StocktonAfterClass

Ronald Stockton

Ron Stockton was a professor of political science at the University of Michigan-Dearborn for 48 years. His specialty was non-western politics and political change. He taught classes on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Religion and Politics, the Politics of Revolution, Non-Western politics, and American politics. He also taught in the Honors Program, focusing upon foundational readings from the 18th and 19th centuries. He has an interest in religion and politics and in the role of religio-ethnic groups in the political system. The listener can anticipate talks on Arab-Americans, Jews, African-Americans, the Scots-Irish, and Evangelicals. He has lectured and written on American politics, public opinion, and voting behavior and on the role of religious organizations and ideologies in the political system. There will be occasional discussions of books and films that address serious issues. And he has lectured and published and even taught a class on gravestones, especially those of different ethnic and religious groups such as Muslims, African-Americans, Jews, and Native Americans. The goal of the podcast series is to provide analysis and commentary by a political scientist to explain and make accessible political, historical, and cultural developments in the United States and around the world, and to give the listener analytical tools to understand those developments. It is also to entertain the listener.

  1. 11/26/2025

    The Georgia Vote Stealing Case. Dismissed today November 26, 2025. What Were the Charges?

    Send us a text Biden carried Georgia by just under 12,000 votes.  They had a Republican governor and Republican Secreatary of State.  Trump called them and asked them to "find" those votes.  I just need one more than Biden got to carry the state.  Trump threatened the Secretary of State with prosecution if he did not "find" the votes.  The county prosecutor Fannie Wills charged the president with corruption.  Trump fought furiously.  In time, Wills was removed for conflict of interest.  (She was boinking one of her associates).  The person who replaced her was a well respected prosecutor.  Today he dismissed the case.  Why?  1.  The case should never have been in a county court.  It should have been in a federal court.  Allowing every county prosecutor to bring criminal charges against a president would produce chaos.  2.  The critical sentence from Trump about "find the votes" could have been interpreted as having criminal intent OR just urging the local official to do his job.  The law specifies that if reasonable people could interpret a statement in two ways, the prosecutor is obligated to grant the accused the benefit of the doubt.  3.  The case was very complex with many individuals named.  It would have involved multiple trials.   4.  Trump is now in office.  It could not go to trial until he was out of office.  That would be very difficult.   What I do not yet understand is what happens to all of the peripheral individuals who already pleaded guilty to being a part of a conspiracy and have been sentenced.  Wills used the RICO law to suggest that there were a host of people involved in this effort.  This podcast will explain the original indictment document, including the logic of the RICO charge.  This is not long and is very informative.

    33 min
  2. 10/26/2025

    To Deport or Not to Deport. Stories From an Expert Witness (me)

    Send us a text I have been an expert witness in four deportation hearings.  The job of an expert witness is to given the judge reasons to permit the individual to remain in the U. S.  The cases were people from Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Palestine.  The Palestinian case was the most interesting because it dealt with a stateless person.   I also want to share with you a conversation I had with an Immigration judge.  Immigration Attorney Shahad Atiya commented on this podcast:  "Asylum law requires people to contort their fears into categories that sometimes make no sense to the expert observer. For those reasons, for the chemist, it was better for him to be able to select a category to be discriminated against such as religion, rather than fit himself into the catch all category (membership in a particular social group, that being chemists). That category kills many cases. Religion is black and white. What is membership in a particular social group anyway? We litigate this every day. "Although you mention these cases may be in the public record, they may be because of media attention or other ways they were discovered. Generally, asylum records and asylum cases are not discoverable and cannot be FOIA’d. You kept them anonymous though anyway. "Many of the timelines you mentioned for these cases put them under the Obama presidency. This shows that asylum law and its harsh realities know no party lines. "There is a level of privilege from the clients that you were an expert witness for having entered the U.S. legally and then applied after overstaying a visa. However, the privilege quickly fails when credibility is at the center of their case. Their credibility of their claims on the fact that they presented themselves at a port of entry, they held themselves out to be tourists or students or temporary workers or visitors. They told officers they intended to leave the U.S. but all along they had the intent to file for asylum because their claims naturally rest on things they experienced prior to their entry. Had their fear started while they were here, the case would be completely different. They would have a valid fear in the opinion of an officer and thereby now AFTER experiencing such events did their intentions change from nonimmigrant to immigrant. Islam and especially Shias put a lot of emphasis on the intentions you make prior to an act.  I joke about how immigration law can be so Shia."

    30 min
4.8
out of 5
42 Ratings

About

Ron Stockton was a professor of political science at the University of Michigan-Dearborn for 48 years. His specialty was non-western politics and political change. He taught classes on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Religion and Politics, the Politics of Revolution, Non-Western politics, and American politics. He also taught in the Honors Program, focusing upon foundational readings from the 18th and 19th centuries. He has an interest in religion and politics and in the role of religio-ethnic groups in the political system. The listener can anticipate talks on Arab-Americans, Jews, African-Americans, the Scots-Irish, and Evangelicals. He has lectured and written on American politics, public opinion, and voting behavior and on the role of religious organizations and ideologies in the political system. There will be occasional discussions of books and films that address serious issues. And he has lectured and published and even taught a class on gravestones, especially those of different ethnic and religious groups such as Muslims, African-Americans, Jews, and Native Americans. The goal of the podcast series is to provide analysis and commentary by a political scientist to explain and make accessible political, historical, and cultural developments in the United States and around the world, and to give the listener analytical tools to understand those developments. It is also to entertain the listener.