Some of the reviews are good, some of the imitations are funny, albeit re acted scenes of films can get to cringe levels. Also a lot of meathead going on here when reviewing movies where they miss critical details and then use it as their own negative critiques. And don’t get me started on their asinine Matt Reeves The Batman and Robert Pattinson slander. Especially considering to any knowledgeable fan of the source material or of quality acting and filmmaking would know Battinson is by far the best iteration of the character ever on screen. Surpassing Keaton the former best Batman and passing Bale the former best Wayne. So he is the best both written and performed take of the character on screen. The film itself is easily the second best movie in the entire franchise after the pinnacle of the entire genre, The Dark Knight. And it’s the first movie in the entire franchise, where the titular character is the most interesting, most important, most frightening character and with the most screen time in the entire movie. Only one that comes close is Batman Begins, which is more Bruce centric, than all the other films. Which all are in service of whatever villain of the week they’re pushing. And with the exception of Alfred and the Joker, who we don’t see enough of in the movie, every other character from the mythology is that it’s best, including Gotham City, in the Matt Reeves movie.
