The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast

The People's Countryside

This podcast's for anyone wanting to explore the big issues, stretching your thinking in relatable ways. Well known personalities, Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and photographer William Mankelow, who aren't experts, but have opinions, authentic views and no scripts. Join them on meandering conversations about nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Sometimes joined by guests, or discussing listener questions between themselves. Always full of fun anecdotes and a bit of silliness. https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside 

  1. 1d ago

    Balanced, Apparently

    This is The People's Countryside Environmental Debate podcast. Listeners send us questions we haven't seen before. Instead of consulting experts, we simply apply curiosity, questionable confidence, and the reckless belief that difficult conversations are worth having. Saoirse, from Drogheda, Republic of Ireland asks - "Who’d want to be a police man or woman? One minute they are accused of being pro-white and anti black etc. With recent events they are now accused in the UK of being anti white. When the police turn up at a scene, they do so as human beings, who should be trying to be balanced in how they interpret and act. Yet how can they be, with societal debates and arguments raging in their head. So their thinking lurches from one perspective to another, instead of altering to a more balanced view of a specific situation. Even with this balance though, the police will still get it horribly wrong, and this can’t always be avoided. It can be learned from though. Of course institutional bias exists too, but how do we hope to send our police out on the streets with a balanced mindset, if we as a society are so divided. It's not all down to social media speeding up division, but it has a big part. Maybe the police on the street need to be AI robots programmed to inhabit the perfect equilibrium. Life isn’t like that though, there needs to be room for interpretation and mistakes. We’re fast disappearing up our own arseholes! All this needs talking about by us all, but equally, no absolute conclusion can hope to be drawn, unless you're one of those narcissists out there that I keep meeting”. William praises the police. Stuart suggests balance isn't always fair. Together they commit the modern crime of considering other viewpoints. A dangerous episode in which the hosts suggest listening to people before deciding they're wrong. Jess, in Bishop’s Tatchbrook, Warwickshire, England then places this question - “Not asked a question for a long time, but here I am again! Stuart I know you’ve got an autoimmune condition, but I’ve heard of a treatment being tested on Lupus patients, that may be an answer. Getting the T cells to fight the B cells, so the body resets. 6 out of 7 patients it's been tested on are in remission. No idea how long it will last or side effects though. Any thoughts?” Stuart explains how modern medicine reboots your immune system, then demonstrates his own approach to wellbeing with whiskey at breakfast. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

  2. Sep 27

    Division Needs Understanding

    Listeners send us questions sight unseen. Like Freddie Mercury handed a mystery lyric sheet seconds before Live Aid, we somehow have to make it work, then steer it towards the environment. Saoirse, from Drogheda, Republic of Ireland sent in todays first listener question - "Over the last few days, violent protests have occurred in Belfast. Some say whipped up by far right agitators looking for trouble, and galvanized by social media and online channels, and leaders using language to incite. Others say they never went out with the intention of being violent, but have been made angry by fake news and other information on social media.  Personally I  feel they went out to do the violent deeds in the first place, otherwise why would all these young men all be dressed the same, in black, with faces covered, all at the same time? They knew what they were doing and didn’t want to be identified. If they have a case, why hide in the shadows?  We really need to have tough conversations to understand the thinking of these effective rioters. Not to concede to them, but so we understand them. Understanding someone's view, even if it's extreme, is a key step to progressing beyond an often confused, ‘now!  At times of struggle and division, the race card gets played, like in the days of Hitler, who mastered the art of division. It's a different time, with different drivers, but there are so many parallels.  Let’s better understand what's happening now, in the now, not wait for the benefit of hindsight. Its starts with listening and understanding, but not necessarily agreeing”. William contributes a strategic silence, while Stuart explores why division works, why understanding matters, and why hindsight is the world's most overqualified expert. Paul, from Lleweni, Wales offers todays second question - “Are you guys as confused as me. Venues have to now adhere to new toilet facility provision and notices. I was at a venue the other day that had 3 separate toilet facility rooms. One was previously female and the other two male. Now, the new signage says one is for females, with a silhouette of a woman. The other two are both redesignated as  Universal, with silhouettes of a man, a woman and another cut down the middle, presumably meaning gender neutral.  Great, modern thinking I thought. On reflection, as there were three rooms, couldn’t one have been female, one male and the last being gender neutral. We’re assuming all men and all gender neutral want to mix at such times. Then you have the debate of where Trans people etc go and pee, or who they play sport with, shower with. I wouldn’t want to be the one setting legislation, but I for one am more confused about the direction of travel.  Dividing and recategorising can help groups be recognised, but it can also divide and categorise. How do we know we’re getting the nuances correct around all this?” Freddie Mercury asked, 'Can anybody find me somebody to love?' William and Stuart ask, 'Can anybody find me the right toilet? What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

  3. Sep 20

    Heatwave Lifestyle

    The UK’s repeated heatwaves are often talked about without much acknowledgement of the wider context of global warming. Even mentioning global warming in weather forecasts can cause some people to switch off, seeing it as unnecessary interference or “nanny state” messaging. Lifestyle also plays a big part in environmental behaviour, and our everyday habits can hold us back from making changes that would benefit the environment. These are two of the themes your cohosts, Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow, explore in this episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast. As always, they dive straight in without seeing the questions beforehand, responding right there in the moment. The first listener question today comes from Harry in Stank, Cumbria, England: “The early heatwave that happened in May in the UK was spoken about in the news with a celebratory tone. Along the line of aren’t we lucky, with a slight mention of global warming. Yet it was still too much for some who don’t believe news outlets should act as a nanny state by telling us about the global warming aspect of the heatwave. They just wanted to enjoy it. Where’s the balance in messaging, or maybe there isn’t one, as we’re too damn divided?” The second comes from Jimmy in Little Waldingfield, Suffolk, England: “There seems to be so many more victims of allergies and scammers. May seem unrelated, but is there a common theme to all these modern day scourges and challenges in the UK? Specifically regarding allergies, food or otherwise, are doctors and therapists too readily jumping to conclusions and on the allergy bandwagon these days? I’ve heard some older people say these allergies weren’t around years ago, so don’t fully believe they are real. I also hear these same people say we had different lifestyles and diets years ago, so could lifestyle be the common theme across the challenges of scammers and allergies etc etc etc?” What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities

  4. Sep 13

    Challenging Environmentalism

    One of the biggest challenges facing 16 to 26 year olds today is navigating an aspirational culture shaped by endless scrolling on YouTube and TikTok, where fame and financial abundance can look easily attainable. Environmentalism can also slip into an “us and them” mindset, especially when business people end up being seen as the enemy. These are two of the themes your cohosts, Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow, explore in this episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast. As always, they go in cold, no preview of the questions, and respond in the moment. The first is from James in Ecclefechan, Scotland: “Its said that in the UK, 16 to 26 year olds are finding it hard to get work, of any kind. Shouldn’t some thought be given to supporting them into self employment, and into the service industry?” The second comes from Debs in Didcot, Oxfordshire: “I remember a time when you could vehemently disagree with someone on something, yet still respect them and engage with them. Now it seems anyone who disagrees with us is the enemy”. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

  5. Sep 6

    Moonshots Cheaper Than Trains, New Leaders Pending

    If you're looking for world-leading experts, you've taken a wrong turn somewhere. This is the People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, where the questions are fresh and the opinions are under construction. Jimmy, from Little Waldingfield, Suffolk, England asks - “I’ve heard getting people to the moon and back recently cost 80 billion, yet the delayed by 15 years HS2 thats only going as far as Birmingham, and slower speeds could cost in excess of 100 billion. Are we finishing HS2 because we started it, or because its needed?” This episode goes full steam ahead into HS2, historical railway politics and eye-watering budgets. Expect discussions about Brunel, billion-pound infrastructure, moon rockets and the possibility that sustainability refuses to fit neatly into a spreadsheet. Rick, Colgate, West Sussex, England - “Should Starmer go and get yet another new PM in? Can the UK move forward if it keeps changing leaders? If policy isn’t adaptable to a changing world, a new new leader can’t surely be the answer? What does our collective future look like?” This week, we ask why we're so obsessed with replacing leaders before they've had time to unpack their boxes. From football managers to prime ministers, we explore whether constant change creates progress, or just a national game of political Hokey Cokey. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities

  6. Aug 30

    Consistency Wins, Unless You're Enhanced

    This is the People's Countryside Environmental Debate podcast. We open your questions live, debate the issues, and turn the conversation into practical environmental action where possible. Ronny, from Kentucky, USA has sent in today's initial question for us to explore - “Do we take consistency and reliable routes for granted?” Do people really want consistency, or are they always searching for change? Stuart and William explore routines, adaptability, political instability, and the tension between stability and progress. Rick, from Colgate, West Sussex, England raises the second question for today - “Recently the Enhanced Games were held in Vegas. Do you think this is an allowable evolution of sport?” Stuart and William discuss performance enhancing drugs in sport, the limits of personal choice, the role of regulation, and why progress often requires action without waiting for perfect solutions. Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

  7. Aug 23

    Election Stupid

    You, the listeners, send in questions that we don’t see before we press record. We then try to have a conversation around them, explore different perspectives, and hopefully come to some conclusions. Today, we’ve got two listeners who have sent in questions for the first time. The first of our newbies is Harry, Stank, Cumbria, England - “So, what did you make of the UK local elections last week?” Stuart believes the shift towards Reform and the Greens is more a reflection of how people vote between general elections rather than a clear rejection of Labour or Starmer. He sees it as an ongoing political trend rather than a definitive statement of intent. Stuart feels that allowing Reform to gain power could expose the limitations of their promises and show voters that they cannot provide simple solutions to complex problems, although he acknowledges the potential damage that could come from that outcome. William feels the local elections do not hold much significance for him and admits he does not usually engage with them. He believes that while general elections are where he chooses to make his voice heard, local politics does not have the same impact on him. William sees voting as a personal choice, even if he questions how much difference one vote can ultimately make. The second debutant is Rick, Colgate, West Sussex, England - “Do you believe in ‘Net Stupid Zero’, when the UK only produces a tiny percentage of the world's pollution and could still be drilling its own oil? How is that inspiring large scale polluters to make a change?" William believes that the UK’s contribution to global pollution should not be used as a reason to avoid taking action. He feels that any steps to improve air quality, protect nature, and restore the environment are worthwhile because they directly affect the future of humanity. William argues that people have the ability to create positive change, but feels progress is being held back by excessive consumerism, division, and a focus on differences rather than working together. Stuart believes the UK should consider a more balanced approach to energy, including the possibility of using its own oil resources. He questions whether the idea that the UK’s actions will inspire larger polluters to change is realistic, suggesting that global progress will take time. However, Stuart feels that doing the right thing should not depend on whether others follow, but should come from a genuine commitment to making better choices. In this episode William talks about a Wikipedia link which shows wind generation by country, here is the link: Wind generation by country, 2021 What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

  8. Aug 16

    Environmental Entitlement

    Many are about the environment, but plenty are not. Whatever the topic, we always try to find an environmental angle and, more importantly, come up with practical actions. We are of course talking about the questions that you, the listener, send in for us to discuss, chew over, ponder etc. We do not see them until we press record. We come to each one completely cold. The first question for this episode comes from Shazad, Great Bricett, Suffolk, England - “What steps must the pharmaceutical industry take to reduce its environmental footprint while still delivering safe, effective medicines to the world?”  Stuart points out that people should not assume pharmaceutical companies always produce safe and effective medicines. He believes the industry's secrecy makes it vulnerable to corruption and notes that some drugs initially deemed ineffective for one condition are later repurposed as treatments for others. William argues that the pharmaceutical industry, like any large industry, should take responsibility for reducing its environmental impact across areas such as manufacturing, packaging, and transportation. He believes companies should already be considering these issues but suggests legislation may be necessary to ensure meaningful action. The second question is from Jimmy, Little Waldingfield, Suffolk, England - “If sustainability requires us to live within the planet’s limits, what moral obligation do we have to change our behaviour when doing so challenges our comfort, convenience, or sense of entitlement? To keep people from abandoning their sustainability obligations though, you need structures that make the sustainable choice the default, the easiest, and the most socially reinforced path. Individual morality matters, but without supportive systems, even well‑intentioned people drift back to convenience. Those structures could be clear, enforceable standards, not voluntary promises. Economic incentives that reward sustainable behaviour. Infrastructure that makes sustainable choices effortless. Cultural norms that make sustainability part of identity. Shared accountability, not individual guilt. Long‑term political commitment. A moral narrative that connects sustainability to fairness. Any others you can suggest?”  William argues that people often follow the path of least resistance, driven by the desire for the latest products and cheap consumer goods. He highlights the rise of platforms offering inexpensive items and suggests that many people overlook where products come from and their environmental impact. He questions how society can encourage people to make more conscious choices and whether meaningful change is possible. Stuart believes sustainable choices need to become the default option by creating structures, pathways, and social incentives that guide people towards better decisions. He argues that while some may resist this as excessive control, large scale behavioural change requires leadership and systems that make sustainable actions easier and more socially accepted. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities

Trailers

About

This podcast's for anyone wanting to explore the big issues, stretching your thinking in relatable ways. Well known personalities, Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and photographer William Mankelow, who aren't experts, but have opinions, authentic views and no scripts. Join them on meandering conversations about nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Sometimes joined by guests, or discussing listener questions between themselves. Always full of fun anecdotes and a bit of silliness. https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside