Evolved Living Podcast

Dr. Josie Jarvis OT

🎙️ The Evolved Living Podcast with Dr. Josie Jarvis, PP-OTD, MA-OTR/L, BA, BS Hosted by occupational therapist, occupational scientist, and open citizen science advocate Dr. Josie Jarvis, The Evolved Living Podcast explores how we can bridge art, science, and wisdom to co-create more liberatory, ecological, and collaborative systems of care. Each episode invites critical yet compassionate dialogue across disciplines—connecting practitioners, educators, researchers, and community members who are working toward holistic, trauma-informed, and life-affirming change. Together, we translate occupational science into real-world practice and collective wellbeing through honest, inclusive, and transformative conversations. josiejarvisot.substack.com

  1. 5d ago

    CMS Payment Reform: Your Voice Is Needed by September 14

    What happens when the people delivering healthcare actually participate in deciding how that care is valued? Right now, we have an opportunity to do exactly that. CMS is accepting public comments on the CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule proposed rule, and the deadline is September 14, 2026. If you are a U.S.-based occupational therapist, physical therapist, speech-language pathologist, or another rehabilitation or allied health provider, this is a moment to pay attention and participate. Read the CMS CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule proposed rule Submit a public comment through Regulations.gov Search for CMS-1848-P when submitting your comment. Why this matters Payment policy is about much more than reimbursement rates. It influences what healthcare systems prioritize, how services are structured, what work is considered valuable, and what kinds of care are realistically available to patients. For rehabilitation providers, there can be a significant gap between the work that actually produces meaningful outcomes and what can be easily represented through a billing code. Think about what goes into a complex rehabilitation encounter. There is the assessment itself, but also the clinical reasoning behind it. There is communication with caregivers and other providers, environmental analysis, education, risk management, adapting interventions to the individual, coordinating care, and making decisions based on information that may not be captured by a single diagnosis or procedure code. For many of us, these are not extras added onto the work. They are the work. That makes this comment period important. Rather than simply saying that reimbursement is too low, we have an opportunity to explain what current payment structures fail to capture and what that means for patients, providers, and the healthcare system. What is changing? The CY 2027 proposed rule includes changes and requests for input related to how Medicare services are coded and valued, including the Practice Expense methodology and aspects of care management and remote monitoring. These are technical policy issues, but the questions underneath them are surprisingly practical: What does it actually take to provide good care? What resources are required? What kinds of clinical work happen outside the most visible portion of an encounter? How should payment systems recognize complexity, coordination, clinical reasoning, and the resources required to manage patients over time? These are questions rehabilitation providers have direct experience answering. OT Potential’s Sarah Lyon and colleagues have been particularly active in bringing OT and PT perspectives into this conversation. Their proposed recommendations include better differentiation in reimbursement for evaluation complexity and consideration of non-time-based therapist management codes to recognize some of the ongoing clinical work that occurs throughout an episode of care. You do not have to agree with every recommendation to see the value in participating. In fact, this is one of the things I appreciate about the public comment process. It gives us an opportunity to respond to what is actually being proposed, identify what we think is missing, describe unintended consequences, and offer alternatives based on what we see in practice. Start with Sarah Lyon’s episode If you want some context before diving into the policy language, I recommend starting with Sarah Lyon’s recent OT Potential episode on this issue. Listen to the OT Potential episode on YouTube The episode provides a useful overview of the current opportunity and the work underway to bring rehabilitation perspectives into the Medicare payment conversation. OT Potential has also created a 2027 CMS Comment Template for OT and PT care, which makes the process considerably easier if you are staring at Regulations.gov wondering where to begin. Access the OT Potential CMS Comment Template The template provides language you can adapt, along with references and guidance for submitting your comment. I would encourage you to personalize it rather than simply submitting the exact same language as everyone else. Your own experience is what makes the comment valuable. What can you contribute? Start with the part of the system you know. Maybe you work with patients whose needs are more complex than the evaluation code adequately communicates. Maybe much of your clinical expertise involves adapting care to cognition, environment, caregiver capacity, health literacy, routines, transportation, safety, or other contextual factors. Maybe you spend substantial time coordinating with other disciplines and caregivers. Maybe your work involves preventing a problem rather than treating the consequences after it happens. Maybe you have watched a patient avoid an emergency department visit because someone identified a risk early. Maybe you have helped a family safely manage a transition home. Maybe your interdisciplinary team caught something that would have otherwise resulted in a complication or readmission. These experiences matter. They help illustrate something that can get lost when healthcare policy is discussed primarily through codes, utilization data, and reimbursement formulas: healthcare is delivered by people making decisions in complex environments with other people. If a payment methodology does not adequately account for the resources required to do that work well, policymakers need concrete examples of what is being missed. Don’t underestimate the value of your clinical perspective You do not need to be a healthcare economist to submit a meaningful comment. You do not need to write a 20-page policy analysis. You do not need to represent your entire profession. A useful comment can be fairly straightforward. Identify the issue you are responding to. Describe what you see in practice. Explain why it matters. Give a concrete example. Then tell CMS what you think should be considered. Instead of simply saying, “OTs need to be paid more,” you might explain how comprehensive occupational therapy assessment requires consideration of cognition, environment, routines, caregiver capacity, safety, equipment, participation, and other factors that may not be adequately represented by the existing valuation structure. Instead of simply saying, “care coordination should be reimbursed,” describe what happens when coordination does not occur. Explain who has to do the work, what information has to be exchanged, what decisions are made, and what can happen to the patient when that work is missing. The more concrete we are, the more useful our comments become. This conversation belongs to all of rehabilitation Although OT Potential’s template focuses on OT and PT, I think there is a larger opportunity here. OTs, PTs, SLPs, and other allied health professionals all see different pieces of the same system. We work across hospitals, outpatient clinics, home-based care, post-acute settings, schools, and community environments. We see where care coordination works and where it breaks down. We see the consequences when payment structures reward one part of the care process while making another part difficult to sustain. That perspective is worth bringing into the conversation. This does not have to become another debate about which profession deserves more. The more useful question is: What does the patient actually need, who has the expertise to provide it, and does the payment system support that care? That is a question worth asking across the healthcare continuum. We have until September 14 We spend a lot of time talking about healthcare payment. We talk about productivity. We talk about coding. We talk about documentation. We talk about access. We talk about burnout. We talk about care coordination. We talk about the disconnect between what patients need and what healthcare systems can realistically provide. This is an opportunity to move some of that conversation into the policymaking process. CMS is asking for public input. We have resources to help us understand the proposal. We have templates to help us get started. And we have our own professional experiences. So take an hour. Listen to the episode. Read the relevant sections of the proposed rule. Use the template if it helps. Add your own examples. Submit your comment. Comments are due September 14, 2026. Read the proposed rule Listen to the OT Potential episode Use the OT Potential comment template Submit your comment And then share this with another clinician. We cannot expect payment systems to recognize the complexity of our work if we never tell policymakers what that work actually involves. Now is the time to put our clinical experience on the record. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit josiejarvisot.substack.com

  2. Sep 6

    Overlap Is Not Duplication: Making Space for Emerging OT Practice informed by Occupational Science

    I wrote this piece in response to some discourse I was tagged in around OT’s role in sports medicine and supporting high performance athletes. The reflection is specifically in response to this three-part LinkedIn series: Part 1: What OT Adds to Sports MedicineRead the original post on LinkedIn Part 2: Collaboration and Professional RolesRead the original post on LinkedIn Part 3: Advocacy, Scope, and the FutureRead the original post on LinkedIn Much of the discourse in the comments was centered on concerns of overlap with athletic trainers and presumptions that what OT is offering would be essentially duplicative and disrespectful to more traditionally prominent members of the sports medicine ecosystem. I had to modify my response on LinkedIn to match their character limit, so I thought I would publish the full response here. It covers content that feels relevant to much of the endless discourse that is largely driven by shorthand misinformation, presumptions, and various insecurities that get stirred when our focus is on eliminating rather than expanding possibilities for care and innovation. Why occupational science literacy matters A big part of why I am a proponent of increased occupational science literacy for OTPs worldwide is to encourage us to use our own distinct lens and concepts when communicating about the innovations, roots, and foundations of our practice so we can get out of this trap of being reduced to limited paradigms and understandings of other professions in bad faith. First, we tend to be undermined for possibly not having the same competencies as another discipline or profession. Then, when we reveal that we do have the same competencies, or we catch up, we are framed as essentially duplicative or redundant and not unique. This is why communicating about our identity and skills from our own foundations and core terminology, including our cosmological, philosophical, epistemic, and emerging practice developments, on our own terms, alongside the formal policy developments that have shaped our practice from the beginning, is so important. Especially if we do so with pride in our unique integrative foundations rather than shame or presumed incompetence, very often this pattern is deeply rooted in the internalization of structural sexism and misogyny as it relates to female-dominated health care professions and integrated care approaches overall. OTPs need to start recognizing that when we are met with such suspicion and accusation, it can actually be a sign of our strength and competence as a threat rather than a sign of our own incompetence or need to prove or defend ourselves where we typically already currently belong. We keep de-skilling each other It’s so interesting how often in this type of discourse we default to pigeonholing and limiting all skilled providers to the bare minimum of responsibilities in institutional settings. For example, often between OT and PT the discourse can reduce both professions down to upper extremity versus lower extremity, even though we all know both disciplines in the real world are full-body therapists. With the discourse around athletic trainers, it seems like we’re reducing all professions to the most basic elements of those responsibilities, rather than exploring nuanced conversations about strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, gaps, and intersections that could lead to more comprehensive care. Unlike competitive athletics, health and human services are not competitive sports. When providers compete, our clients are always the ones who lose out on comprehensive care. I also think this pattern of discourse has consequences beyond any single profession. When we continually reduce skilled professions to their bare foundations and then treat overlap at that level as evidence of duplication, we can inadvertently create conditions that discourage innovation and advancement across health and human services. The bare foundations are the floor of professional capacity, not necessarily the ceiling. If we treat the floor as the ceiling, then every advancement into an emerging specialty, every new application of foundational knowledge, and every development in professional reasoning has to first defend itself against the existence of something another profession already does. That creates a very different condition for professional development than asking what becomes possible when skilled professionals build beyond their foundations. Overlap is not duplication Overlap between providers is not new and never has been new. It’s actually essential to communication and efficiency for there to be essential overlap. One profession having a specific body area or modality in their scope does not mean that it is somehow unlawful or an automatic restriction or duplication for another provider to be skilled and competent in those areas. It simply means more than one profession has core competencies to perform a specific function. It means there are options rather than a basis for exclusion. For example, just about everyone in the hospital performs vitals, and we want it that way, to optimize saving everyone’s lives. The issue, then, is not simply whether competencies overlap. The more important question is what happens beyond those foundations. Nearly every skilled profession has foundational competencies that overlap with other professions. Those foundations establish what a profession is capable of doing. They do not necessarily define everything that profession can become. The floor is not the ceiling. This is also why I think it is important to distinguish overlapping competencies from professional identity. AOTA’s scope statement describes OT as a dynamic and evolving profession responsive to consumer and societal needs, system changes, and emerging knowledge and research. Its scope is organized around the domain and process of occupational therapy rather than around a single body region or a fixed list of procedures. Professional differentiation can therefore exist even when foundational services overlap. It can emerge through what a profession has developed beyond the foundation: its theories, epistemics, cosmology, professional reasoning, specialized knowledge, emerging practices, methods, populations, contexts, and approaches to delivering services. It can also emerge through the way even some of the same foundational services are understood and integrated into a person’s actual occupational life. Two professionals may provide something that looks similar on the surface while asking very different questions about the person, their environment, their goals, their occupations, their identity, their routines, and what meaningful participation looks like to them. That is not necessarily duplication. That is professional differentiation. And those differences can be meaningful to clients. A client may choose between qualified providers not simply because one profession possesses an activity that another profession is forbidden or unable to perform, but because of the way a practitioner understands their needs, the populations or contexts they specialize in, how they approach collaboration, how they conceptualize their goals, and how their services fit with the client’s preferences and priorities. Our clients are not choosing between completely separate universes of intervention. They are choosing people, approaches, relationships, areas of expertise, and ways of understanding and responding to their needs. The more generative question is therefore not simply whether another profession can perform the same foundational task. It is what each profession has developed beyond the foundation and how that development creates additional possibilities for care. OT has always been more than hands Much of what distinguishes occupational therapy exists in what is often regarded as largely unseen realms in physical medicine. Our internal, subjective experiences of navigating changes in body, mind, spirit, and environment are rarely fully appreciated through physical medicine methodologies alone. Occupational therapy emerged through the moral treatment and arts and crafts movements, advancing the right to engage in self-directed activity as restorative to body, mind, and spirit, and as foundational to human rights-affirming living for people wherever they live, work, and play. Occupational therapy is the belief that engagement in self-directed, integrative activity can regenerate health, integrating body, mind, spirit, and especially hands, but never reducing occupation simply to hands, because every occupation requires a full body to execute. This is where Elizabeth J. Yerxa’s work on occupational science becomes especially relevant. In her 2000 article, Occupational Science: A Renaissance of Service to Humankind Through Knowledge, Yerxa argued that occupational science could help occupational therapy develop and define its own knowledge base and scope through scholarship. She centered the human as an occupational being whose relationship with occupation unfolds across development, environment, culture, learning, and agency. That matters because our foundations are not simply historical ideas to preserve. They give us a way of knowing and reasoning that can continue to generate new possibilities for practice. That is also why I am excited that our September Evolved Living Collaborative Journal Club is returning to Yerxa’s article. More than 25 years later, her questions give us an opportunity to consider what occupational science can still contribute to how we understand occupation, knowledge, and the future of occupational therapy. Those foundations are still relevant, but they are also a starting point for what comes next. 📚 September Journal Club Saturday, September 26 at 1:00 PM Pacific Our first Journal Club was moved from August to September so we could give ourselves more time to read and engage with the article. This month we are returning to

  3. Aug 31

    Integrating Creativity and Spirituality in Occupational Therapy: Embracing Arts, Science, and Ancestral Wisdom with Libby Lamb OT, Poet, and Creativity & Spirituality Coach

    Here is a voice-over of the article for those who prefer audio Hi everyone! I’m thrilled to share this episode with you today. If you’ve been following this podcast since it started in 2023, you might know it grew out of my doctoral capstone project during my time in the University of Utah’s Post-Professional Clinical Doctorate program from 2019 to 2023. This journey unfolded during the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, which highlighted the global impact that devaluing public health initiatives has had on collective on health and well-being, and made deeply evident the barriers and costs to humanity created by maintaining dynamics of scientific elitism, and the lack of accessible frameworks for translating impactful health interventions and knowledge from the academy to the field, especially frameworks informed by disability and occupational justice. After navigating two stalled capstone projects due to pandemic-related challenges, I shifted my focus to creating resources for field clinicians to develop occupational science literacy for direct practice. Over three years, I poured my heart and all my spare time into building a fully virtual introduction to occupational science, using innovative online learning tools and best practices in adult education. If you’re curious, you can explore this project at engage.evolvelivingnetwork.com, and just by subscribing to this Substack, you can get free access to the OS 101 guide, which includes a glossary of all foundational occupational science terminology. My journey back into occupational therapy higher education began after feeling disillusioned during my first two years of clinical and school-based practice as a travel therapist. I was searching for a space where I could thrive using holistic approaches that integrated mental and physical health. Initially, I hoped to work in pediatric and school-based settings, but I quickly encountered policy limitations that narrowed the focus of occupational therapy to handwriting and fine motor skills. This was disheartening, especially since my master’s research centered on executive dysfunction supports for adolescents and assistive technology in schools, areas that were largely controversial for occupational therapists in traditional settings at the time. These challenges revealed deeper issues within the field, including limited access to occupational science developments and foundational frameworks like the “Occupational Therapy Practice Framework Fourth Edition.” I realized through my my more in-depth study that these barriers were tied directly to historical inequities, such as structural sexism in higher education and healthcare leadership sourcing all the way back to the 1500s. This understanding fueled my passion for creative problem-solving and building community around these issues. I have a free training in the evolved living collaborative skool community on how Occupational Science is integrated with the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework Fourth Edition for anyone who is looking to get caught up on out latest practice guidence updates. After graduating, I launched this podcast to raise awareness about Occupational Science and my capstone course. Later, I collaborated on a textbook chapter proposal for the “Occupational Therapy Without Borders” third edition, exploring innovative ways to circulate knowledge beyond traditional academic institutions. While the chapter ultimately missed the publication deadline, the experience taught me valuable lessons about resilience and navigating academic challenges. Since then, however, I have been challenged in relation to this podcast by writer’s block, perfectionism, shame around missing the deadline, and a lack of direction without the structure of a prompt, deadline, or institutional affiliation to prove the value of my work to or rebel against. I’ve been on a personal journey of healing and rediscovery, exploring the roots of occupational therapy in the moral treatment and arts and crafts movements, and deepening my understanding of decolonial healthcare frameworks. This has included honoring the wisdom of indigenous and folk healers whose contributions have often been suppressed or commodified by modern healthcare systems. To support my own recovery, I created a podcast and community called “Rewilding the Mythic Self,” where I’ve been reconnecting with creativity, spirituality, and interdisciplinary collaboration outside of formal institutions. Over time, however, I have come to realize that fracturing out these parts of myself wasn’t really possible and was actually disconnecting me from the type of integrative work I am passionate about reviving in Occupational Therapy practice throughout the world and thank goodness I am not alone in this mission! One of the most transformative moments in this journey recently has been discovering the work of Libby Lamb an occupational therapist and poet (Author of the Acacia Project) based in UK and Australia who powerfully integrates spirituality and creativity into her personal life and practice. Participating in Libby’s writing workshop this past July has helped inspire me to revive this podcast and explore in community how occupational therapists can reconnect with their creative and spiritual selves while navigating the demands and restrictions of traditional practice settings. Her insights have been invaluable in addressing my own creative blocks and building confidence to embrace my full self in both my persional and professional practice. Together, Libby and I have been exploring themes around the “witch wound”, the historical legacy of suppression and violence against women healers, and its relevance to contemporary occupational therapy. In relation to our discussion, Libby wrote an incredible article on the complexities of navigating one’s identity as an OTP while also making space for one’s own spirituality and creative expression for our own wellbeing and holistic fulfillment. I highly recommend reading this article and subscribing to her work here: Libby Lamb Find Libby on instagram: @OTandbiscuits and @wordswithlibby and join her free facebook for OT’s Reclaiming Craft here: These conversations have deepened my appreciation for the power of occupational science in addressing systemic barriers and promoting inclusive healthcare practices. I encourage you to check out Libby’s work, including her poetry book and coaching program, “Duality,” which supports occupational therapists worldwide (US-based OTPs are invited to participate in her creative writing offerings through words with libby however she is currently unable to offer 1:1 coaching for OTPs in the USA at this time.) This past fall I also explored simliar themes in a reflexive intergenerational workshop on the concise classic text: Witches, Midwives, and Nurses by Barbra Enenrich and Deidre English on the historic orgins of the American Medical Association and the ties between imperial and colonial Western biomedical models and the formal exclusion and suppression of women, people of color, the global south, and criminalization of folk medicinal practices that are foundational to the fear and apprehension many of us continue to hold up into this day inspite of OT inseperable tie to the arts and crafts, mornal treatment, and spirutality through and self determined engagement in meaningful and purposeful activity in context. This powerful workshop is currently freely available in the Evolved Living Collaborative Skool Community Classroom. This legacy has persisted until this day in the podcast I referenced Drs. Vivian Tatiana Camacho Hinojosa and Bolivian midwife who trained in the west as surgeon before returning to ancestral practices and fighting with her community to protect and expand access to water, food, and traditional medicine world wide. Her powerful work has helped advance protections for folk medicinal practices and keep sacred midwifery practices alive with broad coalitions internationally. She is currently facing political persecution and encourages us to reconnect to honoring life and finding health in connection to life affirming community and protection and collaboration with nature as warriors for life and protection of its most tender expression. Quality outcomes from access to Midwives in childbirth: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9584105/ Here is the reference article on how weavers made Apollo Space Mission possible: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/core-memory-weavers-navajo-apollo-raytheon-computer-nasa Along with the powerful science of knitting: There are some amazing resources available that I plan to read and review on this Substack this year and possibly host discussions on in the Evolved Living Collaborative: I’ve come to realize that true liberation lies in integration, bringing together my creative, spiritual, and professional identities to build coalitions and navigate challenges collectively. This perspective has guided my recent collaborations, including sharing my folk arts and crafts experiments with the Canadian Society for Occupational Science and the American Occupational Therapy Association, and attending the Decolonizing Healthcare Knowledge Summer School Institute in Mexico City. For those interested in joining these conversations, I invite you to explore the Evolve Living Collaborative platform, where we host free workshops like “Witches, Midwives, and Nurses,” weekly craft nights, coffee and co-occupation sessions, and a monthly journal club focused on foundational occupational science articles and emerging interdisciplinary books. Together, we can revive the optimistic origins of occupational therapy, celebrate the power of meaningful activity, and create spaces for healing, creativity, and connection. Direct Link: https://www.skool.com/evolved-living-collaborative-6395/about Thank you for being here, and I hope you enjoy th

  4. Mar 17

    Clinical Reflections on Occupational Apartheid: Ethics, Policy, and Systems Change in Occupational Therapy

    Why this Occupational Science series matters If you are an occupational therapy practitioner in the United States, chances are you are already using occupational science. You just might not have been given the words for it yet. That gap is part of why I created this Occupational Science Alphabet Series, a public learning series designed to make occupational science more accessible and more visible in everyday life and traditional practice settings. This first composite series begins with A for Occupational Apartheid. Recording Timestamps: 00:00 “Occupational Apartheid Analysis” 06:01 “Occupational Apartheid Challenges” 16:11 “Systemic Barriers in OT” 18:04 “Enhancing Accessibility through Advocacy” 25:20 “Defining Occupational Apartheid” 33:06 “Occupation and Systemic Inequality” 39:23 “Advocating Equity in OT Practice” 45:04 “Occupational Therapy for Healing” 48:04 “Advancing Occupational Justice” 54:55 “Occupational Ethics Evolution” 58:50 “Occupational Apartheid Ethics” 01:03:58 “Justice and Veracity” 01:10:17 Healthcare Bias and Scientific Integrity 01:15:59 “Addressing Maternal Health Disparities” The phrase can feel intense at first.It should. Because it names something real. It gives language to the ways people are systematically denied access to meaningful participation in everyday life, not simply because of individual impairment or diagnosis, but because of how social, economic, political, and cultural systems are organized. And that matters deeply for occupational therapy. Because when we only look at barriers inside individual bodies, we miss the wider context shaping participation. We miss the insurance policy.The school policy.The zoning code.The inaccessible architecture.The transportation gap.The labor condition.The funding cap. Occupational science helps us see those patterns clearly. And once we can see them, we can respond more ethically and more effectively. The Secret of Occupation One of the most powerful insights of occupational science is that occupation always transcends the individual. Yes, participation includes personal capacity, motivation, and health status. But occupation is also shaped by: environmentculturepolicyhistoryeconomicssocial relationships When occupational therapists work with clients, we are rarely working with bodies alone. We are working with people in systems. Occupational science simply gives us a language to describe those systems more clearly. Why Occupational Apartheid Matters The concept of occupational apartheid helps us name situations where social systems restrict access to meaningful participation in everyday life. Frank Kronenberg describes occupational apartheid as: “systematically enacted negations of humanity that divide and subjugate collectives of people to the benefit of some at the expense of others.”(Kronenberg, 2018) These restrictions can occur through intersecting social mechanisms such as: racismclassismsexismableismxenophobiaeconomic inequality These forces shape who has access to resources that sustain dignified living. They shape who can participate fully in everyday life. And they show up in everyday occupational therapy practice more often than we might initially realize. When Systems Become Habit One of the most profound insights connected to occupational apartheid comes from the concept of occupational consciousness, developed by Elelwani Ramugondo. Occupational consciousness invites us to examine how systems of power become embedded in everyday activity. Because the truth is: Systems do not reproduce themselves automatically. They reproduce themselves through what people do every day. Policies become habits.Beliefs become routines.Social hierarchies become normalized through everyday actions. Over time, these patterns become so familiar that they operate below the level of conscious awareness. This is where occupation becomes incredibly important. Occupation is the point where ideas turn into action. And when those actions become automated habits, they can quietly reproduce systems of inequality, even after the laws that created them have been formally abolished. When Systems End but Patterns Persist History shows us that oppressive systems rarely disappear completely when policies change. Segregation in the United States was formally dismantled decades ago. Apartheid in South Africa was officially abolished in the 1990s. And yet racial disparities, inequities in access to housing, healthcare, education, and safety persist in both societies today. Why? Because systems do not only exist in policy. They exist in everyday occupations. They exist in patterns of: where people livewho receives serviceswho gets referred to carewhose needs are believedwho feels welcome in public spaceswho has access to transportation, education, and healthcare These patterns often persist through habits and assumptions that operate subconsciously. Occupational consciousness asks us to notice those patterns. Occupational apartheid helps us name their structural origins. Rehumanizing the Collective After War Another important dimension of occupational apartheid is its relevance to collective recovery from war, violence, and social division. Many of the social systems that shape our institutions today were forged in contexts of conflict, colonial expansion, and geopolitical competition. Even when wars formally end, the habits, infrastructures, and relational patterns shaped by those conflicts often remain embedded in everyday life. Occupational apartheid helps illuminate how the aftermath of war can continue to shape participation in subtle ways, through segregation, displacement, institutional distrust, unequal resource distribution, and inherited patterns of fear or exclusion. If left unexamined, these patterns can reproduce division across generations. Occupation is where these patterns are maintained, but it is also where they can be transformed. Through shared activities, community participation, creative practice, caregiving, education, and everyday collaboration, people rebuild relational life. Occupational therapy historically emerged in part from this very context, helping individuals and communities reconstruct meaningful life after the disruptions of war and institutionalization. Engaging with occupational apartheid and occupational consciousness today invites us to continue that tradition. Not by reproducing new forms of division or tribal harm, but by helping cultivate conditions where people can participate in humanizing, compassionate, and sustainable forms of collective life. In this way, occupation becomes a pathway toward healing. Not only individual healing. But collective healing. Occupation as a Tool for Liberation If occupation can reproduce systems of injustice, it can also help dismantle them. Because occupation is also the place where change becomes possible. When we change everyday patterns of doing, we change systems. This is why occupational therapy has always been connected to movements for human dignity and social participation. From the moral treatment movement to disability rights advocacy, occupational therapy has been concerned with helping people return to meaningful life within their communities. Occupational science expands that mission. It invites us to see how everyday activities can either reinforce systems of harm or help create environments where people can live with dignity, belonging, and agency. Why This Perspective Strengthens Occupational Therapy Understanding occupational apartheid and occupational consciousness does not weaken clinical practice. It strengthens it. When therapists understand the systemic barriers affecting participation, they can: design more realistic interventionsadvocate for appropriate equipmentcollaborate with community resourcesidentify policy barriersdocument environmental constraints clearly It also helps us articulate what makes occupational therapy distinctive. Our profession studies human beings as occupational beings. That means we look not only at physical function, but at how environments and systems shape the possibilities for everyday life. This perspective integrates insights from: health sciencessocial sciencescritical social sciencescommunity knowledgedecolonial scholarship Together, these perspectives create a robust and integrated understanding of participation. What This Series Explores This Occupational Science Alphabet Series explores concepts that help illuminate the broader context of occupation, including: occupational apartheidoccupational consciousnessoccupational justicecollective occupationsecological approaches to health Each concept will be translated into examples from real-world practice contexts. The goal is simple: To help occupational therapists, students, and the public better understand the unique scientific foundation of our profession. Subscribe for OS 101 If this conversation resonates with you, I invite you to subscribe to this Substack. Here I share: Occupational Science 101 explanationspodcast conversationsinterdisciplinary scholarshipreflections on ethics and policyexamples from everyday clinical practice My hope is to make occupational science more accessible so that occupational therapy can be better understood both within our profession and by the broader public. Stay tuned for the Forthcoming Learning Community I am also building a forthcoming Skool community where free OS 101 content will be hosted. This space will include: introductory occupational science coursesa journal and book clubcommunity discussion forumsreflection spaces for practitioners and learners Together we will explore how occupational science can support: collective liberationecological balanceoccupational wellbeinghumanizing care across the lifespan Closing Reflection If you have ever felt that occupational therapy is bigger than the narrow boxes it is often placed in, you are not imagining that. If you have sensed th

  5. Mar 9

    Global Conversations: Cross-Discipline Collaboration in Epidemiology, Occupational Science, Disability, and AI with Emmanuel Ampomah Boadi

    Evolved Living Podcast with Dr. Josie Jarvis OT Global Conversations: Cross-Discipline Collaboration in Epidemiology, Occupational Science, Disability, and AIwith Emmanuel Ampomah Boadi --- Episode Overview In this episode of the Evolved Living Podcast, Dr. Josie Jarvis welcomes Emmanuel Ampomah Boadi, a Ghana-based researcher working at the intersection of occupational science, epidemiology, biostatistics, rehabilitation, and disability studies. Their thoughtful, wide-ranging conversation explores how participation in daily life is shaped by social, structural, and systemic forces far beyond individual clinical encounters. Dr. Josie Jarvis opens the episode by reflecting on her diverse clinical background, spanning home health, schools, memory care, and acute and orthopedic rehabilitation. Her journey—deepened by doctoral work amid the COVID-19 pandemic—led her to occupational science as a discipline uniquely equipped to investigate barriers to participation at the population (not just individual) level. --- Key Topics Discussed - What is Epidemiology? Emmanuel Ampomah Boadi grounds the discussion by defining epidemiology: the study of how health, disease, and disability are distributed across populations, and the factors influencing those outcomes. He emphasizes that "it is the backbone of public health," using stories from Ghana and references to public health icons like John Snow and John Graunt to illustrate epidemiology’s roots in mapping, measurement, and understanding the interplay between environment and human behavior. - Bridging Disability Studies and Occupational Science Emmanuel Ampomah Boadi describes how his academic journey—spanning disability/rehabilitation studies and biostatistics—inspired him to explore the overlap between occupational science and population health. He highlights the importance of looking not only at medical conditions but also at social and environmental context, power imbalances, and race—reminding us that “everybody has some form of disability” and that “there is nothing like normal.” - The Role of Data and AI The conversation explores the need to “quantify” our observations to strengthen advocacy. Emmanuel Ampomah Boadi sees artificial intelligence as an assistive technology—valuable, but ultimately limited. He urges clinicians and researchers to retain the clarity and accountability of human interpretation, using AI as a support rather than a replacement for nuanced judgment. - Ethics, Equity, and Systemic Barriers The episode doesn’t shy away from difficult truths. They discuss well-known ethical breaches in research history (Tuskegee Syphilis Study, Nuremberg Code violations) and highlight how, without active attention to equity and ethics, scientific progress can deepen injustice. Dr. Josie Jarvis and Emmanuel Ampomah Boadi both reflect on their lived experiences of systemic inequity—from global vaccine access to the design of research and public health interventions. - Cultural Humility and Community Engagement Emmanuel Ampomah Boadi shares a poignant research anecdote from Ghana: an infrastructure project failed because outsiders did not consult the community, ultimately building a water borehole atop a sacred space. The lesson: knowledge translation is only possible with true cultural humility and partnership, not top-down assumptions. --- Concepts Explained Occupational Science: A discipline that examines human participation (“occupation”) in everyday life, considering both individual and system-level factors—policy, environment, economics, and history—that enable or restrict engagement. Epidemiology & Biostatistics in Rehab: Not just tools for infectious disease, epidemiology provides frameworks for understanding disability, health disparities, and the structural determinants of participation. Biostatistics helps quantify these patterns and decipher root causes, moving advocacy from anecdote to evidence. Occupational Apartheid & Social Models of Disability: The episode contextualizes “occupational apartheid”—a situation where social, economic, or policy barriers systematically exclude groups from meaningful participation in everyday life. Emmanuel Ampomah Boadi distinguishes between the medical, social, and biopsychosocial (ICF) models of disability, urging listeners to see how “systemic barriers” create or intensify disability. --- Practical Wisdom for Listeners - Integration is Key: Solutions come from teamwork—integrating medical science, social science, community wisdom, and policy. “You need to involve the community—what you believe to be the best solution may not fit their real needs.” - You Belong in Science: Dr. Josie Jarvis and Emmanuel Ampomah Boadi both stress that occupational science and health advocacy are not reserved for those with doctorates or prestigious affiliations. Efforts—however imperfect—matter. - Share and Connect: The conversation encourages clinicians, students, and community members to participate, share ideas, question systems, and “be on LinkedIn” or join organizations like CSOS (Canadian Society for Occupational Scientists), which prioritize international access and virtual participation. - Respect, Humility, and Effort: Growth and social change depend on respecting all perspectives, continuous effort, and humility when things don’t go as planned. --- Why This Matters Occupational therapy and science are poised to lead in bridging the gap between STEM and social science, between evidence and ethics, between theory and grassroots reality. Episodes like this demonstrate—in clear, accessible language—why the work of linking occupation, policy, data, and advocacy is both urgent and hopeful. --- How to Engage Further - Resources Mentioned: - Occupational Science 101 Guide - OS Alphabet Series (on TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn) - CSOS membership and virtual events - LinkedIn and Substack for new episodes and reflections - Get Involved: Bring occupational science ideas into your practice, classroom, or community—even if you’re new to the concepts. Connect for further conversations, share your efforts, and don’t wait for perfect conditions. --- Final Thought As Emmanuel Ampomah Boadi shares: "Don’t be afraid that you’ll get it wrong. If you don’t get it wrong, you never know what to do to make it right." Occupational science—and a just health system—needs all voices, including yours. Connect with Emmanuel on LinkedIn here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/emmanuel-ampomah-boadi-08b4241a4/ --- For more episodes, resources, and to keep the conversation going, follow the Evolved Living Podcast on Substack and connect on social media platforms. Let’s keep collaborating across borders, backgrounds, and disciplines—the future of well-being depends on it. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit josiejarvisot.substack.com

  6. 10/27/2025

    🌿 Beyond the Hierarchy: Rethinking Evidence in Occupational Therapy

    When I first learned about evidence-based practice, I remember staring at that glossy triangle, the research hierarchy pyramid, with meta-analyses gleaming at the top like sacred scripture. It was comforting at first. Finally, a clear map of what counts as truth.But once I entered practice, that tidy hierarchy started to crumble under the weight of real people’s lives.Human beings aren’t controlled variables, and occupation doesn’t fit neatly into double-blind trials. The Trouble with the Old Pyramid The traditional Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) pyramid was built for biomedical and pharmaceutical research, where the goal is to test isolated variables across large populations (Duke University Medical Center Library, n.d.). That works beautifully when you’re measuring how a medication lowers blood pressure.But occupation is not a pill… it’s a process.It’s meaning, context, motivation, and environment woven together. In OT, our “data set” is often one person at a time, a life lived in context.Trying to flatten that into a universal protocol often means losing what makes our work effective and human. The Tomlin & Borgetto Research Pyramid: A Model That Fits Our Field In 2011, George S. Tomlin and Brandon Borgetto published Research Pyramid: A New Evidence-Based Practice Model for Occupational Therapy in The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (Tomlin & Borgetto, 2011). They didn’t just redraw the pyramid, they reimagined what evidence could look like.Their four-sided model includes: * Descriptive research: defining and observing occupational phenomena (the foundation). * Experimental research: asking causal questions under controlled conditions. * Outcome research: measuring effectiveness and impact in practice settings. * Qualitative research: exploring lived experience, culture, and meaning. Each side contributes uniquely to a full picture of occupational reality.Rather than stacking these methods into a hierarchy, Tomlin and Borgetto framed them as mutually reinforcing, like the faces of a pyramid that meet at the top…where evidence becomes practice. “Rather than ranking designs by hierarchy, the research pyramid encourages practitioners to evaluate rigor based on the type of question being asked.”- Tomlin & Borgetto (2011, p. 190) Why This Matters in Practice In home health, I’ve seen firsthand how rigid hierarchies undervalue the evidence that actually drives change.An RCT can tell me which exercise statistically improves shoulder flexion …but not whether my client can now garden with her grandchildren, or return to painting without pain. Occupational therapy lives where biology meets biography.To serve people well, we need research frameworks that make room for both. The Critiques That Strengthen Us Scholars such as Whiteford and Wright-St Clair (2004) argue that the old hierarchy often silences the very forms of knowledge that make OT powerful- narrative, context, creativity.When we measure success only by quantitative control, we risk missing the human story. Occupational science reminds us that people are meaning-making beings.Our science must be capable of holding that complexity. How I Apply the Tomlin & Borgetto Pyramid * For mechanical reliability, I turn to experimental studies. * For real-world effectiveness, I consult outcome research. * For understanding experience, I value qualitative inquiry. * And at the root of it all, I rely on descriptive studies to ground my reasoning. Each approach has a place.Evidence becomes less about hierarchy and more about harmony, a dynamic ecosystem of knowing. Reclaiming Evidence as a Living Practice Embracing this model isn’t about lowering standards; it’s about broadening the lens.It validates community programs, arts-based methods, trauma-informed care, and culturally grounded interventions that might never fit into traditional RCTs. When we expand what counts as evidence, we expand what’s possible: for our clients, our profession, and the world we’re helping to rebuild. 🌿 Learn More: Foundations of Occupational Science for U.S.-Based OTPs If this conversation sparks something in you, the urge to better understand why occupational therapy feels different from other disciplines and how to ground that difference in research and policy… I invite you to join me inside Foundations of Occupational Science for U.S.-Based OTPs. This self-paced capstone learning experience bridges theory and practice, guiding practitioners and students to: * Decode the real meaning and application of the Tomlin & Borgetto Research Pyramid. * Integrate occupational science concepts into documentation, advocacy, and program design. * Reclaim OT’s creative and psychosocial roots while navigating contemporary U.S. systems. * Build confidence in articulating the full scope of practice, in language policymakers, payers, and interdisciplinary teams understand. You can explore the course and all current offerings here:👉 engage.evolvedlivingnetwork.com Together, we’re building a movement of practitioners who see evidence as a living, liberatory practice…one that honors both the science and the soul of occupation. References Duke University Medical Center Library. (n.d.). The evidence-based practice pyramid. Retrieved from https://guides.mclibrary.duke.edu/ebmtutorial/ebp_pyramid Tomlin, G. S., & Borgetto, B. (2011). Research pyramid: A new evidence-based practice model for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(2), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2011.000828 Whiteford, G., & Wright-St Clair, V. (2004). Occupation and practice in context (1st ed.). Churchill Livingstone Australia. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit josiejarvisot.substack.com

    🌿 Beyond the Hierarchy: Rethinking Evidence in Occupational Therapy
  7. 10/26/2025

    Reclaiming the Roots of Care: Witches, Midwives, Nurses, and the Occupational Therapy Lineage

    I have been thinking a lot about the history of care and what becomes possible when we take the time to remember the people and practices that came before our modern healthcare systems. That was the focus of a recent book circle and art-making session inside the Evolved Living Collaborative, where we explored Witches, Midwives, and Nurses by Barbara Ehrenreich and Deirdre English through an occupational therapy and occupational science lens. The live gathering has already happened, but the recording and classroom materials are now available inside the community so you can explore the conversation at your own pace. This is one of those topics that I think deserves more than a single conversation. A Forgotten Lineage of Occupation Long before occupational therapy became a profession, people were using everyday occupations to care for themselves, their families, and their communities. Growing food, preparing remedies, weaving, sewing, making pottery, caring for children, attending births, preparing meals, and gathering around shared work were not necessarily separated into the categories we use today to describe healthcare, leisure, productivity, or self-care. They were simply part of living. These occupations helped people survive, connect with one another, pass knowledge between generations, and create meaning within their communities. Witches, Midwives, and Nurses gives us an opportunity to look at what happened when many of these community-based traditions of care came into conflict with increasingly professionalized and institutionalized systems of medicine. Women healers and midwives were not simply forgotten as modern medicine developed. Their knowledge and authority were challenged, restricted, and displaced in ways that were deeply connected to gender, class, and institutional power. That history raises questions that still feel relevant today. Who gets recognized as a legitimate knowledge holder? Whose knowledge becomes evidence? Who gets paid for care? What happens to forms of care that do not fit neatly into professional or institutional structures? These are not just historical questions. So What Does This Have to Do With Occupational Therapy? For me, this is where the conversation becomes especially interesting. Occupational therapy emerged alongside movements that recognized the therapeutic potential of meaningful activity, including the moral treatment movement and the arts and crafts movement. There was an understanding that doing matters. Making matters. Connection matters. The environments in which we live matter. Human beings are not simply bodies carrying diagnoses. We are people living through occupations, relationships, communities, environments, routines, and meaning. And yet, within modern healthcare, many of the things that make occupational therapy distinctive can become difficult to see. Our craft-based roots can become secondary to productivity metrics. Relational work can become difficult to quantify. Psychosocial and community-based occupations can be pushed aside when healthcare systems prioritize what is easiest to measure. Sometimes I think we have become so accustomed to explaining occupational therapy through the language of the medical system that we forget how unusual some of our roots actually are. That is one of the questions I wanted to create space for in this classroom session. What might happen if we became more familiar with the histories of care, craft, community knowledge, and everyday occupation that existed before our profession had a name? Why Revisit This Now? This feels particularly important at a time when so many people are experiencing burnout and disconnection from the systems that are supposed to support health. Clinicians are being asked to do more with less. Communities are struggling with access to care. Insurance structures can make meaningful services difficult to obtain. Healthcare workers are navigating staffing shortages, productivity expectations, and systems that do not always leave much room for relationship or creativity. At the same time, people continue to care for one another outside of formal institutions. People cook for their neighbors. They grow gardens. They make art together. They share skills and knowledge. They create mutual aid networks. They teach one another traditional practices. They gather around tables and find ways to make life a little more livable. None of this replaces regulated healthcare when regulated healthcare is needed. But I think it is worth paying attention to the fact that people have always created ways of caring for one another, particularly when formal systems have not been able to meet every need. Occupational therapy has an interesting place within this conversation because occupation connects individual health with the environments, relationships, communities, and everyday activities that make up a person’s actual life. What We Explored Together In the 90-minute classroom session, we used Witches, Midwives, and Nurses as a starting point for thinking about the relationships between women’s knowledge, folk practices, craft, community care, and the development of occupational therapy. We also created art together. The Window Between Worlds activity invited us to think symbolically about the people, practices, and forms of knowledge that may have been pushed outside of official histories of healthcare, while also considering what knowledge we might want to carry forward. The session includes reflections on selected passages from the book, connections to occupational therapy history, conversation about relational and community-based knowledge, and an opportunity to consider what reclaiming meaningful occupations might look like in our own communities. You do not need to have read the entire book to engage with the session. You also do not need to arrive with a particular interpretation or a perfect understanding of the history. The classroom is meant to be a place to think, question, make, and explore together. Access the Classroom Inside the Evolved Living Collaborative The recording and classroom materials from Reclaiming the Roots of Care are now available inside the Evolved Living Collaborative. Once you join, you can access the links to the text and audio versions of Witches, Midwives, and Nurses, along with the workshop recording and the creative activity we explored together. The community is also becoming a place for ongoing connection around occupational science, occupational therapy, creativity, and meaningful occupation. We are hosting weekly craft nights, Coffee & Co-Occupation gatherings, and a monthly Journal Club, along with other conversations, workshops, and opportunities to learn together. I created this community because I wanted a space where occupational therapists, students, educators, researchers, occupational scientists, creatives, and interdisciplinary collaborators could explore ideas together without everything having to become another formal course or professional development requirement. Sometimes we need to study something. Sometimes we need to talk about it. Sometimes we need to make something with our hands while we think. And sometimes we just need other people who are curious about the same questions. The Evolved Living Collaborative is free to join. You can join the community here. Want to Go Deeper? If you are interested in tracing the threads of occupation across generations, I also explored some of these ideas in my podcast episode, Weaving the Threads of Our Occupation. That conversation gets into why I have become so interested in intergenerational occupational histories and in looking beyond the official timelines we are often given when we learn the history of our profession. Because I do not think our professional history begins when someone first wrote down the words “occupational therapy.” The story is much older than that. There are threads connecting us to the people who made, cared, taught, gathered, adapted, and passed knowledge from one generation to another. I think there is something powerful about remembering those threads. A Closing Reflection The history of care is not only found in hospitals, universities, and professional textbooks. It can also be found in kitchens, gardens, workshops, homes, community gatherings, and in the hands of people teaching other people how to do something that matters. Occupational therapy has a complicated history, and I am not interested in romanticizing that history or pretending that everything that came before modern healthcare was inherently better. I am interested in asking what we might learn when we widen the story. What knowledge was preserved? What knowledge was lost? Who was allowed to become an expert? Who was excluded? And what might we want to reclaim without simply recreating the past? For me, that is where this conversation becomes exciting. Maybe remembering our roots is not about going backward. Maybe it gives us more possibilities for imagining what care could become. 🌿 The classroom session is available now inside the Evolved Living Collaborative, along with the book and audio resources and opportunities to keep exploring these questions together. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit josiejarvisot.substack.com

    Reclaiming the Roots of Care: Witches, Midwives, Nurses, and the Occupational Therapy Lineage
  8. 10/26/2025

    Building Our Own Tables: A Response to “The Seat at the Table Fallacy”

    Last week I reacted live to a powerful post shared by Bill Wong in our community. The article in question — “Occupational Therapy and the ‘Seat at the Table’ Fallacy” by ABC Therapeutics — suggests that the push for higher credentials in OT (e.g., mandatory OTD) has been mis-directed: “A degree doesn’t grant influence. Credentials open doors, but they don’t dictate what happens once you step through them … A ‘seat at the table’ means very little if the table itself was built by someone else.” ABC Therapeutics It’s a critique worth hearing. But it’s also an invitation—not to retreat—but to re-vision how we approach our profession. The core tension The article argues: * Many OTD programs replicate existing content under new credentials, without generating genuine contribution. ABC Therapeutics * Visibility campaigns (hashtags, social media posts) risk being “toothless” when they lack scalable frameworks or evidence. ABC Therapeutics * We have long sought a seat at others’ tables rather than designing our own tables. You’ll hear echoes of that critique in my video: I reflected on how OT education, biomechanics-dominated models, and reimbursement systems have siloed us—and how that matters for people with disabilities, for social justice, and for innovation. My take: Let’s build AND sit 1. Building our own tables Yes—the article is right: credentials alone don’t guarantee influence. But I take that as a call to action. We need to: * Design models where OT is not just invited, but indispensable (policy, systems, community, creative arts) * Co-create the future with interdisciplinary, cross-cultural, and justice-oriented partners * Use our degrees (OTD or otherwise) to contribute—not just credential-inflate 2. Recognizing the invisible tables people actually built OT’s lineage includes folks who built their own tables: moral treatment movement, arts & crafts interventions, community-based rehabilitation, disability justice activism. In my video I referenced how we’re responding to human rights crises, climate, trans / disability access barriers—these aren’t “outside” OT—they’re core. 3. Expanding practice beyond the “biomechanical king of the castle” The article critiques that OTD programs default to clever “hobbie” capstones (“OT in football”, hashtag activism) without rigor or depth. My sympathy to the students who poured their hearts and best work in to their first major OT project. Perhaps some encouragement and support for the potential of their future work is also in order. I can’t tell how much more difficult contributing to the advancement of one’s field without the support or encouragement or belief in possibilities from one’s elders also want to offer what depth and rigor can also look like: * Confronting systems of oppression (transphobia in toileting access, disability justice, policy literacy) * Measuring participation, identity, belonging—not just ROM, strength, task time * Using community arts, folk craft, cross-generation dialogue as legitimate knowledge translation pathways Why this matters—especially now * People with disabilities face occupational deprivation, systemic barriers, and need OT thinking that goes beyond physical rehab. * The U.S. health-human services system is stressed; OT’s value-add includes bridging discipline silos, addressing context, and enabling participation. * New generations (Gen Z, Gen Alpha) bring fresh epistemologies. If we insist on “sit at the table”, we risk boxing their potential. My mantra: “Make room for the next table-builders.” An invitation to you If you resonate with any of these questions: * How might OT design a new table rather than merely trying to sit at one? * What kind of praxis (not just theory) can we commit to that spans social justice, policy literacy, community arts, and cross-cultural collaboration? * Can we mentor and co-create with newer cohorts, rather than gate-keep? Then join me. Let’s build Evolved Living OT/OS Collaborative as a space for these conversations and creations. Reference ABC Therapeutics. (2025, October 17). Occupational Therapy and the ‘Seat at the Table’ Fallacy. Retrieved from https://abctherapeutics.blogspot.com/2025/10/occupational-therapy-and-seat-and-table.html This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit josiejarvisot.substack.com

    Building Our Own Tables: A Response to “The Seat at the Table Fallacy”
4.5
out of 5
6 Ratings

About

🎙️ The Evolved Living Podcast with Dr. Josie Jarvis, PP-OTD, MA-OTR/L, BA, BS Hosted by occupational therapist, occupational scientist, and open citizen science advocate Dr. Josie Jarvis, The Evolved Living Podcast explores how we can bridge art, science, and wisdom to co-create more liberatory, ecological, and collaborative systems of care. Each episode invites critical yet compassionate dialogue across disciplines—connecting practitioners, educators, researchers, and community members who are working toward holistic, trauma-informed, and life-affirming change. Together, we translate occupational science into real-world practice and collective wellbeing through honest, inclusive, and transformative conversations. josiejarvisot.substack.com