NatRevMD

NatRevMD

Medical billing tips for healthcare professionals — by healthcare professionals.  This podcast is here to help private practices get paid what they’ve earned. We share real-world strategies for accurate coding, smoother billing workflows, and fewer denials — all from a team that’s been in your shoes. Whether you’re just getting started or trying to tighten up your revenue cycle, you’ll get practical advice you can actually use. Join the conversation in our Facebook Group: NatRevMDLearn more at www.natrevmd.com

  1. 1d ago

    #183 How Multi-Location Practices Lose Revenue Between Sites, Part 2

    Part 2 of our multi-location revenue series. If you haven't listened to Part 1 (EP182) yet, start there — the systems in this episode build directly on what we covered last week.  EP182: Click here Today we cover the two structural problems that let the Part 1 gaps stay open: front-end data inconsistency across sites, and the one role that either holds a multi-site practice together or lets it fall apart.  System 3 — The EHR and Billing Disconnect:  Different front desks develop different habits. One site verifies eligibility morning-of. The other verifies the day before. One collects copay at check-in. The other sends a statement after. A practice doing $120,000/month at Location B with a 20% authorization miss rate sends $24,000/month into billing with incomplete data. Some claims get caught in scrubbing. Some get denied. Some sit in a gray zone no one can explain at month-end review.  Front-End Gap Reference:  Authorization not captured → Denial or recoupment post-payment Insurance not updated at visit → Claim sent to wrong payer Copay not collected at check-in → Patient AR that rarely converts Eligibility verified day-of only → Coverage lapses missed pre-visit System 4 — The Office Manager Problem at Scale:  Location A has a strong office manager who has been there since the beginning. Location B has whoever was available when the site opened. The metrics look similar on paper. The difference shows up in the denial rate, days in AR, authorization miss rate, and the number of times the billing manager has to fix something that should have been caught at the front desk. A $90,000/month site with an underperforming office manager loses an estimated $8,000 to $15,000/month in avoidable billing delays. That is $180,000/year from one seat filled with the wrong person.  Three actions this week:  Audit front-end protocol consistency — pull authorization miss rate and eligibility verification rate by site Run a site-level office manager assessment — KPIs only, not by feel Schedule weekly site-level KPI reviews — separate meetings, not consolidated Episode breakdown:  00:00 Series callback: the gap the report will not show you  02:00 The thread left open in Part 1  04:30 System 3: The EHR and Billing Disconnect Across Sites  08:00 The $24,000/month authorization miss scenario  11:30 Who owns the front-end protocol fix  14:00 System 4: The Office Manager Problem at Scale  18:30 The $180,000/year gap from one wrong seat  22:00 Who owns the accountability structure  24:30 Three actions this week  28:00 Free resource + next episode tease  Resources Mentioned  Payment Posting Audit Checklist (free):  eligibility.natrevmd.com/payment-posting-checklist  Practice Revenue Leak Scorecard (free):  eligibility.natrevmd.com/nrm-revenue-scorecard-v3  Book a free 30-minute audit call:  calendly.com/heather-natrevmd  RECOVER Diagnostic Quiz:  natrevmd.com/quiz  EP182 — Part 1 of this series:  Link here

    14 min
  2. 5d ago

    #182 How Multi-Location Practices Lose Revenue Between Sites, Part 1

    You opened a second location because the first one was working. What no one told you: the moment you added that second site, you added a second set of revenue gaps. And most of them are invisible on a consolidated report. In Part 1, we cover the two most expensive gaps inside multi-location practices doing over $300,000 a month. Neither generates a single denial. They just show up as missing revenue no one can explain. System 1 — The Credentialing Gap: A provider sees patients at a new site before credentialing is finalized. The claims go out. The payer rejects them, or pays provisionally and recoups months later. One provider, 60 uncredentialed days, 15 patients per day at $180 per visit: $162,000 in claims at risk. The front desk who scheduled those patients had no idea. System 2 — The Shared Billing Problem: One billing team covers both locations. Denials get triaged by volume, not by site. The smaller location falls behind. Its AR days climb past 40, then 50. Six months of recoverable claims cross the timely filing window. A secondary site at $90,000/month with a 12% denial rate instead of the target 5% loses $6,300/month in unworked denials. Over a year: $75,600. That is the gap the report will not show you on a consolidated view. Three actions this week: Build your credentialing matrix (one row per provider, one column per location, effective dates visible) Pull a site-specific AR report — not consolidated, by site Set a site-level denial threshold and define what triggers an immediate review meeting Episode breakdown: 00:00 The revenue gap no consolidated report will show you 02:00 Why multi-location growth is a systems problem 04:30 System 1: The Credentialing Gap 09:00 The $162,000 scenario 12:00 Who owns the credentialing matrix 14:30 System 2: The Shared Billing Problem 18:00 The $75,600/year site-level loss 21:00 Who owns the site-specific AR report 23:30 Three actions this week 27:00 Free resource + Part 2 preview Credentialing Scenario Reference: 1 provider | 60 days | 15 pts/day | $180/visit = $162,000 at risk 2 providers | 30 days | 12 pts/day | $200/visit = $144,000 at risk 1 provider | 90 days | 10 pts/day | $150/visit = $135,000 at risk Resources Mentioned: Payment Posting Audit Checklist (free): eligibility.natrevmd.com/payment-posting-checklist Practice Revenue Leak Scorecard (free): eligibility.natrevmd.com/nrm-revenue-scorecard-v3 Book a free 30-minute audit call: calendly.com/heather-natrevmd RECOVER Diagnostic Quiz: natrevmd.com/quiz

    12 min
  3. May 26

    #181 4 Types of Leverage That Let Your Practice Make Money Without You

    If you stepped away from your practice for 30 days, what would happen to your revenue?  If the honest answer is "it would fall apart" — you don't have a scalable practice. You have a high-paying job with employees.  In this episode, Dr. Heather Signorelli breaks down the four forms of leverage that separate practices that grow on their own from the ones that only move when you show up.  The Leverage Framework:  Form 1 — Capital Leverage: why it's the highest-risk, lowest-compounding form Form 2 — Labor Leverage: why 10x headcount creates 10x management complexity Form 3 — Code/AI Leverage: what $15K–$25K/month in avoidable billing losses actually looks like Form 4 — Media Leverage: the one asset that compounds while you sleep The Lion Sprint Framework: why sprinting beats grinding — and what your three sprints are this week Episode breakdown:  00:00 Opening question: what happens if you step away?  02:30 Leveraged vs. un-leveraged — the real 2026 divide  05:00 Form 1: Capital Leverage  08:00 Form 2: Labor Leverage  11:00 Form 3: Code/AI Leverage  14:30 Form 4: Media Leverage  18:00 The Lion Sprint Framework  20:30 Sprint 1: Policy Sprint (Media Leverage)  22:30 Sprint 2: Chart Closure Sprint (Code + Labor Leverage)  24:30 Sprint 3: Eligibility Training Sprint (Labor + Media Leverage)  27:00 Free resource + payer rule change tease Resources Mentioned  Payment Posting Audit Checklist (free):  eligibility.natrevmd.com/payment-posting-checklist  Practice Revenue Leak Scorecard (free):  eligibility.natrevmd.com/nrm-revenue-scorecard-v3  Book a free 30-minute audit call:  calendly.com/heather-natrevmd  RECOVER Diagnostic Quiz:  natrevmd.com/quiz

    26 min
5
out of 5
25 Ratings

About

Medical billing tips for healthcare professionals — by healthcare professionals.  This podcast is here to help private practices get paid what they’ve earned. We share real-world strategies for accurate coding, smoother billing workflows, and fewer denials — all from a team that’s been in your shoes. Whether you’re just getting started or trying to tighten up your revenue cycle, you’ll get practical advice you can actually use. Join the conversation in our Facebook Group: NatRevMDLearn more at www.natrevmd.com

You Might Also Like