The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

Niall Boylan
  • 5.0 (9)
  • News Commentary
  • Updated Daily

Niall Boylan is online, and nobody can hold him back. Subscribe to The Niall Boylan Show and access premium content by visiting https://niallboylan.com

  1. 4h ago

    #853 Not Suitable For Broadcast. (Trump Takes the Hump) Ep 11

    On this week’s Not Suitable for Broadcast, Niall is joined by his former producer AJ Walsh for a fast moving mix of politics, money, family life, housing and a remarkable story of determination. They begin with Donald Trump’s expected visit to Ireland and the political backlash already surrounding it. With protests being planned and some politicians saying the US President is not welcome, Niall and AJ ask whether personal hostility towards Trump risks getting in the way of Ireland’s economic interests, particularly given the importance of American investment and jobs. They also debate whether Ireland should roll out the red carpet for an elected US President, regardless of what individual politicians think of him. Then it is on to children, chores and pocket money. Should kids be paid for tidying bedrooms, washing dishes and taking out the bins, or should helping around the house simply be part of family life? Niall and AJ look at whether paying for chores teaches the value of work and money, or risks creating a generation that expects payment for every contribution. Energy bills are also under the spotlight after ESB chief executive Paddy Hayes received a €92,000 pay increase, bringing his salary to €410,000, while hundreds of thousands of households are struggling with electricity arrears. Is such a pay rise justified, and should the Government be doing more to reduce energy costs for ordinary households? The pair also tackle the idea of compulsory voting. Would forcing eligible citizens to take part in elections strengthen democracy and improve turnout, or should the right to vote always include the right to stay at home? They discuss the Australian model, spoiled ballots, fines and whether politicians should be earning people’s votes rather than compelling them to participate. Housing comes next, with the controversial Dunsink development plan proposing 18,500 homes for more than 46,000 people. But with the wider project dependent on major water and sewage infrastructure costing a combined €7.3 billion, Niall and AJ ask whether the homes are realistically deliverable, whether local services could cope and whether residents are raising legitimate concerns or standing in the way of badly needed housing. They also debate whether school uniforms should finally be abolished, as parents face growing back to school costs. Are uniforms an outdated and expensive restriction on individuality, or do they still help create equality between children from different financial backgrounds? And finally, the show ends on an extraordinary story. At the age of 97, Betty Bromage has broken her own record as the world’s oldest female wing walker, completing another daring flight after suffering a stroke last year, all while raising money for the stroke unit at Cheltenham General Hospital. Politics, arguments, laughs and absolutely no filter. This is Not Suitable for Broadcast with Niall Boylan and AJ Walsh.

    #853 Not Suitable For Broadcast. (Trump Takes the Hump) Ep 11

  2. 1d ago

    #852 Should School Uniforms Be Abolished Completely?

    Niall talks to Eric Nelligan School Teacher about the fact more than two thirds of parents say they are worried about the cost of school uniforms this year, according to Barnardos’ Back to School Survey 2026. The online survey gave 704 parents the opportunity to share their concerns about the financial pressures they face as children return to school this autumn. Some people believe school uniforms should be abolished. They argue that uniforms are outdated, unnecessarily expensive and restrict students from expressing their individuality. Others say uniforms are essential because they remove visible differences between children from different financial backgrounds and help create a sense of equality and belonging. Should school uniforms be abolished, or do they still serve an important purpose? For many families, the cost is not simply a jumper, a shirt and a pair of trousers. Schools can insist on branded crests, specific suppliers, particular jackets, sportswear, shoes and PE kits. Once several children are involved, the bill can quickly run into hundreds of euro. Parents may also find themselves replacing uniforms during the year because children grow out of them, damage them or lose items. At a time when families are already dealing with rising food, energy, transport and housing costs, is it reasonable for schools to insist on expensive branded clothing? But what is the alternative? Would allowing children to wear their own clothes genuinely save parents money, or would it create a new kind of pressure to buy fashionable brands, designer runners and the latest trends? Uniforms may hide some financial differences, but children are not blind. They can still see who has the expensive phone, the newest shoes or the best schoolbag. Do uniforms really create equality, discipline and school pride, or are they simply an outdated tradition that places another unnecessary expense on parents? We want to hear from parents, teachers and students today. Should schools be required to offer cheaper, generic uniform options? Should crests be removable so clothes can be bought in ordinary shops? Should schools operate second hand uniform schemes? Or should we go further and abolish school uniforms entirely? Give us a call and tell us what you think.

    #852 Should School Uniforms Be Abolished Completely?

  3. 1d ago

    #851 Dunsink: Solving the Housing Crisis by Creating Another Crisis?

    Niall speaks to Councillor Gavin Pepper and a local resident from Scribblestown about controversial plans to build a new town at Dunsink in north Dublin. Fingal County Council’s draft Dunsink Urban Area Plan proposes the construction of 18,500 homes for a population of more than 46,000 people on over 1,000 acres of land beside Finglas, Ashtown, Castleknock and Blanchardstown. Most of the homes would be apartments, with some buildings reaching up to 15 storeys. However, Uisce Éireann has warned that the full development cannot proceed unless two enormous infrastructure projects are completed: the €6 billion Shannon to Dublin water supply project and the €1.3 billion Greater Dublin Drainage Project. While the first phase of approximately 2,500 homes could be supported through local upgrades, the remaining 16,000 homes would depend on new water and wastewater infrastructure that may not be operational for several years. Hundreds of local residents have submitted objections, raising concerns about traffic congestion, pressure on schools and public services, excessive building heights, the loss of recreational facilities and possible health and environmental risks associated with developing land beside the former Dunsink landfill. Supporters argue that Dublin urgently needs housing and that Dunsink is one of the largest undeveloped areas remaining inside the M50. Opponents question whether it makes sense to approve a town of this scale before the roads, water supply, sewage capacity and essential public services are firmly in place. Is Dunsink an essential solution to Dublin’s housing crisis, or is the State attempting to build an entire town before the necessary infrastructure exists? And are the concerns of existing communities being properly heard, or are local objections preventing much needed homes from being built?

    #851 Dunsink: Solving the Housing Crisis by Creating Another Crisis?

  4. 2d ago

    #850 Compulsory Voting: Civic Duty or Democratic Bullying?

    Niall speaks to financial commentator Karl Deeter about whether Ireland should introduce compulsory voting and require every eligible citizen to participate in elections. The debate has recently emerged in Britain after Jacob Rees-Mogg said compulsory voting appeared to be becoming a new political battleground, with the idea reportedly supported by think tanks close to Prime Minister Andy Burnham. Rees-Mogg does not fully endorse the proposal, but argues that it is not automatically unreasonable for the State to impose certain civic duties. He compares voting with jury service, where citizens can be legally required to participate for the broader good of society. Compulsory voting already exists in various forms around the world. Australia has required eligible citizens to enrol and vote in federal elections since 1924, with people who fail to vote without a valid reason potentially receiving a modest fine. Turnout at Australian federal elections has generally remained above 90 per cent. Belgium, Brazil, Argentina, Luxembourg and several other countries also have laws requiring electoral participation, although enforcement and penalties vary considerably. In some countries the requirement is strictly enforced, while in others it exists largely on paper. Supporters argue that compulsory voting produces governments with a stronger democratic mandate because election results reflect the views of almost the entire electorate, rather than only those who are motivated enough to turn up. They say it could reduce political inequality, as people on lower incomes and younger citizens are often less likely to vote voluntarily. It might also encourage political parties to communicate with the entire population instead of concentrating their efforts on reliable supporters and narrow groups of swing voters. There is also an argument that voting should be viewed as a civic responsibility, similar to paying taxes or attending jury service. Under this model, nobody would be forced to support a particular candidate. Voters could still spoil their ballot, submit a blank ballot or select a formal “none of the above” option, preserving the right to reject every candidate while still participating in the democratic process. Critics, however, argue that the right to vote must also include the right not to vote. They say forcing people to attend a polling station turns a democratic freedom into a legal obligation and could result in citizens voting randomly, carelessly or without understanding the issues. Opponents also question whether people should be fined for political disengagement, particularly if they feel that no party or candidate represents them. There are practical questions too. Would people with illnesses, caring responsibilities or difficulties reaching polling stations be exempt? Would the penalty be a warning, a small fine or something more serious? Would compulsory voting unfairly affect poorer citizens, and would the cost of enforcing it outweigh the democratic benefit? Ireland already uses proportional representation and allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference, but participation remains voluntary. The Electoral Commission is currently examining the factors that influence turnout and political participation, although compulsory voting would represent a major change in how Ireland understands the relationship between citizens and the State. Niall asks Karl whether compulsory voting would strengthen democracy by ensuring that every section of society is heard, or whether forcing people to participate would undermine the freedom elections are supposed to protect. Should voting be considered a basic civic duty? Should people be permitted to spoil their ballot rather than choose a candidate? Would compulsory voting force politicians to represent people who currently feel ignored, or would it simply produce millions of reluctant and uninformed votes? And should the Government concentrate instead on restoring trust in politics and giving people a reason to vote, rather than threatening them with a fine for staying at home?

    #850 Compulsory Voting: Civic Duty or Democratic Bullying?

  5. 2d ago

    #849 Why Is the ESB Boss Getting Richer as Customers Get Poorer?

    Niall speaks to Independent Ireland TD Ken O’Flynn about the Government approved decision to award ESB chief executive Paddy Hayes a pay increase of almost €92,000, bringing his annual salary to €410,000. The increase of 29 per cent was approved by Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers following a recommendation from Energy Minister Darragh O’Brien. ESB says the salary reflects the scale and complexity of the organisation and points out that it is the first increase in the chief executive’s salary since 2011. The company reported revenues of €6.73 billion and a pre tax profit of almost €750 million for 2025. Its most recently published detailed liquidity figures also showed approximately €3.1 billion available, including around €1.5 billion in cash and short term deposits, although much of ESB’s funding is required for major investment in electricity networks, renewable energy and infrastructure. The pay rise comes as a record 322,298 households are in arrears on their electricity bills, representing around 14 per cent, or one in seven, of all domestic electricity customers. More than 186,000 households have been behind on their bills for over 90 days, while the average amount owed has risen to €515.77. A further 185,940 households are in arrears on their gas bills. The latest figures are the highest recorded by the Commission for Regulation of Utilities since its current records began in late 2022. Niall asks Ken O’Flynn whether it is justifiable to award such a substantial increase to the head of a State owned company while hundreds of thousands of families are struggling to pay for a basic necessity. Is the Government doing enough to reduce electricity prices, should energy credits be restored, and should assistance be targeted directly at households already falling into debt? With electricity prices still substantially higher than they were before the energy crisis and the colder months approaching, what practical action can the Government take to prevent even more families from being pushed into arrears, threatened with disconnection or forced to choose between heating their homes and paying for other essentials?

    #849 Why Is the ESB Boss Getting Richer as Customers Get Poorer?

  6. 3d ago

    #848 Chores, Cash and Household Negotiations

    Should children be paid for helping around the house, or should chores simply be part of family life? In this episode, Niall speaks to callers about whether pocket money should be linked to jobs such as tidying bedrooms, washing dishes, taking out the bins, hoovering or helping with the laundry. Some parents believe paying children for chores teaches responsibility, encourages a strong work ethic and helps them understand the value of money. It can also introduce young people to saving, budgeting and the idea that rewards usually come through effort. Others argue that children are members of the household and should contribute without expecting to be paid every time they lift a finger. They believe ordinary chores teach independence, consideration and the importance of helping the family without constantly asking, “What do I get for it?” Perhaps there is a middle ground. Everyday jobs such as making the bed or clearing the table could be expected, while larger tasks like washing the car, cutting the grass, cleaning windows or doing extra work could earn a few euro. Do you pay your children for chores? Does it teach them the value of hard work, or does it create a generation that expects payment for every small contribution? Niall hears from parents, grandparents and callers with very different views on pocket money, household responsibilities and what children should be expected to do.

    #848 Chores, Cash and Household Negotiations

  7. 3d ago

    #847 Do Irish Politicians Hate Trump More Than They Value Irish Jobs?

    US President Donald Trump now appears almost certain to visit Ireland for at least two days in September, with preparations already under way for a major security operation. Trump is expected to arrive around 12 September and attend the Irish Open at his golf resort in Doonbeg, County Clare, where he hopes to watch Rory McIlroy compete. The visit is also expected to include engagements in Dublin and a possible meeting with Taoiseach Micheál Martin, although the trip is not currently being treated as a formal State visit. The political battle has already begun. Labour MEP Aodhán Ó Ríordáin has declared that Trump is “not welcome” in Dublin and says the red carpet should not be rolled out, while protests are expected from several political and activist groups. However, others argue that personal dislike of Trump should not be allowed to damage Ireland’s relationship with its largest trading and investment partner. American companies support hundreds of thousands of Irish jobs, while Ireland’s economic prosperity remains heavily dependent on foreign investment. In this episode, Niall speaks to journalist John McGuirk from The Statement about the growing controversy. Should Ireland offer Donald Trump an official State welcome, regardless of political differences? Are Irish politicians entitled to declare that the democratically elected American President is not welcome? Could public hostility towards Trump risk damaging jobs, investment and Ireland’s vital relationship with the United States? Do you welcome President Trump to Ireland, or should the Government tell him to stay away?

    #847 Do Irish Politicians Hate Trump More Than They Value Irish Jobs?

  8. 4d ago

    #003 Hookers, Separate Beds And Secret Messages

    Don’t Call Me Darling with Niall and Karen Boylan is the podcast where a husband and wife give their honest, unfiltered opinions on the stories, relationship dilemmas and social issues that affect us all. Nothing is off the table, and this week’s episode covers everything from hookers and paternity fraud to the far more important question of whether Niall and Karen would like to own a baby goat. They also tackle some of the arguments and awkward questions that come up in almost every relationship. Should married couples sleep in separate bedrooms to avoid snoring and duvet stealing? Should couples share their phone passwords, or is everyone entitled to some privacy? Is it acceptable to return a present you secretly hate, and should you ever tell your partner that their outfit looks terrible? Niall and Karen also debate whether surprise parties are actually cruel, whether backseat driving should be grounds for divorce, and whether couples should reveal their full sexual history or simply accept that the past is the past. It is honest, intriguing, occasionally uncomfortable and full of laughs as Niall and Karen disagree, overshare and say the things most couples are probably thinking but would never dare say out loud.

    #003 Hookers, Separate Beds And Secret Messages
See All (958)

5
out of 5
9 Ratings

About

Niall Boylan is online, and nobody can hold him back. Subscribe to The Niall Boylan Show and access premium content by visiting https://niallboylan.com

Information

  • Creator
    Niall Boylan
  • Years Active
    2020 - 2026
  • Episodes
    958
  • Rating
    Explicit
  • Copyright
    © Copyright The Niall Boylan Podcast

You Might Also Like