Tantra's Mantra with Prakash Sangam

Prakash Sangam

The podcast that goes behind and beyond the technology news headlines to explore the unheard and unseen. The topics include 5G, AI, IoT, Smartphones, Networking, Intellectual Property and others.

  1. Aug 10

    Ep. 72: Is OpenAI Trying to Fight Apple in Public Square?

    In Apple's high-profile case against OpenAI, the latter went on a public offensive. It aggressively projected its version of the story, countering Apple’s allegations through many public channels, including news media and its own blog, even before filing its official legal reply to the court. In this episode, I continue the discussion with Christie Thoene, former VP of Legal and Policy Comms at Qualcomm, on OpenAI’s strategy, how it exploited Apple’s initial misstep to set its own narrative in the public, the delicate balance Apple has to maintain between pushing its case without creating the perception that it is impeding innovation, how important the PR offensive is in high-visibility cases like this, what are the next step and more. We also delve into what Apple’s motion for injunction and OpenAI’s motion to dismiss the case mean. Index: 00:00 - Intro 02:40 - Guest intro (Christie Thoene) 03:15 - OpenAI's strategy to publicly respond to Apple's allegations before court filing, and Apple's initial misstep (company's #blog and MSNBC) 07:11 - Apple's request for "preliminary #injunction" against OpenAI to stop working on the disputed products/services and OpenAI's request for "motion to dismiss" the case because of lack of merit 09:20 - What OpenAI's comms team might be thinking now, and what would be their short-term goals; Quickly set the narrative in their favor, and make the case a public spectacle 11:31 - What Apple's comms team might be thinking now, and what would be their short-term goals; Not fight it in the public square, don't be perceived as a "large company" trying to quell innovation; making sure the #brand is not affected 16:33 - Does the public posturing affect the case? Time is on Apple's side, whereas OpenAI would like to quickly close this case so that it doesn't affect their product & IPO plans 19:47 - How the public discourse affects the judge, potential jury, and Apple's current and potential new partners 22:00 - Will public opinion affect the legal positioning of both companies? 25:26 - Next steps: 1) OpenAI's legal reply to court (Aug 2026); 2) Judge's decision on the injunction and #motiontodismiss requests (Oct 2026) 27:22 - Closing

  2. Jul 13

    Ep. 71: Apple vs. Open AI – Case Analysis

    On Jul 10th 2026, Apple sued OpenAI alleging theft of confidential information. The court filing claims that two OpenAI employees were stealing and encouraging Apple employees who are pursuing employment at OpenAI to steal Apple trade secrets. These individuals, both non-profit and for-profit entities of OpenAI, as well as IO Products, the company founded by legendary designer Jony Ive, acquired by OpenAI, are named as defendants in the case.   In this episode, Christie Theone, Principal at CTG Advisory, and Ex. VP of Qualcomm Policy and Legal comms and I discuss the specifics of Apple’s allegations, OpenAI’s statement, and likely response, as well as possible next steps. We also delve into how this will affect OpenAI’s plan to introduce highly anticipated personal AI devices, who has better leverage, the remedies Apple is requesting, and what some considerations might be for settlement. Index: 00:00 - Intro 01:43 - Guest intro (Christie Thoene Theone, Principal, CTG Advisory) 02:28 - Apple's complaint: Two employees of OpenAI + OpenAI (pro & non-profit) + IO Products (Founded by #JonyIve) 04:05 - Apple's attempt to set a narrative - All OpenAI innovations are tainted by the theft of Apple's trade secrets, even what IO Products might be working on 05:05 - Although complaints are centered around two employees (only one is a top-level executive), liability will be borne by the company 07:56 - Apple's complaints are well structured, presented "as a matter of fact," without inflammatory language, making the case very obvious and appearing to be "open and shut." 10:33 - Jony Ive's name never appears in the complaint. Probably out of respect, and not to tarnish his name 12:06 - OpenAI's statement is pretty standard PR response 14:42 - Next steps - Likely request for an extension to file the reply. The question is whether they just reply to Apple's allegation, or countersue to get some leverage 17:02 - Discovery is going to be interesting, with many trade secrets at play. Details will come out if there are conflicts between the companies. Can it be motivation for settlement? 21:05 - As things stand today, OpenAI is at a weaker place, as this case affects its product plans and IPO plans, and time is on Apple's side 22:45 - Apple's remedy requests are not very clear, not sure what "enjoining" in this case means. Injunctions are very hard to come by 25:15 - OpenAI can keep working on whatever they are doing till there is an order from the judge (e.g. 25:33 - The first target for Apple is to seek an early decision to stop OpenAI from whatever they are working on, and the target for OpenAI is to seek early dismissal of the case. Both are hard to come by 29:12 - Closing

  3. Jul 7

    Ep. 70: State of Enterprise AI - Discussion with Lenovo & TCS

    This is a special episode produced by the collaboration between TiE San Diego and Tantra's Mantra. In this episode, I speak to Mark Budgen of Lenovo and Rajnikant Gupta of TCS on the current status of AI adoption in enterprises. We start by discussing which segments and which functions within organizations have seen deeper adoption of AI, whether AI projects have moved from PoC and trials to production, what the major challenges are in that transition, how the thinking and approach of enterprises toward AI have changed over the short period, the need for “Human in the loop,” and the necessity of Hybrid AI. We discuss key takeaways from Lenovo’s “CIO Playbook 2026” report and how enterprises are now more focused on improving and accelerating business outcomes rather than simply improving productivity. Finally, we delve into what to expect in the near and far future, moving from Generative and Agentic AI to Physical and Embodied AI. Index: 00:00 - Intro 01:05 - Guest intro (Mark Budgen, CTO, Global Technology Partners at Lenovo, & Rajnikant Gupta, Global Head - Partner Ecosystems and Alliances, TCS) 02:28 - Current status of AI adoption in Enterprises, how AI can improve business, not just efficiency, risk considerations 06:30 - Difference in level of AI adoption between various functional groups within Enterprises - IT, Coding, Security, Supply Chain, Sales & Marketing 13:30 - Evolution of Human involvement in AI processes. Humans in the Agentic AI loop will be required for a long time, because of the risk of failure and its costs 16:56 - Key takeaways from Lenovo's "CIO Playbook 2026" report: AI is not the entire toolbox, but one of the tools; focus is on how to use AI to improve and accelerate business and finally the outcomes; mapping IT KPIs to Business KPIs 22:16 - Current status of AI projects, in "Production" vs. "PoC" or "Trials" stage. The majority still in the process of moving to Production. Execs now better understand their business value; Focus on platforms to scale rather than simple point solutions 28:13 - Challenges in implementing AI: Employee fear of replacement, lack of domain experts with AI knowledge, 31:56 - Hybrid AI: How to decide where to run AI: Cloud or Edge? Dependencies: Sovereignty, access to data, power, and cooling; Token use optimization 38:27 - What to expect to see in the near and far future: Physical AI, Embodied AI, AI becoming ubiquitous and 41:20 - Closing

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
4 Ratings

About

The podcast that goes behind and beyond the technology news headlines to explore the unheard and unseen. The topics include 5G, AI, IoT, Smartphones, Networking, Intellectual Property and others.

You Might Also Like