Dear Jane

Scott Baker & Marcie Little

This podcast brings together pro-life leaders and individuals of all stripes to have meaningful conversations about the issue of life. How do we tackle the massive injustice of abortion while keeping the abortion-minded woman at the forefront of our considerations? How do we hold heartbreak, anger, and compassion close to our hearts to minister to everyone impacted by abortion? How do we work with others with whom we differ ideologically on every other issue except the issue of abortion to promote a culture of life? These are just some of the questions we wrestle with on our Dear Jane podcast. The other side only wants to highlight our differences, but we want to talk with people in the movement about what unites us. Dear Jane focuses on the one thing we can all agree on: the sanctity of every human life. Dear Jane will host the hard conversations, ask the tough questions, and acknowledge our differences while always keeping in mind our shared beliefs. Tune in to listen to heartfelt conversations and learn more about what your place in the pro-life movement may be!

  1. Aug 20

    What’s Changing Gen Z’s Mind on Abortion?

    Gen Z has grown up surrounded by abortion messaging. So why are more young people beginning to question it? And why now? Lydia Taylor Davis, a spokesperson and Social Media Coordinator for Students for Life of America who once identified as pro-choice herself, joins Scott and Marcie to talk about what she is seeing firsthand on college campuses: young men becoming more engaged, young women proving harder to reach, and students reconsidering abortion after encountering arguments they had never heard before. But those conversations come at a cost. Lydia says she wears a bulletproof vest when she speaks on campuses and received threats after Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Students for Life considered canceling its speaking tours. They didn’t. She also discusses what the pro-life movement gets wrong when speaking to women, why graphic abortion imagery can backfire, and why social media may be one of the most important battlegrounds left. All of these facts paint a picture and also raise an important question: what actually changes a person's mind about abortion? Watch the full conversation on Dear Jane. Chapters: 0:44 — Campus Trends on Abortion 2:25 — What’s Changing Gen Z’s Mind? 3:40 — The Gender Divide on Abortion 6:06 — What’s Bringing Men Into the Conversation? 7:11 — “Charlie Was First. We’re Coming for You Next.” 8:44 — Why They Refused to Back Down 10:22 — Who Is Actually Changing Their Mind? 11:53 — How Do You Prepare for the Threats? 13:32 — Is the Pro-Life Argument Really Religious? 15:28 — When Becoming Pro-Life Changes Your Identity 17:59 — What Isn’t Working With Gen Z? 20:11 — Does Victim Imagery Work? 22:06 — How Social Media Shapes Gen Z on Abortion 23:42 — Why We Have to Be Online 24:42 — The Social Media Post That Helped Save a Baby 25:00 — Who Is Gen Z Listening To?

    What’s Changing Gen Z’s Mind on Abortion?
  2. Aug 13

    Are Abortion Restrictions Really Causing Maternal Deaths?

    A waiting period. An ultrasound. A requirement that a physician perform the abortion. A new study grouped measures like these under one category: abortion restrictions and linked states with more restrictions to higher maternal mortality. That sounds alarming. But Dr. Christina Francis, a board-certified OB-GYN and CEO of AAPLOG, raises a basic question: how do these policies actually cause maternal deaths? She joins Scott and Marcie to examine what the headline leaves out. How does requiring an ultrasound increase maternal mortality? Why is giving a woman more time before a major decision treated as a health risk? And why is physician involvement being framed as a restriction? The conversation also turns to abortion-pill complications, including research finding that 83.5% of post-abortion-pill emergency room visits were miscoded as miscarriages and 76% of emergency room visits following the abortion pill were coded as severe. Dr. Francis explains why those findings matter, what could happen as physician-only requirements are removed, and the challenges doctors face when they question the dominant abortion narrative within medicine. Watch the full episode of Dear Jane to get the full conversation. -- 1:15 — When Maternal-Fetal Medicine Chooses a Side 3:27 — Do Abortion Restrictions Cause Maternal Deaths? 5:08 — Is a Waiting Period Really a Health Risk? 6:12 — How Does an Ultrasound Cause Maternal Death? 9:15 — What Actually Causes Maternal Death? 10:19 — 80% of Maternal Deaths Are Preventable 12:49 — When Pregnancy Isn’t the Cause 14:23 — Should Non-Physicians Provide Abortions? 16:20 — The Reality of a D&E Abortion 19:22 — How Safe Is the Abortion Pill? 22:00 — When an Abortion Is Coded as a Miscarriage 23:05 — The Trauma No One Warns Women About 23:50 — What Pro-Life Doctors Risk by Speaking Up 24:45 — 93% of OB-GYNs Don’t Perform Abortions 25:58 — Who Stands With Pro-Life Doctors?

    Are Abortion Restrictions Really Causing Maternal Deaths?
  3. Aug 6

    Is the Abortion Pill in Our Water?

    What begins with the abortion pill does not necessarily end when the abortion is over. Once taken, the abortion drug and biological remnants from the abortion enter a toilet, a sewer system, and eventually a wastewater treatment facility that was never designed to remove every pharmaceutical compound. The chemical is only part of what enters the system. Liberty Counsel Action estimates that 30 to 40 tons of hazardous medical waste, including human remains, are being flushed into American waterways. That makes mifepristone different from the other pharmaceuticals already raising concerns in the water supply. It was developed and FDA-approved to end a life in the womb by blocking progesterone, the hormone needed to sustain a pregnancy. But does that anti-progesterone activity disappear once the drug enters the water system? Issues in Law & Medicine,a study reported anti-progesterone activity in environmental water samples from Austin, Texas; Blacksburg, Virginia; and Carbondale, Illinois. The study does not establish that exposure through drinking water causes infertility, nor does it determine where the anti-progesterone activity originated. But it raises a question that has received remarkably little investigation: what happens after mifepristone enters the water system? They also found that downstream levels were not appreciably lower than upstream levels in any of the three cities. In two, they were higher. The authors concluded that conventional water treatment was not consistently effective at removing the activity they detected.cking progesterone, what happens after it enters the water system?Could environmental exposure be one factor worth investigating when approximately 1 in 6 people of reproductive age worldwide experience infertility during their lifetime?Abigail Forman is a researcher and policy analyst with Liberty Counsel Action and the author of a comprehensive analysis on abortion drugs in America's water supply. She joins Dear Jane to walk through what the abortion industry and federal regulators have largely left unaddressed. Abigail Forman is a researcher and policy analyst with Liberty Counsel Action and the author of a comprehensive analysis on abortion drugs in America's water supply. She joins Dear Jane to walk through the research, explain what she believes the abortion industry and federal regulators have largely left unaddressed, and discuss why these questions deserve closer attention. She also raises a question that stops the conversation cold: if women were required to decide whether to cremate or bury what the abortion pill produces, would more of them think twice? Her argument reaches beyond the pro-life movement. You do not have to be pro-life to care about abortion drugs entering the water supply. And because chemical abortions account for roughly two-thirds of abortions in the United States, Abigail argues that water-contamination regulations could change the abortion landscape almost overnight. the abortion pill now accounts for roughly two0-thirds of abortions in the Uni Visit abortioninourwater.org to learn more about the research and current efforts calling on the EPA to investigate. The comment period closes August 31, 2026. Watch the full episode of Dear Jane.

    Is the Abortion Pill in Our Water?
  4. Jul 30

    Has the Pro-Life Movement Lost Its Focus?

    The pro-life movement is not having one conversation right now. It has several, and they do not always agree with each other. Scott and Marcie discuss the Massachusetts bill that would allow abortion up to birth and the question it raises about messaging: As the movement has shifted its focus toward the mother, has it made a strategic mistake by stepping back from talking about the baby? They discuss fetal pain—what it is, how it shapes the conversation, and why some in the movement have moved away from talking about it. They also examine the California lawsuit in which the state's attorney general is seeking more than $20 million and a permanent gag order against Heartbeat International and Real Options for telling women about Abortion Pill Reversal. Under oath, the state's own expert witness could not say APR is unsafe, could not say it does not work, and could not support the state's claim that the abortion pill is safer than Tylenol. These conversations are shaping the future of the pro-life movement and raising questions it can no longer avoid. Watch the full episode of Dear Jane. -- 0:23 — Abortion Up to Birth 1:49 — Have We Abandoned the Baby? 3:30 — The Fetal Pain Argument 4:16 — The Baby Recoils 5:40 — The Problem With Subjectivism 6:50 — Reorienting Around the Baby 7:54 — What's Your Favorite Type of Abortion? 9:34 — Equal Protection Explained 11:00 — Inside the Movement's Divide 13:14 — Unapologetic About the Goal 14:12 — Is the Movement Making It Worse? 15:00 — Abortion Is Illegal. It's Still Happening. 17:10 — History Doesn't Answer 2026 19:30 — Showing What Abortion Actually Is 20:00 — The California Lawsuit 21:00 — Coercion and the Feminist Silence 21:50 — The Baby Who Almost Wasn't 22:40 — The Witness Who Couldn't Back It Up 23:50 — Population Control on the Stand 24:40 — What If We Just Called It Progesterone? 26:00 — APR Is a Choice 27:00 — Taking Away the Right to Change Your Mind

    Has the Pro-Life Movement Lost Its Focus?
4.6
out of 5
21 Ratings

About

This podcast brings together pro-life leaders and individuals of all stripes to have meaningful conversations about the issue of life. How do we tackle the massive injustice of abortion while keeping the abortion-minded woman at the forefront of our considerations? How do we hold heartbreak, anger, and compassion close to our hearts to minister to everyone impacted by abortion? How do we work with others with whom we differ ideologically on every other issue except the issue of abortion to promote a culture of life? These are just some of the questions we wrestle with on our Dear Jane podcast. The other side only wants to highlight our differences, but we want to talk with people in the movement about what unites us. Dear Jane focuses on the one thing we can all agree on: the sanctity of every human life. Dear Jane will host the hard conversations, ask the tough questions, and acknowledge our differences while always keeping in mind our shared beliefs. Tune in to listen to heartfelt conversations and learn more about what your place in the pro-life movement may be!