure psychiatric facility and a prison sentence produces meaningfully different outcomes given her reported current medical status. Motta addresses the systemic challenge this case exposes. Dr. Phillip Resnick's trial testimony on altruistic filicide provided the clinical framework for understanding how severe postpartum psychosis can produce actions rooted in delusional protective impulses rather than malice. Eleven of twelve jurors reportedly accepted that framework. The first-degree murder statute provides no graduated mechanism for cases in which the defendant's alleged actions originated in documented psychiatric crisis. The Plymouth County DA's decision extends beyond this case. Motta discusses the resource cost of a retrial after an 11-to-1 split, the weight the DA should give to the impact on the surviving family members, and the broader implications for how the criminal justice system processes severe maternal mental illness when the available legal framework was not designed for the medical reality. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #Retrial #PostpartumPsychosis #MaternalMentalHealth #BobMotta #TrueCrime #Tewksbury #AltruisticFilicide

    Why a Lindsay Clancy Retrial Raises Questions the System Wasn't Built to Answer

  5. 15h ago

    Why JP Miller's Best Man Released a 400-Word Public Statement

    Sam Rickman played bass in the Solid Rock worship band. After Mica Miller died, he sat in his car at the first Justice for Mica rally, unable to get out. Then he joined the protesters. JP Miller sued him. The jury handed Rickman $3,400 and JP $100. JP abandoned his appeal one week before his own federal arraignment. Rickman did not issue a statement claiming he was never really inside the room. He picked a side and absorbed the cost. Mark Kaufman took a different path. JP's best man, co-owner of a Myrtle Beach piano bar, and recipient of power of attorney over JP's entertainment company shares, Kaufman published a written response after the Netflix documentary Death of a Pastor's Wife reached its global audience. JP, he wrote, "was never part of the core group of friends with whom I regularly spent my time." The wedding tape, the pulpit footage from the morning after Mica's death, and a former pastor's account of Kaufman calling her within minutes of her resignation all point in a different direction than the statement. The spiritual overseer who said in May 2024 he stood behind JP "for the duration" has gone dark since the premiere. A church elder who resigned after Mica died now emphasizes he was "never close friends" with the pastor. The congregation that packed two Sunday services is down to a handful gathering in storefronts and gyms. A separate church in Conway had to tell the public it shares nothing with JP's operation after Netflix viewers confused the two buildings. JP Miller has entered a not-guilty plea to federal charges. His trial opens in the October 2026 term. He maintains his innocence. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #JPMiller #MicaMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #MarkKaufman #SolidRockChurch #Netflix #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MyrtleBeach #JusticeForMica

    Why JP Miller's Best Man Released a 400-Word Public Statement

  6. 19h ago

    Why Lindsay Clancy's Defense Is Pushing for Acquittal Before Retrial

    Defense attorney Kevin Reddington filed a Rule 25(b)(2) motion on September 10, 2026, requesting that Judge William Sullivan enter a finding of Not Guilty by Reason of Lack of Criminal Responsibility on all charges against Lindsay Clancy. The motion is scheduled for hearing on September 29 at Plymouth County Superior Court — the same date as the status conference at which the Plymouth County District Attorney's office is expected to indicate whether it intends to seek a retrial. Defense attorney Bob Motta analyzes the legal basis of Reddington's filing. The motion argues that 11 of 12 jurors applied the reasonable doubt standard and concluded the prosecution did not prove criminal responsibility. Reddington concedes that a hung jury does not ordinarily terminate jeopardy but contends the holdout juror's reported admission of reasonable doubt, combined with his alleged refusal to follow the court's instructions, creates an argument that the mistrial was not a manifest necessity — potentially triggering double jeopardy protections. Motta examines the prosecution's position heading into the hearing. The Commonwealth's trial theory argued both that Clancy staged her suicide attempt and that she killed her children because she wanted to die. With eleven jurors reportedly rejecting that theory, the state faces a significant strategic question about whether to retry on the same basis. Reddington has publicly indicated willingness to negotiate a plea but stated he will not accept any agreement involving incarceration. The Plymouth County DA's office has a documented history of rarely entering plea agreements. Motta discusses the range of potential outcomes, including reduced charges, a bench trial on second-degree murder, and the practical obstacles to reaching a resolution when both sides have publicly staked out positions. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyCase #TrueCrimeToday #KevinReddington #TimCruz #Rule25 #PleaDeal #Mistrial #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta

    Why Lindsay Clancy's Defense Is Pushing for Acquittal Before Retrial

  7. 21h ago

    Why Lindsay Clancy's Holdout Juror Ignored His Own Reasonable Doubt

    The twelve-member jury in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial deliberated for over 38 hours across seven days before Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4, 2026. The panel was split 11 to 1 in favor of acquittal by reason of lack of criminal responsibility. Foreperson Roni Carlson told NBC10 Boston that the lone holdout admitted to having reasonable doubt but stated he would not vote not guilty by reason of insanity. Defense attorney Bob Motta examines the procedural and legal framework surrounding the holdout juror's conduct. Kevin Reddington moved to have the juror removed, arguing the man was not following the court's instructions on reasonable doubt. Judge Sullivan declined the request. Reddington then filed an emergency appeal with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, contending the holdout's reasoning reflected bias against individuals with mental illness rather than a good-faith evaluation of the evidence. The SJC denied the appeal. Since the mistrial, juror Nick Dargie told ABC News the holdout could not identify any evidence or witness testimony supporting his position, reportedly would not engage with fellow jurors during deliberations, and spent time on his phone. Dargie also reported the holdout handled a piece of physical evidence from the case during deliberations. Motta analyzes the voir dire challenge both prosecution and defense face if the case proceeds to a second trial. Massachusetts law places the burden on the prosecution to disprove insanity beyond a reasonable doubt. Screening prospective jurors for bias against psychiatric defenses in a case where the sole contested issue is postpartum psychosis presents a procedural challenge with limited existing legal remedies. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #TrueCrimeToday #Mistrial #HoldoutJuror #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #KevinReddington #JurySystem #TrueCrime

    Why Lindsay Clancy's Holdout Juror Ignored His Own Reasonable Doubt

  8. 1d ago

    Lindsay Clancy’s Jury Got Rules That Contradict EACH OTHER?!

    Judge William Sullivan read Lindsay Clancy’s jury two instructions that cannot both be followed at the same time. One told them to follow the law whether they agreed with it or not. The other told them the verdict must be the result of their own convictions. Then a 175-year-old dynamite charge told the holdout to reconsider his doubt and also never to surrender his honest conviction. The jury split 11-1 after about 38 hours. The foreperson says the holdout admitted reasonable doubt and then refused to vote to acquit. Jurors highlighted the printed instructions and read the standard to him over and over. He couldn’t reconcile the law with the form. The criminal responsibility instruction asks civilians to parse a double-negative legal test the state’s own highest court says is too obscure to explain clearly. The verdict slip carried six options per child across three children. The instructions were written above a twelfth-grade reading level. The average American reads at an eighth-grade level. Status hearing September 29th. Cruz has not announced whether he’ll retry. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #JuryInstructions #Mistrial #HoldoutJuror #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueJustice #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PlymouthCourt

    Lindsay Clancy’s Jury Got Rules That Contradict EACH OTHER?!
See All (3.3K)

Shows with Subscription Benefits

TRUE CRIME TODAY +PLUS

LISTEN AD-FREE to ALL of our True Crime Podcasts!

$5.99/mo or $39.99/yr after trial

View Subscription FAQs

4.2
out of 5
580 Ratings

About

🔎 Daily True Crime Stories | Unsolved Mysteries | Criminal Investigations | Cold Cases True Crime Today is your go-to daily true crime podcast, bringing you the latest murder cases, ongoing trials, criminal psychology insights, and shocking unsolved mysteries. Whether it’s breaking crime news, high-profile trials, serial killers, missing persons, or cold cases, we cover it all with expert analysis, investigative storytelling, and real-time updates. 🎙️ Hosted by leading crime analysts, we uncover the psychology of killers, forensic breakthroughs, police investigations, and courtroom drama—giving you the full story behind the headlines. From notorious cases to little-known crimes that deserve attention, we break down what really happened and why. If you're obsessed with true crime podcasts, criminal psychology, and investigative reporting, subscribe to True Crime Today on Apple Podcasts now! 🎧 New episodes daily.

Information

More From True Crime Today