The Grant

Niels Tudor-Vinther
  • 0.0 (0)
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Weekly

Getting EU funding for your research project idea is great, but the process from project idea to submission of the full proposal is rough and tough. 20.000 proposals are submitted every year and every single one of these preparations goes through many challenges. Most of these challenges have the same overall characteristics, that can be minimized or eliminated by being aware of them already when starting the proposal process. This podcast is for proposals preparers looking for tips, tricks, advice or just an audible pad on the shoulder to deal with the unavoidable tough work

  1. 1h ago

    #249 Has AI Exposed a Broken EU Funding System? w/Annika Jaansoo

    AI and EU Funding – Is the System Reaching Breaking Point?With Annika Jaansoo Check out the €500 EU project campaign Check out the episode website AI has made proposal writing faster and more accessible. But what happens when thousands of applicants discover the same thing? In episode #249, I’m joined by Annika Jaansoo, an EU funding professional with more than three decades of experience in cross-border cooperation, to look beyond the individual applicant and ask what AI is doing to the funding system itself. We discuss rising proposal numbers, increasingly compressed success rates, evaluator overload and the growing feeling among applicants that producing an excellent proposal is no longer enough. Annika argues that AI has not simply created a new problem – it has revealed weaknesses in a system built around the assumption that the ability to write a convincing proposal is a useful proxy for the quality of the underlying idea. We also look at possible alternatives. Some Interreg programmes are experimenting with hearings and pitches, while Annika has created monthly roundtables where practitioners discuss these challenges and turn their conclusions into policy briefs for EU institutions. The question is no longer whether AI belongs in EU funding. It is how the funding system needs to adapt now that AI is here. Time codes: 02:19 Guest introduction and fly in 11:43 AI and the Proposal Explosion 39:50 Are We Evaluating the Right Things? 01:00:47 Reflections and advice 01:01:30 The toughest challenge

    #249 Has AI Exposed a Broken EU Funding System? w/Annika Jaansoo

  2. Oct 26

    #248 BLOXHUB - Connecting an Ecosystem Through EU Projects

    From Newcomer to Strategic EU Partner – The BLOXHUB JourneyAn in-person conversation with CEO Torben Klitgaard Check out the €500 campaign for EU projects Check out the episode website with more information For episode #248, I visit BLOXHUB in Copenhagen to meet CEO Torben Klitgaard and follow an unusually complete EU funding journey: from entering the field as a newcomer to making EU projects a strategic part of the organisation. It started with the New European Bauhaus. BLOXHUB mobilised its network, assembled a European consortium and coordinated the DESIRE lighthouse project. Another successful project followed, and EU funding increasingly became a way of connecting BLOXHUB’s community with international companies, cities, researchers and other stakeholders. But experience changed the strategy. BLOXHUB no longer wants to coordinate major EU projects or write proposals itself. Instead, it is increasingly positioning itself around areas where it has strong competencies and can contribute as a partner or work package lead. Torben explains why running several EU projects simultaneously must be treated as professional business, not an activity organisations simply add on the side. Time codes: 00:00 Campaign Announcement 00:28 Arrival in Copenhagen 04:02 Guest introduction and fly in 06:47 Bloxhub - An introduction 12:30 The Projects 32:31 EU Projects as Strategy 54:41 Learnings, reflections and advice 57:01 The toughest challenge

  3. Oct 19

    #247 Supporting Startup's & SMEs

    Supporting Startups and SMEs into EU FundingWith Lise Pape and Rasmus Mørk Check out how you can collaborate with The Grant Check out the episode website In my earlier field recording with Lise Pape from Walk With Path, we touched on the support she had received from Greater Copenhagen EU Office. This time, I bring Lise together with Rasmus Mørk, who has been supporting her, to look more closely at what that support actually involves. Rasmus explains how he works with startups and SMEs to understand their product-development plans, identify relevant EU funding programmes, assess whether an opportunity is worth pursuing and develop the first outline of a potential project. Lise shares how that has worked from the company side—from discovering calls she might otherwise have missed to discussing consortium composition and whether a particular opportunity really fits the company. #248 Supporting Start Ups and S… And there is an important reality check throughout: EU funding is high-hanging fruit. Not every innovative company should apply. Sometimes the best support is helping a company realise early that its time and resources would be better spent elsewhere. Time codes: 02:03 Guest introduction and fly in 06:55 Supporting Walk with Path 21:14 How CopenVirk Supports Companies 36:05 Reflections

  4. Oct 12

    #246 Experienced Exploitation

    Experienced Exploitation – From Results to Real-World ValueWith Carmen Bianca Socaciu Check out the episode website Check out how you can work with The Grant Exploitation is ultimately about what happens to the results of an EU-funded project beyond the project itself. In episode #246, I’m joined by Carmen Bianca Socaciu, who has worked with exploitation for more than a decade, to explore what that process actually looks like in practice. We move from identifying results and developing value propositions to understanding customer needs, business models, market conditions and the people inside partner organisations who can actually make decisions. Carmen also explains why exploitation is as much about trust, curiosity and human relationships as it is about business tools. And we look at the difficult cases too: sustainable technologies that cannot break even, market conditions that change during a four-year project, results that are ready for market but have nobody willing to pick them up, and the uncomfortable gap between publicly funded R&D timelines and commercial reality. Time codes: 02:20 Guest introduction and fly in 06:35 Understanding Exploitation 12:01 From Project Results to Real-World Use 24:37 Sustainability, Regulation and Long-Term Impact 40:11 Becoming a Strong Exploitation Partner 47:56 Reflections and advice 50:42 The toughest challenge

  5. Oct 7

    Collaboration - RM Framework Series (11): The Quality Label

    The RM Framework Quality Label – Making Training ComparableRM Framework Series #11 with Blanka Csite from EARMA Check out the episode webiste with links Research management training across Europe comes in many different forms—from accredited university programmes to short professional courses, micro-credentials and training delivered by professional associations. In episode #11 of the RM Framework Series, I’m joined by Blanka Csite from EARMA to explore how the project’s proposed Quality Label could help bring more transparency to that landscape. Blanka explains why the current approach is voluntary, developmental and proportionate rather than pass-or-fail, and how self-assessment can help training providers reflect on their purpose, target group, learning outcomes and links to RM Comp competencies and proficiency levels. We also look at what the Quality Label could mean for research managers themselves: clearer information about what different programmes actually offer, making it easier to identify training that matches their own professional development needs. The concept is still being refined through pilot feedback and wider consultation with the European research management community. Time codes: 02:13 Guest introduction and fly in 04:17 Introducing the Quality Label 09:59 Developing the Quality Label Approach 19:06 Supporting Training Across the ERA 25:13 From Development to Testing 29:05 Reflections

    Collaboration - RM Framework Series (11): The Quality Label

  6. Oct 5

    #245 Culture & Creativity NCPs

    Inside Creative Europe – Helping Culture & Media Access EU Funding With Nicoline Joy Haas and Lone Friboe Garde from Creative Europe Desk Denmark Check out the episode website for more information Want you own podcast? Reach out For episode #245, I travelled to the Danish Film Institute in Copenhagen, where Nicoline Joy Haas and Lone Friboe Garde joined me for an in-person recording inside one of the Institute’s cinemas. Together, they introduce the two main corners they work with: Nicoline covers the Culture strand, spanning areas such as music, literature, performing arts, architecture, museums and cultural heritage, while Lone works with the MEDIA strand, covering the audiovisual industries including film, TV series and video games. #245 Culture and Creativity NCP… #245 Culture and Creativity NCP… But the main focus is their work as a Creative Europe Desk. We look at how they help applicants identify relevant opportunities, qualify project ideas, understand calls, review applications, find international partners and navigate the particular language of EU funding. We also discuss what makes a strong Creative Europe proposal—including meaningful international collaboration, international potential, realistic project structures and strategies for reaching audiences. Time codes: 00:00 En route and Arrival 05:26 Creative Europe Desk Denmark 13:52 Introducing Creative Europe 26:07 Supporting Danish Applicants 48:43 Developing a Strong Application 01:0010: Advice, reflections and the toughest challenge

  7. Oct 1

    Collaboration - AAU's Missioner: #2 Hvordan måler man effekten af missionsdreven forskning?

    Tidligere på året udsendte The Grant i samarbejde med Aalborg Universitets Missionssekretariat en podcastepisode som introducerede forskere og forskningsteams til missions-tilgangen. Nu er det blevet tid til en samtale om hvordan man effektmåler i den missionsdrevne forskningstilgang, når flere forskellige forskningsdiscipliner og samfundsaktører er involveret. I episoden taler jeg med Maria Abel Nissen og Jacob Brix fra Aalborg Universitet om, hvad der gør effektmåling i missionsdrevet forskning anderledes end i et traditionelt forskningsprojekt. Samtalen tager udgangspunkt i, at en mission ikke kan vurderes alene på resultaterne fra de enkelte projekter. Effekten opstår i samspillet mellem projekter, forskningsmiljøer og de aktører uden for universitetet, som skal være med til at omsætte ny viden til konkrete forandringer. Vi ser blandt andet på forskellen mellem teknologisk modenhed og samfundets evne til faktisk at optage og anvende nye løsninger. Her kommer begreber som Technology Readiness Level (TRL), Societal Readiness Level (SRL) og implementeringskraft i spil. Derefter går vi tættere på arbejdet med et impact framework: Hvordan kan man skabe en ramme, der forbinder missionens overordnede samfundsmål med porteføljer, projekter, aktiviteter, adfærdsændringer og den effekt, man i sidste ende ønsker at skabe? Endelig diskuterer vi arbejdet med tippepunkter – de steder i en forandringsproces, hvor man begynder at kunne se, at noget reelt har flyttet sig – og hvad hele denne tilgang betyder for forskerne selv. For hvis effektmåling skal have værdi i en missionsdrevet tilgang, skal den ikke alene fungere som dokumentation og rapportering. Den skal også kunne bruges som et redskab til læring, prioritering og til at forstå, hvordan den enkelte forskningsindsats bidrager til en større samfundsmæssig forandring. Tidskoder: 02:22 Gæsteintroduktion 05:52 Åbning: Hvorfor er det her spørgsmål vigtigt? 13:58 Hvad er særligt ved missionsdreven forskning? 24:02 Fra teknologi til samfund: TRL, SRL og implementeringskraft 30:59 Impact framework: Hvordan bygger man en ramme for at forstå effekt? 40:12 Tippepunkter: Hvornår kan vi se, at noget har flyttet sig? 51:05 Hvad betyder det for forskerne? 01:04:50 Afslutning: Hvad er næste skridt?

    Collaboration - AAU's Missioner: #2 Hvordan måler man effekten af missionsdreven forskning?

  8. Sep 28

    #244 Adjusting the Course - The Implementation Series (17)

    Adjusting the Course – When EU Projects Don’t Go to Plan Implementation Series #17 with Antonietta Pizza from ENCO ConsultingSee how you can collaborate with The Grant Check out the episode website Nothing goes exactly according to plan in a multi-year EU project. Activities are delayed, technical results differ from expectations, one work package becomes dependent on another, partners go quiet, or assumptions made during proposal writing simply turn out not to hold. In episode #17 of the Implementation Series, I’m joined by Antonietta Pizza, Head of EU Projects Unit at ENCO Consulting, to look at how coordinators should respond when this happens. We discuss the difference between ordinary turbulence and a structural problem, why bilateral conversations with partners matter, how to keep the consortium aligned and why the project officer should hear about emerging problems early rather than receive surprises later. We then move into adjusting the project itself: tasks, resources, budgets, formal amendments, documentation and the knock-on effects across the rest of the project. Antonietta also explains why a technically disappointing result does not necessarily mean that the work has no value—and why negotiations around money and budget reallocation can be the toughest challenge of all. Time codes: 02:11 Guest introduction and fly in 05:56 Recognising That the Plan Is No Longer Working 19:02 Leading the Consortium Through Uncertainty 28:47 Adjusting the Project Without Losing the Project 45:04 When Failure Creates Better Results 53:57 Reflections and Advice 56:53 The toughest challenge

    #244 Adjusting the Course - The Implementation Series (17)
See All (273)

About

Getting EU funding for your research project idea is great, but the process from project idea to submission of the full proposal is rough and tough. 20.000 proposals are submitted every year and every single one of these preparations goes through many challenges. Most of these challenges have the same overall characteristics, that can be minimized or eliminated by being aware of them already when starting the proposal process. This podcast is for proposals preparers looking for tips, tricks, advice or just an audible pad on the shoulder to deal with the unavoidable tough work

Information

  • Creator
    Niels Tudor-Vinther
  • Years Active
    2022 - 2026
  • Episodes
    273
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © Niels Tudor-Vinther
  • Show Website
    The Grant

You Might Also Like