The True Crime Tapes

Bobby Capucci
  • 4.5 (6)
  • News Commentary
  • Updated Daily

The True Crime Tapes pulls you into the shadowy depths of the criminal underworld, where the line between justice and chaos is razor-thin. Each episode dissects the minds of history’s most infamous serial killers, unravels the inner workings of organized crime syndicates, and investigates baffling missing person cases that still haunt the public’s imagination. From the bloody reign of ruthless mob bosses to the chilling patterns of elusive predators, True Crime Time delivers gripping, deeply researched storytelling that leaves no stone unturned. With a relentless pursuit of truth, True Crime Time goes beyond the headlines, diving into the psychology, motives, and investigations behind the world’s most shocking crimes. You’ll hear firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and rare archival material that shed new light on cases both well-known and obscure. Whether it’s the brutality of cartel wars, the sinister precision of serial murderers, or the eerie last-known moments of vanished souls, this podcast brings you face-to-face with the darker side of human. Every week, True Crime Time takes you on a journey through the twisted corridors of crime, guided by immersive storytelling and chilling attention to detail. Expect heart-pounding narratives, intricate conspiracy threads, and unsettling truths that will leave you questioning everything you thought you knew. If you crave the rush of uncovering the darkest mysteries, brace yourself—because in this world, the truth is often stranger, and far more terrifying, than fiction.

  1. 1h ago

    Ghislaine Maxwell’s 2002 Citizenship and the Federal Law Governing Denaturalization (Part 3) (10/7/26)

    Ghislaine Maxwell’s American citizenship could potentially be challenged under federal denaturalization law, not simply because she was later convicted of serious crimes, but because some of the conduct underlying those convictions occurred before she became a U.S. citizen in 2002. Under 8 U.S.C. §1451, citizenship can be revoked if it was illegally procured or obtained through concealment of a material fact or willful misrepresentation. Maxwell’s naturalization paperwork reportedly included negative answers to questions asking whether she had ever committed a crime for which she had not been arrested and whether she had procured anyone for prostitution. Her later federal conviction included conduct dating to 1997, years before she naturalized. That creates a concrete legal question: whether she knowingly concealed disqualifying conduct and whether truthful disclosure would have affected her eligibility for citizenship or triggered an investigation that would have exposed it. The theory is strengthened by recent and historical denaturalization cases in which the Justice Department stripped or sought to strip citizenship from people whose serious pre-naturalization crimes were discovered or adjudicated years later. Courts have revoked citizenship where applicants concealed sexual abuse, child exploitation, fraud, and other serious misconduct that predated naturalization. Maxwell’s case would still require DOJ to prove materiality, willfulness, and legal ineligibility under the standards set by the Supreme Court, and denaturalization would not be automatic. But because she retained British and French citizenship, losing U.S. citizenship would not leave her stateless, and it could eventually expose her to removal proceedings after she completes her federal sentence. The core question is therefore not whether Maxwell deserves to lose citizenship, but whether she was legally entitled to receive it in the first place. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

  2. 3h ago

    Ghislaine Maxwell’s 2002 Citizenship and the Federal Law Governing Denaturalization (Part 2) (10/7/26)

    Ghislaine Maxwell’s American citizenship could potentially be challenged under federal denaturalization law, not simply because she was later convicted of serious crimes, but because some of the conduct underlying those convictions occurred before she became a U.S. citizen in 2002. Under 8 U.S.C. §1451, citizenship can be revoked if it was illegally procured or obtained through concealment of a material fact or willful misrepresentation. Maxwell’s naturalization paperwork reportedly included negative answers to questions asking whether she had ever committed a crime for which she had not been arrested and whether she had procured anyone for prostitution. Her later federal conviction included conduct dating to 1997, years before she naturalized. That creates a concrete legal question: whether she knowingly concealed disqualifying conduct and whether truthful disclosure would have affected her eligibility for citizenship or triggered an investigation that would have exposed it. The theory is strengthened by recent and historical denaturalization cases in which the Justice Department stripped or sought to strip citizenship from people whose serious pre-naturalization crimes were discovered or adjudicated years later. Courts have revoked citizenship where applicants concealed sexual abuse, child exploitation, fraud, and other serious misconduct that predated naturalization. Maxwell’s case would still require DOJ to prove materiality, willfulness, and legal ineligibility under the standards set by the Supreme Court, and denaturalization would not be automatic. But because she retained British and French citizenship, losing U.S. citizenship would not leave her stateless, and it could eventually expose her to removal proceedings after she completes her federal sentence. The core question is therefore not whether Maxwell deserves to lose citizenship, but whether she was legally entitled to receive it in the first place. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

  3. 5h ago

    Ghislaine Maxwell’s 2002 Citizenship and the Federal Law Governing Denaturalization (Part 1) (10/7/26)

    Ghislaine Maxwell’s American citizenship could potentially be challenged under federal denaturalization law, not simply because she was later convicted of serious crimes, but because some of the conduct underlying those convictions occurred before she became a U.S. citizen in 2002. Under 8 U.S.C. §1451, citizenship can be revoked if it was illegally procured or obtained through concealment of a material fact or willful misrepresentation. Maxwell’s naturalization paperwork reportedly included negative answers to questions asking whether she had ever committed a crime for which she had not been arrested and whether she had procured anyone for prostitution. Her later federal conviction included conduct dating to 1997, years before she naturalized. That creates a concrete legal question: whether she knowingly concealed disqualifying conduct and whether truthful disclosure would have affected her eligibility for citizenship or triggered an investigation that would have exposed it. The theory is strengthened by recent and historical denaturalization cases in which the Justice Department stripped or sought to strip citizenship from people whose serious pre-naturalization crimes were discovered or adjudicated years later. Courts have revoked citizenship where applicants concealed sexual abuse, child exploitation, fraud, and other serious misconduct that predated naturalization. Maxwell’s case would still require DOJ to prove materiality, willfulness, and legal ineligibility under the standards set by the Supreme Court, and denaturalization would not be automatic. But because she retained British and French citizenship, losing U.S. citizenship would not leave her stateless, and it could eventually expose her to removal proceedings after she completes her federal sentence. The core question is therefore not whether Maxwell deserves to lose citizenship, but whether she was legally entitled to receive it in the first place. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

  4. 7h ago

    Mega Edition: Madison Mogen And The DNA Under Her Finger Nails (10/7/26)

    DNA recovered from Madison “Maddie” Mogen’s fingernails became a significant issue in the Bryan Kohberger case because testing of the clippings from her left hand produced a mixture containing DNA from at least three people. Mogen was the major contributor, and the analysis strongly supported Kaylee Goncalves as another contributor, but the mixture also contained male DNA from an unidentified contributor. Initial testing by the Idaho State Police laboratory could neither include nor exclude Kohberger from that complicated mixture, an important distinction from saying his DNA was actually identified beneath Mogen’s nails. The evidence from her right hand was different: those fingernail clippings produced a single-source female profile matching Mogen herself. The left-hand mixture therefore became particularly important because it potentially preserved biological material transferred during or before the killings, while also presenting the difficult problem of determining when and how the additional DNA reached her fingernails. Kohberger’s defense subsequently sent the left-hand DNA data for additional analysis using TrueAllele, probabilistic genotyping software designed to separate complicated mixtures. According to defense expert-disclosure materials filed with the court, that additional testing conclusively excluded Kohberger as a contributor, while the male contributor remained unidentified. That finding fueled a pretrial fight over how prosecutors would be allowed to characterize the original Idaho State Police result, because the defense argued that telling jurors the result involving Kohberger was merely “inconclusive” could wrongly suggest that his DNA might have been beneath Mogen’s fingernails when the later analysis excluded him. The evidence did not by itself establish that the unidentified male DNA belonged to the killer; DNA can be transferred through ordinary contact and investigators would still need to establish its source, timing and significance. But from an evidentiary standpoint, the striking fact was that investigators recovered an unidentified male DNA contribution from Mogen’s left fingernails while subsequent defense testing reported that contribution was not Bryan Kohberger. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

  5. 9h ago

    Mega Edition: The State Of Idaho Once Again Responds To The Kohberger Autism Motions (10/7/26)

    The State argued that Bryan Kohberger should not have been allowed to use his autism diagnosis as a broad explanation for his behavior during the guilt phase because Idaho law sharply limited the use of mental-condition evidence. Prosecutors relied on Idaho Code § 18-207, which provides that a mental condition is not itself a defense to criminal conduct and permits expert testimony only when it bears directly on a state-of-mind element the State must prove. Kohberger’s own expert disclosures said the autism testimony was not being offered as a traditional mens rea defense, but instead to explain his demeanor, social behavior and other characteristics the defense feared jurors might interpret negatively. The State responded that this put the evidence outside the statutory exception: if Kohberger was not claiming autism prevented him from forming the required criminal intent, then the diagnosis did not tend to prove or disprove an element of the murders. Prosecutors also said they did not intend to introduce evidence characterizing Kohberger as socially odd or use his courtroom behavior as proof of guilt, weakening the defense’s argument that autism evidence was needed to rebut such impressions. The State also argued that Kohberger’s demeanor while sitting at counsel table was not evidence in the first place, particularly if he chose not to testify, so expert testimony explaining that demeanor would invite jurors to focus on something they legally were not supposed to consider. Judge Steven Hippler largely agreed with that reasoning, finding that allowing experts to explain Kohberger’s flat affect, intense eye contact, awkward posture or limited emotional responses could confuse the issues, encourage jurors to scrutinize his behavior even more closely and potentially generate sympathy unrelated to the actual evidence. The judge noted that he had observed Kohberger through numerous lengthy hearings and had not seen the kind of extraordinary or alarming courtroom behavior that required expert explanation. The court therefore ruled that autism evidence offered merely to explain Kohberger’s courtroom demeanor was inadmissible if he did not testify, while leaving open the possibility that some neuropsychological evidence could become relevant if the State opened the door to it or if Kohberger testified and his demeanor became relevant to his credibility. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

  6. 11h ago

    Mega Edition: The Murder Of Suzanne Morphew (10/6/26)

    Suzanne Morphew was a 49-year-old mother of two from Colorado who disappeared from her home near Salida on May 10, 2020, Mother’s Day. She had originally been from Indiana and was married to Barry Morphew, but investigators later uncovered evidence that the marriage had deteriorated and that Suzanne had been considering divorce. Her disappearance triggered an enormous search after she was reported missing when she failed to return messages and plans with family members. Her bicycle was eventually found away from the home, and investigators increasingly focused on Barry, alleging that he killed Suzanne on May 9 and attempted to make her disappearance look like the result of an abduction or bicycle ride gone wrong. Barry denied killing his wife and maintained that someone else could have abducted her. He was arrested and charged with first-degree murder in 2021, but prosecutors dismissed the case without prejudice in April 2022 after serious discovery problems led a judge to restrict key prosecution witnesses, leaving authorities free to bring charges again if additional evidence emerged. The case changed dramatically in September 2023, when Suzanne’s remains were discovered in a shallow grave near Moffat, Colorado, more than 40 miles from her home. An autopsy subsequently classified her death as a homicide, and investigators found chemicals associated with the wildlife tranquilizer mixture known as BAM in her remains; Barry had experience using tranquilizers while raising deer, and investigators had previously recovered tranquilizer equipment during searches connected to the case. In June 2025, a Colorado grand jury indicted Barry Morphew again for first-degree murder, putting the case back on track for trial. He has continued to maintain his innocence and dispute the prosecution’s theory. As of October 2026, Barry is again in custody after his bond was increased to $10 million following an August 2026 incident, and his murder trial is currently expected in the summer of 2027. Suzanne’s disappearance therefore evolved from one of Colorado’s most closely watched missing-person cases into a homicide prosecution that, more than six years later, is still moving toward a final courtroom reckoning.

  7. 13h ago

    The Murder Of Zoey Felix

    Five-year-old Zoey Felix was murdered in Topeka, Kansas, on October 2, 2023, after she was left alone with Mickel Cherry, a family acquaintance who had been living with Zoey, her father and her sister in a homeless encampment near a Dillons gas station. Prosecutors said Cherry raped Zoey inside a tent and then suffocated her with a pillow. Around 5:55 p.m., Zoey was found unresponsive near the gas station where her father was working, and emergency crews were unable to save her. Medical personnel documented severe injuries consistent with sexual assault, and later testing found biological evidence linking Cherry to the attack. Cherry initially gave investigators false stories about what had happened, but he eventually admitted responsibility. In December 2024, he pleaded guilty to first-degree murder committed during a felony and rape of a child under 14. The case also became a major scandal over the warning signs that preceded Zoey’s death. Neighbors, police, teachers and child-welfare officials had repeatedly raised concerns about neglect, domestic instability, a lack of utilities and Zoey’s living conditions, and Kansas authorities had investigated the family multiple times before she was killed. Despite those interventions, Zoey ultimately wound up living in the encampment where the murder occurred. In July 2025, Cherry was sentenced to two consecutive life sentences and must serve at least 50 years before becoming eligible for parole. The murder prompted intense scrutiny of the Kansas Department for Children and Families and renewed questions about how a five-year-old who had already generated so many welfare concerns remained in such an unstable and dangerous environment.

  8. 15h ago

    Bill Chemirmir Gets His Ticket Punched By His Cellmate

    Billy Chemirmir was killed by his cellmate on September 19, 2023, while serving two life sentences without parole at the Coffield Unit in East Texas. Chemirmir had been convicted of murdering two elderly women and had been indicted in 22 capital murder cases tied to a broader series of deaths involving older women in the Dallas area. According to the Texas Office of Inspector General, Chemirmir’s cellmate, Wyatt Busby, attacked him inside the prison and stabbed and beat him to death with an edged instrument. Busby was himself serving a 50-year sentence for a 2016 murder. Chemirmir was found mortally wounded during a period when the Texas prison system was already under unusual scrutiny because of a rise in inmate violence and a statewide lockdown. Early accounts of the killing suggested the attack may have followed a confrontation between the two men, with Dallas County District Attorney John Creuzot saying he had been told Chemirmir made sexually inappropriate comments about Busby’s children before Busby attacked him. Creuzot said Chemirmir was allegedly dragged from the cell into a common area and assaulted while other inmates watched without intervening, although those details came from preliminary information and were separate from the formal inspector general findings. The official custodial-death report ultimately described Chemirmir as having been stabbed and beaten to death. His death brought an abrupt end to the possibility of additional prosecutions connected to the many women authorities believed he had killed, leaving some victims’ families with a complicated reaction: relief that he could never hurt anyone again, but frustration that numerous cases would never be fully adjudicated in court. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

See All (1K)

Ratings & Reviews

4.5
out of 5
6 Ratings

About

The True Crime Tapes pulls you into the shadowy depths of the criminal underworld, where the line between justice and chaos is razor-thin. Each episode dissects the minds of history’s most infamous serial killers, unravels the inner workings of organized crime syndicates, and investigates baffling missing person cases that still haunt the public’s imagination. From the bloody reign of ruthless mob bosses to the chilling patterns of elusive predators, True Crime Time delivers gripping, deeply researched storytelling that leaves no stone unturned. With a relentless pursuit of truth, True Crime Time goes beyond the headlines, diving into the psychology, motives, and investigations behind the world’s most shocking crimes. You’ll hear firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and rare archival material that shed new light on cases both well-known and obscure. Whether it’s the brutality of cartel wars, the sinister precision of serial murderers, or the eerie last-known moments of vanished souls, this podcast brings you face-to-face with the darker side of human. Every week, True Crime Time takes you on a journey through the twisted corridors of crime, guided by immersive storytelling and chilling attention to detail. Expect heart-pounding narratives, intricate conspiracy threads, and unsettling truths that will leave you questioning everything you thought you knew. If you crave the rush of uncovering the darkest mysteries, brace yourself—because in this world, the truth is often stranger, and far more terrifying, than fiction.

Information

  • Creator
    Bobby Capucci
  • Years Active
    2022 - 2026
  • Episodes
    1K
  • Rating
    Explicit
  • Copyright
    © Copyright Bobby Capucci
  • Show Website
    The True Crime Tapes