Founder Brand with Finn Thormeier

Finn Thormeier

Best-in-class playbooks to build your Founder Brand on LinkedIn. www.founderbrand.org

  1. 5h ago

    Owner.com’s Youtube & Founder Brand Playbook

    David Fallarme is the VP Marketing at Owner.com (Series D, valued at $2.3B), an AI platform for restaurant owners. Before Owner.com, he ran marketing for Asia at HubSpot. Owner.com built one of the most prominent founder brands and Youtube channels in B2B. They invested $1m into brand when they were still doing only $10m in ARR (now doing over $100m), resulting in 27M impressions last year, with organic generating 20% of pipeline every month. In this episode, we talk about their approach to Youtube and leveraging the founder brand early. --- We discuss: * How to crush Youtube as a B2B company * The #1 mistake B2B companies make when they try to leverage Youtube * First order irrational, second order rational: why Owner.com invests so much into brand * How and why Owner.com CEO Adam Guild spent 10 hours every Saturday to produce videos * Variables to success and comparing 2 videos: same title and thumbnail, one with 100k views, the other with 3.4k views (30x less) * Brand strategy into topics into script flow * The 5 stages of building an organic motion from scratch * Why a great Youtube editor is worth 10-100x a good one (they pay $120-150k to people straight out of college) * David’s advice for founders who want to build their founder brand --- Show Notes: --- Connect with David Fallarme: David Fallarme's LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dfallarme/ Owner.com: https://www.owner.com/ --- Connect with Finn: Finn's LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/finnthormeier/ Founder Brand & LinkedIn Advisory: https://thormeier.co/ --- Mentioned in the episode: Owner.com’s Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@owner-com/ Ahrefs’ Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@AhrefsCom Owner.com Founder Adam Guild: https://www.linkedin.com/in/adamharrisonguild/ In-N-Out video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbx8EG9I0tY Five Guys video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQnNJF79psk NotebookLM: https://notebooklm.google/ --- Get full access to The Founder Brand at www.founderbrand.org/subscribe

    Owner.com’s Youtube & Founder Brand Playbook
  2. Sep 29

    How to be weirder on Linkedin (and why you should be)

    Jillian Richardson is a Linkedin ghostwriter and runs “Make LinkedIn Weird”. Before degenerating into Linkedin work (I’m allowed to say this because I do Linkedin work), she did standup comedy and 6 years of improv training, which is where she gets her inspiration from. In this episode, we talk about why you should be weirder on Linkedin, how to find your flavor of weird, whether you can say the word F**K on Linkedin, and more. This one’s for you if you feel like your writing is too boring or you’re not able to get your full personality on paper. --- We discuss: * Why “Linkedin is the fakest place on earth” is the best news for anyone willing to be weird * The benefits of allowing yourself to be weirder * How to find your flavor of weird * Jillian’s envy-disgust matrix * The three-pass editing routine (this one was eye-opening to me!!) * Can you say f**k on Linkedin? Should you? * How to become funnier --- This post is sponsored by Thormeier.co Thormeier.co is my LinkedIn & Founder Brand advisory where I’ve worked with 30+ SaaS and AI founders grow faster on LinkedIn, build a stronger founder brand, and drive more pipeline from it. If you want to understand how I work with founders, book a call here. --- Show Notes: Connect with Jillian: Jillian’s LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/thatjillian/ Make LinkedIn Weird: https://www.makelinkedinweird.com/ Jillian’s website: https://www.thatjillian.com/ Connect with Finn: Finn’s LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/finnthormeier/ Thormeier.co - Founder Brand & LinkedIn Advisory: https://thormeier.co/ Mentioned in the episode: Upright Citizens Brigade Comedy Improvisation Manual: https://ucbcomedy.com/product/upright-citizens-brigade-comedy-improvisation-manual/ The Artist’s Way by Julia Cameron: https://juliacameronlive.com/register/the-artists-way/ The Writing Life by Annie Dillard: https://www.anniedillard.com/books-annie-dillard.html Kait LeDonne: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kaitledonne-personalbrandingexpert/ Matt Barker: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mattjbarker1/ Jasmin Alić: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alicjasmin/ --- Full Transcript: Finn Thormeier: All right, my guest today is Jillian Richardson. She is a ghostwriter for solopreneurs and executives, and she helps people be weirdo on LinkedIn, which I love. I think much needed. The platform can use it. Her message resonated with me. I found you like a couple weeks ago on LinkedIn for the first time, stumbled upon my feed. So I wanted to have her on to learn from her and maybe get a free consultation for all of us here. So Jillian, thank you for joining the pod. Jillian Richardson: Thank you so much for having me. Finn Thormeier: Cool. Let’s maybe start with making the case for why people should be weird on LinkedIn. Jillian Richardson: Okay, so I’m someone, I go to a lot of dinner parties, a lot of places where I meet new people, and I say, you know, I’m a ghostwriter for LinkedIn, and the faces... It’s very telling of, I think, what LinkedIn’s brand is in the world. Like people are like, oh, LinkedIn, like LinkedIn is horrible. It’s so fake. It’s everyone just talking about how accomplished they are and their career milestones. And it’s just the fakest place on earth. Finn Thormeier: LinkedIn invented slop before AI slop were the thing. Jillian Richardson: Yes. Like even before AI, it was slop. Why would you ever want to write content for that platform? And so then I get to say to them, well, imagine if you didn’t fit into that mold, how happy people would be to see your content because the bar on LinkedIn is not very high and there’s so much room for creativity and humor and personal stories. And it’s pretty easy to make yourself stand out if you actually have a point of view and you have a little bit of fun with it. So that’s my case for it. Everyone knows LinkedIn doesn’t have the best reputation. And so if you can make it a little bit fun for people who are slogging through LinkedIn, trying to get a job, make a business contact, whatever, they will love you and they will remember you. Finn Thormeier: Is it fair to say that being weirder on LinkedIn is the same thing as showing your personality? Jillian Richardson: Yeah, I would say so. I think being weird, showing your personality, I say because I teach a class on this, it doesn’t mean you have to be posting memes every day or only telling jokes. I think everyone has their own brand of what I call weird, but it’s really just your personality. And so it might be sharing takes in your industry that a lot of people disagree with, sharing stuff about your personal life that you’re comfortable sharing, sharing hard moments in your business. But for whatever reason, the framing of weird seems to help people think about things in a new way. Yeah. Finn Thormeier: And I mean, I would say it comes at a time where it’s most needed for the platform because there is so much AI. I think LinkedIn just won the award of the platform that has the most AI slop Jillian Richardson: on it. Wait, what do you mean? I didn’t hear this. Finn Thormeier: Yeah, I think someone published, I think it was some major publication that did an analysis and it was like 43% of all of LinkedIn posts was categorized as AI slop. However, that was being categorized and it was the highest compared to X and Instagram and Substack and all the other platforms. But I think having a personality, showing your personality, being willing to show up the way that you are, maybe not fully, but more so, has always worked. But now, given that there’s so much AI-generated content, which I think, one, means there’s just a lot more content and a lot of the content just looks and sounds the same, just because everyone basically has the same ghostwriter now. Jillian Richardson: Yep. Finn Thormeier: I guess that’s why it’s even more needed right now versus, I don’t know, two or three years ago. Jillian Richardson: A hundred percent. And the thing on AI, I don’t know if you saw that there’s now a new button on LinkedIn. It sounds like AI slop, which is fascinating that LinkedIn decided to add that to the platform. Like three weeks ago, they had an AI rewrite feature, but, uh, If people are going to use some sort of ghostwriting tool, now that there’s that button, you have even more of a reason to work with a human ghostwriter. Finn Thormeier: It’s almost like signaling to everyone, but just having one weird sentence in there that’s like, this is really me. I actually wrote this. Jillian Richardson: Yes. A person wrote this. Finn Thormeier: Now, um, you also, I think on your website, you list kind of some benefits of being weirder. Jillian Richardson: Yeah. Finn Thormeier: What are some of the benefits of showing up weirder? Jillian Richardson: So honestly, the biggest one I would say is that the more fun you have with your writing, the more you are likely to actually show up because so many people ha it’s kind of like with exercise. If you do a form of exercise that you super, super, super hate. You’re going to be less likely to go to the gym than, you know, if you sign up for a Zumba class and you’re like, oh, I love Zumba and I have all my friends there and it’s my favorite part of the week. So if you can actually see it as a creative writing exercise, a way to get to know yourself, a way to get to know the world, then you’ll show up and you’ll do it more. And consistency is what builds a social media presence. Finn Thormeier: Okay. And I guess it’s, I mean, that’s one of the benefits, consistency. I mean, the other benefit I feel like is, and again, feel free to talk to other ones, but if this is actually you, you just have stronger bonds with people, with your audience, right? Because it’s... Jillian Richardson: I totally agree with that. Because there’s this bizarre thing on LinkedIn where... People will hire a ghostwriter and then they’ll get some sort of AI commenting tool that’s like commenting and also in their DMs. And then I’ve heard this from a lot of people I work with. They have this bizarre experience of feeling like they know a person and then they get on Zoom and they’re like, wait, this person doesn’t seem at all like the person I was interacting with. Was I even interacting with the person at all? And a lot of the times it turns out that they literally weren’t. And what a terrible way to interact with your customer, that their first impression of you is, actually, I don’t know you at all. Finn Thormeier: Yeah. Well, it can also, I mean, it goes both ways. I think oftentimes people will realize if you don’t allow yourself to show that weird or Weird side of you or that personality of yourself that on the call they’ll be like, you’re actually more interesting than I thought. Yes. Jillian Richardson: That’s a great point as well. That’s a good flip side of, oh, actually I enjoyed talking to you more than I thought I would. Finn Thormeier: Yeah. No broetry. You don’t speak in one line sentences. Jillian Richardson: Yeah. Yeah. Finn Thormeier: Okay. I want to show, do you have a favorite example of a weird person? Post or being weird on LinkedIn. I’m going to share my screen here. I’ll just show one here. So like one example, let me make this big. Do you just see my LinkedIn now? Jillian Richardson: Yes, I can see it. This is my like pièce de résistance. Finn Thormeier: Exactly. Yeah. So this is kind of, it’s a good example of a weird post because it’s also your post where you make the case that people should be weird. This is the post how I found you. It started with, I am on my knees begging, be weird on LinkedIn, 10% weird, 100% weird if you had a good breakfast. It’s already clear that this post has personality. This is a hook that no one would use on LinkedIn. It’s a very bold choice to start a sentence like that and no one sees that on LinkedIn. Then

    How to be weirder on Linkedin (and why you should be)
  3. Sep 22

    The future of the CMO role w/ Zapier's CMO & Chief AI Transformation Officer

    Dan Slagen is the CMO & Chief AI Transformation Officer (CAITO) at Zapier. He joined just over a year ago as SVP Marketing, and recently got promoted to own the company-wide AI transformation mandate. Before Zapier, he was CMO at Tomorrow.io, where he helped grow the company from $2M ARR to a $1B+ valuation, CMO & Chief Culture Officer at ThriveHive, and Head of Global Advertising at HubSpot. In this episode, we talk about the future of the CMO role, why the CMO should (?) own the company-wide AI mandate, his “red alert” for Zapier’s marketing team, strategies to speed up your team’s AI adoption, and much more. --- We discuss: * Why Dan took on Zapier’s company-wide AI transformation mandate as the CMO * Dan’s case for fewer CMOs * The “red alert” he called on Zapier’s marketing team * The first step to making your company (and marketing org) more AI-native * Zapier’s internal AI policy * LLM jail, automation debt, and why only 24% of GTM workflows need AI * Why AI is causing “generation loss” & what it has to do with your approval processes * What every CMO behind on AI should do this weekend ---- Show Notes: Connect with Dan Slagen: Dan Slagen’s LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dan-slagen-718675a/ Dan Slagen’s website: https://www.danslagen.com/ Zapier: https://zapier.com/ Connect with Finn: Finn’s LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/finnthormeier/ Thormeier.co - Founder Brand & LinkedIn Advisory: https://thormeier.co/ Mentioned in the episode: ZapConnect (Zapier’s annual conference): https://zapier.com/zapconnect Dan Slagen’s “LLM jail” & “Automation Debt” post: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dan-slagen-718675a_our-team-keeps-hearing-the-same-two-words-activity-7490753511693930499-8NRJ Zapier’s AI Workflow Index (Q2 2026): https://zapier.com/ai/workflow-index/q2-2026-report Tomorrow.io: https://www.tomorrow.io/ Tom Wentworth (CMO at incident.io) episode: https://www.founderbrand.org/p/the-most-ai-pilled-cmo-in-tech-shares Don Jeter (CMO at Torq) episode: https://www.founderbrand.org/p/how-to-radically-stand-out-w-don Torq: https://torq.io/ Paul Roetzer’s SmarterX: https://smarterx.ai/ MAICON: https://www.maicon.ai/ Clay’s AI writing policy: https://www.clay.com/blog/ai-writing-policy Claude Code: https://claude.com/product/claude-code Cursor: https://cursor.com/ Codex: https://openai.com/codex/ Midjourney: https://www.midjourney.com/ HeyGen: https://www.heygen.com/ --- Full Transcript: Finn Thormeier: All right. My guest today is Dan Slagen. He is the Chief Marketing and Chief AI Transformation Officer at Zapier. Zapier, I’m sure given my audience, everyone will know it’s an automation platform, or as they say, it’s the most connected AI orchestration platform. Dan joined Zapier a little Over a year ago as SVP of Marketing and recently was promoted to CMO and CAITO, Chief AI Transformation Officer, which is a very interesting combination and we’ll discuss that. Before joining Zapier, Dan was CMO at Tomorrow.io, where he helped grow the company from $2 million in ARR to $1 billion plus valuation in five years. CMO at ThriveHive, where he led the team through a $1.3 billion acquisition. CMO at Alignable, Head of Global Advertising at HubSpot and many other roles including founder of a video tech company for a year and he was also named one of Forbes top 50 entrepreneurial CMOs of 2024. Dan thank you for joining and anything to correct or amend there in the intro? Dan Slagen: No, appreciate it. Very, very kind words, but happy to be here. Finn Thormeier: Cool. What’s the story behind the new title and is it disconnected or is there a reason why the company-wide AI transformation chief officer title was given to the CMO? Dan Slagen: Good question. So I joined Zapier about a year ago and it’s a, you know, 13, 14 year old company, a lot of history. And so, you know, first and foremost, I think they want to make sure that someone coming in at this level is not going to stick around for a little while and leave. They want to make sure that someone who’s going to be really invested in the company and all that. And so it’s funny, you know, any Any executive marketing role these days, I feel like it’s a one-year trial, essentially. It’s a test. I’m going to see if I like the company, if I like working for the CEO with the exec team, and they’re going to do the exact same thing back to me. And so as we were nearing the one-year mark, Wade and I... Got together, Wade’s the CEO, co-founder of Zapier, and we sort of had the conversation of is this a one-year deal or do we want to try and sign a multi-year contract? What do we want to do? And we both felt like the relationship was going well and this had been a fruitful experiment so far and it felt like something we both wanted to invest in moving forward. And so as we did that, We also sort of talked about how else could the role expand and what else could you do outside of marketing. And so I’ve been extremely fortunate in the past to work for some smaller startups that went through hyper growth where you own everything. You know, I can remember roles where I owned marketing and sales and CS, BD, like everything, just building those systems from the ground up. Certainly not at the scale that Zapier is at, but I had some good familiarity. The one common factor with all of that was growth and pushing the limits on the technology that we’re using. And so with AI, you mentioned my last company, it was a really, really small marketing team. With a very small budget. And so when AI came out, that was an aha moment for me of being this thing that we can finally compete with the biggest companies in the world. The playing field is finally level. I can do all these things I haven’t even been able to do. I wasn’t so excited about AI at first because it made the things I was doing better. I would tell you because I could literally do things that I couldn’t do before. I just told my CEO, can’t do that, can’t do that, can’t do that unless we, you know, get headcount or budget. So I’ve stayed really close to that. And I’ve also stayed really, really close to the culture. In another previous role, you mentioned ThriveHive, I was the chief culture officer as well as the CMO there. So I started to learn a lot about that. And at my last company, the culture team and I partnered so closely together. So I’ve had all this experience that was sort of building towards something I didn’t quite know what it was. And it fruitfully ended up being this dual role of marketing and AI transformation at Zapier. Finn Thormeier: Do you think marketers are somehow better suited for that type of role or was it just really this unique mix that you personally had that will not apply to other marketers as related to their peer leaders? Dan Slagen: That’s an excellent question. I truly believe that someone sitting in The head of marketing role is in the best position in the company to lead it. However, A lot of the personas that I see within marketing either have not had the experience that I just went through or do not have the mindset to be able to do it. They’re too focused on one thing. They know how to tell a really, really good brand story, but they have no idea how to think about pipeline and demand generation or the inverse of that. And it is hard to find someone that truly can spike across all three areas. Happy to dig more into that. I think if you can find the person with the right background, someone sitting in the marketing and growth department is an incredibly dangerous persona that can help the business immensely. Finn Thormeier: Not to go on too much of a tangent, but you said At Tomorrow.io, you had a very small team. I think I saw you gave a presentation where you had four people reporting into you and that when AI happened, you felt like you could finally do these things that you hadn’t been able to do because of lack of headcount. Are there any specific ones that you can mention here where, again, things that you wanted to do but really couldn’t and now finally you were able to do? Dan Slagen: Sure. One example that I like to tell is, you know, when I was at the company, we got included in an RFP from a major entertainment brand. They own theme parks around the world. They have lots of movies. You can probably guess who I’m talking about. And the RFP was really, really last minute. And we had a week or two to get something to them. And we knew there were 10 other companies all pitching. And we were added late. And they’re like, what are we going to do to stand out? What we ended up doing was we created this video using AI where we went to all of the movies that the entertainment company had created and we saw where all of the characters were impacted by weather. And we’d be like, what if they had had access to our technology? They would know when to leave the dock. They would know when to go fly. They would know when to go outside. They wouldn’t be at risk. Literally use the exact scenes from the movies and the characters and all that. And when we showed it to them, the response was literally, we love how much you just love our brand. You stood out so much compared to everyone else. We’re going to move you guys to the next round. We haven’t even looked at your technology yet. We’ll worry about that in the next round. But just they’re one of those companies that they want to see that people love their brand and get involved in their brand. And so, you know, that’s something that, again, I wouldn’t have even proposed that prior. And, you know, we did this when, you know, Midjourney was really getting good. The video creator was starting to get good. We were using things like HeyGen AI to do all of our product marketing videos. So we were getting good at that really, really quickly. And so, again, it was sort of a new thing we could even offer the sales tea

    The future of the CMO role w/ Zapier's CMO & Chief AI Transformation Officer
  4. Sep 17

    Why Claude Code won't kill Clay w/ The Kiln’s Patrick Spychalski

    Patrick Spychalski is the co-founder of The Kiln, a leading GTM engineering agency and one of only six Clay Elite Studios, their highest partnership tier. They recently got acquired by 2X. Before The Kiln, Patrick helped Clay stand up its early social, events and partnership motions, back when Clay had just invented the term “GTM engineer”. In this episode, we talk about the state of GTM engineering 3 years in, whether Claude Code is eating Clay’s lunch, when a startup should hire its first GTM engineer, and more. --- We discuss: * Clay vs Claude Code * Patrick’s top Clay / Claude workflows and agents: what he would keep if he had to delete everything else * The newest tools Patrick is currently experimenting with * When to hire your first GTM engineer and what makes a good one * Into whom should GTM engineering should report into? * Why Patrick sold The Kiln to 2X --- Show Notes: Connect with Patrick: Patrick Spychalski’s LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrickspychalski/ The Kiln: https://thekiln.com/ 2X: https://2x.com/ Connect with Finn: Finn’s LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/finnthormeier/ Thormeier.co - Founder Brand & LinkedIn advisory: https://thormeier.co/ Mentioned in the episode: Clay: https://www.clay.com/ Claude Code: https://claude.com/product/claude-code n8n: https://n8n.io/ Modal: https://modal.com/ Eric Nowoslawski (Growth Engine X): https://coldoutbound.com/ Deepline: https://deepline.com/ BlitzAPI: https://www.blitz-api.ai/ Tom Wentworth (incident.io) episode: https://www.founderbrand.org/p/the-most-ai-pilled-cmo-in-tech-shares --- Full Transcript: Finn Thormeier: All right. My guest today is Patrick Spychalski. He is the co-founder of The Kiln. The Kiln is one of the leading GTM engineering agencies and clay partners. They recently got acquired by 2X. He also previously helped clay stand up their early social events and partnership motions. I wanted to have him on because I don’t think there’s many people who are deeper in the whole Thank you for coming on the podcast. Patrick Spychalski: I appreciate you having me. Glad to be here. Finn Thormeier: How would you describe the, I mean, you’ve been there since basically the, let’s say the dawn of GTM engineering when kind of Clay coined that term, which I guess has been like three-ish years, something like that. How would you describe the state of GTM engineering as of July, 2026? Patrick Spychalski: Yeah. Yeah, I think it’s at an interesting stage right now where it’s evolved to the point where many people, I’d say even a majority in some spaces of people in marketing and sales have heard about it. They know what a GTM engineer is. It’s becoming a lot more in the vogue, a lot more prominent. Even a year ago, I would say it wasn’t a super popular job role. And now most companies, especially tech companies, are prioritizing it as kind of a core role to hire for. It’s also in an interesting state where the tool stack, I think, is shifting a little bit. Clay initially came up with the term GTM engineering. That was kind of their invention. And I’d still say they’re really core to the work that GTM engineers do. But for a while, I would say that it was really one of the only tools that people were using for a GTM engineer, at least the primary one. It’s now evolving to the point where the Claude Codes of the world, obviously N8N has come out probably into the vogue maybe a year ago or so. It’s getting to the point where the tool stack’s changing pretty significantly. And also, it’s starting to come out with sub-niches of the role where initially, let’s say the broad GTM engineer role is what everybody’s looking to hire for, but now they’re realizing that GTM engineers mean something different for every company. There’s different priorities associated with every business. Sometimes I talk to a company and their main priority is outbound, so they need a GTM engineer who’s got a lot of experience with outbound tooling and the tool stack connected to it. Really want more of like a data engineer, like someone who can go into a data warehouse and sequence all the information to something like Salesforce and create these bi-directional syncs. And so I think they’re coming to realize that, you know, different GTM engineers have different skill sets and need to be hired accordingly. So yeah, it’s at a very interesting stage right now. Finn Thormeier: How would you describe what’s the leading edge of GTM engineering right now? I mean, I feel like three years ago, just having a clay account and having any workflow in there, that’s like the leading edge. Where are we now? Patrick Spychalski: Yeah, so I would say like all of the most talented cutting edge UTM engineers I know are building a lot of really interesting infrastructure within Cloud Code. So I think a lot of the really talented ones that I’ve worked with have realized that, you know, you can recreate a lot of the workflows you would build in no code tools in tools like Cloud Code and save yourself a lot of money depending on what the workflow is. But they also realize that these things should not be completely agentic. So for example, if you have an enrichment workflow, the whole thing shouldn’t just be an agent going and finding information and putting it in a document. It’s a big waste of money. You’re using a ton of tokens to do that, and it’ll end up costing you actually more than a tool like Clay would. Clay, I think, is a really good combination of the agentic and the deterministic. So they have to actually rebuild the scaffolding that kind of supports a tool like Clay as well. I would say GTM engineers at a lot of startups I know are starting to try to create their own workflow interfaces and agents. This is a lot more difficult for enterprise companies because of security and compliance reasons. It’s pretty complicated to spin up your own agent and then connect it to Salesforce without there being any problems. But for companies, especially in the Seed and Series A range, I’ve seen a lot of GTMes create their own workflow scaffolding and cloud code and almost become their own host for the workflows that they’re building. Finn Thormeier: What does switching or replicating things that maybe previously you did in Clay instead in Cloud Code, what does that unlock except maybe some cost benefits? Patrick Spychalski: I would say the majority of it is cost benefit. There’s a little bit of added positives. I’d say one thing Clay isn’t very good at so far, and I’m sure they’ll improve this, is the relativity component. Let’s say you source Yeah. You can think when you’re using Excel or Google Sheets, you can reference another cell in a table. Clay can’t really reference another cell. So it’s really tough to do that relativity. And that surfaces in a lot of workflows. So things like that, I think, are nice to build yourself or build in something. So there is some unlocked benefit, but for the most part, I think it’s just that place changed their pricing recently. It’s a lot more enterprise forward. They’re really trying to target these bigger companies. And for people who are at Series A or C companies with pretty tight budgets, they were having a lot of trouble justifying the cost, especially to probably the founders or co-founders or CEOs. And so it’s just easier to build it, something like Cloud Code. And again, we’re not really seeing that shift on enterprise. I think enterprise companies will stick with Clay for quite a while, just due to the security constraints and the fact that it’s like a real tool you can procure. Finn Thormeier: I mean, what is your take on Cloud Code eating Clay’s lunch? Patrick Spychalski: I think it’s a lot more complicated a problem than people say it is. I see all these posts being like, Cloud Code is going to completely destroy Clay. Clay is dead. Clay is dead. And I really just don’t agree with that. I think Clay has built a really good platform for, and I kind of mentioned this a second ago, but combining the agentic and deterministic aspects of enrichment to create a really cost-effective platform, even with them up They still create a pretty cheap way to run enrichment, build workflows, and safely connect them to platforms. And I really think the safety part is important to hammer on because, like, if you create a Claude agent that connects to your Salesforce, there’s really no guarantee it doesn’t just, like, destroy all the data, wipe it out, not use a sandbox. There’s a million things that can go wrong. Clay really is, One of the safer ways to update your CRM or send messages through a sequencing tool or update a data warehouse because you’re able to visualize all of the outputs before sending it over. You’re not letting an agent just run crazy. It’s just a direct integration with data inputs and outputs. Yeah, I don’t see any large businesses moving over to strictly cloud code anytime soon. I still think Clay is probably their go-to, but I can totally see the justification for startups. One other thing I’ll add quickly is that I think there are some use cases There are cases that are great to be replaced with Cloud Code, and then there’s others that aren’t. So a great example of one that I’ve seen a lot of people effectively replace with Cloud Code is enrichment of lead lists. And so if you have a list of 1,000 contacts that you’re planning to reach out You just want to find their LinkedIn and their email and their phone number. You can just plug that list into Cloud Code, use a tool like an API like DeepLine or something or Blitz API and just run the whole thing and enrich the whole list and send outreach. And I’m seeing that being done really well. People like Eric Nowoslowski, who runs a really successful outbound agency, has essentially just built this huge Incredible automated system that does all of

    Why Claude Code won't kill Clay w/ The Kiln’s Patrick Spychalski
  5. Sep 10

    My personal coaching session with Jonathan Courtney of AJ&Smart

    This episode is a bit different. A little over a year ago, I listened to a podcast between Jonathan and Jason Fried, the co-founder of Basecamp/37signals. I had known Jonathan for a while, and I’m a big fan of Jason Fried, but the episode was very different — it was almost like a therapy session. Jonathan had reached out to Jason for some general business and life advice, and instead of keeping it private, he decided to publish it. At the time, I got a ton of value out of it. So in almost a “déjà vu” moment, I’m doing something similar here, but with the roles reversed: Jonathan giving the advice, instead of asking it. We recorded this a couple weeks ago when I was trying to figure out where to take Project 33. Given that Jonathan had built a large agency but then also pivoted into other, more scalable offers (he’s the CEO of AJ&Smart and facilitator.com), he felt like the perfect person to ask for advice. And if you’ve seen any of my recent stuff on LinkedIn, you might’ve seen that I pivoted the podcast and launched my advisory firm thormeier.co A good chunk of that was kicked off and inspired by this conversation. --- We discuss: * Why I’m the one getting coached this time * Four ways to get a dream out of your system and “the tiniest announceable version” * The agency/offer ladder: from DIY (do it yourself), to DWY (done with you), to DFY (done for you) * 25% close rate: anything higher means you’re too cheap * “If you have to sit down and do 10 hours of work to be successful, then you’re just doing stupid s**t” * How to make a 500-listener podcast worth $100k --- Show Notes: Connect with Jonathan Jonathan’s Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonathan-courtney-4510644b/ AJ&Smart: https://ajsmart.com/ Facilitator.com: https://facilitator.com/ The Unscheduled CEO podcast: https://www.unscheduledceo.com/ --- Connect with Finn: Finn’s LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/finnthormeier/ Thormeier.co - Founder Brand & LinkedIn advisory: https://thormeier.co/ --- Mentioned in the episode: Nat Eliason’s essay on de-atomization: https://www.nateliason.com/blog/de-atomization-is-the-secret-to-happiness Built to Sell by John Warrillow: https://builttosell.com/ Sprint by Jake Knapp: https://www.character.vc/sprint Skool: https://www.skool.com/ --- Get full access to The Founder Brand at www.founderbrand.org/subscribe

    My personal coaching session with Jonathan Courtney of AJ&Smart
  6. Sep 3

    How to build & monetize a newsletter w/ Growth Unhinged’s Kyle Poyar

    Kyle Poyar is the founder and writer of the wildly popular Growth Unhinged, a newsletter with over 85,000 subscribers about pricing, monetization and GTM. He also has over 110,000 followers on Linkedin. He started the newsletter in March 2021 as a side project and went all-in about a year ago. Since then, his one-person business is doing over 7-figures a year, between brand partnerships, subscriber revenue, and advisory work. In this episode, we talk about how to build & monetize a newsletter, including how Kyle tests every newsletter idea before writing it, why Kyle’s pulling away from Linkedin, leaving Substack for beehiiv, and more. --- We discuss: * How Kyle started & grew his newsletter from zero to over 85,000 subscribers in 5 years while having a full-time job * How Kyle validates newsletter ideas before writing them up * How he creates his graphics, which are a large part of his success/shareability * Why Kyle is pulling away from Linkedin even though he has 110,000 followers * The math behind running a 7-figure/year solo creator business * Why he left Substack for beehiiv after 5 years on Substack * Why subscribers you get from the recommendation feature are mostly “garbage” --- Show Notes: Connect with Kyle: Kyle’s Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kyle-poyar/ Growth Unhinged: https://www.growthunhinged.com/ Mostly Growth podcast: https://www.growthunhinged.com/podcast --- Connect with Finn: Finn’s LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/finnthormeier/ Thormeier.co - Founder Brand & LinkedIn Advisory: https://thormeier.co/ --- Full Transcript: Finn Thormeier: Alright, my guest today is Kyle Poyar. He is the founder and writer of the Growth Unhinged newsletter where he talks about monetization, pricing, GTM growth and other practical advice for B2B startups. He started it in March 2021 when he was still working full-time at his job and it has since then grown into one of the most popular newsletters in the B2B space with over 85,000 subscribers. He is also a prolific writer on LinkedIn with over 110,000 followers. His background is in Venture Capital where he was an operating partner at OpenView, which invested in companies like Datadog and Calendly, as well as, found this out during research, a company called Project 44. My company is called Project 33, so clearly they have the edge on us. Matter of fact, we’re 25% worse than them. Kyle is also the host of the Mostly Growth podcast and he advises B2B startups on growth and monetization. Kyle, thank you for joining and anything to correct or amend there in the intro? Kyle Poyar: Thanks for having me on. No, I think you got it right, but it’s been interesting that I started the newsletter while working full-time in VC, but it’s grown big enough to kind of support an independent solopreneur business, which is pretty cool. Finn Thormeier: Nine months ago, right? Nine months ago, you went kind of fully on this business? Kyle Poyar: Exactly. So it was August of last year, of 2025, that I made the decision and then really went in earnest in September. Finn Thormeier: There you go. Okay, so you started it in March 2021, and then you were full-time at OpenView. In those five years, it’s about five years, you’ve grown it to 85,000 subs. Before we talk about the lessons, I’m just curious about your writing process. What does it look like? How much time do you spend on each thing? How do you pick topics? Just start where you want, walk me through your process. Kyle Poyar: So the starting process I had is probably the most relevant for anyone that’s thinking about starting a writing practice. I began on LinkedIn actually before I ever had a newsletter — wrote long form content around COVID. Very active on LinkedIn. And I would realize I’d have these pieces. I mean, a lot of my posts would fall flat and have no engagement, but I’d have other pieces that would do quite well, but I would run into character limits, or I’d post something and then it was impossible for someone to find a couple of weeks later. I’d also get DMs from people that were smarter on a topic than I was. And so I was like, I feel really constrained by LinkedIn. And so what I decided is not just that I would throw out LinkedIn for a newsletter, but I would test ideas on LinkedIn. I would see what my audience cared about. I would take that as signal to go write a deeper piece on a topic, or sometimes string together multiple LinkedIn posts to turn it into a piece. And then I’d promote that back on LinkedIn. And so it all became a flywheel where for me, it wasn’t like I’m going to have this brilliant idea and write about it and then post. I think about content as a place where writing and distribution need to be on equal footing, and where the best practices create a flywheel where you’re building for and with a community. And I think that’s what can make a newsletter really stand out. Finn Thormeier: And if I remember correctly, back then when you started on LinkedIn, you were an operating partner. So you were working with the portfolio companies at your VC firm on their go-to-market strategy, pricing. And I think you were kind of talking about lessons, takeaways, insights, things that you were seeing with those portfolio companies. Kyle Poyar: Exactly. Exactly. And so for my content calendar, and even for the LinkedIn content calendar, often it was pretty informal. Finn Thormeier: Did you back then have like a, “I’m going to post every single day” or “I’m going to post twice a week,” or was it just completely ad hoc whenever something popped into your head? Kyle Poyar: Back then it was pretty ad hoc. I mean, some of these people post literally daily, including weekends. I don’t know how you have the stamina to do that. I’ve always been long winded and I just don’t have enough good ideas that I want to go that deep about every single day. My cadence over time has been about two to maybe four times a week — almost never publish more frequently than that, unless something is like really wrong with me. And it’s pretty ad hoc. I like to post multiple days a week. And so if I don’t have any ideas, I might find something from my archives and kind of tweak it or tailor it. But generally it’s not super planned far in advance. I try to keep things fresh. There’s one point in my career when I used a scheduling tool, actually the native post scheduling tool within LinkedIn. And then I realized it was either the content was outdated, or maybe it was LinkedIn penalizes you for scheduling content — I don’t exactly know what it was, but I felt like that was actually having way worse results than publishing fresh insights. I almost always post in the morning. I do find that that’s when I have my best ideas, I’m sharpest, but also that’s when people are most engaged. Sundays work surprisingly well. I think there’s just a lot less competition and you get all the LinkedIn diehards on Sunday, but then your post is the first thing people see on Monday too. So I do find that that works quite well. And I will say one thing that works quite well for me is I think about the visual as much as the text. I spent six years in consulting and so I would make decks — I’ve always thought in terms of slides — but I would translate that to LinkedIn infographic style visuals. And that’s become a bit of a signature, a calling card for me. But those visuals perform far better than text only posts. They’re way easier to share. I think it’s partly to do with, it feels save worthy — like, oh, I should save this and maybe bookmark it for a presentation I’m working on, or I can share this with a friend or colleague. I think it’s also something that drives more dwell time. These are generally not super simple infographics. They’re pretty complicated ones, which means people are actually spending real time reading it. And that means they’re spending more time on LinkedIn, which means LinkedIn can get more ad dollars. And so they’re going to push that harder. And so these dense infographics are the starting point for most of my posts. Finn Thormeier: How much time do you spend on an infographic? Kyle Poyar: 30 minutes, maybe. I actually do them all by hand. I have got a Google Slides template that was made by a great designer when I was at OpenView, and I’ve kept that template and made some tweaks. But it has a couple of fonts in it that are out of the box in Google Slides, a couple of colors, nothing fancy. But I literally will make the visuals myself, which feels weird to be doing point and click in 2026. Some people would say, is that really the best use of your time? But honestly, if you get the visual right, that can make the difference between a post being viral or not. I reuse posts in speaking decks when I go out and do public speaking. I’ll put those visuals in my newsletter articles. A great visual is so valuable that it feels very hard for me to give that up. But yeah, I’m not taking hours and hours on it. Finn Thormeier: Do you start with writing the text and then later you find a graphic that works for it? Or do you start with the graphic and then write? Kyle Poyar: Oh no, the graphic is the starting point. And then I write something to go with it. I think of a hook that I think is useful. And then the graphic is so dense, there’s actually a lot of writing in the graphic itself. And so I often copy and paste from what I wrote for the graphic into LinkedIn. It’s kind of like, I mean, if you go on Instagram, people put captions with their posts, but realistically, you scroll through Instagram for the image or for the video. And I think people do similar things on LinkedIn where the hook has to be strong, but the visual also has to be quite strong. Finn Thormeier: Which visual are you very proud of that we can a little bit use here as an example? Kyle Poyar: You can take the pricing one. That’s the one you’

    How to build & monetize a newsletter w/ Growth Unhinged’s Kyle Poyar
  7. Aug 6

    Fibbler’s Founder Brand + LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads Playbook w/ Adam Holmgren

    Adam Holmgren is the co-founder & CEO of Fibbler, a paid ads attribution tool that connects your Linkedin and Google ad accounts to your CRM and calculates influenced pipeline and revenue. They are bootstrapped, roughly 2.5 years in, and they just hit $1M ARR with a team of two. Before Fibbler, Adam was Head of Demand Gen at Rillion and GetAccept. In this episode, we talk about how Adam batch writes five posts every Sunday night, his three content pillars, the $10-15k/month Linkedin ads engine behind Fibbler’s growth, the 100-like threshold for turning posts into ads, cold vs retargeting frequency, and the pink lion mascot that became one of their best marketing assets. --- We discuss: * How Adam writes five Linkedin posts every Sunday night * The three content pillars behind Fibbler’s growth * Why almost every Adam post is an image post now (and why pure text posts stopped working for him) * His 100-like threshold to decide which organic posts get promoted into Thought Leader ads * Fibbler’s two-layer ad structure * The $100,000 ad-spend post that’s been running as an ad for over a year * Why the founder of an attribution tool ignores attribution for his own advertising * The pink lion mascot * Running B2B ads on Hulu & HBO Max through Linkedin CTV --- Connect with Adam: Adam’s LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/adam-holmgren/ Fibbler: https://fibbler.co/ --- Connect with Finn: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/finnthormeier/ Project 33 - LinkedIn Agency for CEOs: https://www.project33.io/ (do we want to switch this alredy to: Thormeier.co: https://thormeier.co/) Hope you enjoy!! Get full access to The Founder Brand at www.founderbrand.org/subscribe

    Fibbler’s Founder Brand + LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads Playbook w/ Adam Holmgren
  8. Jul 30

    How to market to AI agents

    Kevin White is the Head of Marketing at Scrunch AI, an AI visibility and agent experience platform just acquired by Sitecore. Before Scrunch AI, Kevin was Head of Marketing & GTM Strategy at Common Room, Head of Marketing at Retool, and Head of Growth Marketing at Segment, which was acquired by Twilio. In this episode, we talk about how to market when AI agents are your PRIMARY website visitor, the 8,000-token site Scrunch serves to bots, becoming AI’s default recommendation, how Kevin automated his weekly reporting with Claude Code, and more. --- We discuss: * The average website now gets 60-70% of its’ traffic from bots (source: Cloudflare) - and what that means for you * How to market when your PRIMARY website visitor becomes AI agents * The 8,000-token version of Scrunch’s website they serve to AI agents vs the 300,000-token version they serve to humans * Does the llms.txt file matter? * The next moat is becoming AI’s default recommendation and what to learn from products like Neon & Supabase * Is marketing’s new job writing clean and clear documentation? * Defining “LLM-led growth” --- Connect with Kevin: Kevin’s LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevbosaurus/ Scrunch AI: https://scrunch.com/ Sitecore: https://www.sitecore.com/ --- Connect with Finn: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/finnthormeier/ Project 33 - LinkedIn Agency for CEOs: https://www.project33.io/ --- Mentioned in the episode: Vector: https://vector.co/ Wispr Flow: https://wisprflow.ai/ Granola: https://www.granola.ai/ Claude Code: https://claude.com/claude-code TBPN: https://www.tbpn.com/ Marketing Against the Grain: https://marketingagainstthegrain.com/podcast Lenny’s Podcast: https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/podcast PostHog: https://posthog.com/ Torq: https://torq.io/ Hope you enjoy!! Get full access to The Founder Brand at www.founderbrand.org/subscribe

    How to market to AI agents

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
3 Ratings

About

Best-in-class playbooks to build your Founder Brand on LinkedIn. www.founderbrand.org

You Might Also Like