TRUE CRIME TODAY +PLUS

LISTEN AD-FREE to ALL of our True Crime Podcasts!

$5.99/mo or $39.99/yr after trial

Hidden Killers Live! Daily True Crime News & Breakdowns

True Crime Today
  • 4.0 (96)
  • TRUE CRIME
  • UPDATED DAILY

Hidden Killers Live! is your daily true crime podcast delivering two hours of nonstop coverage every weekday. Hosted by Tony Brueski & Robin Dreeke this show dives into the most compelling stories in the true crime world — from murder trials and cold cases to criminal psychology, investigations, and the dark motives behind real-life crimes. Each episode brings a mix of breaking crime news, courtroom analysis, and raw conversation that takes you beyond the headlines. Whether it’s exploring how investigators crack cases, uncovering the psychology of killers, or following the twists of ongoing trials, you’ll get sharp, unfiltered insight every time. Unlike recap shows, Hidden Killers Live! is true crime talk in real time — asking the tough questions, cutting through the noise, and giving listeners the context they need to understand today’s biggest cases. If you crave smart, binge-worthy true crime content with expert commentary, emotional depth, and daily updates that keep you ahead of the story, this is the podcast for you. Follow now on Apple Podcasts and join Tony Brueski & Robin Dreeke inside Hidden Killers Live! — where the truth is always in the details.

  1. HOW TO LISTEN to PREMIUM PLUS AD-FREE, ADVANCE Episodes!

    JAN 22

    HOW TO LISTEN to PREMIUM PLUS AD-FREE, ADVANCE Episodes!

    How to Get Ad-Free, Advance Content from True Crime Today and Hidden Killers Podcasts Do you want to enjoy all the content from True Crime Today and Hidden Killers podcasts without ads and before everyone else? Here’s exactly how to do it: Subscribe to True Crime Today PREMIUM PLUS on Apple Podcasts. Choose either a monthly or yearly subscription. Make sure you select True Crime Today PREMIUM PLUS—this is the channel that gives you all the ad-free and advance content. Important: If you’re hearing ads, it means you’re not on the right channel. Double-check that you’ve subscribed to True Crime Today Premium Plus. Follow the True Crime Today PREMIUM PLUS channel on Apple Podcasts. This is a separate channel where all the ad-free and early-access episodes are uploaded. Remember: Regular episodes with ads will still be available on the main channels. To get the ad-free and advance episodes, you must subscribe and follow the True Crime Today PREMIUM PLUS channel. If you’re still getting ads, head over to the True Crime Today PREMIUM PLUS channel and ensure you’re subscribed there! Enjoy your exclusive content!

    1 min
  2. What's Hiding In Thousands Of Nancy Guthrie Surveillance Tapes?

    5H AGO

    What's Hiding In Thousands Of Nancy Guthrie Surveillance Tapes?

    There are thousands of hours of video sitting in the Nancy Guthrie case file. Intersection cameras. Doorbells. Home security systems. Private business feeds across the Tucson area. Sheriff Chris Nanos has said it himself — "thousands and thousands" of clips. The question is what's in them. And whether anyone has the capacity to actually find it. Tony Brueski sits down with retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer to dig into what processing that mountain of footage actually involves. Jennifer worked complex multi-agency cases for 28 years at the Bureau. She knows what it takes to build a usable timeline from raw video — the tools, the manpower, the cross-referencing with cellphone data and license plate scans. She also knows the bottlenecks that can lose a case months at a time. Beyond the video, there's the DNA. Unknown contributor sample recovered from inside Nancy's home. Where it came from. Whether it's been uploaded to CODIS yet. What it means if the contributor isn't already in the system. And the controversy over how the DNA was routed through labs — multiple federal and state labs instead of straight to Quantico — and what that decision is doing to the timeline. Jennifer walks Tony through which of these two evidence streams is most likely to actually break the case first. Her answer is more pointed than the official statements have been. She also addresses Sheriff Nanos's repeated insistence that the investigation is "close" — and what kind of behind-the-scenes movement would actually back up that language. For anyone watching this case in real time, this is the kind of analysis that puts the daily updates into actual context. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #NancyGuthrie #SurveillanceFootage #DigitalEvidence #DNAEvidence #FBI #JenniferCoffindaffer #PimaCountySheriff #HiddenKillersLive #TucsonMissing #TrueCrime

    21 min
  3. Did Savannah Guthrie's Family Push Sheriff Nanos Out?

    7H AGO

    Did Savannah Guthrie's Family Push Sheriff Nanos Out?

    The FBI is now the only voice talking to Nancy Guthrie's family. Sheriff Chris Nanos confirmed it himself. The man who was once texting Savannah Guthrie and calling her siblings directly has stepped out of those conversations entirely. Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to ask the question Sheriff Nanos isn't answering: how did this happen? Did the Guthries quietly cut him out? Did the FBI take over because they had to? Did he walk away from the relationship because the pressure on his office got too loud? Each possibility tells a very different story about where the Nancy Guthrie investigation actually stands. Jennifer brings 28 years of FBI experience to this read — SWAT, organized crime, complex multi-agency casework. She knows what a healthy partnership between a sheriff's office and the Bureau looks like, and she knows what it looks like when one side starts boxing the other out. The Nancy Guthrie case has shown all the public signs of friction: contradicting statements, a no-confidence vote, recall efforts, and questions about how key evidence has been handled. Now the family communication itself has changed. That's not a routine adjustment. That's an inflection point. Jennifer also takes on Sheriff Nanos's repeated claim that the investigation is "getting closer." She walks through what kinds of behind-the-scenes movement would actually back up that language — and what it sounds like when an official is performing confidence instead of operating from it. For Nancy's family, who have done everything investigators have asked of them, lost the woman at the center of their lives, and put up a $1 million reward, the change in who picks up the phone matters. Jennifer says exactly how much. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #ChrisNanos #PimaCountySheriff #FBI #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #TucsonMissing #FamilyJustice

    11 min
  4. How Did Alex Murdaugh End Up Being The One Investigating His Own Trial?

    17H AGO

    How Did Alex Murdaugh End Up Being The One Investigating His Own Trial?

    The state prosecutor who handled Becky Hill's criminal case said there wasn't enough evidence to charge her with jury tampering. Four months later, the South Carolina Supreme Court unanimously ruled that's exactly what she did. The state never treated her conduct as the constitutional violation the Supreme Court found it to be. It never followed the evidence wherever it led. So who's investigating? Alex Murdaugh's defense team. Five days after the reversal, they filed a seventeen-page federal civil rights lawsuit against Hill. Section 1983. Six hundred thousand dollars in damages directed to the receivership. Jim Griffin said publicly the money isn't the point — the subpoena power is. Depositions. Sworn testimony. The ability to ask questions under oath that the state never bothered to ask. Eric Faddis explains the mechanics — what Section 1983 requires, why it's unusual to aim it at a court clerk rather than law enforcement, and what civil discovery opens up that the criminal process never provided. He addresses why Griffin went out of his way to distance Murdaugh personally from the damages, and what the discovery process could reveal about whether Hill acted alone. The retrial question sits behind all of it. Murdaugh is 57 and serving 40 years federal — he's never leaving prison regardless. But Maggie was 52 and Paul was 22. They were killed on their own family's property, and the legal record currently says nobody has been convicted of doing it. The guilty verdicts are gone. The life sentences are vacated. A thief's sentence is not a murderer's accountability. The obligation to answer who killed them hasn't disappeared — it's been reset. The Attorney General is reportedly considering the death penalty. Financial crimes victims have said they'll testify again. The question of who killed Maggie and Paul Murdaugh deserves an answer that can't be challenged. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #AlexMurdaugh #BeckyHill #MurdaughRetrial #Section1983 #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #EricFaddis #SCSupremeCourt #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

    30 min
  5. Can Kouri Richins Still Hurt Her Family From Behind Bars?

    20H AGO

    Can Kouri Richins Still Hurt Her Family From Behind Bars?

    Before Kouri Richins was sentenced, a message she wrote from jail ended up in the prosecution's filing. She promised to "expose this county, the prosecution, the judge, the Richins, the investigation." She said, "They picked the wrong one." She said, "They haven't seen anything yet." She allegedly instructed her brother to testify falsely. She's accused of witness intimidation. Her own thirteen-year-old told the court he's afraid she'll come for him. The sentencing judge called her "simply too dangerous to ever be free" and imposed life without parole. The jury needed less than three hours. Her children begged the court to keep her locked away. But none of that means the threat is contained. Eric Faddis spent years as a felony prosecutor and explains exactly what someone serving life without parole can still do from inside — mail, phone calls, proxies, and people on the outside who believe she's innocent and are willing to act. He walks through the legal tools available to protect the Richins family: no-contact orders, protective orders, corrections-level restrictions on communication — and what gaps remain even when all of them are in place. On the appellate side, Kouri's defense asked the judge for extra time to file for a new trial and said they need to retain an expert. Faddis examines every available lane — the alleged prosecutorial listening of attorney-client jail calls, the Crozier recantation, the venue challenge, and the sufficiency argument — and identifies which have genuine legal weight. The attorney-client monitoring issue is the most viable. The others face steep odds against a jury that convicted in under three hours after the defense called zero witnesses. When Kouri told her sons "we're going to make this right," the question isn't whether she means it. She means it. The question is whether the system can stop her from doing damage while she tries. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #KouriRichins #EricRichins #LifeWithoutParole #WitnessIntimidation #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ParkCityUtah #KouriRichinsAppeal #JusticeForEric

    43 min
  6. How Does The FBI Read Nick Reiner's Behavior Behind Bars?

    23H AGO

    How Does The FBI Read Nick Reiner's Behavior Behind Bars?

    Retired FBI behavioral analysis chief Robin Dreeke has studied people who present one face to the world and allegedly operate from an entirely different place underneath. The behavioral picture emerging from inside Twin Towers Correctional Facility is the kind of contradiction his career was built to decode. Nick Reiner is reportedly described as almost childlike in custody — delusional, allegedly unable to process why he's incarcerated, reportedly screaming innocence at night. Simultaneously, he's reportedly planning a revenge tell-all designed to humiliate his surviving siblings and expose what he calls family secrets. Those two realities existing in the same person at the same time tells Dreeke something specific about what's allegedly driving the behavior — and whether the reported tell-all is strategy, symptom, or someone else's influence. The behavioral context is significant. Nick's schizoaffective disorder diagnosis is documented. A reported medication change occurred approximately a month before the alleged killings. Multiple sources describe a deterioration in the period leading up to the night Rob and Michele Reiner were allegedly killed in their own home. Jake and Romy have reportedly cut contact. The defense attorney quit. Jake Reiner broke his silence with a Substack essay about his parents — who they were, what they gave, what was stolen. He wrote about trading every milestone ahead for one more hour with them. That essay and Nick's reported tell-all exist in the same family, and the gap between them is the emotional center of this case. Dreeke examines the listener questions driving the conversation: can an insanity defense work under these circumstances, what does a medication change mean in the context of alleged violence, and the hardest question of all — what happens when a family does literally everything and still allegedly loses everything? The question of who's behind the reported tell-all remains open. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #ReinerCase #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #BrentwoodMurders #BehavioralAnalysis #JakeReiner

    43 min
  7. What Do D4VD's Alleged Grooming Patterns Reveal To The FBI?

    1D AGO

    What Do D4VD's Alleged Grooming Patterns Reveal To The FBI?

    Retired FBI counterintelligence behavioral analysis chief Robin Dreeke has spent decades studying how people allegedly manipulate, isolate, and control. The alleged patterns prosecutors describe in the D4VD case are the kind he's trained to decode — and the behavioral questions extend far beyond the defendant. According to prosecutors, Celeste Rivas Hernandez was fourteen when she was allegedly killed because she threatened to tell the truth about a relationship that reportedly began when she was thirteen. Dreeke examines the alleged grooming architecture: the financial manipulation, the alleged thousand-dollar payment to a classmate to reportedly get Celeste a new phone after her parents took hers, the alleged international travel where she reportedly met Burke's family and allegedly got matching tattoos, and the deliberate isolation that allegedly severed her from every protective adult in her life. He draws comparisons to behavioral patterns he's studied in other federal cases. The bystander dimension is equally significant. Three separate grand juries heard testimony from people in Burke's orbit. His manager was reportedly overheard telling an attorney that reporting to police was not his responsibility. Friends reportedly accepted a story that the fourteen-year-old was a college student — despite what prosecutors describe as obvious signs to the contrary. Someone in Burke's Discord server reportedly posted about the missing girl months after she disappeared. Nobody reportedly acted. Burke's parents and brother were subpoenaed. Court records indicate his mother reportedly managed his business finances. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines the mechanisms that allegedly allow networks of people to reportedly fail to intervene — the professional loyalty, the financial dependence, the willful blindness that reportedly enables alleged harm to continue in plain sight. The alleged disposal evidence prosecutors describe raises additional questions about whether someone else was allegedly involved and reportedly backed out. Burke has pleaded not guilty and maintains his innocence. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidAnthonyBurke #JusticeForCeleste #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #ShavaunScott #FBI #BehavioralAnalysis

    46 min
  8. Why Did Both Sides Want The Kepner Trial Delayed?

    1D AGO

    Why Did Both Sides Want The Kepner Trial Delayed?

    The defense asked for the delay. The prosecution didn't object. That alignment is the detail worth examining in the Anna Kepner case — because both sides agreeing to slow down a trial eighteen days before jury selection tells you something about where the case actually stands. This defense team moved at unprecedented speed for a federal case carrying two life sentences. Waived the transfer hearing. Requested adult prosecution for a sixteen-year-old defendant. Pushed for a June 1 trial date with barely three and a half months of preparation. There were clear strategic reasons — a jury over a single judge, pretrial freedom preserved, and forcing the government to try the case as it existed rather than building a stronger one over time. Then Document 74 appeared. Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial. The defense cited voluminous discovery, lead counsel's conflicting federal trial schedule, and family obligations. The prosecution's silence — no objection — raises its own question. A government that wanted to maintain pressure would have fought the continuance. Instead they agreed to September 8. The behavioral read on the reversal: something in the discovery production changed the defense's assessment of what they were walking into. The speed-first strategy assumed the government's case was beatable as-is. The continuance suggests the evidence files contained something that required more time to address — whether that's volume, complexity, or substance. The unresolved proceedings between now and September matter enormously. The autopsy remains sealed. The detention question is still open — the defendant is on GPS monitoring, not in custody, and the government wants that changed. Pretrial motions haven't been heard. Federal evidentiary rules could filter out much of what the public believes it knows about this case. Anna Kepner was eighteen when she was found dead aboard the Carnival Horizon in November 2025. Her stepbrother Timothy Hudson faces two federal felony counts as an adult. Anna's father has publicly expressed concern about the defendant's release conditions. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #AnnaKepner #CarnivalHorizon #TimothyHudson #FederalTrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForAnna #CruiseShipCase #FederalDiscovery #MiamiFederalCourt

    40 min
See All (898)

Shows with Subscription Benefits

TRUE CRIME TODAY +PLUS

LISTEN AD-FREE to ALL of our True Crime Podcasts!

$5.99/mo or $39.99/yr after trial

View Subscription FAQs

4
out of 5
96 Ratings

About

Hidden Killers Live! is your daily true crime podcast delivering two hours of nonstop coverage every weekday. Hosted by Tony Brueski & Robin Dreeke this show dives into the most compelling stories in the true crime world — from murder trials and cold cases to criminal psychology, investigations, and the dark motives behind real-life crimes. Each episode brings a mix of breaking crime news, courtroom analysis, and raw conversation that takes you beyond the headlines. Whether it’s exploring how investigators crack cases, uncovering the psychology of killers, or following the twists of ongoing trials, you’ll get sharp, unfiltered insight every time. Unlike recap shows, Hidden Killers Live! is true crime talk in real time — asking the tough questions, cutting through the noise, and giving listeners the context they need to understand today’s biggest cases. If you crave smart, binge-worthy true crime content with expert commentary, emotional depth, and daily updates that keep you ahead of the story, this is the podcast for you. Follow now on Apple Podcasts and join Tony Brueski & Robin Dreeke inside Hidden Killers Live! — where the truth is always in the details.

Information

More From True Crime Today

You Might Also Like