The Grow and Convert Marketing Show

Benji Hyam and Devesh Khanal

We share our thoughts and ideas on how to grow a business.

  1. Jun 8

    Does Third-Party Content Actually Drive LLM Brand Mentions More Than Your Own Site?

    "Third-party content drives 85% of brand discovery in LLMs." It's the GEO stat making the rounds on LinkedIn right now, and a lot of marketers are using it to argue that your own site content doesn't matter anymore- that GEO is really about getting mentioned everywhere else. We disagree. And we have client data that contradicts it. In this episode, Devesh and Benji break down where this narrative came from (an Air Ops post citing a Graphite study), where the methodology breaks down, and what we're actually seeing across our clients in Traqer.ai.  The short version: big brands like Salesforce and Peloton skew studies like this because they already have category-level brand awareness.  For smaller players like Toro TMS and Climb Hire, clients we've worked with where their own content is essentially all we've done, they're pulling strong brand mentions across ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode, and Gemini. That's not third-party publications doing the work. We also get into:– Why Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode behave differently than ChatGPT and Gemini (and what visibility numbers look like across each)– The growing evidence that LLMs may decide what to recommend from training data and a loose SERP read first, then find sources to cite after the fact– Why competitive categories (CRM, exercise bikes, content marketing agencies) need a different playbook than less-saturated ones– Why your own site is the only place with enough canvas to spell out the specific use cases, pain points, and customer types that LLMs match against real user conversations Referenced posts: Invisible Prompts and Topic-Based GEOhttps://www.growandconvert.com/ai/invisible-prompts/https://www.growandconvert.com/ai/topic-based-geo/ This is the companion to last week's episode on self-promotional listicles for SEO. Watch that one first if you haven't. Subscribe for new episodes. Newsletter and full written breakdowns: growandconvert.com/newsletter #GEO #AISearch #ContentMarketing

  2. Apr 2

    GEO Is Not SEO: The New Rules for Getting Recommended by AI

    Most people optimizing for AI search are focused on the wrong metric. Getting cited by an AI model feels like a win but a citation doesn't mean you're actually influencing the answer.  And after sampling AI search prompts over 20,000 times, the data makes that painfully clear. In this episode, Devesh and Benji from Grow and Convert sit down with Bernard from Clearscope to break down what's really driving AI recommendations and what isn't.  They get into why Gemini searches an average of 5.7 times per query while ChatGPT barely searches at all, why Google appears to be actively suppressing brand citations even when it mentions you, and why the GEO "hacks" everyone's pushing right now (schema, Reddit, you name it) aren't moving the needle. The bigger takeaway: training data controls 70–80% of what AI recommends. Web search only affects 20–30%. Which means the content strategy that actually works in this new era isn't about producing more it's about going way more specific. In this episode: Why getting cited by AI ≠ influencing the answer Gemini vs. ChatGPT: how differently they search (and why it matters for your strategy) The brand suppression finding: why mentioning yourself might be hurting your citations Why "Content 2.0" is about persona-specific, long-tail content not volume How Grow and Convert is evolving Pain Point SEO for the AI search era Relevant articles:Invisible prompts: https://www.growandconvert.com/ai/invisible-prompts/Topic Based GEO: https://www.growandconvert.com/ai/topic-based-geo/

  3. Feb 12

    Topic Based GEO: Why You Need to Measure AI Visibility with Topics Instead of Individual Prompts

    Did you know that when you ask ChatGPT for a product recommendation, ChatGPT can recommend 50+ different brands for the same prompt? In this episode, we break down Rand Fishkin's latest research on the extreme variance in AI search results across ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews.  His team gathered 600 volunteers, ran nearly 3,000 queries, and the findings are eye-opening. Here are some key insights: LLMs can share 50 different companies for each product related prompt.  The chance of getting the exact same list of brands twice is less than 1%. The top 6 brands are mentioned over 80% of the time.  So what does this mean for marketers trying to track their GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) performance? Most AI visibility tools give you a misleading snapshot — you ran one prompt, you showed up, and you think you're winning. But run it again and you might not show up at all. We walk through Rand's key charts and takeaways, explain why "rank" is meaningless in AI results (unlike SEO), and show how the top brands in any category still get mentioned consistently 70-90%+ of the time. Then we hop into Traqer.ai to show how our topic-based GEO approach — running multiple prompt variations per topic — gives you a far more accurate and responsible picture of your actual AI visibility. If you're doing GEO or reporting on AI visibility to leadership, this is a must-watch. 📖 Rand Fishkin's full blog post: https://sparktoro.com/blog/new-research-ais-are-highly-inconsistent-when-recommending-brands-or-products-marketers-should-take-care-when-tracking-ai-visibility/🔗 Our blog post on Topic Based GEO: https://www.growandconvert.com/ai/topic-based-geo/🔗 Check out Traqer: https://www.traqer.ai/

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
5 Ratings

About

We share our thoughts and ideas on how to grow a business.