CXOInsights by CXOCIETY

CXOCIETY | FutureCIO FutureCFO FutureIoT

CXOCIETY (read "society") is the platform for senior business, technology, finance and operations executives to discuss, share and discover the latest in technology, process and people innovation."CXOInsights" by CXOCIETY is the repository of shared insights and experiences by the best, brightest and most experienced professionals globally. Subscribe to "CXOInsights" by CXOCIETY to keep abreast in the latest in all things innovation.

  1. 3d ago

    PodChats for FutureCISO: Defending against the invisible

    Before Stuxnet, there was fast16: a state-grade sabotage framework that didn’t steal data or crash systems. It silently altered engineering simulations and calculations—poisoning digital twins while everything appeared normal. Now imagine AI giving attackers the power to find such weaknesses in hours. As Singapore expands protections beyond core CII, fast16 is a warning: tomorrow’s breach won’t hold your data hostage. It will corrupt the simulations and AI models you trust to run your plant, bridge, or refinery. And you won’t know until something breaks. In this PodChats for FutureCISO, Vitaly Kumluk, cybersecurity researcher at SentinelOne Lab, SentinelOne, sheds light on what cybersecurity teams need to know and be prepared against this new breed of cyberthreats. 1.       What is the role of a researcher in the cybersecurity space? 2.       In a nutshell, what is fast16 and what makes it different from other categories of cyber threats? 3.       How do we identify which of our engineering simulations, digital twins, and AI training pipelines are most vulnerable to silent output manipulation—and do we have any validation layer that checks results against physical or independent models? 4.       How do we detect an attack that changes calculations but leaves systems running normally? 5.       What stops an AI-powered attacker from finding a hidden weakness in our simulation software? 6.       How do we assess and continuously monitor the integrity of simulation outputs from external partners, cloud-hosted digital twins, or legacy OT environments we cannot directly instrument? 7.       Our incident plan covers ransomware. Do they cover a scenario where a state-grade actor has been quietly corrupting our engineering decisions for six months? How do we roll back trust in our own data? 8.       If an attacker manipulates a supporting system’s simulation to cause a real-world failure, will current cyber insurance or legal framework treat that as a “breach” or as a “design error”? 9.       How do we differentiate between adversarial attacks on the AI’s availability (denial) vs. subtle corruption of its reasoning or output distribution—and which defensive architectures apply? 10.   Given what we now understand about fast16, what is your recommendation for moving forward?

    PodChats for FutureCISO: Defending against the invisible
  2. 3d ago

    PodChats for FutureCIO: Trends shaping the CIO agenda for 2026–2027

    A recent Gartner survey found that only 28% of AI use cases fully meet ROI expectations, with a further 20% failing outright. For Asia-Pacific CIOs, the bottleneck is clear: it is not the model, but the governance and orchestration layer beneath it.  In 2026, the challenge has shifted from experimentation to industrialisation, demanding a focus on taming "agent sprawl" and mitigating "shadow AI" risks.  As Celine Siow, VP of Sales, GM for APAC at Workato argues, the control plane must be platform-agnostic to avoid recreating fragmentation. The path to 'production-ready AI' lies in a robust, vendor-neutral governance layer that ensures trust, interoperability, and measurable business value. She joins us on this edition of PodChats for FutureCIO to elaborate further on her arguments for a platform-agnostic control plane as CIOs orchestrate the industrialisation of AI. 1.       With only 28% of AI projects meeting ROI targets, how can we build a formal "value playbook" to ensure our AI investments deliver tangible, measurable business outcomes? 2.       As "agent sprawl" becomes the new technical debt, how can we architect a neutral control plane to govern, orchestrate, and observe our growing fleet of autonomous agents? 3.       Given that 80% of workers now use unapproved AI tools, how can we move from simply blocking "shadow AI" to enabling governed, safe adoption across the entire workforce? 4.       What does an effective governance framework look like when AI moves beyond content generation to action management, requiring real-time control over permissions, escalation, and audit trails? 5.       With AI infrastructure costs set to run up to 30% higher than planned, how should our FinOps practices evolve to manage this new cost volatility, including token-based consumption?

    PodChats for FutureCIO: Trends shaping the CIO agenda for 2026–2027
  3. 5d ago

    PodChats for FutureCIO: Innovation-focused IT budget strategies

    CIOs across Southeast and Northeast Asia face a brutal budgetary paradox today: board-mandated surges in AI and cybersecurity investments clashing directly with flat overall IT expenditure.  According to IDC and Forrester, while regional tech spending is rising, geopolitical risks and inflation are eroding real purchasing power. Consequently, technology leaders are forced into aggressive reallocation.  They must defer legacy ERP upgrades, consolidate SaaS contracts, and renegotiate vendor support to fund digital priorities without expanding the top-line budget, turning run-rate IT optimisation into a critical strategic lever for margin protection. This shift is redefining the CIO role. In this PodChats for FutureCIO, we explore why IT budget strategies need to shift from cutting waste to driving innovation. For more on this, we are joined by Seth Ravin, CEO of Rimini Street. Setting the Macro Context 1.       With overall IT budgets remaining largely flat across Asia despite surging AI demands, how are CIOs fundamentally restructuring their 2026 budget cycles to accommodate these new priorities without asking for more money? The Core Trade-off: AI vs. Legacy  2.       In your conversations with customers, when boards ring-fence AI and cybersecurity spend, which specific legacy IT projects or 'run rate' operations bear the brunt of the cuts? 3.       You have highlighted the deferral of ERP upgrades; what are the operational and technical risks CIOs are willing to accept by pushing these critical modernisations down the line? Executing the Cuts: ERP, SaaS, and Cloud  4.       How are enterprises leveraging third-party enterprise software support models to immediately free up capital. Is this shifting from a tactical cost-saving measure to a strategic boardroom lever?  5.       Beyond traditional on-premise legacy systems, are we now seeing CIOs aggressively consolidating SaaS contracts and even renegotiating hyperscaler cloud commitments to fund AI initiatives? Regional and Sector Nuances  6.       CIOs at different sectors: manufacturing, healthcare, logistics, and financial services, approach how they manage their IT budgets. Are there distinct budget-cutting patterns or unique pressures specific to these sectors in the Asian market? The CIO and CFO Dynamic  7.       How has the conversation between the CIO and CFO evolved in the region? Are finance leaders now driving IT vendor renegotiations, or is the CIO leading this charge to protect innovation budgets? Strategic and Financial Implications  8.       Looking beyond 2026, if AI and cyber costs continue to scale without a corresponding increase in overall IT budgets, is the current model of funding them purely through legacy cuts sustainable? 9.       Let’s round out what we’ve covered so far. Our topic is IT budget strategies for focusing on innovation and not cost-cutting. What are your top 3 recommendations for IT budget strategies for focusing on innovation and not cost-cutting?

    PodChats for FutureCIO: Innovation-focused IT budget strategies
  4. 6d ago

    PodChats for FutureCIO: Tips for safeguarding AI integrity

    In 2026, the competitive advantage in AI will no longer come from model speed or scale—it will come from trust. As Southeast Asia and Korea accelerate enterprise AI adoption amid fragmented regulatory landscapes (from Singapore’s FEAT to Korea’s AI Basic Act), the CIO’s mandate has shifted from deployment to defense.  “AI integrity”—the convergence of data provenance, bias mitigation, explainability, and ethical resilience—is now a board-level risk. For heads of compliance and data science, the question is no longer “Can we scale AI?” but “Can we certify its integrity?” Without it, you face regulatory fines, model drift, and reputational collapse.   In this PodChats for FutureCIO, we are joined by Lee Anstiss, Regional Director, Southeast Asia and Korea at Infoblox, to hopefully get insights and tips on how to safeguard AI integrity. 1.       Do Asia’s CIOs and CISOs know exactly which AI models are running across all our business units—or is shadow AI already creating integrity risks we cannot see? 2.       Given the fragmented state of each model’s regulatory status, what options are there for CIOs as they navigate fragmented rules with fragmented data? 3.       In your view, are enterprises in Asia prioritizing raw accuracy over an “integrity scorecard” that includes bias, explainability, and robustness—and if so, are CIOs trusting models that are fast but not fair? 4.       Based on current technologies and practices, can CIOs trace every piece of training data, including synthetic data, back to its source? Do organisations have blind spots where hidden bias or poisoned inputs could enter? 5.       Can CIOs test their production AI for bias against local languages and cultural norms in each market? Can they produce an audit trail for any regulator who asks? 6.       If a regulator demands proof of real-time bias disclosure tomorrow, is there a way for enterprises to have automated logs mapped to specific legal articles? 7.       Should organisations maintain a human-in-the-loop for high-stakes decisions, with override logs that feed back into retraining? How risky is using the discipline of oversight as a checkbox? 8.       Our topic is “tips on how to safeguard AI integrity” Can you share some of the most common or practical tips for CIOs, heads of AI, for ensuring or safeguarding AI integrity.

    PodChats for FutureCIO: Tips for safeguarding AI integrity
  5. Jul 13

    PodChats for FutureCIO: Turning APAC’s AI Pilots into Profits in 2026

    Across Southeast Asia, generative AI pilots are stalling—not from a lack of model power, but from broken retrieval. Agentic RAG bridges this gap: autonomous agents that verify facts, enforce governance, and execute end-to-end workflows. For CIOs in 2026, this turns fragile experiments into auditable, scalable profit centres.  With Gartner warning that 60% of AI projects will be abandoned due to poor data and weak controls, agentic RAG is no longer optional—it is the only practical path from pilot to production. In markets like Singapore, where data residency and compliance are non-negotiable, retrieval intelligence is now the bedrock of ROI. In this PodChats for FutureCIO, Ed Keisling, Chief AI Officer, Progress Software, discusses how CIOs and heads of AI across Southeast Asia, can turn AI pilots and POCs into profit-generating initiatives for enterprises in 2026. What is RAG?Given that most regional AI pilots never scale, what specific architectural weaknesses does agentic RAG fix that traditional RAG or fine-tuning cannot?In markets with fragmented data landscapes—legacy systems, multilingual content, and disparate cloud storage—how does agentic RAG ensure consistent, high-quality retrieval at enterprise scale?What out-of-the-box governance and audit trails does agentic RAG provide to satisfy both local data residency laws (e.g., Singapore’s PDPA) and board-level risk controls?For CIOs managing lean teams, how does agentic RAG reduce the operational burden of maintaining retrieval pipelines, monitoring hallucinations, and orchestrating multi-step agent workflows? How can agentic RAG help move beyond isolated use cases (e.g., customer support) toward fully autonomous, end-to-end processes spanning finance, supply chain, and compliance?As agents become more autonomous by 2027, what retrieval strategies will prevent cascading errors or unauthorised actions, and what should CIOs implement today to stay safe?(original 3) How should CIOs in Singapore and across Southeast Asia measure the ROI of retrieval intelligence compared to simply upgrading large language models?For regional enterprises without custom AI stacks, what vendor or open-source scaffolding for agentic RAG offers the fastest path from pilot to profit while preserving data sovereignty?What organisational, data, and leadership shifts must CIOs prioritise over the next 12–18 months to ensure agentic RAG transitions from a technical capability into a sustained source of competitive advantage?

    PodChats for FutureCIO: Turning APAC’s AI Pilots into Profits in 2026
  6. Jun 29

    PodChats for FutureCISO: Agentic AI Fraud—Can Digital Trust Keep Up?

    APAC CISOs face an escalating battle as AI agents rapidly outpace traditional defences. Key issues include distinguishing legitimate actions from malicious automation, soaring fraud speeds, and customer attrition from either excessive friction or unreimbursed losses.  The Biocatch report, the future of Digital Trust, concluded that with 86% viewing AI agents as the industry’s greatest vulnerability, leaders urgently need real-time behavioural insights and interbank collaboration to preserve trust. To know more about this and to help CISOs at the region’s banks find solutions to this rising AI-driven fraud incidents, we are joined by Subhashish Bose, Director of Global Advisory, BioCatch. 1.       What are the key salient points of the future of digital trust report? 2.       How can we distinguish legitimate AI-assisted customer actions from agentic AI-driven fraud in real time? 3.       What behavioural and intent-based signals can replace static identity checks as AI agents mimic human behaviour? 4.       How do we prevent customer attrition caused by either excessive friction or unreimbursed scam losses? (intelligent friction?) 5.       What interbank intelligence-sharing frameworks can we deploy to stop authorised fraud at the receiving account stage? 6.       AI-powered scammers are on the rise. How do we accelerate fraud detection systems to match the rising speed of AI-generated attacks? 7.       What investments are needed to counter agentic AI attacks that 79% of our peers have already encountered? 8.       How should we restructure fraud and scam reimbursement policies to maintain trust without increasing vulnerability? 9.       What metrics will tell us whether our AI defences are reducing fraud losses or merely shifting criminal tactics? 10.   What is your advice for CISOs, CIOs and banking executives in the face of this rising AI-driven fraud? 11.   What is the biggest myth related to financial fraud with AI?

    PodChats for FutureCISO: Agentic AI Fraud—Can Digital Trust Keep Up?
  7. Jun 3

    PodChats for FutureCFO: Transforming finance to align with business priorities and market dynamics

    CFOs in Southeast Asia and Hong Kong face a new reality: talent is now a strategic risk. Between 2026–2027, cautious hiring contrasts with fierce competition for hybrid-skilled professionals who blend accounting expertise, digital literacy, commercial acumen, and regulatory fluency. Automation and AI threaten traditional career pipelines, while rapid AI adoption, family office growth, and capital market resurgence intensify demand, driving attrition and salary inflation. CFOs must act as talent architects, restructuring teams, embedding AI governance, and building resilient succession plans to safeguard leadership continuity against competitive pressures and workforce disruption. In this PodChats for FutureCFO, Angus Tsang, CFO and Company Secretary, CN Logistics International Holdings Limited, shares his thoughts on how finance leaders transforming the finance function to align to business priorities and market dynamics. 1. How are CFOs redefining the finance operating model to balance cost efficiency with the strategic agility required to support business growth in 2026-2027? 2. Do CFOs have a clear inventory of the skills they need versus the skills they possess, particularly regarding AI, data analytics, and regulatory technology? 3. How are CFOs adapting their talent acquisition strategy to compete for "versatile" talent in a market where specialists command significant salary premiums? 4. What is the CFO’s strategy for managing the "automation paradox"—automating routine work without eroding the developmental pathways for early-career finance professionals? 5. In your view, are succession plans for critical roles (e.g., Controllers, FP&A Heads, Tax) robust enough to withstand unexpected departures in a volatile hiring market? Is this succession plan reactive (someone resigns) or proactive? 6. What should be the approach to managing the emerging risks associated with AI governance, specifically ensuring that the team has the talent to oversee algorithmic decision-making and regulatory compliance? 7. How are CFOs leveraging the fluidity of regional hubs (Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia) to access talent pools that were previously out of reach? 8. Given the rise of contract roles (fractional/project) driven by transformation projects, how are CFOs (and CHROs) balancing permanent headcount with flexible talent to maintain organisational resilience? 10. How do CFOs measure the ROI of their talent development programmes, specifically regarding their impact on retention and internal promotion rates for leadership roles?

    PodChats for FutureCFO: Transforming finance to align with business priorities and market dynamics
  8. Jun 1

    PodChats for FutureCIO: Embedding genuine carbon action in the age of autonomous AI

    This year’s Earth Day (22 April), the conversations pivot from carbon accounting to carbon action. While APAC CIOs have embedded sustainability dashboards, the rise of autonomous agents threatens to undo this progress.  In 2026, an uncontrolled "agent sprawl" could exponentially increase compute, data storage, and energy use—directly conflicting with Net Zero pledges. True sustainability isn’t just about reporting emissions; it’s about embedding green governance into every autonomous decision.  As agents become "digital coworkers," CIOs must treat energy efficiency and waste reduction as non-negotiable compliance metrics, ensuring AI acceleration doesn't come at the planet’s expense. With us to understand what Earth Day means in the context of the exploding AI agent sprawl is Mr Liher Urbizu, present and MD of SAP Southeast Asia. Questions covered: 1.       Give us the agentic sprawl in Southeast Asia in 2026. 2.       How do you embed "carbon-aware" policies directly into agent workflows? This should force autonomous agents to defer non-urgent batch processing to times of renewable energy availability. (treat carbon data like financial data) 3.       With Earth Day commitments tightening, what technical controls are required to mandate energy consumption caps per agent, treating efficiency as a governance rule rather than a post-execution report? 4.       To ensure agents don't inadvertently increase waste, how do you establish trusted data lineage for Scope 3 emissions, enabling an agent to verify a supplier's carbon intensity before autonomously placing an order? 5.       Given that poor data quality leads to redundant processing, what data governance rules are necessary to prevent agents from repeatedly querying or transforming the same inefficient datasets, wasting energy? 6.       How do you build a "sustainability audit trail" for every autonomous decision, allowing CIOs to trace a specific agent's action back to its energy cost and carbon footprint for regulatory reporting? 7.       As we manage agents like digital coworkers, what "retirement criteria" ensure that low-value, high-frequency agents are automatically decommissioned to prevent long-term energy leakage? (leanIX) 8.       To avoid "shadow agent" sprawl doubling your infrastructure emissions undetected, what discovery tools can catalog every autonomous agent and calculate its real-time energy consumption against your Net Zero milestones? 9.       With stakes higher than Shadow IT, how do you differentiate between essential agents that optimize sustainability (e.g., logistics routing) versus "rogue" agents that create unnecessary digital waste and technical carbon debt? 10.   Where is the starting point for my organisation to move towards a more sustainable IT operation?

    PodChats for FutureCIO: Embedding genuine carbon action in the age of autonomous AI

About

CXOCIETY (read "society") is the platform for senior business, technology, finance and operations executives to discuss, share and discover the latest in technology, process and people innovation."CXOInsights" by CXOCIETY is the repository of shared insights and experiences by the best, brightest and most experienced professionals globally. Subscribe to "CXOInsights" by CXOCIETY to keep abreast in the latest in all things innovation.